Doesn't matter.

I suppose that means it's not the best console version?

Jin

Ms have the worst parity clauses wheh Xbox one was weaker than ps4 they made sure no 3rd party game which had marketing deal with ms could look better on ps4

Just like Phil Spencer talking about marketing deals with limited timed exclusive dlc being bad for gamers yet having no issues signing those deals did deals for Xbox one

Being on this site I hear it all the time how it's run hy playstation Nation yet if you look daily vast majority of the coverage is positive towards Xbox and being hated towards ps4

I think you need to research what the word "variable" means.

It is a variable, unlocked frame rate, when they say it is a variable framerate. Sorry if I was being condescending. But it means it isn't 30, or 60. It isn't locked. Although I am sure they will have a mode where it is locked at 30 as well. If you don't have a freesync monitor.

Love the disagrees from people that don't know how FreeSync works. The game will have to run at 48fps or higher for adaptive refresh rate support to work on all Samsung 4K TVs. If you drop below 48Hz the tv will go back to 60Hz and you'll experience all the regular pitfalls of v-sync or Ubisoft will have to introduce tearing.

my ps2 output HD to my HDTV with the component cables on GT4. I’m typically forward thinking with my electronics. My most recent 4k Tv will be 3yrs old this year so i’m gonna upgrade later, i’ll be getting one with HDMI 2.1 which most TVs that are supposed to have that will have VRR. So that will be great for me later

Exactly. It’s expected that the most powerful console should have the better version of any game.

That's a straight fail. You use VRR on displays that support it. Locked when the displays doesn't.

That's not how FreeSync and G-Sync work. The reason variable framerates normally suck has to do with the way vertical sync operates, if the game fails to hit its 16.67ms frame time the game will wait until 33.33ms to display the frame, so that the game's refresh fits within the displays refresh rate, meaning the framerate drops to 1/2, aka 30fps. Triple buffering sort of solves this but then results in judder while adding another frame of latency, as the refresh rate does not match the display. Adaptive refresh rate displays solve this by reducing the display refresh rate to match the game's internal refresh rate, allowing for vertical sync without the compromises normally associated with it. This means that when your game drops from 60fps to 54fps, you don't get a hard lock to 30 and a doubling of the frame time from 16.67ms to 33.33ms as you would with double buffered v-sync. Instead your frame time only increases to ~18ms, which is imperceivable. There's also no judder because the display is now displaying at 54Hz.

Cross save just isn't going to happen. There's ubisoft accounts that have played it on all three platforms.

That said raid/incursion exclusives aren't so exclusives anymore and not really that deal breaking. Its the expertise/proficient that's the big hang up.