All Channels
Popular
1120°

Sony Patents Gaming Controller With a Touchscreen Display, Check Out the Image Explaining the Tech

PS5 controller might have a touchscreen? Sony files patent for gaming controller at the USPTO. There's an image as part of the patent explaining the tech too.

Skull5212751d ago (Edited 2751d ago )

Ugh, the touchpad on the DS4 is pretty worthless except for being an extra button, not the direction I would take the controller in. I would just replace that touchpad with a few extra buttons. Sounds like a good way to turn the controllers battery life into complete s***, not to mention an undoubtedly higher controller cost.

Dreamcatcher452751d ago

I think the only thing it is good for is bringing up maps in open world games.

jagermaster6192751d ago

Totally agree, on paper it sounds like it could be cool but the PS4 controller battery life sucked so these will most likely have way worse.

Snappy2751d ago

Guessing you haven’t played Astrobot then

kneon2751d ago

As long as they aren't going for the latest and greatest high PPI resolution, HDR screen then the cost is rather insignificant, just a few dollars for the quantities they would be buying.

As for uses, I can think of plenty. The obvious one is dynamic controls that change depending on context. You could also implement the Pip Boy UI on the controller for Fallout.

bouzebbal2751d ago

Nothing worthless more than an xbox fanboy talking shit about the competitor...

1nsomniac2751d ago

It works great as a separate button for the map but also worked great in The Witcher and very few others where swiping it up,down,left or right brought up a different menu each.

DarXyde2751d ago

Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't you a fervent Xbox One supporter since it was announced?

If so, I'm not sure you're the best judge of directions a company should take.

Either way, it's just a patent. Sony does this a lot; they file patents often, but the follow-through is somewhat spotty. If anything, they would probably rather integrate smartphone interactivity than have it baked into the controller.

Segata2751d ago

It's not the Touchpad. It's the Selectangle. All it was good for.

FinalFantasyFanatic2751d ago

As cool as the touch pad is, hardly anything uses it, I have seen some cool uses, but the majority of the time it's just a glorified big button.

gamer78042751d ago

this sounds a bit different, more like a touchscreen similar to a smartphone, it could work if done well, but yeah it could increase the cost of their controllers. I agree that the current touchpad is not very useful, some games its annoying.

SwampthingsSon2751d ago

No idea why you have disagrees. The touch pad is very under utilized.

blazin82751d ago

look at the disagrees you're getting. the touchpad is pretty much worthless. there have always been complaints about the battery. what would adding a full on touchscreen serve

LiamKreptic2750d ago

It’s a patent...may never see the light of day, but keep complaining!

nitus102750d ago

WOW! How many games have you played on the PS4?

Sure the touchpad on the DS4 can be used as a single button but many games or at least the games I play the touchpad can double as two buttons and in addition, it also acts as (gasp) a touchpad with swipes implementing certain actions or gestures.

In addition, the DS4 has a six-axis detector as well as an inbuilt speaker and the ability to connect a stereo headset and speaker which allows one to uses voice commands (implemented from the release of the first PS4).

As for the battery. You are correct the battery does not have the capacity the DS3 had. However, you can replace the DS4 battery with a better one for only a few dollars. See YouTube for a How To.

GTgamer2750d ago

How is extra buttons worthless 🤔 it's not Sony fault that third party devs didn't find allot to do with it but I love it in open world games hell I still hit in RDR2 thinking it gets me to the map.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 2750d ago
DevilHunterDante2751d ago

Are you the guy who only says interesting on this website?

-volt-2751d ago

Sony copying yet another idea.

roadkillers2751d ago

Lets say they are copying it, why would it work? They copied the WII with the PS3's motion controller. That failed and they got rid of it. Uncharted 2 scrapped it within the game and Warhawk was the only good game that pulled it off.

In my opinion, Sony and other high profile console devs should put more focus on VR. It sounds crazy now, but I think that is the next huge step forward in hardware. If we can get rid of the wires and have a VR treadmill that actually worked at under $1000 starting price, that's the future.

