All Channels
Popular
130°

Netflix For Games, Good For Who?

As the industry moves towards the next level of content distribution in the form of a 'Netflix for games', Game Savvy asks the question, who is it actually good for? Gamers? Game studios?

Read Full Story >>
gamesavvy.net
maelstromb2836d ago (Edited 2836d ago )

This WILL be the future. So the important question here is: How many publishers and devs will proactively hop onboard NOW in an attempt to shape how this future of digital distribution and its monetization will look? Napster may have been the first mainstream music distribution platform, but I think based on that history we can see the toll it took on its most important benefactors, the record industry and labels, while they hemorrhaged hundreds of millions fighting the inevitable only to finally come around to the new form of market access about 5-7 years late to the game. Often, massive sea changes like this represent positive shifts as they force direct competition and provide the perfect opportunity for the market shareholders to examine their business models. I think it goes without saying, we live in a technological age, and those who choose to not adapt are the ones who become dinosaurs and fail. This is fact.

So it remains to be seen where we go from here, but one thing is certain - we all (consumers, publishers, and devs) have an opportunity here to design the future of this medium, and we didn't get here by just standing around asking ourselves what we think the next guy's going to do. My hope is that we utilize our time, talents, and resources wisely and we all benefit in the end.

maelstromb2836d ago (Edited 2836d ago )

To add to my comment - I'm also not saying I'm in favor of eliminating physical game releases either! Quite the contrary... I am an avid games collector and have been for 20+ years, so whenever I can get a physical copy of a favored game, I will absolutely pay for it especially when given the choice over digital. So for someone like me, the thought of moving into a monthly digital subscription service for games is very unappealing. I had an Nvidia Shield for a year and not once did I feel the inclination to signup for GeForce NOW for that very reason.

In that same vein, newer businesses/services like Limited Run Games, Indiebox, Special Reserve, etc. have seen massive support and fanfare from their customers because they've tapped into a need which has always been present, but not fulfilled; delivering unique, quality physical media to their customers in the form of special edition releases which can't be found elsewhere, often by working directly with the developer as they craft the contents of the package. And so, businesses/services like these only serve to strengthen the argument regarding the importance (and relevance) of physical game releases. My point though is that Netflix-like digital subscription models are an inevitable path for many, many consumers and these services will absolutely be launched within the next 2-5 years. So, I think in the discussion to shape this new distribution pipeline, we also must ask ourselves whether cheap, convenient access is worth the inherent sacrifices (such as the consumer's inability to actually own a tangible medium or the rights to its access), or whether digital subscription models AND physical releases can still co-exist within the market.

LandoCalrissiano2836d ago

Just a thought, why hasn't gamefly broken out as the primary 3rd party Netflix style subscription service?

2836d ago
2836d ago Replies(1)
Pantz2836d ago

100+ games for $10 ($5 on sale) for a whole month. What more questions do you need to ask? Game Pass is the best deal in gaming.

Blu3_Berry2836d ago

This style of distributing games is inevitable whether people like it or not. Honestly it could work out very well if the technology is there.

maelstromb2835d ago

This is the point I made in my post above. I've received nothing but down votes from people even though I've been clear that this subscription model is not something I'm interested in and that I will always prefer to purchase physical over digital. The evolution of this business model is inevitable though. Apparently, people want to live in denial about the direction of the industry.

Blu3_Berry2835d ago

Yeah I agree. The industry is always changing and people can choose if they want to be in denial or not. But in the long run, this will probably end up making them more money then they currently are. That way from the company's eyes, they don't have to worry about the used market and they can distribute everywhere just like the internet is now. Look at Netflix, hell just look at the apps in general. They are everywhere from TVs to Tablets to smartphones to computers.

maelstromb2835d ago

Yeah, exactly. I think people believe the subscription model will become the *only* model, and that's just daft. Companies are always on the look out for generating new revenue streams in any market. The games industry is no exception. As I said - I believe it's possible for digital media and physical to co-exist. If the model is designed well enough with a fair enough price point, it will garner the attention and business that it deserves. If not, it will fail. Simple as that.

Show all comments (13)
90°

The Cloud Gaming Graveyard: Dead Cloud Gaming Services

We take a walk around the Cloud Gaming Graveyard - listing all the failed cloud gaming services over the last decade.

We discuss the ups, the downs, and overall history of this technology. Turns out running a successful cloud gaming service that addresses the various technical hurdles and actually makes money is a real challenge.

