All Channels
Popular
360°

Revisiting The Order: 1886 with developer Ready At Dawn

We look back at one of the prettiest — and shortest — PS4 exclusives

sampsonon2832d ago (Edited 2832d ago )

make a sequel. take my money.

i played it with my girl on halloween with two glasses and a bottle of wine.....
we loved it. this was a year after everyone bashed it so we didn't go in with any negativity.
you would be surprised how much of a difference that makes when playing a game without all the noise.

at least make a comic or a show because i want to see what happens.

jimbost792832d ago (Edited 2832d ago )

I thought it was brilliant too mate. Went in with zero expectations and thoroughly enjoyed my time with it. It looked great, played well and the story and setting were brilliant too.
The length of the game wasnt an issue for me. Id prefer quality over quantity any day of the week.
Definitely deserves a sequel.

playnice2832d ago

I gotta give it a shot! Got it for dirt cheap but never opened it ...

bouzebbal2832d ago

I loved it too, but full price for a couple hours and no repeatability is what caused the mixed reviews..
It's a 10/10 game for 20 bucks,that's 4 sure

Skull5212832d ago

I didn't get in more than two hours before it bored me to death, I certainly never finished it. The game got the criticism it deserved, that doesn't mean you can't like it.

jimbost792832d ago (Edited 2832d ago )

Lets click on an article about a game that bored me to death, and tell people it's ok to like it. Well thanks mate, i feel much better now i have your approval and im sure everyone else does too. I wasn't sure wether or not it was allowed to like it. Thanks again

Skull5212832d ago

The article is specifically called "Revisiting The Order"

Are you only allowed to revisit if you liked it? The game was terrible, and nearly every review was honest about that fact.

NecrumOddBoy2832d ago

The Order only suffered from a few small things (crappy collection system, nav system and extreme linearity) and one major design flaw with its popup target style of combat. With a wide-linear design for more exploration and a better combat system, the sequel would be a GOTY contender. The art, sound, weapons, graphics, acting, story, script, and world was perfect and one of the most enjoyable experiences this gen.

Knights!!!

jimbost792832d ago

@skull521
Bit of a twat arent you? Why on earth would you revist a game you hated? The game was terrible in your opinion.
I dont give a fuck about reviews, ill judge for myself what i like. For example horizon got great reviews and guess what, i couldnt get into it for whatever reason. Now im not gonna go to any threads about horizon and tell people there who enjoyed it that it was shit.
That would make me a dick.

brando0082832d ago

In the same boat all the way

RememberThe3572832d ago (Edited 2832d ago )

Oh Jim don't worry about the douche, douches will be douches. The game wasnt even trashed in reviews, it was too short, didn't have any replay value, and not enough variation. That not trashing a game, that's calling out it's weaknesses. The game is still one of he prettiest ever made and the world is amazing. It was a fun game to get through but I wanted so much more and Ready at Dawn and Sony just left it sitting there. This and Heavenly Sword are two great game that will probably never see sequels, yet some how we got Knack 2... 😒

jc122831d ago (Edited 2831d ago )

@Jimbost79 You thought The Order was "brilliant?"

Guys, I understand this message board is very pro Sony, but lets not get carried away here.

@Bouzebbal "Its a 10/10 game."

What? What the hell are you guys smoking? If this game was a 10/10, then The Last of Us is a 20/10. Give me a break.

jimbost792831d ago

@jc12 yea i did. Thats the thing with different people's tastes and opinions. They differ.
I really enjoyed the order, im not saying it was perfect and it had its faults. But i think with a sequel they could create something truly special.
Last of us was a good game but for me not this masterpiece eveyone raves about. But i can see how people do think it is, and i wouldn't say their opinion is wrong.
Same with horizon zero dawn, i got aloy to lvl 20 but couldn't bring myself to carry on. Did finish lou tho. Will probably give horizon another go at some point aswel.
Im only pro sony when i think theyve created a great game. Like ive already said i dont listen to reviews ill form my own opinion on games. Gow and U4 my 2 favourite exclusives this gen. I wouldnt care if they had a 40 metacritic they would remain my favourites.
There's no right or wrong here. Just different peoples different opinions. If you think its shit, fair enough. I think it was brilliant.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 2831d ago
Vandamme212832d ago (Edited 2832d ago )

I agree with you...the game was awesome...I want a sequel to.