Why?
1. Excersize will bring positive media towards games. It happened with the Wii, every media outlet was handing out free publicity and praising the Wii. In actuality, it honestly wasn't much for a workout.

China is currently in the process of regulating video games. No one under 18 can play for more than 2 hours a day (more strict for younger ages). Now China's still communist, but I believe that if you can get excersize from a video game that the positives will outweigh the negatives. Plus that's 1+ billion market.

2) More realistic if pulled off correctly. We all talk about how emersive a game is.

3) Draw of watching someone else play. I purchased a Vive with Beat Saber, everyonr of my friends wanted to play after watching me. Picture someone legit jumping to reach the ledge in Uncharted 5.

Now, something like this would cost 6,000 if compared to other like-wise products, which do not work well. Make it under $1000 with support and they will sell like hotcakes.

2751d ago
fr0sty2751d ago

@roadkillers +Motorstorm, Wipeout (just about any other racing or flying game that used it as well), flOw, flOwer, just to name a few others that also made good use of the motion control.

cooperdnizzle2750d ago (Edited 2750d ago )

Roadkillers. Man the whole comment was the worst thing I think I’ve ever read on here. Worst comment ever! Your name fits! You are killing things.

telekineticmantis2750d ago

With how much Nintendo has copied, it's only fair, the Dreamcast had an interactive screen in their controller also

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2750d ago
thejigisup2751d ago

More like... livin la 'vita' Loca...

zahdab2751d ago (Edited 2751d ago )

More like wii u (they hii shii) ing it up

CobraKai2751d ago

The WiiU deserves the credit.

RizBiz2751d ago (Edited 2751d ago )

The Vita launched a whole year before the Wii U, you wankers.

deafdani2751d ago (Edited 2751d ago )

@RizBiz: are u serious? This is for a controller with a screen for a console. This mirrors the Wii U, not the Vita.

If you want to include handhelds on the discussion, then the DS says hello... that thing came out in 2005.

thejigisup2749d ago

And just to confirm can you use the day with the Wii or Wii u? I know my Vita could control my PS3 and 4.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2749d ago
Kribwalker2751d ago (Edited 2751d ago )

the battery life on the PS4 controller is so terrible with just the light on it. Imagine a full on touch screen lol

Looking at the patent picture, it looks an awful lot like there is planned cloud processing

nucky642751d ago

yea, but i can't believe sony doesn't address the battery issue when doing ps5. and btw - is that light on the ps4 controller the most worthless thing or what?

Ricegum2751d ago

Krib

Can always count on you to put a negative on this. Do you even have a PS4?

Speaking of controllers, do your Xbox controllers still use external batteries?

Clark882751d ago

Coming from a ps4 hater so typical

Kribwalker2751d ago

@unreal

i’ve posted multiple times that i have a ps4, haven’t turned it on since God Of War, but i do.

I use rechargeable batteries in my elite controller. I’ll get 15-20hrs out of a single charge and there’s always a set of batteries waiting. And if the batteries stop holding a charge (haven’t had that yet this gen with them) i could toss them out and get new ones. Unlike the built in battery on the ps4 controller

@Clark
lol, is the ps4 controller battery life bad or not?.......

gangsta_red2751d ago (Edited 2751d ago )

Considering the actual article makes mention of PS4's horrible battery life, where's the lie?

@unreal

"Speaking of controllers, do your Xbox controllers still use external batteries?"

Mine does, I got some rechargeable batteries for them and they last for a long time. Wish Sony's controllers would give me that option instead of what they offered.

one2thr2751d ago

Its not the light that drain the battery, its literally the touch pad, its always on/active when the control is on.

andibandit2751d ago

@Unreal actually I wouldn't mind external batteries since both my DS4(from 2013) both run out of juice after 4-5 hours. What were they thinking with 1000mAh batteries???, seriously you can get 2800mAh AA batteries now.

