650°

Stephen Colbert uses Super Mario to make a point about Trump blaming violence on video games

Following the tragic mass shootings that took place in Texas and Ohio, a number of Republicans rolled out a tired scapegoat: video games.

Despite evidence to the contrary, video games have often been singled out as a cause of violence in U.S. society. In a recent press conference, Trump put them in the spotlight once again, condemning the "gruesome and grisly video games that are now commonplace."

The Late Show, however, was not about to accept his statement quietly. In the Super Mario parody above, a little animated Trump jumps a goomba before being confronted by the Italian plumber himself.

Read Full Story >>
mashable.com
nitus102354d ago

What! I thought the mass shootings happened in El Passo Texas and Dayton Ohio, not Toledo Ohio. Oops, well, he did get Ohio right and his speech to the nation was one of the best Zombi impressions I have seen for some time. 😣

lxeasy2354d ago

Donald Trump is terrible, can't wait for him to lose in 2020

neutralgamer19922354d ago

2020 he will be out of office I think. Him staying quite and supporting these racists groups will cost him in debates

2354d ago
JackBNimble2354d ago

You people should actually pay attention, I would be very worried about how far left your beloved Dem's want to take America.

You will all be screwed if the Dems get in but I can't see that happening.
Hopefully all the grownups vote to keep Trump in.

DeadlyFire2354d ago

The Government has a pretty solid rigged system 8 years then party flip lock. I m pretty sure Trump wins 2020. Democrats win 2024, Republicans win 2032.

Majin-vegeta2354d ago

And hopefully it's to Andrew Yang.All the other old coots are garbage.

2354d ago
2354d ago
nowitzki20042354d ago

Dont be so excited.. I wont be surprised if he gets elected again. I never thought he would be in office in the first place... Remember, he lost majority the first time but the electoral college is all that matters.

kneon2354d ago

@JackBNimble

What you and the crazies at the GOP call left, the rest of the world would regard as centrist. You've been brainwashed by those republican con men to vote against your best interest by making you scared of everything. They know that works because fear is the main driver behind conservatism.

ravens522354d ago

@PlainSimpleGarak. I know for a fact you dont believe he isnt racist to mexicans.... right? I mean really lol

CaptainObvious8782353d ago

@Kneon

It is absolutely astounding what you wrote. Literally switch 'republican' and democrat in your statement and you might get something that isn't completely divorced from reality...

Republicans the party of fear?

They're aren't the ones pushing climate alarmisn, pushing how all conservatives are racist, pushing the pathetic Trump Derangement Syndrome at every single news cycle. Good grief

DarXyde2353d ago

IF* he loses.

Don't "wait". Vote.

He has an incredibly fiercely loyal base who WILL be voting, so if you want to see him gone, do your part.

SyntheticForm2353d ago

The man is a complete fool and a total buffoon.

gamer78042353d ago

To be fair lots of politicians blame videogames when its politically convenient, Hilary, Biden and now Trump have all done this.

Donnie812353d ago

That’s not gonna happen. Look at the clowns the democrats are running against him. In a debate he will destroy any of those morons.

StormSnooper2353d ago (Edited 2353d ago )

@JackBNimble
That’s interesting you say that because all the studies are showing that it’s the Republicans who have been moving more and more to the right. This has been the case even before Trump’s presidency which has moved republicans into the closest the party has been to the far right as it has ever been, to the point that some Republicans are fighting to keep the party’s old ideals alive. If you think the Democrats are moving to the left, it’s mainly because the Republicans have moved so far into the right that the middle is no longer where it used to be. On the “far left” we do have the liberals like Bernie Sanders, but their difference from traditional democrats are limited to a handful of positions regarding healthcare and education. On everything else that matters, they are very much democrats, and do not seem to promote a societal shift like the “far right” or the “alt-right” movements in the republican side.

+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 2353d ago
Orionsangel2354d ago

@JackBNimble Grownups? When is Trump is gonna grow up?

nitus102353d ago (Edited 2353d ago )

Trump is a "sociopath". Don't believe me then look it up and tick all the boxes that you associate with Trump. Here are just a few traits:

Profile of the Sociopath
- Glibness and Superficial Charm.
- Manipulative and Conning. They never recognize the rights of others and see their self-serving behaviours as permissible. ...
- Grandiose Sense of Self. ...
- Pathological Lying. ...
- Lack of Remorse, Shame or Guilt. ...
- Shallow Emotions. ...
- Incapacity for Love.
- Need for Stimulation.

