All Channels
Popular
540°

Come on Nintendo, sharing goes both ways

Xbox and Nintendo seem to be working closely at the moment with Phil Spencer welcoming collaboration between companies but why is this sharing so one-sided?

Read Full Story >>
xboxenthusiast.com
strayanalog2543d ago

I understand where you're coming from, but I think one important thing is missed: Microsoft wasn't using Banjo for anything. And while that may not have been a deciding factor, it definitely had to help.

hulk_bash19872542d ago

Microsoft is more interested in getting their games on as many platforms as possible. This is why I feel we wont be seeing that many, if any, Nintendo games on Xbox.

Sharky2312542d ago

I think we’re in a time where Microsoft is gonna push the cloud. I don’t think they are as concerned with getting consoles in houses. If you can play there games every where why do they care if they sell a Ton of consoles? Nintendo understands like Sony... if you have to sell a console it needs exclusives!

RosweeSon2542d ago

Won’t see any, my friend mentioned this the other day oh Nintendo/Mario will
Be on Xbox... since when. Nintendo do their own console and their own services to fill up with their games why would they help Microsoft. Microsoft need them not the other way round.

Obscure_Observer2542d ago

@Sharky231

"Nintendo understands like Sony... if you have to sell a console it needs exclusives!"

You talk like Sony still sees consoles as their prime business. Flash news: They DON´T.

Nintendo? Yes! Nintendo is the sole company that is 100% devoted to console business as their prime.

Both Sony and Microsoft will try and push their streaming services from now on. I don´t care about cloud gaming. I´ll continue to support console as long it exist. Only god knows if streaming is gonna take over the gaming market.

battlegrog2541d ago

but apparently Nintendo if not ready will follow Sony with partnering to use MS server structure for a streaming service. So in a sense it wont matter. We will get to play all the nintendo sony and MS platform on PC at some point over the next few years.

Kingthrash3602541d ago

MS is a 3rd party dev....Nintendo is not.

Easy.

ThinkThink2541d ago

5 years ago who would of thought that Nintendo would ever partner with ubisoft to make a Mario/Rabbids game. Nintendo has really opened themselves up for collaboration. I wouldn't be surprised to see them eventually doing skmething similar with Sony if it all pans out.

CyberSentinel2541d ago

@KingThrash360

"MS is a 3rd party dev....Nintendo is not."

I never looked at it like that,...but your right!

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2541d ago
blackblades2542d ago

Pretty sure Mario and other ip is never going to another console. Maybe bayonetta or any other 3rd party exclusive could be shared.

shiva12542d ago

Just put Mario on all available devices and see. It would get all that money for that game, which their all gen combined consoles couldnt get. No need of any advertising as well.

Obscure_Observer2542d ago

@blackblades

"Pretty sure Mario and other ip is never going to another console."

We heard the same thing about Nintendo games on mobile.

RobLoPR2541d ago

I got Mario on iOS so.... yeah its all about money... the right amount and boom!! Mario on the X

blackblades2541d ago

Consoles and mobile are different things, Nintendo arent going to put there ip on another console.

FBNS2541d ago

Android consoles: am I joke to you

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2541d ago
Jin_Sakai2541d ago

I knew it wouldn’t be long before Xbox sites started begging for Nintendo content.

Xbox are the ones wanting their games and content on as many platforms as possible. Don’t expect anyone else to follow.

ThinkThink2541d ago (Edited 2541d ago )

This is a win/win for both companies! Nintendo is introducing a whole new generation to the Banjo Character. Now, when MS drops the next Banjo game, switch players who favored Banjo in Smash, might be interested in giving it a shot.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2541d ago
2543d ago
-Foxtrot2543d ago

Two reasons

Nintendo are too proud to give anything to a rivals console.

Microsoft need Nintendo a lot more then they need them.

Lennoxb632543d ago

Microsoft need Nintendo? You won. LMAO

-Foxtrot2542d ago

If they want to put their plan into action and broaden the Xbox brand onto everything they can...yeah...I think they do.

Trueflames2542d ago

With all due respect MS can buy nintendo 7 times or more and they need them?