SpaceRanger2751d ago

I know right. They should stop innovating with new battery and touchscreen technology and go back to adding batteries to controllers! /s

CoinOrc2751d ago (Edited 2751d ago )

I have never had a problem with the battery life. I just recharge it when it gets down to one bar, which takes quite a while. As for the touch screen, I can see a lot potential uses for it, but just because they filed a patent doesn’t mean they will follow through. Companies do this all the time. As for not turning on your PS4 since god of war, I haven’t turn on my Xbox One since quantum break.

BehindTheRows2751d ago (Edited 2751d ago )

Yet, I’m sure you take no issue with having to buy a charge cable (or batteries) for your Xbox One controllers (a 2013 device with a very outdated concept even then). Spare the artificial concern.

OT: Take the current idea and expand. The current touchpad, while under utilized, was a nice touch on the DS4.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 2750d ago
rainslacker2751d ago (Edited 2751d ago )

Yeah, but I doubt this controller will work very far from the base unit. So it's more like WiiU'ing it up....assuming the 2nd screen can display the actual game on that screen, which I think is probably a waste of money to put into a controller since it's likely to be rather tiny. If its more like the Dreamcast VMU, then that'd be OK. That thing was pretty cool for the 3-4 games which used it.

bluebenjamin2751d ago

Dreamcast was ahead of its time and many freaking ways Sega needs to come back and fix gaming

DarXyde2751d ago

Oh boy.

Just so you know, Nintendo's recent console ideas are similar to Sony's patents and ideas preceding them.

Sony demoed their intentions for PS Move with PS2 before Wii was even a thing and Wii U/Switch are basically remote play made standard.

It's disingenuous to suggest Sony copied Nintendo here; it is perhaps more accurate to say Sony had the idea first, Nintendo acted on the ideas and, in light of its success, Sony followed through in creating their own version(s) of things.

I do, however, believe Sony copied Nintendo's touch screen implementation.

Team_Litt2751d ago (Edited 2751d ago )

So his comment is not wrong then? Because he never suggested Nintendo never copies from Sony, I'm not sure where you got that idea.

Kinda went off on a tangent about eye toy there too.

deafdani2751d ago

Nintendo also demoed Wii Remotes during the gamecube era. Look it up. This notion that Nintendo copied Sony's experiment with the PS wand during PS2 days is false.

Take a look:

https://nintendoeverything....

DarXyde2750d ago

Deafdani,

1. Did you really just provide a link to Nintendo Everything to prove your point?

2. This article was written less than a month ago.

So I'm able to provide you with this....

https://www.gamasutra.com/v...

... outlining that demonstrations were given prior to the PS2 LAUNCH, and published in 2006.

I think my notion still holds true.

SuperSonic912750d ago

The Dreamcast had a controller with a screen, boi.

wonderfulmonkeyman2749d ago

Not even close to being the same thing as modern examples, BOI.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2749d ago
hench072751d ago

Looks like Sony is going for gimmicks next gen, interesting to see if the fanbase eats it up or laughs at it like they did the Wii U.

MasterCornholio2751d ago (Edited 2751d ago )

They will still release plenty of quality games though. So while the controller might have a screen, the console itself will still be supported with plenty of core games.

As for what Sony is going for next gen i would say games, games and more games. Just like this gen.

Sorry about that.

wonderfulmonkeyman2751d ago

The Wii U had plenty of core games too; the controller was still hated, as was the system itself.
If someone hated the Wii U's controller for having a big screen, it will be hypocritical of them to like it when Sony does it.

MasterCornholio2751d ago

@Wonder

The problem here is that the DualShock will always be the default controller. If Sony does produce a Wii U like controller it will be optional just like PSVR is. Which wasn’t the case with the Wii U’s gamepad.

DarXyde2751d ago

I actually enjoyed the games on Wii U. But yeah, the gamepad was not perfect. I hated the way it felt.

blazin82751d ago

how far up sony's ass can you be? what good are the games if your controller turns out to be trash. I shouldn't have to buy 3rd party peripherals just to enjoy my games.