There are more traits but you get the picture. You only have to look at the younger Trump and he has not changed although it does appear that his mental health has deteriorated.

Of course, quite a few people will disagree with me but this forum is a gaming site and Trump and his sycophants are trying to deflect from the issue of firearms by trying to demonize games and if you are a gamer you should be disgusted with this tactic.

kneon2353d ago

@CaptainOblivious878

What's astounding is that people like you are so easily conned. The difference between the two is that the republicans make up things to be afraid about, the democrats are talking about reality.

They want you to be afraid of illegal immigrants taking your jobs, while simultaneously sitting at home collecting welfare. Never mind that they could virtually eliminate illegal immigrants by requiring social security number verification to obtain employment and hefty fines for any company that employs illegal immigrants. But that won't happen because too many of their donors rely on dirt cheap employees to make their bloated profits.

You're also supposed to be afraid of brown people, black people, and of course Muslim ("terrorist") people. Meanwhile, you've had more people die to domestic gun violence than in all your (many many) wars combined. Will they do something? No, because again you can't go upsetting your donors.

My favorite though is the rampant homophobia. What makes this one particularly funny is how many right-wing politicians, anti-gay activists, and religious leaders/con-men have been literally caught with their pants down with a member of the same sex.

I'm so lucky not to be American so I can just sit back and laugh at the clown show that is US politics. It's been broken for decades so the current state was always inevitable.

S2Killinit2353d ago (Edited 2353d ago )

I think the reason he said “Tolido” even though the teleprompter in front of him clearly said “el paso and dayton” was because they knew that more mass killings were bound to happen, and in his rehearsal speech for such an occassion, they had used “tolido”. They know that they are causing people lives but stick to the gun lobby’s agenda. I wonder what city’s name they will use in the next rehearsed speech.

NeoGamer2322353d ago

People have to be really careful what they ask for.

In no way am I a fan of Trump at all. He has put in a few common sense things that are good. But, he hasbeen divisive and exclusionary. And it can be argued that he has done a lot of short term gains for long term pains.

The DNC has to be smart about things and bring politics back to the center more rather than going way left. Right now the US is experiencing a farther right wing president then any probably ever. And that is not good. But voting in a far left wing president is not the solution either because the far left policies would send people the other way again.

As much as people complain about hurt in compromise the only true path to make the world generally better and safer is through compromise.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2353d ago
Knushwood Butt2354d ago

Stamping on heads. Reminds me of Amercan History X.

PurpHerbison2354d ago

You know, it was a pretty solid film but I will never get over the fact that they expected me to believe Derek could ball like that. That entire basketball scene needed to be deleted.

Knushwood Butt2354d ago

Just that the concept of jumping on heads / things to squash them to death as seen in Mario games, is somehow not violent, is ridiculous.

Elda2354d ago

Stephen is always too funny & on point when he lights Trump up.

2354d ago Replies(6)
senorfartcushion2354d ago

He's good, but does represent the middle-ground brand of wealthy bourjois, so complaining about gun violence screams "love me" when it's really just what was decided by proper left wingers decades ago.

They need to catch their asses up, or else The Republicans will have the say on class - the issue that wins elections.

Highlife2354d ago

Stephen on point? How did that Russian narrative turn out? Is Trump a good person no but I would take him over any left wing socialist nut job.

Srhalo2354d ago

"How did that Russian narrative turn out?"

We dunno yet, the final page of that chapter will probably be written as soon as Trump is out of office, regardless of if it's 2020 or 2024.

2354d ago
senorfartcushion2354d ago

Democratic Socialist* you're talking about something completely unrelated

rainslacker2353d ago

I'd rather not have to settle and take someone who works for everyone regardless of their views, and doesn't classify people by their political beliefs.

Crazy to think the sooner Americans can start compromising and working together, the sooner things may actually get better for everyone, instead of alienating people based on their political beliefs. The constant infighting is like living in a dysfunctional family where everyone feels they have to be on top and get everything they want, and if one person isn't happy, then everyone has to be miserable.

That's just me though.

nitus102353d ago

It's always funny in a bizarre way when Republicans are proud of flipping a state or town/city "red" and then trying to demonise the opposition as Communist or Socialist when the colour associated with Communism is "red". Remember McCarthyism (look it up) from the 1950s which was instigated by Republican Senator Joseph McCarthy (1908 - 1957).

Those that refuse to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

@Srhalo

If Trump wins the next (ie. 2010) election then how sure are you that he won't go for a third or longer-term? You only have to look at his so-called "Jokes" with regard to extending his presidency are you really sure they are jokes?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2353d ago
2354d ago Replies(1)
2354d ago Replies(1)
2354d ago Replies(1)
2354d ago Replies(1)
Kornholic2354d ago

I guess they changed the definition of funny, then.

