480°

Phil Spencer says Microsoft isn’t working on a “streaming-only console”

As Microsoft is getting ready to let gamescom attendees go hands with Project xCloud next week, Phil Spencer has just confirmed that a new Xbox console dedicated to game streaming isn’t in the works. The Xbox boss doesn't think that traditional consoles are going away for a while.

Read Full Story >>
gamespot.com
lxeasy2347d ago

Glad they are making Scarlett their top priority. I'm not interested in a streaming only console at the moment. besides we're getting Xcloud soon and we should see how that does first.

2347d ago Replies(6)
Obscure_Observer2347d ago

The myth that Xbox would turn into some streaming only platform is officially debunked; just like the one which told us that Microsoft would leave the console market and become a third party publisher.

Good work, Phil.

lxeasy2347d ago

yeah that rumor was only started by fanboys who want to see Xbox fail lol so glad Phil shut that down.

rainslacker2347d ago

I would think that them saying they were going to have a full console back when they first revealed scarlett would be enough to debunk the myth. Nothing new here, except that apparently they aren't going to have a cheaper, streaming only version, which I thought MS also said they were going to have, or maybe that was just a rumor.

If MS leaves the console market, it won't be until after next gen. That should be obvious with the fact they're releasing Scarlett. Again though, nothing new gleaned from this article, so I don't see why you're celebrating as if you've suddenly won some long drawn out argument.

Kingthrash3602346d ago

You do realize they already are 3rd party right? I mean where have you been? Even phil himself confirmed this.

mcstorm2346d ago

For me I see xcloud as more to use on pc/remote usage and as another option if people don't want the high end console/pc.

Intresting times for cloud gaming though and for me this seems to be what is now becoming the talk and VR is taking a backseat.

Obscure_Observer2346d ago

@Kingthrash360

"You do realize they already are 3rd party right?"

Not in the sense that you expected, that´s for sure. Microsoft are honoring previous multiplatform contracts made before those studio acquisitions by them.

Are you expecting the Scarlett´s new next games from The Initiative, Playground, Ninja Theory, RARE and Obsidian to be avaliable on Playstation?

Lol! I know you´re not! ;)

2346d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2346d ago
AngelicIceDiamond2347d ago

@Easy My bad it was the less powerful console MS was suppose to release that got quietly cancelled. As far as I'm concerned there was never a streaming only Xbox ever in the works besides Xcloud but that's different.

"That's why I'm glad that Phil came out and flat out stopped that rumor because of people like you." Ok chill like I said I got it mixed up didn't mean to spread misinformation. As I said there were rumors of slightly less stronger Xbox that was suppose to be cost efficient. But that got silently cancelled. Here's a link of that. https://www.esquire.com/uk/...

Christopher2347d ago

Was pretty clear that Scarlett was the streaming console and the info was about turning it into its own cloud streaming tool without having to sub to a service.

Obscure_Observer2347d ago

Scarlett was never supposed to be *THE* streaming console. Scarlett is supposed to be a powerful console to run games locally with max performance and image quality.

A streaming only console would never require such beefy specs and would probably cost less than half.

Christopher2347d ago (Edited 2347d ago )

***Scarlett was never supposed to be *THE* streaming console. ***

Based on rumors from people who got it all wrong? Stop listening to people online for rumors.

I didn't say Scarlett was going to be it, I said Scarlett put those rumors to rest by being even more.

***A streaming only console would never require such beefy specs***

Yeah, but the fact is that anyone thought they were working on hardware just for streaming, knowing what it would require versus what already existed. With phones, tablets, and the current Xbox being more than enough to do that, what company in their right mind would make one with limited features when they don't need to? Just sell the model that can do that plus more and requires no additional work.

That's why all those rumors got it 100% wrong and when they announced Scarlett would be it's own cloud provider, it became very easy to see where all of those people got it wrong.

Obscure_Observer2347d ago

@Christopher

"Based on rumors from people who got it all wrong? Stop listening to people online for rumors."

"Based on rumors from people who got it all wrong? Stop listening to people online for rumors."

"People who got it all wrong"? Maybe the idea of a streaming only Xbox console is not interesting to you (or me), but i can see why it would work for Microsoft from a business standpoint and, for casual gamers who only desires the console experience but don´t want to spend a lot of money on a powerful console, since they don´t care about maximum performance or visual fidelity.

Christopher2347d ago

@Observer: people got it wrong, though. I get you would want it, and it would exist with just the regular Xbox Slim that you can get sub-$200 easily since it doesn't require much to do that and is primarily on the Cloud side, but that has nothing to do with the rumors being completely wrong on what Microsoft was doing.

AngelicIceDiamond2347d ago

The problem is this ins't news he stated that in that one lnterview a few weeks backs. Plus Scarlet was never the streaming only console, the streaming only console got quietly cancelled by MS.

lxeasy2347d ago

I wasn't so where you worked at Microsoft. Please can you source your claim that Microsoft "quietly canceled" their streaming only Xbox? Send us a link. That's why I'm glad that Phil came out and flat out stopped that rumor because of people like you.

Christopher2347d ago (Edited 2347d ago )

Scarlett wasn't the console but was a sign that they are focusing on better and not cloud-tailored hardware.

A streaming console would be pointless with hardware already out there that could stream games and the prices continuing to go down every year.

rainslacker2347d ago (Edited 2347d ago )

I'm kind of fuzzy on the original reveal about all this. Was the streaming only version actually announced? I can't remember if they were rumors, or they said they had a couple in the works.