Read Full Story >>
clouddosage.com
Chocoburger684d ago

I'm sure that there will be more to come in the future.

UltimateOwnage683d ago

Latency and video compression will always make cloud gaming an afterthought.

210°

PlayStation beat Xbox cloud gaming users in 2021, new CMA data indicates

PlayStation dominated cloud gaming users throughout 2021, beating Microsoft's xCloud streaming by over 10%, but Xbox swings back at PlayStation in 2022.

Read Full Story >>
tweaktown.com
Nanukas1213d ago

Good, i want sony to feel heat. Ordinary people win from good competition.

BehindTheRows1213d ago

“Good competition” is not something Microsoft offers often. You should want THEM to feel enough heat to actually do better.

Nanukas1213d ago (Edited 1213d ago )

Agree. I wish sony would be more afraid of gamepass to get better games on ps+

Obscure_Observer1213d ago (Edited 1213d ago )

"You should want THEM to feel enough heat to actually do better."

Phil Spencer started to acquire studios back in 2018, after that, Xbox Studios only had 5 studios. Now Xbox has 23 almost 5x more studios. Not to mention third party exclusives like Flight Simulator, Contraband and Project Dragon.

Plus, unlike Sony, Xbox Studios won´t be distracted with things like VR, all of their first party efforts goes towards Xbox first and foremost.

Sony so can expect a much more robust Gamepass in terms of first party and third party exclusives games from Xbox from now on.

Since Sony have less studios and won´t release their games day one on PS+, they better make sure andl deliver high quality games like Ragnarok. Because so far, 2023 hadn´t started well for them with Forspoken.

https://www.videogameschron...

Sony spent millions to secure a AAA third party exclusive game build from the ground up for PS5, not to mention more millions spent on market to be outperformed by a AA game which costs less than half on Steam, had an EPIC day one surprise announcement AND release with ZERO money invested on promotion and marketing.

If that´s not good competition, I don´t know what it is.

BehindTheRows1213d ago

@Obscure_Observer

It isn’t.

Obscure_Observer1213d ago (Edited 1213d ago )

"It isn’t."

Oh yes, it is. You can bet your life that both companies cares about their money and investments.

The simple fact that Sony continues to pay multiple publishers to keep games out of Xbox forever, is nothing but a reaction to Gamepass.

Imo, Sony now fears that once their timed-exclusive contracts ends, those games will be available on Gamepass the moment the said games hits the Xbox platforms.

Sony fears the scenario where gamers realize that it´s not worth to invest in every single game released on Playstation at full $70 once they´ll be getting it for "free" on Gamepass eventually, just like Yakuza, Dragon Quest, Octopath Traveler, Nino Kuni, Persona series and more.

ARK 2 (exclusive on Xbox consoles), S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2( exclusive on Xbox consoles), Flintlock, Wo Long, Atomic Hears, Lies of P, Eiyuden Chronicle, Hollow Knight: Silksong. Minecraft: Legends, MLB 23...

Those are just some of the games that Xbox players will be getting for "free" day one while Playstation gamers will have to pay for all of it.

So at least you´re rich or something, Xbox players will be getting way more NEW games to play than you. That´s just facts.

BehindTheRows1213d ago (Edited 1213d ago )

@Obscure_Observer

I can bet that one company brings actual competition, isn’t afraid to share losing numbers, and doesn’t buy huge publishers due to said weaknesses. That’s what I can bet.

As a fan of theirs, you should want them to do better and offer more than subscriptions services and unfulfilled promises.

tay87011213d ago (Edited 1213d ago )

@obscure. Well Sony can't control 3rd party games quality, but their 1st party certainly trounces MS's. Spiderman 2 is going to a absolutely dominate the holiday season, just like ragnarok did this past holiday season. Sony easily has the best gaming studios out of the big three. It's.not Sony who has to worry about their 1st part output, it is MS.

MIDGETonSTILTS171213d ago

@Obscure: what AAA games would I buy an XsX today to play?

I own a ps5 and XsX, and I don’t know of one game that would have motivated me to buy an XsX ( I bought it to appease my dumb Xbot friends).

I bought a ps5 for Demon Souls (best looking game on consoles), Returnal (top 10 game of all time for me), and Dualsense upgrades for shooters (completely changes R6 for me).

So, can you illustrate how XsX is competing? I liked HiFi Rush a lot, High on Life too, but neither make we happy about the $500 I sunk into the hardware to play them.