MasterCornholio2751d ago (Edited 2751d ago )

@Blazin

The PS5 won’t have a garbage controller. So the games will still be great on that system. It’s not like Sony is going to make a Wii U controller the default controller for the system. They will probably just evolve the DS5 even further.

Also there’s no need for the personal attack.

wonderfulmonkeyman2749d ago (Edited 2749d ago )

You say that, but Sony made a pretty big push to sell all those motion controllers when the PSVR came around, "optional" or not.

It's not outside the realm of possibility for Sony to pull a Wii U, and make this the default controller, if they go for it.

Of course, this is all moot until something crops up proving that they'll even use the patent, but at the same time, there's nothing stopping Sony from doing so if they think they can get away with it.

And judging from some of the comments here, I think they might be able to get away with it.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2749d ago
rainslacker2751d ago

Eh, the touchpad was worthless, but Sony didn't spend an inordinate amount of time making it a main focal point of their PS4 marketing, so whatever. I could actually see more practical use for the touchscreen, but I feel it's probably just more of an expense than really necessary, especially if it doesn't receive enough support like the touchscreen did.

If it's like the Dreamcast VMU, then that'd be alright I suppose, but I'd rather have longer battery life, than the ability to carry around my expensive controller on it just to play mini-games. Think if Sony wanted to go that route, they should just allow people to use their phones. In any case, touchscreens would be bright light on the front of the controller, and I can see that as distracting. On the backside of the controller, I never notice the lights, and also found them pointless outside of where you needed the light for the camera to see it.

Thundercat772751d ago

You don't even know what this is. You should eat your garbage.

wonderfulmonkeyman2751d ago (Edited 2751d ago )

If [and that's a BIG IF] it even happens and this patent gets used, they'll eat it up, because it's Sony.
Doesn't matter if they hated it when the Wii U did it; they'll use some excuse to say it's amazing on a Sony console.
I expect some sort of Vita reference as one of the many excuses.

bouzebbal2750d ago

in the meantime, i am laughing at your comment..

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2749d ago
ILostMyMind2751d ago

Is the joystick on that image? Because i didn't see It.

pcz2751d ago (Edited 2751d ago )

It must have been difficult getting a patent for a replica of a wiiu controller. They probably just moved the start button 1 millimetre to the left

Asuka2751d ago (Edited 2751d ago )

No thank you. Just look at the Wii U. Hell just look at the touchpad on the DS4. hardly utilized, and whenever it is used its just a gimmick or is nothing more than a remapping of existing buttons/functions. Focus on battery life please.

Eonjay2751d ago

I am thinking more on the lines of the Dreamcast VMU. Not the Wii U. Why would they go that route. They wouldn't unless it was a Switch like add on.

Segata2751d ago

Wii U sold better than Dreamcast so comparing it to a VMU is making it worse. MS nearly included VMU's with the original Xbox but noticed in focus tests no one looked at the VMU on the Dreamcast. It's a neat idea on paper that is ultimately just not wanted by most people.

xX-oldboy-Xx2751d ago

Segata - how were the focus tests for Kinect?

As for a screen on my controller? I'll pass, doesn't interest me in the slightest.

Show all comments (126)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay26d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn227d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn226d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown27d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay26d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay26d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac26d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger27d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300027d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde27d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde26d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
40°

Microsoft lifts the lid on Project Helix at GDC Festival of Gaming

The Xbox maker will begin sending alpha versions of Project Helix to developers starting in 2027.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
240°

Xbox Confirms 'Project Helix', Its Next-Gen Console That Will Also Play PC Games

New Microsoft Gaming CEO Asha Sharma, who took over as the head of the Xbox business last week as longtime Xbox boss Phil Spencer retired, has confirmed the codename for Xbox's next-generation console – Project Helix – and also confirmed long-swirling rumors that the device will play Xbox and PC games.

80d ago
dveio80d ago

Hm.

Selling to customers the benefits of Xbox Helix compared to a PC and Steam Machine will be the biggest task for Xbox' marketing, I suppose.

