Most of them are human too

Because an "angry" commentator is prone to be more exciting or funnier than a "normal" one (whatever normal is in that department).

angry commentators? they just report the news and try to defend customer against predatory tactics and predatory things in gaming and expose them. this is reality.
from when speaking about bad things which others do are negatives or angry? those humans or firms do that on them self and that is on them, not on youtubers.

Why do journalists always ask stupid questions in the title for a topic that's got an obvious answer?

This is clearly trying to build off from the hit piece CNET recently did so I'd recommend people don't click because the original article was deliberately starting drama in the name of criticizing drama which is hypocrisy at its finest.

The Internet makes us all into trolls, sooner or later, by systematically discouraging any kind of nuance of balance in our assessments of things. Everything must be absolutely righteous or absolutely evil. The possibility that reasonable people of good will can disagree with one another no longer applies: disagreement is taken as a sign that the other person - always the other person, never ourselves - is unreasonable, malicious, or just stupid.

Then, we are drawn to the people who feed our own sense of righteous wrath against those who disagree with us.

I hope it’s better than that Prime series… woof.

Looks like everyone is a miscast :)

I would like this.