Mr_cheese1212d ago

Obscurer, you're saying an awful lot without talking much sense at all.

VR isn't a distraction, neither does it take games away from playstation. Sony have been building and harnessing studios just for this while working on their 1st party none VR titles.

Microsoft is fully committed to gamepass and that's fine for them and those that like to game that way. It will be an even better product if Microsoft can nail their 1st party games.

What I'd hate to see are more moves like the Activision and Bethesda purchases and attempts because it destroys the gaming ecosystem. I'd say the same for Sony as well because once the ball is rolling, they'll all start buying and diving gaming.

Obscure_Observer1212d ago (Edited 1212d ago )

"I can bet that one company brings actual competition, isn’t afraid to share losing numbers, and doesn’t buy huge publishers due to said weaknesses. That’s what I can bet."

Unfortunately for you, MS or Nintendo aren´t forced to play by yours or Sony´s rules. Fyi, Sony used to buy publishers back in the day. The only reason they aren´t doing it now is simply because they can´t.

As it is, Sony already owns 14.09% of Kadokawa´s shares while Tencent acquired 16% of the company's shares, which means 1/3 of the entire company ownership.

The only reason why Tencent owns more than Sony is because Sony couldn´t pay more for it. So spare me from this "victim complex" bs defense for Sony.

Phil acted as the "nice guy" for too long. To the point where stupid fanboys were all happy when Xbox acquired new studios and publishers, because the idiots were under the illusion that all future Xbox games would become multiplatform and be released on Playstation.

Yeah, they were stupid to the point of thinking that MS would turn into a third party developer for Playstation.

Reality hits hard and here we are. Now that they KNOW those games aren´t coming to Playstation, all that they can do now is cry and moan over games paid and developed by Microsoft to not be on their platform of choice.

They think they´re entitled to have anything and everything otherwise it´s not good competition.

Phil Spencer won´t stop. Be the Activision/Blizzard deal approved or not, he can just go after a single studio like CDPR for example and you´ll be here crying all the same.

I don´t care if Sony or Nintendo buys SquareEnix, From Software or even SEGA tomorrow. Because I have no problem buying products from those companies if they have the games I want. I care about games first and foremost. So don´t expect me to be on your sad place complaining about big a$$ companies running their business as they see fit.

Lightning771212d ago

"You should want THEM to feel enough heat to actually do better."

But when they do attempt to do better ppl complain about it.

BehindTheRows1212d ago

@Lightning77

What genuine attempts have people complained about?

Lightning771211d ago

With the whole Bethesda thing. There was article on here not too long ago talking about how Bethesda investment will pay off for MS. The whole comment section everyone was whining about how MS was taking games away. So when MS competes everyone here complains on here. No matter what MS hurts feelings. It's quite funny actually.

BehindTheRows1211d ago

@Lightning77

In other words, outside of publisher acquisitions, they have not really attempted to compete.

And "whining" happens on both sides, so I hope you are just as entertained when people bitch and moan about moves Sony makes.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 1211d ago
Crows901213d ago

Ps+ extra already has better games than gamepass. Just look at the highest scoring games...ps extra has more of them.

Obscure_Observer1213d ago

Lol. What a joke.

PS+ relies on old games. Gamepass not only has day one first party games but also day one third party as well. Even from Sony. XD

S2Killinit1213d ago (Edited 1213d ago )

Exactly. “Day one” is a buzz word that makes these guys think they have a better line up but it has not amounted to much. If you look at what they have at any given time on their service its not that rosy. Not to mention “day one” also exists on PS plus just not for the first party AAA story games (which is fine w me as long as they continue making the hits).

Check out their list of day one releases for all the years they had gamepass. Its a joke.

Crows901213d ago (Edited 1213d ago )

@obscure

I'd take good old games then new Bad games. Besides that wasn't his point and that has nothing to do with what I claimed. The op said that they should offer better games but they already offer better games. He did not say new games. Or even New Quality games. But to your point, I know that game pass lovers do enjoy their day one bad or mediocre games. It's all about value with you guys and not quality

GamingSinceForever1213d ago

Some are going ape shit over Hi-Fi Rush but completely forgot about the Tokyo Wire dud the same developer last released. My point being there are hits and misses.

1213d ago
1213d ago
Obscure_Observer1213d ago (Edited 1213d ago )

" It's all about value with you guys and not quality"

Lol. Your false narrative didn´t aged well.

