All Channels
Popular
260°

Now More Than Ever, Backward Compatibility Matters

Backward compatibility has emerged as an important factor in deciding the upcoming console war.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
FallenAngel19842590d ago

Backwards compatibility has always been important to me

lalalala2590d ago

It's nice to have the option but not a necessity. I think if it came down to a more expensive console with BC vs a cheaper console without, I'd go for the one without and hold on to my older console for slightly longer.

JonTheGod2589d ago

Why would you actively choose to have 2 different consoles when you could have one that does the job of both?

lalalala2589d ago

Why would you pay for something you already have the ability to do? I used BC on my PS3 for SOTC and GOW2, but that was because I got rid of my PS2, I would have much rather kept the PS2 and paid less for the PS3. After I got my PS4, I kept my PS3 but not really had any need to play it.

kreate2589d ago

While BC seems important, sales data do not reflect that data. Microsoft also said bare minimum plays 360 games on the xbox one.
And nobody bought a PS3 to play ps2 games.

This is the problem. BC doesn't sell consoles.

nitus102589d ago (Edited 2589d ago )

Backwards compatibility is very important at the start of a new console, however, after a year or two BC becomes less important, although this feature is still a great value add even though some people may not use it.

Of course, there are many people who still like to replay an older game especially when that game (this is subjective) has high replay value to that player. What is even more attractive is the possibility of the new console being able to smooth and upscale an older game.

PhoenixUp2590d ago

“When you think about this, this makes total sense—people rarely buy Nintendo consoles as primary platforms.”

I wouldn’t say it rarely happens, but in my experience it’s still hard for me to see Nintendo consoles as a primary format

porkChop2590d ago

I agree. I love my Switch, and I've really, really enjoyed playing it. But the multiplatform library is obviously smaller, so it makes more sense as a second system. PlayStation will likely always be my main console.

DaDrunkenJester2590d ago

Especially when they struggle to get most 3rd party games ported. What happens when Xbox 2 and PS5 come out and the hardware and graphics leap even more? Nintendo again will be left in 3rd party dust 3 gens in a row.

rainslacker2589d ago

Just depends on what you want from the console. I brought the switch as a primary portable console, and it's nice I can play games in the big screen with it. Bc would be cool, but given the media if the two prior systems it doesn't make sense. An extra cart port for 3ds games would be nice as I still have a lot in my backlog. But it's not that important.

StrengthInNumbers2590d ago

Backwards compatibility has always been important. The sheep can say what they want but they know it's truth.

Ricegum2590d ago

I disagree. And I'm not a sheep. I have my older consoles to play my older games and my new consoles to play new releases.

While it's a nice option, it's nothing major.

starchild2590d ago

Do you carry around a separate flashlight, GPS unit and calculator too?

I find that argument stupid. I mean, it's fine if that works for your particular situation, but it's very easy to see why most people prefer convergence, efficiency, space-saving and the enhanced visuals and framerates that backwards compatibility can offer.

I love the fact that the PC offers backwards compatibility with decades worth of games. It's definitely a significant positive factor in its favor for me. I would never use any platform without backwards compatibility as my main platform.

JonTheGod2589d ago

@starchild PREACH!! 🙌🏼

JackBNimble2589d ago

I would like to point out that BC has always been important to Sony. Every console except the ps4 has been BC right out of the box , and the only reason ps4 wasn't BC was because of ps3 cell architecture.

MasterCornholio2590d ago (Edited 2590d ago )

How important is the question. And I would like to add that when BC is added is also very important given the results that we have from sales.

starchild2589d ago

How important? It's subjective. It varies from person to person. There's no way to quantify how important it is on average without controlling for all variables and only altering the inclusion or exclusion of backwards compatibility. That would require two consoles that are identical in games, features and price but which only differ in terms of backwards compatibility.

All I know is that it is important to me and many other people who've expressed the same. It has traditionally been celebrated in past consoles and PC gamers frequently list it among the PC's best features. Sony also seems to be positioning it as a standout feature of the upcoming PS5, as they also did in the days of the PS2 and early part of the PS3's lifespan. The games media also seem to see it as an exciting feature and have given it plenty of coverage.

rainslacker2589d ago

Its important to some people. But I think most of the people that it's important to would be hardcore gamers, who aren't likely to forgo a generation or system because they couldn't play their old games. Switching consoles is pointless if you dont have older games for the system your switching too.