Sully52462354d ago

Nobody liked him before he started criticizing trump. Dude aint funny

2354d ago
rainslacker2353d ago

Man is a comedic genius, and before his current job, he was probably the best satirist comedian around. Played the extreme conservative part with conviction to the point it was actually believable. Of course, he could easily show the stupidity of media and politicians through his work.

What's more, he was probably one of the best interviewers of political figures on TV, and when he did serious interviews, he managed to keep it respectful and didn't back down too often.

Saying no one liked him is a falacy, and just an attempt at trying to discredit his work. Either you are unaware of his life work, or you are too scared to just address what he has to say, and feel that if you marginalize him, you won't have to worry about him.

2353d ago
2353d ago
Sophisticated_Chap2353d ago

Stephen Colbert, just like Bill Maher and jimmy Kimmel, is a Democrat shill, nothing more. Their studio audiences are a bunch of zombies, who clap and cheer for anything they say. Sad!

rainslacker2353d ago

So....they're the democratic version of Trump? Trump is a republican shill, nothing more. His audience are a bunch of zombies, who clap and cheer for anything he says. It's pretty sad, because the man isn't even funny. His audience likes him because he panders to their fears, and tell's them that he'll fix their troubles, when they don't even seem to know their troubles, or their troubles weren't troubles until Trump told them it was.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 2353d ago
2354d ago Replies(8)
bluefox7552354d ago (Edited 2354d ago )

Jesus, really? The way that everyone has politicized the horrific acts in recent days is pretty disgusting tbh.

Eulderink2354d ago (Edited 2354d ago )

not really, i would say it's more understanding or considering for all the victims to make it political, yes the families struck by these events should be left alone.Though in my eyes trying to make an appeal to politicians to change something about either the mental health system or gun control is just common sense, atleast if u want something like this to never happen again or atleast minimize the risk of it happening again.

If someone of my family got shot by some guy wanting to watch the world burn, i definitely want no one to suffer those same events.

Like they say: you need to learn from history, else it repeats itself.

and yea we should blame the people who vowed they would serve us, since they can make and change the laws.
I mean this isn't the first one why is still nothing happening, except condemning the shooters.

stupidusername2354d ago

At least some are trying to solve the problem instead of clinging to their guns and shouthing prayers.

2354d ago
TK-662353d ago (Edited 2353d ago )

@PlainSimpleGarak

So you've presented all the facts and info, but you're then denying ANY role guns could play. That is at best denial of the situation because no other country has this problem. Every single thing you point to that happens in other nations is an anomaly compared to what is the regular in the US. A lot of the facts you listed are going to require citations. For example, why does the 'well-regulated militia' not have access to tanks and military grade drones? Because I have a news flash for you. ISIS is better armed than your militia and they're not that scary as a fighting force compared to a professional army.

"If guns are the issue how did London beat New York in murders?"

Maybe because It didn't:

https://edition.cnn.com/201...
https://www.bellingcat.com/...

How ironic after your talk of facts.

"Mass stabbings happen in Asian and Europe."

How many people in developed nations die in mass stabbings in each country compared to mass shootings in America? Because ironically one of the links in another article someone posted said 17 victims but only 2 dead. That is a drastically better outcome than what we see from most mass shootings in the US. Considering a lawmaker in the US recently fabricated a mass stabbing in Norway suggests you should drop this line of argumentation.

"I'd rather we tackle mental health so that doesn't have to happen at all."

How about supporting medicare for all as a start? It would be a good way for the US to bring itself in line with the rest of the developed world.

"Take away the guns and you get a truck driving through Nice."

You're reaching now babe. Because the Boston bombing doesn't happen on an almost daily basis like mass shootings do and you cant just pin them all on mental illness and absolve guns of any role. Also comparing cars to guns as though guns are as necessary as cars are to everyday life is a joke. Do not attempt to tell me how a gun is necessary for people to get to work in the US, and do not try and ask me about hunters or sport because there are exceptions for those in other countries too.

What you're doing can be summarized as pretending things like the June 2017 London Bridge attacks are as frequent as mass shootings are in the US. If anything I may as well just argue whats the point of locks because people can still break into peoples homes. It's a dumb argument, and you're the one making it right now.

