All Channels
Popular
280°

Subscriptions Are Going to Ruin Video Games

A reader worries that the increasing popularity of services like EA Access and Game Pass will be the doom of smaller games and companies.

2489d ago Replies(9)
Sgt_Slaughter2489d ago

The first company to say you can only get their games through a subscription is going to fail miserably, we just don't know who it will be yet. I don't think it's a matter of if, it's a matter of when.

2pacalypsenow2489d ago

It’s going to happen.

Companies will slowly usher them in, MS, EA Ubisoft and humble bundle are already doing it.

In a few years it will be as normal as DLC.

2488d ago
2pacalypsenow2488d ago (Edited 2488d ago )

I was referring to subscriptions, not games tied to a subscription.

Seems like I replied to the wrong comment.

Kribwalker2489d ago

googles already saying that. You need a sub to use stadia then you gotta buy the games on top of it

Unspoken2489d ago

Hmm, I'd say by then they would have run the numbers and seen it was more profitable to sale as a subscription service, not before.

S2Killinit2488d ago

Ouya did that. And you arent wrong. Stadia is doing it now.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2488d ago
killswitch802489d ago

Just like subscription serives ruined tv and movies..oh wait those things are better now

jlove4life2489d ago

Bad example netflix 148 million paying subs ps4 just hit 100 million do you think every ps4 user will buy psnow and even if they did its 19.99 a month apples vs oranges my friend

2489d ago Replies(3)
2pacalypsenow2489d ago (Edited 2489d ago )

I don’t know if having to subscribe to 3-4 different services to watch all you want is “better”

It’s not gonna be any better than paying for cable with every network getting their own subscription service.

Chocoburger2489d ago (Edited 2489d ago )

TV and movie streaming doesn't have to deal with input lag. How hard is that for you realize?
Imagine a future where every game ever made featured input lag and you were always at the whims of servers and ISPs running at all times if you wanted to play a modern game.

Yeesh!

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2486d ago
LordJamar2489d ago

I think he is highly wrong there are plenty indie games on gamepass that launch on there which would have otherwise not been picked up by many.

gamepass offers low entry for consumers and much needed exposure and player base and money for indie devs

Hell I have seen older games mainly multiplayer ones which pretty much died come back to full life with game pass and games I would have never tried and end up loveing them maybe that same company drops there next new game maybe I buy it full price outright now it I would have never played it or discovered it without gamepass I’m not saying it’s perfect system but I think benefits outweigh the negatives

gangsta_red2489d ago

I don't see anything wrong with these services since they are all optional (at the moment.)

A lot of us are already paying a yearly fee for multiplayer privileges, why would there be any complaints for a game service that offered multiple games at a low price?

Srhalo2489d ago

You are defending it but you have to say "at the moment"?

Most people are unhappy about having to pay for multiplayer and they should be.

The problem with you is, you have been bent over so many times your already in position for the next screw job.

gangsta_red2489d ago

I say "at the moment" because as of now the fact remains these are optional. When the time comes when retail isn't available and these games are only accessable through different services then my opinion might change.

"Most people are unhappy about having to pay for multiplayer and they should be."

And yet they still pay for it.

"The problem with you is..."

Naw, that's actually not the problem. The problem is people crying and complaining, refusing to let go and not realising that not only is this still an option but this is where the industry is ultimately heading.

I guess these people feel like if they leave comments about how much they hate these services their screw job won't feel as uncomfortable as they pay for them anyways.

Srhalo2489d ago

@gangsta_red

Hey, please step back forget the xbox stuff and just read what you said. Do you really think consumers should just accept everything?

gangsta_red2488d ago (Edited 2488d ago )

@Srhalo

Exactly where did I specifically say anything about Xbox in my reply to you? Is it really impossible to have a normal discussion with you without it turning into a fanboy console war?

Consumers don't accept everything. Why are you making up hystericaly overblown statements. And th

This has been proven in certain games with loot boxes or MTs that have failed (ie Battlefront 2). Consumers won't just accept everything.

Do you have anything of reference to go by or is this discussion just going to talk about what you personally hate and then extend that to what you believe is everyone?

Think about that for a minute before you reply.

esherwood2489d ago

I don’t know it makes sense to me to have to pay for multiplayer, Microsoft’s providing a service. I’m not a fan of the subscription game services because I know it’s going to lead to micro transactions

gangsta_red2489d ago

Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo are providing a service that should be free.