BC, or the lack of it, is more a gripe based on an ideal that's existed for all of console history. It started with, "wouldn't it be cool if", then was cool on the systems that did it, then it didn't matter that much, then it did again when the console wars grabbed hold.

I think most are appreciative or wouldn't mind the feature, but if it ended up adding to the cost of the system, the vast majority would probably prefer to save money.

MasterCornholio2589d ago

@Star

The way I see it it's important for Sony to have BC because it will make loosing your library of games much harder to deal with by switching to another brand. Most likely PS4 owners with a substantial library of games will probably stick with Sony's ecosystem because the PS5 will be backwards compatible with all PS4 games.

As for me I own all console and have the biggest library of games on my PS4. I'll probably buy a PS5 because that means I'll be able to enjoy my current library of games and enjoy the next gen ones as well. I can't just stick in my PS4 games into an Anadaconda so s PS5 will probably be th best option for me.

Dragonscale2589d ago

Just because some people don't agree with you doesn't make them sheep fgs.

StrengthInNumbers2589d ago

Agreed. Simply disagreeing isn't what makes a sheep a sheep. It is the reasoning behind disagreeing that makes a sheep a sheep. Read @Ricegum comment above.

Silly gameAr2590d ago (Edited 2590d ago )

Article 200,53,000 of the media telling people what matters and what they want. BC has been around FOR YEARS. If people wanted it, they would have been ok paying for the PS3 which had TRUE BC of PS1 and PS2 games, plus all the the added extras, but it was just an afterthought to the consumer then. Something to be taken for granted. Now, that emulation, (not true BC) was beat into everyone's head this gen as BC=important, now it's important.

Just like cross play was trash last gen, but this gen it's a game changer. The gaming industry is petty as f***, and I'm tired of the flip flopping when it's only convenient.

FallenAngel19842590d ago

Just because Sony took backwards compatibility out of later models doesn’t mean consumers didn’t want the feature. Sony did it as a cost cutting measure to keep the price down.

That also doesn’t mean that every consumer must always agree with what the manufacturer wants. When Nintendo took backwards compatibility out of later DS & Wii models that didn’t mean people didn’t like the feature at all either.

xX-oldboy-Xx2590d ago

FallenAngel1984 - Would a console not having BC be a reason for you not to buy it?

Because I look at this gen and I'd much rather have new, quality gaming experiences rather than reliving old ones because I don't have new ones.

FallenAngel19842590d ago

It was the reason I waited so long in getting a PS4. If the console had BC I would’ve been an early adopter just like I was with PS2, GBA, DS, PS3 & Wii. But because it didn’t I waited until it’s library was bigger and costs went down.

Who doesn’t want new experiences? That still doesn’t mean I don’t want to replay my older games on modern hardware especially since it’d cut down on the clutter in my entertainment system. I even got a cheap Wii U just to replace my old Wii for that reason.

In general it’s ridiculous to say nobody would ever go back and play older titles at any point in time. People go back to older works in movies, television, comics, literature, & music ALL the time in addition to experiencing new works, so why should gaming be any different?

It’s not an either or thing. A gamer can enjoy both. Even if BC isn’t there a gamer’s experience won’t be tarnished, but its addition is still appreciated especially when you consider the importance of gaming preservation.

xX-oldboy-Xx2590d ago

Movies are very, very different to games, sprite based games haven't aged badly but first gen 3D games. Music also has evolved into an abomination, gaming is evolving in a positive - bumpy, GAAS, MT's - but generally a positive way.

More than happy for you and anyone else to hold the position that BC is an important feature. Not for me.

And it's bloody annoying to keep hearing how important it is, it seems my opinion is in the minority - sweet by me.

But why do websites keep pumping the narrative that it's so important?

FallenAngel19842589d ago

Different mediums same principle. People can find value in revisiting or experiencing older works in various mediums.

The preservation of the medium, or any medium, is important. Gaming is a unique medium from other entertainment mediums in that you need a specific device to play certain content. That’s why BC is so important because it allows greater opportunity to experience a title rather than have it lost to the annals of time on a particular device.

What act like preservation is a nonissue?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2589d ago
Silly gameAr2590d ago (Edited 2590d ago )

@Fallenangel

Did I say ANY of that, that you typed in your comment?

No. I didn't say no one wanted it. I said it wasn't deemed important enough to buy a console for. You notice that hardly anyone cried when it was taken from the PS3 to cut cost?