80d ago Replies(2)
80d ago Replies(5)
1Victor79d ago

I said when Xbox destroyed their future with with all their arrogance at the start of XBone”if they keep loosing money they only have 2 more generations before they exit the console market like sega.
This is their final chance to validate the existence of a console to the INVESTORS if this console fail as we all know without exclusives from the activision acquisition or their old exclusives for more than a year it’s game over for Xbox consoles.
Everyone know games will wait for a timed exclusive to go to their console of choice, Microsoft signed the Xbox console death certificate the moment they started PORTING ALL THEIR GAMES to other consoles.
Now my hope is that Valve gives Sony a run for their money and we get a good generation where they take risks and bring new experiences to the market.

79d ago
S2Killinit79d ago (Edited 79d ago )

They will make xbox “consoles”, but they actively downplay consoles because their business strategy is walled garden services

This is basically a PC w xbox logo

fr0sty79d ago (Edited 79d ago )

Xbox has put itself in a tough position... With current RAM prices, the system is going to cost a fortune (it's APU alone is $500-600, before you even get to the RAM, SSD, power supply, etc). So, we're looking at a 4 digit price tag, and it has the Gabecube to compete against now directly in that console space. It has no exclusive games at all. PS6 is coming in close in performance but expected to cost hundreds less, and PS6 Pro will likely again take the "most powerful crown" once it drops, but it will actually have exclusive games.

Not an easy sell to the general public, and not even an easy sell to the PC enthusiasts as it isn't powerful enough to justify paying that much for when you could just build a far more powerful PC for not much more $. If I'm dropping north of $1k on a game system, I'm going to want to go all out, not have mid-range performance. It'll be interesting how they plan on marketing this thing, and who they expect to buy it.

Reaper22_79d ago

Looks like you dont know what you're talking about.

1Victor79d ago

What changed?
Hey obscured 🤖🤖
I’ll explain it like to a IQ 9
Nothing has changed they kept loosing money and to please their INVESTORS Microsoft purchased activision and other developers spending more money they could make in WAAAAAY too long for the company CEO that love monetizing everything so they started porting to EVERYTHING they could (even fire stick🤣🤣).
Do you know why it’s called the big 3?
In the lat 70’s to early 80’ there was multiple companies with their own consoles each the market collapsed and only 2 survived, enter PlayStation, exit sega, exit google, Microsoft is destabilized and desperately start to port all their games EVERYWHERE, enter valve.

Now
W h a t do Y O U think w i l l h a p p e n t o
t h e 3rd leg of that triangle when one is warbling and a replacement is on the way.

GhostScholar79d ago

Loosing money ? Got it. You’re obviously educated….

1Victor79d ago

@ghost: “ Loosing money ? Got it. You’re obviously educated…”
Sure I’m not a scholar but it’s obvious that they aren’t going to be publishing their big franchises day one games on their competitors because of brotherly love for the gaming industry.
Unless and I know this is something a lot of Xbox hardcore fans like obscure can’t comprehend that a big corporation like Microsoft is loosing money gen after gen,
Money doesn’t come for free from big corporations Xbox gen 1 lost money on consoles sold. Xbox 360 lost money on repairs of the RROD Xbox One didn’t make the money they wanted, Xbox series hasn’t sold as well as expected and have a MASIVE LOAN from all the studios and a publisher purchase..
I’ll be waiting for your reply proving they are not loosing money. Oh I see you pulling that game pass card, put it back FCC filing by Microsoft said they didn’t make money from game pass.
NOW PROVE ME WRONG

mudakoshaka79d ago (Edited 79d ago )

They had to put them on other platforms. All the gaming companies they bought cost a LOT of money. Xbox is not sufficient to bring in new revenue, so the only choice is expanding your market share by releasing on other platforms that are clearly leading the market. It was not something they wanted but something they needed to do to recoup some of all the expenses.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 79d ago
peppeaccardo79d ago

I might be saying the obvious but any piece of hardware for as powerful as it could be, without an healthy portfolio of fun to play and engaging games is worth less tehn zero. So as long as the new XBOX will be marketed as the most powerful console on the planet and NOT as the ONLY place where true long lastying XBOX fans can impersonate their beloved characters/heroes this thing is going to fail big. I would love to think that Playstaiton is moving away from the PC ports also to keep its identity, the truth is that a console value is higher if that console is the only mean to access certain IPs. XBOX with gamepass and PC ports has depersonalized his player and fan base.
Just my two cents ... but I am sure there is some thurth in here.
Peace on !