Why should we pay for online and yet their first party games still have DLC, MTs and other paid options.

I'm more of a fan of subscription based game services because at least it makes more sense and gives you more games to play for a low cost.

Maybe if these services take off, maybe these companies can offer free MP for their consoles.

2489d ago
gangsta_red2489d ago

@tekiz

Show where I defended 6s and 7s.

"The dollar store might be fine for you but some of us don't mind paying a little more for quality products."

Metro, DmC, Monster Hunter World, RE and other triple A games are dollar store products? When did this happen...or is it possible you have absolutely no clue what you're talking about.

Oh, are you referring to the Indies that are appearing on the service? Are Indies not awesome anymore...that's not what you said not long ago...

https://n4g.com/news/228370...

***@Petebloodyonion

What are you talking about?

Embracing indies was awesome, way better than Microsoft who's initial plan was to block indies and self publishing completely. ****

I keep forgetting that you have to find any way possible to downplay something you have no clue to the point of having to constantly change your opinion or stance.

Imalwaysright2488d ago (Edited 2488d ago )

Then you should be paying the companies that are providing the servers. Why are you paying MS to play a multiplatform game when 3rd party publishers are the ones providing and maintaining servers for their games?

esherwood2488d ago

I don’t understand why that should be free and all other services shouldn’t. I’m against micro transactions and ur way they’re paying for online services through micro transactions. Why the hell wouldn’t they just charge for online

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2488d ago
Godmars2902489d ago

They are not optional: if there is something on one service that you want to - legally - see, you have to pay for that service. Things were well enough with Netflix when it offered a variety of big brands, but now the holders of those brands are creating their own separate services with many not caring if people have to pay for all of them to see everything, which many can't.

gangsta_red2489d ago

"...you have to pay for that service"

Couldn't that be said for a console that has exclusives, a retail store that has a particular item?

These services are optional because you are not forced to pay for them.

"Things were well enough with Netflix when it offered a variety of big brands, ..."

So you want these other companies to let Netflix create a monopoly or not try their hand at this successful model?

Which successful company do you know of that sat back and did nothing to evolve with the times?

"...many not caring if people have to pay for all of them to see everything, which many can't."

Flawed logic because not everyone is spending money on all the services that are available even today.

Godmars2902489d ago

With consoles, for the moment at least, you're still talking about a single point of sale, not an ongoing service, much less one console that divides into several.

Likewise, when you say monopoly its not as if Netflix has an iron grip on content or is charging outrageous prices because its the only place to go.

gangsta_red2489d ago

"you're still talking about a single point of sale, not an ongoing service,"

A single point of sales with an optional service to pay to play online. You're not making a very good point when trying to compare consoles with services when they have services you need to fully take advantage of their console.

And isn't this why Sony and MS are focusing a lot more on streaming because of this? Why Google, Verizon, Apple have put more energy into services and less on hardware because it's a single purchase piece.

"...when you say monopoly its not as if Netflix has an iron grip on content or is charging outrageous prices because its the only place to go"

Pretty sure that was my point and the reason why other companies are creating their own content on their service. And with this competition comes different prices that are competitive with each other.

Your original statement said everything was well enough with just Netflix. But now your acknowledging that there's other options because companies are creating other streaming services to go to besides Netflix.

Unspoken2489d ago

Example analogy; you only have enough money for one console. Hey look, you can only purchase games that play on said console. "You are locked in" essentially.

Multiplayer being free... My god these people think money grows on trees.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2488d ago
Show all comments (89)
90°

The Cloud Gaming Graveyard: Dead Cloud Gaming Services

We take a walk around the Cloud Gaming Graveyard - listing all the failed cloud gaming services over the last decade.

We discuss the ups, the downs, and overall history of this technology. Turns out running a successful cloud gaming service that addresses the various technical hurdles and actually makes money is a real challenge.

Read Full Story >>
clouddosage.com
Chocoburger675d ago

I'm sure that there will be more to come in the future.

UltimateOwnage674d ago

Latency and video compression will always make cloud gaming an afterthought.

210°

PlayStation beat Xbox cloud gaming users in 2021, new CMA data indicates

PlayStation dominated cloud gaming users throughout 2021, beating Microsoft's xCloud streaming by over 10%, but Xbox swings back at PlayStation in 2022.