Are you going to seriously sat there, and act like BC was always super important, when it wasn't even a thing until MS made it a thing? Ever since then, it's been Bc this and BC that, just like with Fortnite and cross-play. Sorry, but I stand by what I said. If BC was so important, it would have always been important and wanted since it was introduced with the PS2.

Kiwi662590d ago

People were upset with Sony when they removed it from the PS3

Silly gameAr2590d ago (Edited 2590d ago )

@Kiwi66

Yeah, but was it a huge uproar, like it was a horrible thing? Did it make the PS3 fail for not having it? No, it did not. So, not sure how BC is going to determine who wins a whole console gen all of a sudden.

yomfweeee2590d ago

Kiwi66 people were so upset that sales increased? Don't overexaggerate. Hardly anyone cared. Most gamers don't play old games.

Kiwi662590d ago

I'm not saying it was a huge uproar I'm just saying that there were people who didn't like the fact that Sony removed bc from the PS3 when they introduced the new model, therefore some people did care despite what you claim

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2590d ago
SkatterBrain2590d ago

I Loved my backwards compatible launch PS3 it was Great and that built in memory card reader was great too , my little cousins made the cord unplug while it was in the middle of a game and it broke, curcuit city insurance gave me back my 600 and bought a backward less ps3 for $400 + 3 games an extra controller and something else, missed it though i hated clicking in my disk on my slim ps2 felt like my games were were gonna break

FallenAngel19842590d ago

A lot of people expressed concern when Sony axed backwards compatibility in 2007 starting with the 40GB model. It’s absurd to say if people really cared about BC for PS2 titles they should’ve bought the $500 model without WiFi or the $600 model. Some didn’t have a choice in the matter since they may have waited for costs to come down and by the time they did Sony had started phasing out the old BC models with cheaper models that lacked the feature. How else was Sony supposed to reach that $400 consumer friendly price point in its first year?

BC is important to a lot of people. Obviously not everyone buys a device specifically for its BC, but it’s still a very big part of the appeal when you do end up getting it. It’s really absurd to act like it’s a feature nobody on the planet cares about at all. It’s even more absurd to act like solely Microsoft is the only reason people care about BC especially when the feature is promoted anytime hardware features it. Sony themselves used to be champions of the feature. It was a great feature on GBC, PS2, GBA, DS, PSP, 360, PS3, Wii, 3DS, PSV, & Wii U. It’s been lauded for decades, not something that just popped up overnight in 2015.

Backwards compatibility is especially important to many people outside of the gaming medium. Look at any other electronic medium and you’ll see people appreciate BC in its various uses. Why should it be any different for the gaming industry?

If you’re the type of person who doesn’t care about the feature that’s alright, but to say that the majority of people don’t care is beyond ridiculous. When Apple removed headphone jacks in 2016 onwards that doesn’t mean that most consumers don’t bother using headphones anymore. Another example is when Nintendo took out GameCube functionality out of later Wii models, it didn’t mean people stopped using GameCube controllers as was proven with the accessory for Wii U & NS. What a hardware manufacturer does isn’t always indicative of what its consumers want.

There’s always people who like BC, if it wasn’t at all then Sony wouldn’t be flaunting the feature for PS5 at all.

starchild2590d ago

Your comments are plagued with binary, black-or-white thinking. More precise thinking requires the ability to track the interplay and effects of multiple factors across time. What you pointed out really only shows that backwards compatibility is not the ONLY thing that people care about. It does not, however, indicate that people don't care about backwards compatibility.

If I open up a shop in a new town and sell bananas for $10.00 per pound and nobody buys them it would be incorrect for me to conclude 'nobody in this town likes bananas'. When the reality is probably that they just don't want to pay that much for them.

I hope you can see the error in your logic. Either way, I'm glad Sony didn't listen to people like you.

