And even then, modders do the bulk of the work.

@Ted and a bug from Fallout 4 was fixed by modders, yet in 76..

They let modders do the work and fix nothing.

Emphasis on that engine, that thing is ancient and there is no excuse to still be using it, hell that tired old cod engine has shed better than that thing

Morrowind and Fallout 3 were their last projects I respected. Elder Scrolls series only got worse; personally I think ESO is now stronger than their series releases, and Fallout 4 was a shadow of what the series is. At least they publish interesting games.

Agreed

Fun is subjective. Fallout 76 gameplay (not story telling) is exactly the same as its single player counterpart aside from items being balanced for MP. ESO on the other hand was a completely different experience that played absolutely nothing like previous entries. The quicker you learn your opinion of fun isn't a fact, the quicker you'll have meaningful conversations with people instead of looking like a spoiled brat that didn't get the game THEY wanted.

It's a cash grab why? Because they made a game that doesn't peek your interest? An online only game made from a previously exclusive single player franchise? A game that will continuously be updated for free and instead of charging a monthly fee they offer cosmetics as an alternative that don't affect gameplay? All of these things are subjective and will ALWAYS make for a bad game to specific players. I don't see one person out here defending Bethesda for the mediocre performance and tons of bugs at launch. No one is denying that. The patch that came out yesterday was a HUGE step in the right direction (especially for performance) but they still have tons of work to do. No one is defending them in that regard. When you use terms that don't apply because the game isn't targeting you, that's where the problem lies.

What do you mean it's not a cash grab? They are basically using the Fallout name to sell this crap at full retail price. Just because you like the game and enjoy it doesn't mean that people can't disagree with you, I think Bethesda delivered a turd a broken turd at that.

How are they using the name? It still looks like Fallout, still plays like Fallout, still operates like Fallout, still massive with tons of places to explore with many hidden secrets just like Fallout. Why wouldn't it be called Fallout? If you said ESO was using the name and brand for a cash grab, there's justification in that even if I don't agree with it. Yes, I enjoyed (haven't played in a while) ESO. ESO didn't look like a ES game, didn't play like an ES game, didn't even feature have the functionality of a standard ES game and instead was more MMO with an ES skin. That's changed since launch, but at launch that's what it was. I still enjoyed it, but I wouldn't argue against someone saying it's a cash grab. Fallout 76 on the other hand plays EXACTLY like it's single player counterart. Yes the story structure and other elements have changed due to multiplayer but the difference is, Fallout 76 stays more true to it's core than ESO does to this day.

You're obviously entitled to your own opinion, but when you spew it without justification and your reply adds zero reasons and just reiterating yourself, then you don't really have an argument.