Read Full Story >>
tweaktown.com
Nanukas1204d ago

Good, i want sony to feel heat. Ordinary people win from good competition.

BehindTheRows1204d ago

“Good competition” is not something Microsoft offers often. You should want THEM to feel enough heat to actually do better.

Nanukas1204d ago (Edited 1204d ago )

Agree. I wish sony would be more afraid of gamepass to get better games on ps+

Obscure_Observer1204d ago (Edited 1204d ago )

"You should want THEM to feel enough heat to actually do better."

Phil Spencer started to acquire studios back in 2018, after that, Xbox Studios only had 5 studios. Now Xbox has 23 almost 5x more studios. Not to mention third party exclusives like Flight Simulator, Contraband and Project Dragon.

Plus, unlike Sony, Xbox Studios won´t be distracted with things like VR, all of their first party efforts goes towards Xbox first and foremost.

Sony so can expect a much more robust Gamepass in terms of first party and third party exclusives games from Xbox from now on.

Since Sony have less studios and won´t release their games day one on PS+, they better make sure andl deliver high quality games like Ragnarok. Because so far, 2023 hadn´t started well for them with Forspoken.

https://www.videogameschron...

Sony spent millions to secure a AAA third party exclusive game build from the ground up for PS5, not to mention more millions spent on market to be outperformed by a AA game which costs less than half on Steam, had an EPIC day one surprise announcement AND release with ZERO money invested on promotion and marketing.

If that´s not good competition, I don´t know what it is.

BehindTheRows1204d ago

@Obscure_Observer

It isn’t.

Obscure_Observer1204d ago (Edited 1204d ago )

"It isn’t."

Oh yes, it is. You can bet your life that both companies cares about their money and investments.

The simple fact that Sony continues to pay multiple publishers to keep games out of Xbox forever, is nothing but a reaction to Gamepass.

Imo, Sony now fears that once their timed-exclusive contracts ends, those games will be available on Gamepass the moment the said games hits the Xbox platforms.

Sony fears the scenario where gamers realize that it´s not worth to invest in every single game released on Playstation at full $70 once they´ll be getting it for "free" on Gamepass eventually, just like Yakuza, Dragon Quest, Octopath Traveler, Nino Kuni, Persona series and more.

ARK 2 (exclusive on Xbox consoles), S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2( exclusive on Xbox consoles), Flintlock, Wo Long, Atomic Hears, Lies of P, Eiyuden Chronicle, Hollow Knight: Silksong. Minecraft: Legends, MLB 23...

Those are just some of the games that Xbox players will be getting for "free" day one while Playstation gamers will have to pay for all of it.

So at least you´re rich or something, Xbox players will be getting way more NEW games to play than you. That´s just facts.

BehindTheRows1204d ago (Edited 1204d ago )

@Obscure_Observer

I can bet that one company brings actual competition, isn’t afraid to share losing numbers, and doesn’t buy huge publishers due to said weaknesses. That’s what I can bet.

As a fan of theirs, you should want them to do better and offer more than subscriptions services and unfulfilled promises.

tay87011204d ago (Edited 1204d ago )

@obscure. Well Sony can't control 3rd party games quality, but their 1st party certainly trounces MS's. Spiderman 2 is going to a absolutely dominate the holiday season, just like ragnarok did this past holiday season. Sony easily has the best gaming studios out of the big three. It's.not Sony who has to worry about their 1st part output, it is MS.

MIDGETonSTILTS171204d ago

@Obscure: what AAA games would I buy an XsX today to play?

I own a ps5 and XsX, and I don’t know of one game that would have motivated me to buy an XsX ( I bought it to appease my dumb Xbot friends).

I bought a ps5 for Demon Souls (best looking game on consoles), Returnal (top 10 game of all time for me), and Dualsense upgrades for shooters (completely changes R6 for me).

So, can you illustrate how XsX is competing? I liked HiFi Rush a lot, High on Life too, but neither make we happy about the $500 I sunk into the hardware to play them.

Mr_cheese1203d ago

Obscurer, you're saying an awful lot without talking much sense at all.

VR isn't a distraction, neither does it take games away from playstation. Sony have been building and harnessing studios just for this while working on their 1st party none VR titles.

Microsoft is fully committed to gamepass and that's fine for them and those that like to game that way. It will be an even better product if Microsoft can nail their 1st party games.