I think some sort of streaming only device may be applicable to the market. Nothing as fancy as a console, but just something like a Chromecast or Roku. Not every device is going to support whatever they're doing to stream content, and there are millions of TV's out there already. On top of that, it's questionable if newer TV's will bother including all the necessary hardware to run a service of this nature....namely a way to have a controller input with low lag, and a good network card as most TV's use horrible network adapters since lag isn't typically an issue for TV content.

@Christopher

I don't think it would be pointless. It'd be a lot cheaper to have a device dedicated to streaming than require the customer to buy a full console. Even if they only require an X1, the X1 is going to feel like old tech next gen, so it would have the wrong stigma attached to something new they're doing. I wouldn't think a streaming device would require much in terms of hardware.

Christopher2346d ago

***I don't think it would be pointless. It'd be a lot cheaper to have a device dedicated to streaming than require the customer to buy a full console. Even if they only require an X1, the X1 is going to feel like old tech next gen***

Eh, gotta disagree 100%.

1. People already have things for streaming, just enable controller support on PC, Android, iOS.
2. It's cheap hardware, but people will find XBO 'old' so they should buy something lesser than that just to feel better?
3. Going with #1 and #2, then they should just use whatever new device they buy rather than having to pigeon-hole themselves into a console?

rainslacker2346d ago

I'm speaking of old hardware from a psychological viewpoint. However, thinking on it, the discless x1s makes more sense in that scenario. Rebrand it as a streaming device that can also run local x1 games and their back catalog of xbox games locally, and one can use it to also remote play their purchased games. Itll likely be pretty cheap when things really get rolling with streaming.

In any case, some sort if stand alone seems like it would make sense. Even if because it would be more easily portable for those that travel.

I still think that TV makers or other device makers arent going to jump on this bandwagon on the hardware side. There's more to what's required than just having the app on the tv. Google may be an exception since they make some of their own hardware, and they already will have a stand alone box

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2346d ago
Profchaos2346d ago

Yeah I remember those very early rumours also typically they were bs

2346d ago
BlackIceJoe2347d ago

I personally hope Microsoft will start up several new game studios and then bring out their own vr headset.

I can't tell you enough how I've enjoyed my time with Oculus and if Microsoft would get fully onboard with vr, l can see it being a boon for not just Xbox, but Microsoft as a whole. Because this is where I see the industry going.

There is so many potential things with vr, that have nothing to do with video games. For example hospitals could use it to help with surgery, you could use it as a virtual shopping center, there even is military benefits and I'm just surprised Microsoft isn't investing more into that field of business.

DaDrunkenJester2347d ago

Even if they don't make their own, but teaming up with Oculus to use their headsets on Xbox would be awesome. If MS isn't ready to dive into the VR market yet.

lxeasy2347d ago

I think Microsoft has said in the past that they are keeping a close eye on VR. I know there are a lot of Windows 10 PCs that are compatible with VR, so I wouldn't be surprised if project Scarlet is also compatible with VR

Atanasrikard2346d ago

They are already doing these things with HoloLens. You just don't hear about it because it has nothing to do with video games.

2347d ago Replies(2)
AngainorG7X2347d ago

That's good, now make sure that we will have the most powerful console once again!

lxeasy2347d ago

That'll be impressive if they message the most powerful console again

AngainorG7X2347d ago

They MUST.

1) Most Powerful Console
2) 15 First Party Studios
3) Best Place to play 3rd Parties
4) Game Pass Ultimate
5) Elite Series 2.0
6) Xcloud

What else can we ask!?! ;)

lxeasy2347d ago

I don't think they are done buying First Party Studios

AngainorG7X2347d ago

No you are right, i expect something at the X019 event, if not sooner at Gamescom..

lxeasy2347d ago

I believe XO19 is going to be in London. They're definitely planning something big

2347d ago Replies(1)
MasterCornholio2346d ago

Microsoft doesn't know if their system will be the most powerful. Because if they did they would have announced it last E3.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2346d ago
Show all comments (83)
50°

Kotick claims lawsuit objecting to MS-Activision deal was "tied to Embracer's desire to boost sales"

Former CEO describes lawsuit filed by Swedish pension fund as a "collateral attack" on Activision Blizzard.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
OpenGL1d 8h ago

Yeah, the Microsoft deal has DEFINITELY worked out for everyone.

galgor1d 5h ago

Can this mother fucker just get lost already

PRIMORDUS1d 4h ago

He belongs in here ⚰️, hopefully sooner than later.

MrDead12h ago(Edited 12h ago)

Kotick Made $155 million from MS in the buyout, the little b*tch needs to stop whining. Thanks to this Microslop deal and massive industry consolidation thousands upon thousands of devs and other workers lost their livelihoods. This greedy piggie pervert needs shut up and f-off.

50°

Larry Hyrb (Major Nelson) announces he has been laid off by Unity

Larry writes: "As many of you have been with me during my career in gaming, I'd like to share personal news. Like many in the gaming space recently, I've been laid off from @Unity"

darthv722d ago

...me thinks a switch was involved.

1Victor2d ago

That’s some major layoffs best of luck to him and the rest that got laid off. It always hurt specially more before or during holidays.

The_Blue1d 22h ago

Cool, sucks to see him go!

elJoker51d 13h ago

Met Larry a couple times. Sucks to hear he got laid off. Real standup guy who just loves gaming and the industry.

SegaSaturn6691d 8h ago

Dude finally got laid at 58 years old. Bit of a weird flex but im still happy for the guy!🥂

30°

New owner of GOG discusses taking on Steam, the devil of DRM, and following in Nightdive's footsteps

"We see DRM as something which can make the life of a legal customer more difficult," says Michał Kiciński, "so there is no reason to keep it alive."

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz