All Channels
Popular
440°

Red Dead Redemption 2 review | Polygon

Red Dead Redemption 2 is one of the weirdest, most ambitious and confounding big-budget games of this decade.

ArchangelMike2772d ago

Typical of Polygon. Pretensious to the bone.

nyu12772d ago

Oh please, if any site doesn't give it a perfect score, you'll call it pretentious.

They recommend the game and have generally high praise for it.

FPS_D3TH2772d ago (Edited 2772d ago )

Oh please, as if polygon doesn’t have a history of bs like this

UltraNova2772d ago

Oh please!

What? I just wanted to say oh please...

Orionsangel2772d ago

Yes! I'm spending a lot of money on this game. I need the reviews to be good so I know I'm not wasting my money. Don't spoil my excitement for the game you darn critics!

DaReapa2772d ago (Edited 2772d ago )

Is it so hard to write a review without it being ripe with spoilers?? Props to VG24/7 for being one of the few keeping it spoiler free.

fiveby92772d ago

I have already bought the game so I am avoiding reviews and streams at this point. Just going to play for days without the influence of outside sources.

UltraNova2772d ago

So log off from n4g and go dark.

Edito2772d ago

I really don't know if all those sites had the time to play the game to give those scores.. i mean the game is super huge... but if it's real that amazing.

badz1492772d ago

Read reviews from IGN. it runs like an advertisement for the game. doesn't sound like a review at all

UltraNova2772d ago

Read kotaku's then, the best review around.
https://n4g.com/news/221358...

Skankinruby2771d ago

IGN is a damn cancer to the gaming industry

rainslacker2771d ago

@Ultra

do you work for Kotaku? Saw you talking that review up a lot. I read it, and while it's quite eloquent in its wording, the review aspect of it itself sounds more hyperbolic, abstract, and mostly just a bunch of generalities. It even mentions some rather deep flaws to the game play, yet glosses over them as no big deal because of how amazing the rest of the game is, despite the author saying the game just isn't fun. But that's OK, because it's different than other games they consider more visceral fun.

Not much was backed up with all those generalities, with almost no examples outside the world details, but still, nothing to say how it came together. Then a good part of the review went on a tirade about the working conditions over at R*, which made a lot of assumptions and seemed more agenda driven than relevant to the quality of the game itself.

@Badz

I read the IGN review, and I agree. I see some major sites mentioning some major game play criticisms, and then waving them off as not a big deal because of how awe inspiring the game is. While I understand that some thing can be overlooked when the overall experience is great, it's still a reviewers responsibility to mention how those things come together and can bring something down. Maybe not nitpick small things, but certainly not dismiss potentially major flaws. All that awe-inspiring grandeur is cool and all, but if you're spending 50-100 hours on a game, much of that becomes less important after a while.

Christopher mentioned in another review about how you couldn't auto loot, and how that was considered cool by the review. That was mirrored in something else in the Kotaku review, where they said the game constantly forces you to slow down and appreciate the world. While I understand a game wanting to pace things differently than other games do, or what the player may expect, it is still an important aspect to consider how that affects the player, or how they may potentially feel about such a thing after the 100th, or 1000th time they may do the same repetitive thing over and over again.

I'm not going to say this game is bad. I understand many people may love this game, and I'm not one to say they're wrong. But it's not a reviewers job to gush endlessly over things, but rather inform the reader in a meaningful way about what they're getting for their money.

UltraNova2771d ago (Edited 2771d ago )

Rain,

Do I work for Kotaku? Hell no, I actually think they are a bunch of morons over there, but I can appreciate good writting when I see it. Is it perfect in its description to what the game actually offers? No, no review can be perfect. But this level of eloquent writing is super rare in our industry's critical side so that's that.

rainslacker2770d ago

I hate to get too off topic, but the Kotaku review was just a bunch of flowery words. The review didn't do much good at describing the game at all. He gave spoilers for other games. Spent 1/4 of the review talking about something unrelated to the game. Barely talked about the technical issues he himself cited, and even claimed the game wasn't fun, but barely even made that worth consideration.

Sorry, but the Kotaku review was not the best review around. It was just well written prose on the authors feelings of the game, instead of an analytical review of the game itself. It was akin to a book report, not an analysis.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2770d ago
King_Noctis2771d ago (Edited 2771d ago )

Reviewer gets the game before the public, usually 1 week beforehand as far as I know.

ShockUltraslash2771d ago

Yea dat white suppramecay hea! Im so mad now gurr. . . .

2771d ago
BenRC012771d ago

"The gunplay and combat isn’t dramatically improved from Grand Theft Auto 5, which is to say, in 2018, it’s serviceable"

That's all I needed to hear, I'm out.

doggo842771d ago

O whatever, the gameplay looks light years better than gta v

BenRC012771d ago

The graphics do, the gun play looks identical

yeahokwhatever2771d ago

...what problem is there with the "gunplay" in GTA5? It works great...

Show all comments (25)
30°

Red Dead Redemption 2 Turns Into Elden Ring in New Mod, Featuring Uncle as Final Boss

Red Dead Redemption 2 mod turns the game into Elden Ring, adding spells, boss fights, and Uncle as the final boss.

110°

GTA5 Has Sold Over 220 Million Copies, Red Dead Redemption 2 Has Sold Over 79 Million Units

Take-Two announced its financial results for Q2 of fiscal year 2026, and shared an update on the sales of GTA5 and Red Dead Redemption 2.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
TheDreamCorridor201d ago

You think Rockstar views Red Dead 2 as a failure because it didn't sell 150m copies?

jznrpg201d ago

3 billion or so in revenue not including online stuff I’m sure they don’t

SethNW201d ago

I am pretty sure they don't. It was profitable and made them a lot of money. Not GTA5 money but far from failure. Maybe it is lower priority franchise, due to being smaller, but that is about the lowest they would put it as. Only thing they do consider failure is RDR2 Online, unlike GTA5 Online, that RDR2 Online flopped. Hence why it got less support. And when it come to profits, sales for both combined don't come close to GTA Online microtansactions. Hence why everything very quickly got canceled and GTA Online was top priority, so no GTA6 for a long time, no DLC for GTA5, despite there being 5 DLCs planned, at least I think it was 5, give or take one. But as I see it, they needed to rejuvenate interest and all, hence why GTA6 eventually is getting made. But what they are really looking forward to is refresh of Online.

ZeekQuattro200d ago

Only in terms of the online aspect of the game. They didn't support it as much as they did GTA V Online. I remember people being pissed about that.

jznrpg201d ago

I own a few GTAs but never played them. I love Red Dead though

Yui_Suzumiya195d ago (Edited 195d ago )

Boring and overrated. Red Dead Redemption is pretty good though. The Hundred Line: Last Defense Academy is my personal GOAT. We need more stuff like that from TooKyo.

victorMaje201d ago

I must be one of the few who are fine with the GTA6 delay. People treat that game like it’s the 2nd coming lol.

FIELDMARSHALL_P200d ago

My daughter asked me how I felt about I shrugged and said I don't care gives me time to finish up games I already have. It's all good let them make the best game they can.

RedDevils201d ago

Wish they make another Manhunt or Bully.

gold_drake201d ago

damn, thats a ridiculous number

Show all comments (11)
160°

Dan Houser: RDR2 was "behind schedule" and "over budget so much I didn’t want to think about it"

Dan Houser opens up about Red Dead Redemption 2’s rocky development, calling it behind schedule, massively over budget, and full of pressure to prove doubters wrong.

Read Full Story >>
thegamepost.com
Storm23205d ago (Edited 205d ago )

The world they built is pretty amazing. Unfortunately, the game was mostly boring to me. I definitely had fun in some parts, but it didn't do it for me as a whole like the first one did. I loved RDR so much.

The budgets and time it takes to make games these days is out of control. Such a big risk. If a game isn't a huge hit, it is often it for a studio. Scary. I really miss the PS2 and PS3 days where studeios could make 4 games in a generation and take risks in making something new. And so many were using their own engines. Those were the days.

neutralgamer1992205d ago

Agreed. I love RDR but couldn't get into RDR2. The animations take forever and game slows you down on purpose. It won't let you have fun because R* want us to play the game they want to. I know millions love RDR2 and I even bought and own it. But just wasn't for me.

It's like comparing GTA4 to saints row 2. One game was about fun while the other was about realism and that's coming from someone who beat GTA4 many times. I much rather a game be fun to play than chase realism

YodaCracker205d ago

GTA IV’s realism is what made it so much more fun for me. I loved experimenting with the physics.

Storm23204d ago

I bought RDR2 also. Put 100+ hours into it and beat it our of respect for Rockstar and all the people saying it was the greatest game ever. RDR blew my mind but might also have been the best time in gaming for me personally. l loved that PS3 gen so much.

I am excited to see what GTA6 is like.

205d ago Replies(1)