CP_Company2832d ago

Played this year. Enjoyed a lot. Only gripe is lenght. There is a lot of lore there, which begging to be explore.

sprinterboy2832d ago

Thoroughly enjoyed it too at launch, my only regret was buying digital as I had no trade in value after my 2nd playthrough. Got about 20hrs of playtime so got my my money's worth imo, sequel would be much welcome and learn from some the mistakes they made werewolf battles as a example but great game non the less.

thatguyhayat2832d ago

Didn't they say this would be a franchise years ago? The way it ended they need to make a sequel

nucky642832d ago (Edited 2832d ago )

i'm with you sampsonon - i loved the story and i want a werewolf vs vampires war!

edit: bouzebbal - it wasn't a 2 hour game. my first playthrough was 9 hours.

sampsonon2832d ago

@bouzebbal: "I loved it too, but full price for a couple hours and no repeatability is what caused the mixed reviews..
It's a 10/10 game for 20 bucks,that's 4 sure"

I'm sorry, but the amount of work they put into the game, and it wasn't a couple hrs, would be an insult at $20.
i spend more than $60 for dinner and a movie for two, and that is only 2 hrs.

like people say " i would rather play a game that is quality over a game that isn't but is longer."

sampsonon2832d ago

i think people are confusing a cheap Tetale game with the production of a game like the order. not even close friends. by maybe 90 million

porkChop2832d ago

If it had launched at a more reasonable price I think the game would have been fine.

But $60 for a 5-6 hour game with little replayability was too much for many people.

sampsonon2832d ago (Edited 2832d ago )

it wasn't 5 - 6 hrs long unless you sped through it. game took me about 10 hrs playing casually, meaning searching and looking at the beauty.
the game being $60 had nothing to do with length it had to do with the amount of time and money that went into the game. it's not a cheap Telltale game, no disrespect to Telltale Games, in that the quality and time spent working on detail is why they charge what they did. i would rather pay $60 for the world building they did than pay $20 for a cartoon Telltale game. as much as i like Telltale games.

PhantomS422832d ago

The game clearly has potential, it really does need a sequel for a chance to shine.

sinspirit2832d ago

It felt like a small hint of Uncharted in a gritty old London atmosphere with a sprinkle of Resistance with its weapons. The game itself was very underrated, it was short if you sped through it but it was well done. With how open Sony normally is to franchise potential it really feels like they dropped the ball here. I think they'll pick it back up eventually.

The game would have made a lot of sense if they made an online horde mode. Maybe, the Order will drink a concoction to drift off into a mental battleground with hordes of ethereal monsters, and this prepares them for the real deal.

TheGoodestBoi2832d ago

I really enjoyed it too. In fact it was my first ever platinum for playstation.

bangoskank2832d ago (Edited 2832d ago )

I also played it more recently so expectations weren't affected by the mixed reviews it received at launch. The visuals, voice acting, writing, and score were all top notch. I would love to return to this universe with more of the shooter mechanics. The quick time events hardly bothered me because everything else was so great.

brando0082832d ago

Yup, fully agreed. Got it for a steal, had low expectations, and was utterly blown away by the quality of the game. Definitely one of my favourites on PS4

nicsaysdie2831d ago

For realz yo. I bought this game for twelve bucks during all the hate speech. I fully went in expecting a dumpster fire with how bad it was received. I came away with a great experience. It was super fun and beautiful. Best looking game for sure at the time, and still looks amazing. As far as the story goes, it was great. And the length, it was the perfect length for the story it told. Ready at dawn, if you're listening, please continue. Don't let this amazing story die.

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 2831d ago
spirited2832d ago

This deserved a sequel more than Knack
are u with me guys?

sprinterboy2832d ago

Agree sort of as had a blast with the kids with knack

Shiken2832d ago

I loved the game, beat it twice and got the plat. It had a lot of untapped potential and I feel it deserves another shot. The criticism the first got was deserved, but what was there was great IMO.