Reaper22_79d ago

Xbox has a huge library of great games. This new console will be able to play them all. Thats what gamers care about the most.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 79d ago
80d ago Replies(1)
Deathdeliverer80d ago

The question will be if you have a PC, why buy a Xbox that plays PC and Xbox games… Unless they plan to have you buy a Xbox PC instead of a dedicated PC. Thats got to be the plan. Take some of the PC players and turn them into console PC players. They couldn’t give you full access to the PC/console like you can with a dedicated PC because you would think the piracy for the “dedicated” Xbox games would be crazy. Yeah, they are really going to have to explain who this is for. If you can install whatever you want then you would have Steam access. This directly copies the Steam box idea so I’m sure Steam isn’t happy about it. I guess time will tell.

80d ago
Rainbowcookie79d ago (Edited 79d ago )

Maybe it will be heavily subsidized so software sales will make up the loss to get it into peoples hands early and the system allows for a steam like environment. I think Sony knows since rumor has it that they will do less Pc ports.

derek79d ago

I dont think that's in the cards not with the 80 plus billion spent on gaming this gen. Microsoft aint subsidizing hardware anymore look how they've priced the series consoles and offered no deals this past holidays. Sony pulling away from pc ports is because there is no good rational for continuing to do so.

ABizzel179d ago (Edited 79d ago )

They don’t sell enough of the current Xbox consoles to heavily subsidize those platforms and in fact they increased in price, so I don’t see a future where this gets any. I think we’re looking at a $999 platform, which I mean is great for a GPU rumored to be on par with a full PC running a RTX 5070Ti/5080 equivalent depending on clocks, since those GPUs alone around $1000+.

I assume they’re going to do a two tiered system again, because a lowered cost version could be the significantly better option for PC gamers specifically the esports crowd who doesn’t upgrade all the time and don’t care about the highest specs. If they can do something around a RX 9060 with 16GB+ of VRAM for $499 then that would be the true winner because it gives those PC gamers a REAL substantial upgrade at a very reasonable price. It’ll also put a huge amount of pressure on the Steam Box.

isarai_lee79d ago

What i was wondering too, like best case scenario it's a PC with a bunch of restrictions on it, and when ALL their games on on PC, what is even the incentive here? 🤔

ABizzel179d ago (Edited 79d ago )

It builds a niche for them, and I’ve been saying they should have done this since the XBO. However, it’s still going to be a battle. Hardcore PC gamers are not leaving PC unless this is an ultimate steal in price:performance.

The rumored spec depending on clock speeds should place this around RTX 5070TI / 5080 performance which sounds insane, but the rumored launch in late 2027 and the RTX 5070Ti/5080 will be almost 3 years old by then.

But those GPUs are retailing around $1000, so what is this PC-Console hybrid going to cost.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 79d ago
MrNinosan80d ago

Basically a PC with an Xbox logo slapped on, just like the so called Xbox handheld.
My guess is it won't play my Xbox games I have on disc 🤔

80d ago
babadivad79d ago

Nah, the handheld IS a PC. It can stream Xbox games or play the PC version of those games with "play anywhere".

This sounds like it will play Xbox games natively, which is amazing if true.

I want to see more. I already have a powerful PC so I need to be sold on this before just diving in. Tech whore that I am. Seems very interesting so far, regardless.

DazaMc79d ago

Perhaps it will download a compatible version if you have the disc in.

Reaper22_79d ago

You just described all consoles. At the end of the day they're all PCs.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 79d ago
Show all comments (122)