By the way, the best option at that point was singing. Truly a beautifull moment and I dont care how bad you think the writing is for that moment
Edit
That's the point. There are many options and some will seem weaker than others

"Are you trying to say you can find debatable things in the story like in every single story be it in video games or movies?"

If its debatable then you would've debated instead of just characterizing the authors work as 'channelling hate'.

"How does that give any arguement regarding my comment?"

You claim the author was just channelling hate. I showed some of the many valid criticisms of his work. Also if you disagree that it's a bad race metaphor tell me what are the visual features in distinguishing an android from a human? Because the one feature the game emphasises (the chip on the side of thr head) can be removed making them visually identical, and in effect rendering the race metaphor that Cage pushed invalid. So I guess I atleast understand making a race metaphor better than you.

"Who is saying David Cage or ANY OTHER WRITER is the best writer ever ? "

Fuck if I know. Who is saying that? It's almost as though no one has said that in this thread so why even suggest I or anyone else thinks he is or asserts people think that? Address what I've said and not what you want me to say.

"So if you want argue my comment, please do with no goal post moving"

You accused the author of just hating David Cage. I presented scenes from his most recent game that demonstrate he does not know how to write emotions in games. People don't become prejudiced from a 5 second clip of a news broadcast or stop shooting protesters because a couple started kissing. I gave substance whereas you are just characterizing people and refusing to discuss his game.

"By the way, the best option at that point was singing. Truly a beautifull moment and I dont care how bad you think the writing is for that moment"

Which is again just out of place. Not quite as silly until my friend sitting next to me starting giving background music to his singing with a Kazoo. The scene is so badly crafted it's painful.

If you don't care then don't engage in a comment section to an article that's entire reason for existence is criticism.

You dont seem to understand what I'm saying.
I'm telling how beautiful the scene is and I dont care about what you think of the writing.
Please dont go on forever Haha
(And yea the,article is supposed to be about emotion)
My first comment.
1 clearly the article exploit the prejudice, criticism, even hate some people have about DC in particular. Here with a headline
'DC doesnt understand human emotion ' seriously? You find it good journalism or pushing clickbait?

2 they qualify the game as a poorly written civil right metaphor.
That's so simplistic dont you agree?
There are concentration/extermination camp metaphor in the game. They could just as well say the game is a poorly written anti nazi genocide metaphor.

"I'm telling how beautiful the scene is and I dont care about what you think of the writing."

Then don't complain when someone offers an alternate view if you can't offer any substance to back your own up. You're saying you like it and it's beautiful and when someone says 'I disagree because of X, Y and Z' you're basically responding with 'Yeah, but I liked it'. Good for you, but that's not how criticism works, and it makes your opinion somewhat worthless when discussing the quality of the game. You can like something, and still acknowledge that it was poorly constructed.

"1 clearly the article exploit the prejudice, criticism, even hate some people have about DC in particular."

Quote the article and show how it's exploiting the 'prejudice, criticism, even hate some people have about DC' please. You need to do more than just assert that the article is doing something. Elaborate on what specifically you take issue with in the article and why (quote it too to help).

"2 they qualify the game as a poorly written civil right metaphor.
That's so simplistic dont you agree?"

I've already explained how the race metaphor fails. Androids can remove the chip in the side of their head and the trade-off for doing so is minute compared to being shutdown/killed. If you can't tell who an android is in public then there is no way of targeting them in the way we see early on in the game. Also another aspect of the game that's terrible is how if you want everyone to live you have to be a pacifist which I'm in favor of on principle but is not in any way realistic.

His attempt at creating a metaphor doesn't line up with what actually happens in those situations, and your Nazi comparison doesn't work. Cage himself said this was a metaphor for civil rights movements, so you can't just claim it's something else when we're criticizing him on what he said his game actually is and how it fails at that. You have yet to provide any substance to refute my claim and support your own.