Let the learn from their mistakes and move forward with the IP. If they listen to the feedback from the first, we could have a real gem on our hands.

RememberThe3572832d ago

How did you read my mind 13 hrs ago?

Platformgamer2832d ago

knack deserved a sequel because it's a good game.
same goes for the order 1886, i want a sequel for it too

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2832d ago
leahcim2832d ago

Sony must give RAD the chance of redeem themselves !
They deserve it
Have you played Daxter or Chains of Olympus?? those previous games were amazing

Spurg2832d ago

Ready at dawn need to make a sequel to the order. I absolutely loved that game.

cfc832832d ago

The Order is to ps4 what Ryse is to xb1.

TheEnigma3132832d ago

Both could have been way better sequels.

nucky642832d ago

not sure why you'd mention/think that; but, kind of off topic.

cfc832832d ago

Isn't OT. Both games got alot of criticism, and some harsh reviews, but alot of people who actually paid for them enjoyed the games.

PowerOfTheCloud2832d ago

Cfc83
But ryse is a multiplatform game, while the order is an exclusive so i don't get the comparison.

spicelicka2832d ago

But The Order is a Sony exclusive and Ryse is a Microsoft exclusive, so just get the comparison.

Rimeskeem2832d ago

Really? Cause I remember xbox people defending Ryse.

spicelicka2832d ago

And PS people defend The Order, right in this article even. Are you reading?

spicelicka2832d ago

Agree with this. Both games had beautiful graphics, great well acted stories, and visceral gameplay. The length and gameplay depth fell short for both, but they're great games.

Ratchet752832d ago

Ryse definitely deserved a sequel but i believe crytek is on their last leg and close to bankruptcy

cfc832832d ago

Pitty nobody could buy the i.p. Crytek sold a couple of titles to thq nordic.

carcarias2832d ago

For whatever it's worth, I thought the same thing. It's definitely interesting to note the similarities. Not sure why you have so many downvotes.

Both games shouldered the huge burden of being technical showpieces early on in their respective console cycles. People had huge expectations for them but both games were on the short side with game mechanics that, while solid and enjoyable, people had seen many times before.

However, like you said, both games got a bit of a beating from the critics but word of mouth was much more positive, especially when time had gone by. I wasn't blown away by either of them (except perhaps in terms of presentation) but I did enjoy them and would play bigger, more fleshed out sequels to both.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2832d ago
Show all comments (78)
210°

The Order: 1886 Sequel Would Have Featured Larger-Scale Battles & Multiplayer

A sequel to Sony and Ready At Dawn's action-adventure game, The Order: 1886, would have featured larger-scale battles as well as multiplayer.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
pwnmaster3000357d ago

I missed it when games use to have a multiplayer to them.
Hope Sony revives the game at one point

KyRo356d ago

Killzone, Resistance, Uncharted, TLOU, Motorstorm. Great times. Its a shame how far they've fallen this generation

Muigi356d ago

Oh they still do…its just the whole game now 😂.

-Foxtrot357d ago

Why add multiplayer when the single player (despite enjoying it for what it was) had flaws?

You'd work out the issues with how you craft the single player then once you’ve perfected it do multiplayer after.

RaidenBlack357d ago

https://www.videogameschron...
"Two sequels were planned for the franchise, The Order 1891 and The Order 1899. While the third game was never in development, Weerasuriya says he had planned where the story of the franchise was planned to go, if he had been able to develop the full trilogy."
...
Alas, we'll also might never get the PC version of 1886, which is currently residing in some dev's hard drive, nearly ready for a release if required.

Charal356d ago

It’s a shame we didn’t gave its chance to this franchise.
Game world was very interesting, and gameplay could have evolved to a major hit with sequels.
Not even speaking about graphics that were way ahead of their time.

Reaper22_356d ago (Edited 356d ago )

If "we" is sony, i agree. I liked the game but it was metacritic that contributed to it's death. It's a shame.

AshleeEmerson356d ago

No, we are "us," the gamers who rated it so low on Metacritic, hurting... Killing its sales. I agree it is a shame. I loved this game.

Charal356d ago

No it is not, it is us has a community which crucified this game, which is happening much too often.