The Wood2542d ago

With all due respect MS can buy nintendo 7 times or more and they need them

Don't think who has more to spend. Think who's obviously not doing as well as the other. There's many reasons why Microsoft haven't been able to purchase everyone who's in a better position than them. You can't say Nintendo or Sony's consoles aren't profitable and performing well so what gives. . . .I'd love to hear your theory

DogJosha2542d ago (Edited 2542d ago )

@Trueflames It would take a little over 8.6 billion dollars to buy controlling stocks at Nintendo. Microsoft has less than 12 billion to spend. They can't even buy Nintendo twice, nor can they afford to buy all of their stocks a single time over.

2541d ago
kayoss2541d ago

@Trueflames
"With all due respect MS can buy nintendo 7 times or more and they need them?"
You dont really think things through huh? Xbox is a different division of Microsoft. If Xbox is not making money, what you think will happen to the gaming division (xbox)? Microsoft will shut it down. Lets just entertain you idea for a fraction of a moment. If Microsoft wanted to buy Nintendo, who to say Nintendo will sell? Just because you want to buy something, doesnt mean the other person is willing to sell it.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2541d ago
Zeref2542d ago (Edited 2542d ago )

lol no they don't if streaming takes off. They'll reach a lot more people than the Switch ever will.

Xbox really doesn't "need" anyone for the future. In fact it's Sony and Nintendo that need Microsoft. Why do you think PlayStation chose Azure over Amazon or Google? It's not only because xCloud is better it's also because depending on Google and Amazon would have made it easier for them to acquire playstation. They would have been vulnerable.

Nintendos online system sucks so bad that they should just replace it with Xbox Live at this point. OG Xbox live was better than Nintendo Online. Who really needs who?

XabiDaChosenOne2542d ago

lol no they don't if streaming takes off
no they don't if streaming takes
they don't if streaming takes
don't if
IF

rainslacker2542d ago (Edited 2542d ago )

Azure: A cloud based server structure used to run programs in one of three service models, used to deliver a clients specified products or services to private or public customers.

xCloud: A service that runs on a cloud based hosting service, such as Azure, to stream content, specifically video game related content.

The two things are not the same, and you using the two interchangeably makes it look like you are ignorant, more than the rest of your comment already proves you are.

Sony doesn't need MS, they could use Amazon, or Google, or other cloud services, or even expand their current service. Azure just makes more sense for them to use....of course, assuming they actually end up using it.

xCloud has nothing to do with PSNow being hosted on any cloud service, and absolutely nothing suggests or implies that Sony will be using any technologies that xCloud uses to deliver it's service. Not a single thing. not one.

But, there is evidence, and comments, that say that MS does indeed use some of Sony's streaming tech, as they licensed it for that purpose. Does that mean MS needs Sony? No. Just that it's beneficial for them to go that route than spend more making their own solution.

How is that related to Nintendo?

Well, nintendo doesn't need MS, and MS doesn't need Nintendo. But they may have products or services which are useful for the other, and despite how some MS fan boys acted about it being a big thing, each and every one of those things they worked on or shared was it's own thing, and it didn't indicate anything about the two working together on more. It's just yet another instance of people who make more out of something than there actually is.

GTgamer2542d ago

Streaming ain't taking off anytime soon buddy

Livingthedream2542d ago

Even if it doesn't take off they don't need it. Nintendo releases one good console then one bad console. A partnership would be beneficial for both, but MS doesn't need them.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2542d ago
rainslacker2542d ago

Third reason

People just assumed that Nintendo was going to reciprocate MS support of Switch, even though Nintendo isn't known for such things, and there is no reason for them to other than to try and get more sales of the software, but Nintendo actually makes money on hardware sales, and the licensing of games on it's system, and they're doing fine.

Livingthedream2542d ago

Lol have you seen how much MS is worth? Sorry this is shenanigans.

krauley2542d ago

proud? how about smart business sense! giving away your bread and butter wouldnt be smart. exclusives sell consoles.

Gotcha52542d ago

Foxtrot
Someone been smoking those "Mushrooms".

Obscure_Observer2542d ago

@-Foxtrot

"Microsoft need Nintendo a lot more then they need them."

You´re desperate, dude. Why exacly Microsoft need Nintendo for? Never mind. I sure you don´t have a answer. Lol

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 2541d ago
TheColbertinator2543d ago

Nintendo needs nothing from Microsoft and vice versa.