2589d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2589d ago
SkatterBrain2590d ago

Ive been Playing PSP Games on my note 9 and that 2k screen really shows off the games, im Amazed at how much detail was really packed into those disk, midnight club 3 ,and Tomb Raider legends and Driver 76, Tony Hawk Underground 2, Def Jam fight for new york on it and they look WOW, good backwards compatibilty really can make old games feel new

Show all comments (65)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay74d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn275d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers75d ago (Edited 75d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn274d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown75d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos75d ago (Edited 75d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay74d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay74d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac74d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger75d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300075d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde75d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood75d ago (Edited 75d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde74d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
40°

Microsoft lifts the lid on Project Helix at GDC Festival of Gaming

The Xbox maker will begin sending alpha versions of Project Helix to developers starting in 2027.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
240°

Xbox Confirms 'Project Helix', Its Next-Gen Console That Will Also Play PC Games

New Microsoft Gaming CEO Asha Sharma, who took over as the head of the Xbox business last week as longtime Xbox boss Phil Spencer retired, has confirmed the codename for Xbox's next-generation console – Project Helix – and also confirmed long-swirling rumors that the device will play Xbox and PC games.

128d ago
dveio128d ago

Hm.

Selling to customers the benefits of Xbox Helix compared to a PC and Steam Machine will be the biggest task for Xbox' marketing, I suppose.

128d ago Replies(2)
128d ago Replies(5)
1Victor127d ago

I said when Xbox destroyed their future with with all their arrogance at the start of XBone”if they keep loosing money they only have 2 more generations before they exit the console market like sega.
This is their final chance to validate the existence of a console to the INVESTORS if this console fail as we all know without exclusives from the activision acquisition or their old exclusives for more than a year it’s game over for Xbox consoles.
Everyone know games will wait for a timed exclusive to go to their console of choice, Microsoft signed the Xbox console death certificate the moment they started PORTING ALL THEIR GAMES to other consoles.
Now my hope is that Valve gives Sony a run for their money and we get a good generation where they take risks and bring new experiences to the market.

127d ago
S2Killinit127d ago (Edited 127d ago )

They will make xbox “consoles”, but they actively downplay consoles because their business strategy is walled garden services

This is basically a PC w xbox logo

fr0sty127d ago (Edited 127d ago )

Xbox has put itself in a tough position... With current RAM prices, the system is going to cost a fortune (it's APU alone is $500-600, before you even get to the RAM, SSD, power supply, etc). So, we're looking at a 4 digit price tag, and it has the Gabecube to compete against now directly in that console space. It has no exclusive games at all. PS6 is coming in close in performance but expected to cost hundreds less, and PS6 Pro will likely again take the "most powerful crown" once it drops, but it will actually have exclusive games.

Not an easy sell to the general public, and not even an easy sell to the PC enthusiasts as it isn't powerful enough to justify paying that much for when you could just build a far more powerful PC for not much more $. If I'm dropping north of $1k on a game system, I'm going to want to go all out, not have mid-range performance. It'll be interesting how they plan on marketing this thing, and who they expect to buy it.

Reaper22_127d ago

Looks like you dont know what you're talking about.

1Victor127d ago

What changed?
Hey obscured 🤖🤖
I’ll explain it like to a IQ 9
Nothing has changed they kept loosing money and to please their INVESTORS Microsoft purchased activision and other developers spending more money they could make in WAAAAAY too long for the company CEO that love monetizing everything so they started porting to EVERYTHING they could (even fire stick🤣🤣).
Do you know why it’s called the big 3?
In the lat 70’s to early 80’ there was multiple companies with their own consoles each the market collapsed and only 2 survived, enter PlayStation, exit sega, exit google, Microsoft is destabilized and desperately start to port all their games EVERYWHERE, enter valve.

Now
W h a t do Y O U think w i l l h a p p e n t o
t h e 3rd leg of that triangle when one is warbling and a replacement is on the way.

GhostScholar127d ago

Loosing money ? Got it. You’re obviously educated….

1Victor127d ago

@ghost: “ Loosing money ? Got it. You’re obviously educated…”
Sure I’m not a scholar but it’s obvious that they aren’t going to be publishing their big franchises day one games on their competitors because of brotherly love for the gaming industry.
Unless and I know this is something a lot of Xbox hardcore fans like obscure can’t comprehend that a big corporation like Microsoft is loosing money gen after gen,
Money doesn’t come for free from big corporations Xbox gen 1 lost money on consoles sold. Xbox 360 lost money on repairs of the RROD Xbox One didn’t make the money they wanted, Xbox series hasn’t sold as well as expected and have a MASIVE LOAN from all the studios and a publisher purchase..
I’ll be waiting for your reply proving they are not loosing money. Oh I see you pulling that game pass card, put it back FCC filing by Microsoft said they didn’t make money from game pass.
NOW PROVE ME WRONG

mudakoshaka127d ago (Edited 127d ago )