All Metacritic scores for day one first party games
.
Ori and the Will of the Wisps 92 on Metacritic
Flight Simulator 90 on Metacritic
Forza Horizon 5 92 on Metacritic
Halo Infinite 87 on Metacritic
Grounded 85 on Metacritic
Pentiment 87 on Metacritic
Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition 87 on Metacritic
Hi-Fi Rush 88 on Metacritic

And that´s only from first party games/IPs on Xbox series consoles.

So much for your "quality vs quantity" BS narrative.

Oh, and we "Gamepass Lovers" also love old quality games as well. I also can give you a large list of high quality third party on Gamepass. Just ask. ;)

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1213d ago
GamingSinceForever1213d ago

@Obscure_Observer… Forspoken was not a 1st party game from Sony nor should it be treated as such. Square Enix will comeback nicely with FFXVI I’m sure.

Besides Sony is entitled to some misses here and there because they actually take chances on new titles and release them regularly.

Bu the time Spiderman 2 releases everyone will have forgotten all about this terrible start you’re claiming.

Crows901213d ago

They're so anxious to try to nail Sony on something that they'll even bring up third party developers not under Sony. Oh look this time's exclusive that wasn't developed by a Sony studio was bad so Sony doesn't know how to do good games.

1213d ago
Obscure_Observer1213d ago

"@Obscure_Observer… Forspoken was not a 1st party game from Sony nor should it be treated as such. Square Enix will comeback nicely with FFXVI I’m sure."

In no moment I said it´s a first party game. Both Forspoken and FFXVI are exclusive Playstation 5 games which Sony invested large sums of money to secure to their platform. Just like the original Spiderman from Insomniac. (which till this day Sony fans treat it like a first party/IP)

So it´s pretty obvious if the game fails, Sony also fails and loses tons of money which could had been invested on first party games.

"Besides Sony is entitled to some misses here and there because they actually take chances on new titles and release them regularly."

True.

"Bu the time Spiderman 2 releases everyone will have forgotten all about this terrible start you’re claiming."

Also true. The same can be said about FFXVI, imo.

Abear211213d ago

The leader, Nintendo, doesn’t care what the competition does.

Obscure_Observer1212d ago

"The leader, Nintendo, doesn’t care what the competition does."

Couldn´t agree more

BehindTheRows1212d ago

The Switch is leading the PS5 because it launched three years prior. PS4 won last gen is all forms (money made, units sold, software totals).

No hate for Nintendo though, as they are another company who actually puts out quality games in high numbers, but just a little perspective.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1211d ago
Orchard1213d ago

“In 2022, Microsoft took the lead with 60-70% of total MAUs”

From 20-30% up to 60-70%? That’s some crazy growth. Probably thanks to Fortnite.

SurgicalMenace1213d ago

That's what's up, young fella. You feel better now?

The Wood1213d ago

All the other stats dont matter. Especially the ones where ps is tearing xbox a new one

1213d ago
Obscure_Observer1213d ago

“In 2022, Microsoft took the lead with 60-70% of total MAUs”

Probably one of reasons why Sony won´t return Activision´s calls.

BehindTheRows1213d ago

Oh, yeah, THAT must be it….

Outside_ofthe_Box1213d ago

You're not asking for numbers now, I noticed? 🤣

Orchard1212d ago (Edited 1212d ago )

Oops, somebody didn't read the article.

This isn't a "YoY increase". It's market share, so we know they had 60-70% of the streaming market.

MIDGETonSTILTS171213d ago

That’s why we game: to celebrate YoY growth!

Three cheers for first-party content-starving fueling third party max’s and subscriptions.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1212d ago
Tacoboto1212d ago

What a clickbait headline. Why mention 2021, when the tides turned in 2022 for the obvious reason of one company making the Cloud service one of their biggest marketing pushes throughout the entire year while the other company was able to promote the games they had coming out?

And it's imprudent to suggest crazy growth when we only know proportions - did Xbox grow its proportion by attracting from the competitors' bases, did their marketing pay off and attract new users, or did cloud gamers on competitors just not play as much? The MAU figures don't point to shifts as significant as the Cloud proportions do, and Microsoft's lack of raw subscriber numbers that they happily boasted about in 2021 is telling too.

70°

Assassin's Creed Odyssey available on PC and Xbox Game Pass today

Ubisoft's brilliant Assassin's Creed Odyssey will become available via Xbox and PC Game Pass today, Microsoft has annou…

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
RavenWolfx1360d ago

At the time of this comment, I am not seeing Odyssey on Xbox or PC yet.