Godmars2902542d ago

But MS would love to apply/use Nintndo's history and reputation to the Xbox brand in order to make it more popular to the non arena shooter crowd.

Show all comments (73)
60°

Final Fantasy X 25th Anniversary Website Launches With New Nomura Artwork and Merchandise

Square Enix launches Final Fantasy X 25th anniversary site, revealing new Nomura art, books, music releases, and merchandise.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
-Foxtrot33d ago

Look I know VIII has its issues and all that but how on earth can the do big anniversary events with new artwork and merchandise for VII, IX and X yet VIII got sweet f*** all.

They could have given it something during its 25th anniversary yet all it got was a single Happy Anniversary post on their social media.

solideagle33d ago

they should know that we are OG fans of VIII as it sold truckload as well. not as much as VII or X. I personally didn't like IX but X and VI are my personal fav.

Shadow Hearts 2 covenant is another game I love. I hope one day someone can make remake, I would be delighted

Relientk7732d ago

Final Fantasy VIII is great and you are always the first to defend it in the comments

40°

Star Wars: Bounty Hunter Let Jango Fett Loose

LucasArts gave Jango Fett his own game in 2002, and it pulled Star Wars into a much dirtier, rougher, and more interesting corner of the galaxy.

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
Relientk7737d ago

I remember playing this back in the day on PS2. What a sick game!

270°

We Are Xbox

Dear team,

Xbox has always been different.

We started with a simple idea. Games should bring people together through shared experiences. That led to the first Xbox in 2001, Xbox Live in 2002, and new ways to connect, from friends lists and achievements to parties and play across devices. Today, Xbox reaches over 500 million players around the world, with some of the most important franchises in entertainment.

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
38d ago Replies(15)
Outside_ofthe_Box38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

If they go back to exclusive games it at least shows that they are finally getting it. They would be turning down immediate money for something that will potentially workout in the long term.

Only issue is they've already opened Pandora's box. A lot of their base has moved to PC or jumped to PS. So will be a long road to get back on track.

We have been saying this from day one exclusives are a must if you are going to be selling hardware look at Nintendo and Sony before Jim Ryan. That's the proven formula. You had some that were deluded and blinded by loyalty accepting that multiplat was the future and that MS was merely getting ahead of where the industry was headed, but at least they can finally see the light and agree with what everyone has been saying for a decade+

pwnmaster300038d ago

True, blame it on the rabid fanboys. MS can do no wrong and spinner this multiplatform move. While the actual fans moved on.

I feel like with the new Xbox coming they are hoping to bring back those old fans and then if it goes well. Bring back exclusives.

If the new console is performing like series x and one. Naw they staying multiplatform.

darthv7238d ago

Actual fans dont move on... they can add to their hobby while waiting for the next new release. If you believe what you typed then I guess PS fans moved on too.... you know, since its been a Sahara for 1st party games this gen.

S2Killinit37d ago

The fans didn’t tell them to go multilat. MS was forced to after the 82 billion they spent to destroy gaming. Then, while xbox fans cheered, MS realized they can’t justify the price tag by selling through xbox only, so they went multiplat and in the process began to downplay console gaming.

38d ago Replies(4)
CrashMania38d ago

I think it's too late, xbox sales were diving even before ABK, they got even worse since then even long before the full multiplatform push. I'd be surprised if they even went back to timed exclusivity at this point, Helix is basically a PC and is going to be expensive, they already struggle to sell cheaper xbox consoles, it will be low volume and they'll have a very small 'console' base to sell to, which has already been conditioned to just play via gamepass anyway.

S2Killinit37d ago

They will do what they always do, they will promise the world at the beginning of next GEN and then failed to deliver all generation long. But there will always be some gamers who will buy into their promises.

ocelot0737d ago

Absolutely agree, Do people genuinely believe Microsoft are now going to go. Hang on how's about we go back to 2020. Then GP was stagnating, Games sold where awful because of GP. Outsold by Playstation by a landslide.

They have sold 5m of Forza I believe on PS5. Spite it being a old game. I think Starfield is going to sell well in the end. Halo is deffinetly going to sell well as is Fable and Forza Horizon 6.

I think at best (for Xbox fans). Single player titles like Clockwork will have a timed exclusivity. Multiplayer centric games like Forza, E Day will release day and date on all platforms.

