680°

15 Worst Games of 2019 You Need To Avoid

In half a year of some memorable highlights, there have also been some notable dips.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
2384d ago Replies(16)
Battlestar232384d ago

Left Alive wasn't that bad i enjoyed it enough to platinum it.

Nitrowolf22384d ago (Edited 2384d ago )

I got the Plat also (least I think I did) but it’s “bad” game

I wanted it to be good, and maybe that’s why I kept playing it but the stealth being it’s main selling point for gameplay never worked to well. I’d say if they had included some of the improved perk from the get go it probably would have fair better in reviews

It’s a shame cause it will probably never be given the chance to improve on all that, especially the wander combat

Rangerman12082384d ago

It's not just the stealth. The shooting felt off, the Ai was all over the place, the janky animations can result some infuriating moments, etc. It really sucks because I was probably one of the few people who found the story and cast of characters.

Honestly, what annoys me the most about the game is its user score on metacritic. The fact that it's higher than most games released on the PS4 and PC is baffling, but at the same strange, especially when I found out that the amount of positive scores on the PS4 version is 95% the same as the PC version's. If these people actually used bots, then the game deserves all the critisim it gets.

The one big praise I can give to Left Alive is that it's nowhere near as bad as games like Gene Rain and Alekhine's gun.

Jammer2102384d ago

Agreed. The game did recieve a patch so to give the devs some credit, they kinda tried their best. I mostly put the blame on Square.

PrensGaia2384d ago (Edited 2384d ago )

"It’s a shame cause it will probably never be given the chance to improve on all that, especially the wander combat."

And it's all Square's fault. From what I have read, they didn't have much faith with the poject from the getgo, considering that they only hired a small developer that only worked on a mobile game to develop the title, and the little marketing there was was an early sign. Just shows that Square only made the game just so they get some extra cash from the fans.

The only way Square can redeem themselves is if they either let the devs improve the game or port some of the older Front Mission games to current platforms. They did the latter with Star Ocean after the failure of the 5th installment, so I won't be surprised if Square are actually planning to do the same with the FM series.

Joshua132384d ago (Edited 2384d ago )

I mean it's not terrible (there were definitely far worse games released this year), but it was definitely disappointing, especially when this is coming from someone who enjoyed the Front Mission games (including FM:Evolved, which was the weakest of the series). And it wasn't just me and other people that were disappointed, but so were Square.

I don't mind people liking this game (each to their own of course), but I have to disagree to those who thinks this game is worthy to be called a "cult classic" in the future.

Rangerman12082384d ago (Edited 2384d ago )

True. I agree on the same spectrumas you despite my previous post sounding a bit negative. And to Jammer, I forgot that the game got a patch that dumbed down the difficulty and added a mode for a more casual audience. Don't know if they're still supporting the game but if this was really the last patch, then I'm kinda disappointed. As Nitrowolf said, Left Alive could be something special if they have enough time to refine the game but ever since Square's tweet on Left Alive's underwhelming sales, only time will tell.

And as I said earlier, I have definitely far worse games. Gene Rain comes to mind since it's a scifi third person shooter where you play as three characters though Left Alive is a superior game compared to Gene Rain.

PrensGaia2384d ago (Edited 2384d ago )

@Rangerman1208 You see now that's a better reply than your previous one...sort of.

PrensGaia2384d ago (Edited 2384d ago )

The game's mediocre but definitely not terrible.

Still wished it was better though but I doubt Square are gonna bother.

V10Elit3x2384d ago

Crackdown 3 was downright a disaster of a game. With all that cloud hype, best graphics it was foretold, shaping up nicely according to Phil Spencer! For me it was a disaster!

2384d ago Replies(9)
AngelicIceDiamond2384d ago

CD3 needs a dedicated team to work on the game. Not 2nd party, part time workers and ppl leaving the project for other things. MS needs a dedicated studio for CD3 similar to Halo and Gears. That way MS can oversee and have some control over its development, at least where control is needed. CD3 was simply all over the place and for once MS was too lenient op the devs and the handling of the game.

pietro12122384d ago

You don't understand how a second party developer would actually function

Chevalier2383d ago

It has nothing to do with the studio being 2nd party, it has to do with MS not managing their own game development.

nibblo2384d ago

I enjoyed the hell out of the campaign, some of the best gaming fun I've had in a long time, never touched the multiplayer though. Don't understand the hate though I guess a lot has to do with the stupid "console wars" bs.

sushimama2384d ago

Nah. Days Gone is really good. I played through it twice, one time on Survival mode

2383d ago
travestyj2384d ago

Crackdown 3 was garbage. They should have bailed on that game ages ago. Microsoft still can't make a good game to save their life.

Kiwi662384d ago

But had they bailed on it people on here would talk even more crap about how ms gave up on a game that was hyped up by some

Chevalier2383d ago

Hyped up by some? MS hyped up the game themselves. All this talk about the cloud and the destruction and now the games crap and 'other' people were hyping up the game?

Kiwi662383d ago

Good to see that some people don't get the full context of my comment as "by some" does include MS, guess it has to be spelled out for the less intelligent people

Show all comments (122)
40°

Could Anthem live on? Tech allowing local server hosting existed, former executive producer says

BioWare's multiplayer shooter Anthem was terminated this week because EA no longer wanted to maintain servers for people to play the game on, and without them, no one can play the game. But the former executive producer of Anthem has revealed that BioWare had technology working, close to the game's release, that would enable us to host our own servers to play the game on.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
elJoker51d 14h ago

EA/Bioware should allow us to host our own servers to let this game live on.

Christopher1d 10h ago

I'd be fine just playing it as a localhost and dumb as rocks AI bots. Just give me the choice.

40°

Anthem Players Report Download Errors A Week Before Shutdown

BioWare and EA had previously said the game would be accessible to those who owned it until it shuts down on January 12.

anast10d ago

Never buy online games unless there is some kind of refund policy.

50°

Only days remain before EA will switch off the servers to BioWare's ill-fated multiplayer game

Time flies (like a Javelin suit): there are only 10 days left to play BioWare's ill-fated multiplayer game Anthem before the servers are switched off, presumably forever.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
DivineHand12514d ago

In my opinion, Anthem was a good IP that was worthy of a no man's sky or cyberpunk 2077 treatment.

To this day, their sub reddit is active and I was able to get into a game quickly a few weeks ago when I booted it up.

It is a shame EA and Bioware didn't want to give the game the overhaul it needed to turn it into a competent looter shooter.

GamerRN13d ago

They were close to releasing the overhauled version and then EA cancelled it

TheGamersDojo11d ago

I wholeheartedly agree. If ANY game deserved to get the rework/relaunch it deserved it was this one. More than literally any other. Even over FFXIV, No Mans Sky etc.

SlothLordPootus14d ago

I just finished this up a couple days ago. Although it's a bit repetitive and the story is meh, the game feels great to play. Even if you can only hop on the game for a couple hours before it shuts down, I think it's worth it.

chicken_in_the_corn13d ago

Really enjoyed this. Shame to see it go.

Software_Lover13d ago

I didnt know servers were still up. I could have been playing!!!

victorMaje13d ago

2nd comment attempt (1st doesn’t appear & this may register as duplicate):

They can spend billions to buy or get bought but they can’t spend a fraction of that to fix or overhaul a game that could have been truly special, smh.

Show all comments (8)