What I'd hate to see are more moves like the Activision and Bethesda purchases and attempts because it destroys the gaming ecosystem. I'd say the same for Sony as well because once the ball is rolling, they'll all start buying and diving gaming.

Obscure_Observer1203d ago (Edited 1203d ago )

"I can bet that one company brings actual competition, isn’t afraid to share losing numbers, and doesn’t buy huge publishers due to said weaknesses. That’s what I can bet."

Unfortunately for you, MS or Nintendo aren´t forced to play by yours or Sony´s rules. Fyi, Sony used to buy publishers back in the day. The only reason they aren´t doing it now is simply because they can´t.

As it is, Sony already owns 14.09% of Kadokawa´s shares while Tencent acquired 16% of the company's shares, which means 1/3 of the entire company ownership.

The only reason why Tencent owns more than Sony is because Sony couldn´t pay more for it. So spare me from this "victim complex" bs defense for Sony.

Phil acted as the "nice guy" for too long. To the point where stupid fanboys were all happy when Xbox acquired new studios and publishers, because the idiots were under the illusion that all future Xbox games would become multiplatform and be released on Playstation.

Yeah, they were stupid to the point of thinking that MS would turn into a third party developer for Playstation.

Reality hits hard and here we are. Now that they KNOW those games aren´t coming to Playstation, all that they can do now is cry and moan over games paid and developed by Microsoft to not be on their platform of choice.

They think they´re entitled to have anything and everything otherwise it´s not good competition.

Phil Spencer won´t stop. Be the Activision/Blizzard deal approved or not, he can just go after a single studio like CDPR for example and you´ll be here crying all the same.

I don´t care if Sony or Nintendo buys SquareEnix, From Software or even SEGA tomorrow. Because I have no problem buying products from those companies if they have the games I want. I care about games first and foremost. So don´t expect me to be on your sad place complaining about big a$$ companies running their business as they see fit.

Lightning771203d ago

"You should want THEM to feel enough heat to actually do better."

But when they do attempt to do better ppl complain about it.

BehindTheRows1203d ago

@Lightning77

What genuine attempts have people complained about?

Lightning771202d ago

With the whole Bethesda thing. There was article on here not too long ago talking about how Bethesda investment will pay off for MS. The whole comment section everyone was whining about how MS was taking games away. So when MS competes everyone here complains on here. No matter what MS hurts feelings. It's quite funny actually.

BehindTheRows1202d ago

@Lightning77

In other words, outside of publisher acquisitions, they have not really attempted to compete.

And "whining" happens on both sides, so I hope you are just as entertained when people bitch and moan about moves Sony makes.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 1202d ago
Crows901204d ago

Ps+ extra already has better games than gamepass. Just look at the highest scoring games...ps extra has more of them.

Obscure_Observer1204d ago

Lol. What a joke.

PS+ relies on old games. Gamepass not only has day one first party games but also day one third party as well. Even from Sony. XD

S2Killinit1204d ago (Edited 1204d ago )

Exactly. “Day one” is a buzz word that makes these guys think they have a better line up but it has not amounted to much. If you look at what they have at any given time on their service its not that rosy. Not to mention “day one” also exists on PS plus just not for the first party AAA story games (which is fine w me as long as they continue making the hits).

Check out their list of day one releases for all the years they had gamepass. Its a joke.

Crows901204d ago (Edited 1204d ago )

@obscure

I'd take good old games then new Bad games. Besides that wasn't his point and that has nothing to do with what I claimed. The op said that they should offer better games but they already offer better games. He did not say new games. Or even New Quality games. But to your point, I know that game pass lovers do enjoy their day one bad or mediocre games. It's all about value with you guys and not quality

GamingSinceForever1204d ago

Some are going ape shit over Hi-Fi Rush but completely forgot about the Tokyo Wire dud the same developer last released. My point being there are hits and misses.

1204d ago
1204d ago
Obscure_Observer1204d ago (Edited 1204d ago )

" It's all about value with you guys and not quality"

Lol. Your false narrative didn´t aged well.

All Metacritic scores for day one first party games
.
Ori and the Will of the Wisps 92 on Metacritic
Flight Simulator 90 on Metacritic
Forza Horizon 5 92 on Metacritic
Halo Infinite 87 on Metacritic
Grounded 85 on Metacritic
Pentiment 87 on Metacritic
Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition 87 on Metacritic
Hi-Fi Rush 88 on Metacritic

And that´s only from first party games/IPs on Xbox series consoles.