CrimsonWing69356d ago (Edited 356d ago )

I think MP being co-op would’ve been awesome. Essentially, I always viewed this as Sony’s take on the Gears series.

However, it really failed to measure up to what I expected. I definitely saw the potential but there were some things that really bogged it down for me like the forced slow walking segments (which I know was to hide loading), the repetitive warehouse werewolf fights, not enough variety in enemies, oddly we fought more humans than Darkstalkers, and the stealth sections were infuriating.

One thing there’s no denying though, this damn game was a looker. Such a shame at the wasted potential.

Show all comments (16)
120°

The Order: 1886, a Ten Year Reunion

WTMG's Leo Faria: "After finally playing the now decade-old The Order: 1886, what do I think about it? Is it really worthy of all the hate it has received over the past decade? Or is it some kind of hidden gem? I honestly think it falls somewhere in the middle. I loved the setting, the story is initially fine, the combat isn’t half-bad, and the potential for some awesome world building was there. It was all bogged down by too much ambition against a tight deadline, as well as poor marketing. As a result, it’s short, full of plotholes, infested with QTEs, and not exactly memorable as a whole. As a game you can grab for less than ten bucks today, I absolutely think it’s worth checking out. It’s one hell of a wasted potential, but for such a discount, I had some fun with it, and I’m sure you will too."

Read Full Story >>
waytoomany.games
SimpleSlave453d ago (Edited 453d ago )

Great setting, great graphics, even decent gun play, but what a trash of a game. The fuck were these people thinking? We could've had something like an Alan Wake 2 meets Mass Effect 2 style game. With investigations, creepy locations to uncover and explore, people to talk to and even recruit, clues to uncover and connect, monsters to slay, side quests to get lost in, and a more expansive lore to go with it.

Instead we got a shitty AAAAAAAAA Third Person Pew Pew snoozfest. Awesome.

_SilverHawk_453d ago

The order 1886 was one of the best games I played on ps4. Within a top 5 best ps4 games I'd put the last of us 2, the order 1886, days gone, horizon zero dawn and God of war.

SimpleSlave453d ago

"The order 1886 was one of the best games I played on ps4. Within a top 5 best ps4 games..."

Jesus H. Christ, bud. You just sound like a Sony apologist. What the fuck? Anyways. Good luck with that or whatever.

coolbeans453d ago

God. The "what could've been" you're describing would've been way better than just being the most empty cinematic shooter slop of that generation.

SimpleSlave453d ago

Right? I mean, I can understand people enjoying this thing ironically. Knowing that it sucks but still enjoying it for what it is. I get that. That's fine. We all have our guilty pleasure no doubt. But to come here and actually pretend that this is a top 5 PS4 game? Wow!

To pretend that this barely there game is anything more than an "empty cinematic shooter slop of that generation," as you said, is beyond ridiculous. But I guess Self-Awareness is some expensive ass DLC still.

Espangerish453d ago

I really enjoyed this game and also think it was one of the best PS4 games. It’s weird to me that this makes you so angry. I’m not a Sony fan at all by the way, very much pc player.

SimpleSlave452d ago

"and also think it was one of the best PS4 games"
"I’m not a Sony fan at all by the way, very much pc player."

Yeah, OK. You want to lie to yourself? You do you, bud. But like I said to the other Sony apologist, "good luck with that or whatever."

-Foxtrot452d ago

Jesus, it had some flaws but you're acting like it was unplayable.

It built a foundation, a rocky one but a sequel is where they could have refined things.

Personally my only issue is I feel like the "Gears of War" like over the shoulder gameplay, especially getting into cover and the like didn't really fit the game as much. In Gears you understand that kind of gameplay because they are wearing super heavy amour and guns but in the Order these guys are super human, they should feel more of a breeze to control, easily jumping over things and being allowed to climb whatever similar to Uncharted.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 452d ago
Inverno453d ago

Im back again to simp for The Order, if ya like games well grounded in their reality with consistency in everything it does then I recommend it if ya haven't played it. Play it thru emulation or on your PS it don't matter just play it.

1nsomniac453d ago (Edited 453d ago )

A great game run down by the media for it's price vs length - Which was understandable, but it shouldn't of been the be all and end all.