They had to put them on other platforms. All the gaming companies they bought cost a LOT of money. Xbox is not sufficient to bring in new revenue, so the only choice is expanding your market share by releasing on other platforms that are clearly leading the market. It was not something they wanted but something they needed to do to recoup some of all the expenses.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 127d ago
peppeaccardo127d ago

I might be saying the obvious but any piece of hardware for as powerful as it could be, without an healthy portfolio of fun to play and engaging games is worth less tehn zero. So as long as the new XBOX will be marketed as the most powerful console on the planet and NOT as the ONLY place where true long lastying XBOX fans can impersonate their beloved characters/heroes this thing is going to fail big. I would love to think that Playstaiton is moving away from the PC ports also to keep its identity, the truth is that a console value is higher if that console is the only mean to access certain IPs. XBOX with gamepass and PC ports has depersonalized his player and fan base.
Just my two cents ... but I am sure there is some thurth in here.
Peace on !

Reaper22_127d ago

Xbox has a huge library of great games. This new console will be able to play them all. Thats what gamers care about the most.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 127d ago
128d ago Replies(1)
Deathdeliverer128d ago

The question will be if you have a PC, why buy a Xbox that plays PC and Xbox games… Unless they plan to have you buy a Xbox PC instead of a dedicated PC. Thats got to be the plan. Take some of the PC players and turn them into console PC players. They couldn’t give you full access to the PC/console like you can with a dedicated PC because you would think the piracy for the “dedicated” Xbox games would be crazy. Yeah, they are really going to have to explain who this is for. If you can install whatever you want then you would have Steam access. This directly copies the Steam box idea so I’m sure Steam isn’t happy about it. I guess time will tell.

128d ago
Rainbowcookie127d ago (Edited 127d ago )

Maybe it will be heavily subsidized so software sales will make up the loss to get it into peoples hands early and the system allows for a steam like environment. I think Sony knows since rumor has it that they will do less Pc ports.

derek127d ago

I dont think that's in the cards not with the 80 plus billion spent on gaming this gen. Microsoft aint subsidizing hardware anymore look how they've priced the series consoles and offered no deals this past holidays. Sony pulling away from pc ports is because there is no good rational for continuing to do so.

ABizzel1127d ago (Edited 127d ago )

They don’t sell enough of the current Xbox consoles to heavily subsidize those platforms and in fact they increased in price, so I don’t see a future where this gets any. I think we’re looking at a $999 platform, which I mean is great for a GPU rumored to be on par with a full PC running a RTX 5070Ti/5080 equivalent depending on clocks, since those GPUs alone around $1000+.

I assume they’re going to do a two tiered system again, because a lowered cost version could be the significantly better option for PC gamers specifically the esports crowd who doesn’t upgrade all the time and don’t care about the highest specs. If they can do something around a RX 9060 with 16GB+ of VRAM for $499 then that would be the true winner because it gives those PC gamers a REAL substantial upgrade at a very reasonable price. It’ll also put a huge amount of pressure on the Steam Box.

isarai_lee127d ago

What i was wondering too, like best case scenario it's a PC with a bunch of restrictions on it, and when ALL their games on on PC, what is even the incentive here? 🤔

ABizzel1127d ago (Edited 127d ago )

It builds a niche for them, and I’ve been saying they should have done this since the XBO. However, it’s still going to be a battle. Hardcore PC gamers are not leaving PC unless this is an ultimate steal in price:performance.

The rumored spec depending on clock speeds should place this around RTX 5070TI / 5080 performance which sounds insane, but the rumored launch in late 2027 and the RTX 5070Ti/5080 will be almost 3 years old by then.

But those GPUs are retailing around $1000, so what is this PC-Console hybrid going to cost.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 127d ago
MrNinosan128d ago

Basically a PC with an Xbox logo slapped on, just like the so called Xbox handheld.
My guess is it won't play my Xbox games I have on disc 🤔

128d ago
babadivad127d ago

Nah, the handheld IS a PC. It can stream Xbox games or play the PC version of those games with "play anywhere".

This sounds like it will play Xbox games natively, which is amazing if true.

I want to see more. I already have a powerful PC so I need to be sold on this before just diving in. Tech whore that I am. Seems very interesting so far, regardless.

DazaMc127d ago

Perhaps it will download a compatible version if you have the disc in.

Reaper22_127d ago

You just described all consoles. At the end of the day they're all PCs.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 127d ago
Show all comments (122)