So much for your "quality vs quantity" BS narrative.

Oh, and we "Gamepass Lovers" also love old quality games as well. I also can give you a large list of high quality third party on Gamepass. Just ask. ;)

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1204d ago
GamingSinceForever1204d ago

@Obscure_Observer… Forspoken was not a 1st party game from Sony nor should it be treated as such. Square Enix will comeback nicely with FFXVI I’m sure.

Besides Sony is entitled to some misses here and there because they actually take chances on new titles and release them regularly.

Bu the time Spiderman 2 releases everyone will have forgotten all about this terrible start you’re claiming.

Crows901204d ago

They're so anxious to try to nail Sony on something that they'll even bring up third party developers not under Sony. Oh look this time's exclusive that wasn't developed by a Sony studio was bad so Sony doesn't know how to do good games.

1204d ago
Obscure_Observer1204d ago

"@Obscure_Observer… Forspoken was not a 1st party game from Sony nor should it be treated as such. Square Enix will comeback nicely with FFXVI I’m sure."

In no moment I said it´s a first party game. Both Forspoken and FFXVI are exclusive Playstation 5 games which Sony invested large sums of money to secure to their platform. Just like the original Spiderman from Insomniac. (which till this day Sony fans treat it like a first party/IP)

So it´s pretty obvious if the game fails, Sony also fails and loses tons of money which could had been invested on first party games.

"Besides Sony is entitled to some misses here and there because they actually take chances on new titles and release them regularly."

True.

"Bu the time Spiderman 2 releases everyone will have forgotten all about this terrible start you’re claiming."

Also true. The same can be said about FFXVI, imo.

Abear211204d ago

The leader, Nintendo, doesn’t care what the competition does.

Obscure_Observer1203d ago

"The leader, Nintendo, doesn’t care what the competition does."

Couldn´t agree more

BehindTheRows1203d ago

The Switch is leading the PS5 because it launched three years prior. PS4 won last gen is all forms (money made, units sold, software totals).

No hate for Nintendo though, as they are another company who actually puts out quality games in high numbers, but just a little perspective.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1202d ago
Orchard1204d ago

“In 2022, Microsoft took the lead with 60-70% of total MAUs”

From 20-30% up to 60-70%? That’s some crazy growth. Probably thanks to Fortnite.

SurgicalMenace1204d ago

That's what's up, young fella. You feel better now?

The Wood1204d ago

All the other stats dont matter. Especially the ones where ps is tearing xbox a new one

1204d ago
Obscure_Observer1204d ago

“In 2022, Microsoft took the lead with 60-70% of total MAUs”

Probably one of reasons why Sony won´t return Activision´s calls.

BehindTheRows1204d ago

Oh, yeah, THAT must be it….

Outside_ofthe_Box1204d ago

You're not asking for numbers now, I noticed? 🤣

Orchard1203d ago (Edited 1203d ago )

Oops, somebody didn't read the article.

This isn't a "YoY increase". It's market share, so we know they had 60-70% of the streaming market.

MIDGETonSTILTS171204d ago

That’s why we game: to celebrate YoY growth!

Three cheers for first-party content-starving fueling third party max’s and subscriptions.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1203d ago
Tacoboto1203d ago

What a clickbait headline. Why mention 2021, when the tides turned in 2022 for the obvious reason of one company making the Cloud service one of their biggest marketing pushes throughout the entire year while the other company was able to promote the games they had coming out?

And it's imprudent to suggest crazy growth when we only know proportions - did Xbox grow its proportion by attracting from the competitors' bases, did their marketing pay off and attract new users, or did cloud gamers on competitors just not play as much? The MAU figures don't point to shifts as significant as the Cloud proportions do, and Microsoft's lack of raw subscriber numbers that they happily boasted about in 2021 is telling too.

70°

Assassin's Creed Odyssey available on PC and Xbox Game Pass today

Ubisoft's brilliant Assassin's Creed Odyssey will become available via Xbox and PC Game Pass today, Microsoft has annou…

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
RavenWolfx1351d ago

At the time of this comment, I am not seeing Odyssey on Xbox or PC yet.