At the right price this was a great game & deserved a sequel!

thorstein453d ago

Exactly. What a weird metric that suddenly was important and then, within a few months, no longer mattered.

andy85453d ago

I enjoyed this. I think the complaints were the length if I remember. Nothing wrong with a short good game, at least to physical copy owners 😅

Rebel_Scum453d ago

Put the thing on PS plus already!

Show all comments (16)
310°

The Order: 1886 Dev Pitched a Sequel to Sony, But Was Denied

Co-founder thinks bad reviews were to blame.
Ready at Dawn co-founder has revealed the now-shuttered studio pitched a sequel to PS4 exclusive The Order: 1886 to Sony, but was denied the chance to make it.

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
_SilverHawk_463d ago

I can't believe sony turned down a sequel to the order 1886 which ended basically on a cliffhanger. The game is amazing and I would love a ps5 pro enhanced version just like I'd like a driveclub ps5 pro enhanced version.

DodoDojo463d ago

About 2 million sales and not the greatest of reviews, I can believe it.

Tbh there's a lot of dormant Sony exclusives that are more deserving of a sequel.

ravens52462d ago

Have you played it? Just curious.

ABizzel1462d ago (Edited 462d ago )

2 million probably wasn’t enough to make a strong profit on, and the mid reviews didn’t help, even though it was a solid game just short, and could have expanded way more on the creature mythos.

Days Gone: +7 million / mid reviews (no sequel)
Infamous SS: 6 million / mid reviews (no sequel)
Killzone SF: +2 million (4 mo.) / mid reviews (no sequel)
Driveclub: +2 million (2015 / leaks say 5m) / mid reviews (no sequel)

Basically it looks like for the PS4 generation budgets were getting out of control and Sony made the decision

sales + reviews - budget = sequel or no sequel

goken462d ago

Whatever the number, can’t be worst than concord

SimpleDad462d ago

Glad that Alloy Lego is doing great.

Toecutter00462d ago

Two million in sales for a new IP is pretty impressive. The world-building was in a class on its own. Any moron could see this IP had mad potential and the fact that Sony balked on it makes one question their competence and leadership.

Cacabunga462d ago

Nothing to do with sales. It’s all about the broken vision that Sony is having lately.
Days Gone sold great but they still don’t want a sequel to it.
Sony wants Easy money and they saw it in gaas and lazy games like lego horizon and countless remasters..

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 462d ago
pwnmaster3000462d ago (Edited 462d ago )

Idky you can’t believe it.
This game was shitted on by everyone besides some PS fans.

Don’t blame Sony on this one. Blame everyone who wanted to see this burn. Sony does a lot of stupid shit with their IP and waste a lot of them like bloodborne and days gone, but don’t be surprised with this one.

Outside_ofthe_Box462d ago

Exactly. I came to post exactly this. The game was torn apart upon release. It's not shocking that a sequel was denied.

S2Killinit462d ago

Not “upon” release. There was a whole campaign “prior” to release.

In my opinion they should have made it a bit less linear and it would have been great. I did enjoy it. But the reception it got makes sense that Sony wouldnt want to risk a sequel if it was going to open up a can of worms with people who wanted the first one to fail.

462d ago
Christopher462d ago

I played the game. I 100% believe Sony turned down a sequel.

blackblades462d ago

Well pretty obvious when it was left on a cliffhanger. Many sequels get turned from companies as someone else said above blame the SOB's that always whining.

Sabbath1313462d ago

i 100% agree with you, both of those games were amazing

Bathyj462d ago

What's so hard to believe? Don't you remember this game was crucified by the media.. it was DOA. It's a shame because it was a really fresh new IP it was gorgeous and a play really well . it had some issues but it wasn't the only game with qte repeated bosses and a playtime under 10 hours.

TheEroica462d ago ShowReplies(2)
mkis007462d ago (Edited 462d ago )

It was panned because of the graphics hype. Kind of similar to Ryse and hellblade 2...although the story was pretty interesting in all 3.