Or all games will release on all platforms day and date. But maybe Xbox and Windows Store copies will have exclusive bonuses. Or may even get timed exclusive dlc like Fallout and Elder Scrolls and COD use to do.

I think they will treat Xbox players like the premium customers or at least act the way. But will serve just the Playstation and Switch 2 customers as well.

Neonridr38d ago

I don't see them removing PC from the equation. Considering MS has a heavy enough investment in the PC market, it would be foolish to abandon them. I could see them taking away games from PlayStation or ensuring they are timed exclusives at the very least. Say what you will but if Call of Duty ends up becoming a timed exclusive to Xbox machines, that would hurt PlayStation, don't pretend like those games don't sell millions.

Outside_ofthe_Box38d ago

They would lose out on a lot of CoD sales tho. Doesn't PS make up most of the sales?

Neonridr37d ago

@Outside - possibly, but it might push people to want Xbox hardware so they can play with their buddies day one.

Who knows.

S2Killinit37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

it would but remember doing that can splinter the COD fan base and in the process damage the call of duty brand which is probably the only franchise in that $82 billion purchase that in anyway gets even close to delivering what Microsoft thought they bought. If Microsoft fudges around too much with the COD franchise, you might even see a competitor franchise show up on the scene and that would be a catastrophe after the huge debt that Microsoft put itself into with the ABK purchase.

But Its almost guaranteed that Microsoft will want to do something drastic at the beginning of the next generation as they always do. We will see.

Pyrofire9538d ago

Their lifeline of solely the Xbox consoles is dry. Good-Great games on a 1st party scale can't be made at a loss so willingly - sent to the Xbox to only sell limited copies.
They invested billions scooping up studios and need to start making returns.
Sucks that nearly every company is publicly traded and have to be so shareholder biased but that's how it is.
Their words are strong but it'll take time to see what their actions accomplish. Lowering the cost of Game Pass and taking CoD off of it was a good clear start.

darthv7238d ago

More like, allot of their base just played game pass. So now they need to encourage them to start buying again.

S2Killinit37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

A lot of their base left for greener (bluer?) pastures.

--Onilink--38d ago

What exactly is the long term goal with exclusives though?

Because for the most part, the hardware side of things has never been the most profitable, even sometimes being subsidized for a period before breaking even. And that’s before the hardware component nightmare we currently live in.

The whole point of exclusives was to get more people to buy your console in order to have a bigger install base, which meant even bigger software sales.

But if their ports to PS5 are selling (for the most part it seems) quite well, then other than negating the cut Sony takes there, unless you are REALLY increasing your software sales on your own console, it probably doesn’t make that much of a difference?

Honestly I don’t even understand Sony’s decision to scale back on it for PC unless they weren’t even recouping the port expenses. They released ports when the hardware sales never really dropped, and now that all consoles will undoubtedly take a noticeable drop in sales due to the ridiculous prices, that’s when they decide they don’t want to sell to a larger install base to more easily recoup dev costs… it’s just weird

Outside_ofthe_Box37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

I agree. I mean once they went multiplat, in theory there should be no going back especially when you have games that have sold really well on other platforms.

Microsoft are the ones that announced that they are reevaluating. So I'm just guessing on what their end goal is. Right now Xbox as a hardware is not a must buy for anyone but fans of the brand because their games can be played elsewhere. Going exclusive would solve this, but you lose out on a ton of money instantly which has always been what the company does not want to do so not really sure what their "reevaluating exclusives" means unless they are pulling a Phil Spencer and are just saying what people want to hear and will continue to do what they are currently doing.

darthv7237d ago

Their ports to PS5 are selling because Sony's output has been so dry... the fans are thirsty, and MS is the oasis.