Wallow2354d ago

At what point do people not politicize shootings? When the 1,000,000th shooting happens and America gets a super awesome prize for all the dead bodies that have piled up? Grow up. You either are complicit and silent or you speak out and remind people how NOT normal this is.

Show all comments (132)
40°

An Update to Our Shared Commitment to Safer Gaming

Discover how Sony Interactive Entertainment, Nintendo, and Microsoft continue to collaborate to improve player safety across our platforms.

Read Full Story >>
sonyinteractive.com
110°

There's an Underrepresented Majority That Wants Entertainment Without Agendas, Says Ex Tripwire CEO

Ex-Tripwire CEO John Gibson shares his 'Entertainment First' vision to capture the agenda-free magic of classics like Star Wars, Zelda, and Metroid.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
Goodguy012d ago

Yes. Just make a good game instead of worrying it should make some kind of stupid social/political differences in the world... we've got enough of that in the real world. Games are places we can escape to and just have fun.

z2g2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

How about you make a game that’s important to you and the people who are interested in that buy it and the ones that don’t like it don’t have to buy it. Just because something bugs some people doesn’t mean there aren’t other people who it doesn’t bug. Someone’s hangups shouldn’t be other people’s problems.

Don’t want a game that features a political or cultural statement or an underrepresented group of people? Don’t buy it.

Not all of us just want vapid, mindless fantasy all the time. Sometimes we want something that represents us or means something. There’s nothing wrong with that. Look how many movies in the world have covered so many types of stories, people or historical controversies to huge successes. Games are no different.

Eonjay2d ago

The plot to remove representation or ideas and content that you dont approve of is an agenda within itself. Its also censorship. People need are trapped in this main- character syndrome where they believe that the world and all of its happens are fashioned for them alone.

crazyCoconuts2d ago

"Don't buy it"
Exactly what people do.
And then big companies are reminded why if you want to make money you may not want to do things like villainize half your market. If you want to preach one side of an argument you're gonna lose people. At least do the Deus Ex/GTA thing and show the warts on both sides so everyone has something to agree with

senorfartcushion2d ago

We’re still waiting on that Splinter Cell remake…

raWfodog2d ago

On the flip side of that, good games can have characters of different ethnic and social backgrounds without thinking that some agendas are trying to be pushed. I've played many, many great games throughout my life with many different characters (male, female, white, people of color, even some animal characters) and loved them all simply for the story and entertainment they provided me while I escaped into those worlds.

senorfartcushion2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

That’s not possible.

Being a child doesn’t remove the political points of OLD GAMES, we were just kids. In fact, older media was decidedly more political than some of the cowardly, childish efforts we have today.

This is precisely why we are still to get that Splinter Cell remake. We can’t have a fun Splinter Cell game with AAA graphics because a few virgins don’t want “politics in their games.”

neutralgamer19922d ago

Keep gaming free of nonsense. Agenda pushing in social media age has gotten worst

senorfartcushion1d 9h ago

Name a game and I’ll tell you what the agenda was

Notellin1d 23h ago

"While our first game is faith-based"

Yeah you guys want to get rid of all the politics and play a nice Southern Baptist game. We get it.

Christopher1d 21h ago

He should follow his own words, then.

*** That changed around two years ago, when he started consulting for Bible X, the studio behind the Christian-based game project Gate Zero. Last month, Gibson, through his recently established publisher Templar Media, acquired the developer.***

Not sure there's anything more political in history than religion.

S2Killinit1d 18h ago

But his statement is also an agenda. Hope people are intelligent enough to know that.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 1d 9h ago
z2g2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I fail to see how representing actual underrepresented or making them feel included is an “agenda”. This is an extremely self centered selfish viewpoint. Those actual underrepresented people just want to be recognized as valid. The privileged majority who are always represented take that for granted and can’t deal with the fact that “other” types of people or views exist. Inclusion or awareness isn’t an agenda. It’s representing reality and making those “other” people or stories be seen and align with actual reality.

There are literally thousands and thousands of games to choose from, and if you are annoyed that some have cultural or topical relevance, that’s your problem and you don’t have to buy them. Meanwhile other people who want that actually have games that speak to them. So sick of this “my way or the highway” attitude.

And there are plenty of games out there, if that privileged majority have an issue or don’t want a game based on cultural relevance. Pick up a Switch. Most games are g-rated, noncontroversial cartoons with stories fit for tweens. No reality to get mad at.

2d ago Replies(2)
KyRo2d ago

It's always me me me me me with you lot. There's a difference between representation and forcing it for the sake of forcing something to a very very loud but very small minority.