SIdepocket38d ago

Unfortunately, the studios they buy wither under their leadership.

mcstorm37d ago

Microsoft still has a name with Xbox the issue is the casual games are not looking at the console because its not the same console their friends have. Look at that poll on how many users upgraded from xbox 365 to one and then the X. Part of Microsoft's downfall was thinking that the Wii was the market they had to be in when really it was the core market. If you get the core gamers you then get the market to. As I posted a few minuets ago on another post Microsoft putting exclusives on PS this gen could bold well if they hit next gen with all our games are staying exclusive from this new gen. They will then get gamers wanting Halo, Forza Gears but this is also where Microsoft fell over with the xbox one and X in terms of they did not have may quality 1st party games affter they fell into the Gears, Forza and Halo cycle. If they can get some old IPs back to bring back the old core gamers as well as fresh ips to bring in new gamers things could improve next gen. But as I said in my last post its all if buts and maybes at the moment. No one knows if the next home consoles will be to expensive that people move to pc as we are now seeing or look at the stem deck as a cheepier alternitive.

DarXyde37d ago

"Only issue is they've already opened Pandora's box."

That's very optimistic. It's not the only issue, far from it. There is a serious rupture between Microsoft generally and the public caused by their weird Game Pass price fluctuations, taking down physical game space in stores, and being the first to go nuts on hardware price hikes that they themselves played a big part in.

They're also charging beyond a premium for Helix which is just vile at a time when the economy is in shambles.

The company itself is really not doing itself any favors with the approach they're taking Windows. Even France is looking to ditch Windows in favor of Linux.

But the most offensive thing is this AI push. They're doubling, tripling, and quadrupling down on the very technology they're using to replace a considerable proportion of their workforce... And the slap in the face is how they bake copilot into everything when nobody likes it—they couldn't even make Bing stick, so why on earth are they trying so hard? You know it's bad when people would rather use ChatGPT than Copilot which is killing their OS. But aside from their snatching up of farmland to build data centers (and reduce the agriculture capacity of whichever country allows them to build them), they made an AI-generated gamer gurl that loves AI the head of Xbox.

Even if we grant them the full benefit of the doubt, it hardly matters what Xbox wants to do if Nadella says no, and that includes exclusive games. Microsoft's relationship with Xbox is the opposite of Sony's relationship with PlayStation—Microsoft pulls the reins of Xbox, but Sony damn near went under for the PS3.

Tanktopmaster9237d ago (Edited 37d ago )

“If they go back to exclusive games it at least shows that they are finally getting it.”

Great strategy, especially after Forza selling 5 million on PlayStation and sea of thieves selling at least another million (2 million) for example. In March 2026, Xbox consoles sales ratio vs PS was 10:1.

In addition to that, with Gamepass, which unequivocally cuts out chunks of sales (Cannibalizing revenue from 1st month sales especially).

I’m sure going exclusive again after releasing everything on Ps5 is going to work out great for business.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 37d ago
maximusprime_38d ago

Despite all of that, it's clear that Microsoft's Xbox division is broken beyond repair.

38d ago
BeHunted38d ago

PlayStation is currently draining money on flop after flop. It's Sony that needs to re-evaluate their strategy

38d ago
CrashMania38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Wonder how much money was lost on perfect dark, hellbalde 2, 300 million lost revenue
by putting cod on gamepass. The recent Jason schrier news that Xbox has cancelled dozens of projects, spent 70 billion just to see Xbox sales further collapse and gamepass see little growth.

The fact is this has been PlayStation's most profitable generation and they are making loads of money and selling plenty of consoles and games. While MS won't give you any sales figures or profit numbers for Xbox, says it all really.

S2Killinit37d ago

Sony PlayStation has deservedly dominated xbox. Facts

Tanktopmaster9237d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Ok tween.

Xbox series SX got outsold 10:1 last month. lol.

37d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 37d ago
shadowT38d ago

"Our presence on PC isn’t strong enough."

Fishy Fingers38d ago

It isnt. But I dont think they mean in 'games', rather, footprint.

They own the OS but as far as gaming is concerned, Steam dominate. I imagine the VAST majority of people who use the Xbox app/launcher are PC gamepass subs. No ones buying their 3rd party PC games through Xbox PC.

badz14938d ago

and many gamers prefer SteamOS for gaming over Windows too. If only Valve would be more uncompromising to the anti-cheat makers that locked out non-windows players, more pc gamers would have moved onto SteamOS by now and not looking back to Windows. overall, Win11 is a terrible, bloated, unoptimized OS which is not what many people want

ocelot0737d ago

Agreed and I think that's where they are going to focus on more. I think cheaper games on Windows/Xbox store (MS IP) compared to Steam and Epic and maybe even compared to PSN store as well.

Show all comments (107)