Christopher2d ago

You really are only proving their point with this sort of response to the idea of people feeling included in some games versus the plethora of games without it.

Outside_ofthe_Box2d ago

We need to define what "forcing" is because I've seen people say things like Aloy being female in Horizon is pushing an agenda or catering to a "very very loud but very small minority" before.

dveio2d ago

@z2g

I personally think you've nailed it here.

For decades, wether in film or music, there had been ONE primary target group.

And if you're looking further, even in economy, laws, courts or any other area there had been only one target group.

While others, let's be real, were surpressed.

It's "funny" though - why do we all think personalities like David Bowie, Mick Jagger, Freddy Mercury, etc., have had such a huuuge impact on cultures and society? Because they were 1:1 depicts of the Demon Slayer or the Duke?

No, because they were different. Because we all are different.

The only people time and time again that are complaining, whining and moaning about everything (while highly likely even been a fan of Queen or something) are prejudiced people.

Are people that "But it's never been any different, and I want it to stay that way!".

There's nothing highly hidden here. It's always been the same. After decades, even centuries of rules written by and for the "one primary target group", they are now the loudest that complain & moan.

Inverno2d ago

Y'all could also, ya know, just not buy games you feel have an agenda? This constant bitching coming from all these whiney men every time they see a game that isn't catering to them specifically is tiring. They latch themselves onto these games and throw endless amounts of harassment as if there aren't another thousand games releasing before/around/after. I'm usually outspoken when it comes to forced diversity in games, but the issue here is you're all bigoted as hell and need to learn to be a little less offended. Y'all become the snowflakes you mocked so much lol.

MrDead2d ago

This guy is one of the biggest most delicate snowflakes out there, I'm sure he'll be crying on Tucker Carlson or Fox "News" again soon.

Michiel19891d 22h ago

@christopher cater to and include are two very different things. Played most of the games you mentioned and had no issue with any of em because they just include it. I have no issue with inclusion of that, but if in the next god of war, Kratos would all of a sudden hyperfocus on being a strong independent man or a hypermasculine one, I would give them shit for it as well. It has nothing to do with the inclusion of x or y group, but about the integrity of the game.

@inverno stop putting words in my mouth . It's actually the opposite of what you say, I said there can be no conversation because as soon as you criticize them, a whole angry mob comes at you and tries to cancel you. Thankfully it's become less and less over time and people actually realize now they can voice their opinion without having the fear of losing their job.
You really can't see that a lot of companies are now backpeddalling about the woke bs? They finally realize making your product worse to cater to a group who doesn't buy your product anyway is terrible.

Michiel19892d ago ShowReplies(4)
PitbullMonster1d 17h ago

Who was crying about kingdom come deliverance, Stellar Blade and the first descendant? White Hetero men Or leftards?

Inverno1d 5h ago

Leftards but those games still went on to release and become financially and critically successful. This dood, who was a CEO, went on social media to voice an opinion that at the time was controversial. Just cause you have freedom of speech and expression doesn't mean you hafto always voice your opinions publicly. He had to step down because it was more about the company than just him. Now he's back talking bout "unrepresented majority", as if there aren't different audiences to cater to. Since people from both sides can't seem to escape getting fired for voicing opinions then I guess everyone's got to equally face the consequences of their inability to shut up.

MrBaskerville2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Star wars, anti agenda? Lol. I don't think Lucas would agree.

Inverno2d ago

One of the most politically charged movies in existence. They can pretend it's all about space wizards with swords but the space nazis are still in the movies and they're still the bad guys. It's ironic as hell.

JEECE2d ago

More evidence that if the agenda feels legitimate within the story's world, people don't even notice that it is an agenda and they don't complain.

Elit3Nick2d ago

This one gave me a chuckle, too.

JEECE2d ago

As ever, this is a misguided expression of the speaker's issue. While of course there are some games (pure puzzle games, etc) that have no agenda, any game with a narrative is conveying some type of message. What people who say they don't like "woke" or "politics in games" actually mean is that they don't like hamfisted, poorly written narratives/characters that are thin veneers for modern political messages that feel out of place in the game's universe. It's why all these people complain about the Veilguard and not Baldur's Gate 3. They both have "woke" characters but in BG3 they feel like they belong in the universe, while in the Veilguard they just feel like generic fantasy skins for modern American 20-somethings.

Show all comments (61)
40°

Interview: Groovin’ On a New Donkey Kong Country Tribute Album

Mega Mixtape has some good grooves coming in, and Gamerhub UK talks more with them.

Read Full Story >>
gamerhub.co.uk
15h ago