As a matter of fact I think Indy's success is partially due to the fact the graphics were not hyped up pre launch.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 462d ago
-Foxtrot463d ago

It’s strange though Sony would be so proud about their work and overall quality but wouldn’t give them an extra year to, give them that quality.

Anyway he talks about if it was in the 70s they’d have had their sequel but Days Gone is at 71 on Metacritic and we don’t have a sequel.

Both games should have one, I think they deserve a second chance at refining and building onto that foundation already laid out.

neutralgamer1992463d ago (Edited 463d ago )

Definitely days gone 2 should happen. Who knows maybe now Sony will let them make it since bend had to cancel its live service game. Days gone 2 for PS6 sounds amazing

As far as order 1886 sequel it would be have been interesting. I think if this game was a RPG with 15 hour story it would have done so much better. Don't get me wrong game is great but you can tell the potential is there if they were allowed to make some drastic changes

Sadly this new Sony is not the PlayStation they are suits and spreadsheet guys. Playstation has lost its touch with gamers. I miss Shawn jack Andrew house etc

At the launch of PS4 Playstation was at its full strength with gamers running the company but not anymore. No we have a guy who loves horizon above every thing else and is willing to fund projects based on that IP

Redemption-64463d ago

So an IP that actually sell? Sony moved away from the type of games you saw during the launch of the PS4 because many gamer didn't support them. I hear people crying more about say Japan Studio closing than actually supporting their games when they were open. Wasn't it shawn layden who said many of these games fail and you hope a few like horizon to make up for the failed games. Maybe if gamers actually supported these games there would be more of them. Shocking right?

Redemption-64463d ago

There is no sequel for Days Gone because it didn't sell. The director himself said "If you love a game, buy it at f****** full price. I can't tell you how many times I've seen gamers say 'yeah, I got that on sale, I got it through PS Plus, whatever'.”

Majority of the sales from days gone came from when it was heavily discounted, and I have seen many gamers say they will not pay full price or the game isn't worth full price, but they will buy it when it's discounted. Yet they get triggered when the studio decides to move away from a game they refused to support at full price

jwillj2k4462d ago (Edited 462d ago )

What this is showing is that the majority of people don’t like the price. It doesn’t mean they don’t like the game. Two different dimensions.

Example: The company Take Two took advantage by selling NBA 2K at $20, completely undercutting NBA live to become the most popular basketball game. High priced games isn’t the only way they can make money.

-Foxtrot462d ago

Well. If we are going to go off that director apparently Days Gone hit 8 million sales around the same time frame that Ghost of Tsushima later did.

https://x.com/JakeRocket/st...

One was considered a failure, the other a massive success so I don't think it just boils down to sales.

Redemption-64462d ago

@Foxtrot

Hey, maybe you clearly know more than the director/writer. If memory serves me right, Days Gone went on sale faster than Ghost. Also, please know budget is a major factor. There is a huge difference between Ghost with a budget of $60M selling 8M, vs Days Gone, with a budget of $250M selling 8M after major price cut. One can be considered a success, because it had a much lower budget.

Don't Complain If a Game Doesn’t Get a Sequel” If You Didn’t Buy It “At F-cking Full Price, clearly shows the game didn't make the money it needed to make within the time frame it needed

Redemption-64462d ago

@jwillj2k4

What is shows is majority of gamers didn't think Days Gone was worth the $60 price tag and clearly Sony agrees with them. You can like a game, but if you don't think it is worth the price tag, why do you complain when the company decides to not invest in a game you don't think is worth what they are charging? They should release the game, lose money, cut the price and then you will support it?

jwillj2k4461d ago

Reading is fundamental. I said start with a reduced price not cut the price after you’ve already released it. It was an example to show how there are other ways they couldn’t make money. The idea is that number of buyers is much greater at $20 than $60. I didn’t think I had the point that out to you.

Redemption-64460d ago (Edited 460d ago )

@jwillj2k4

The number of buyers being greater at $20 than $60 does not equate to more money. You literally have to sell 2-3 times more to makeup the difference. Starting with a reduced price for an AAA that costs say $250M is pure stupidity and again would have to sell 2-4 times more depending on the reduced price break even. Or include micro transactions. They can make it into a free live service game with mtx. Yeah, you are right, maybe they should follow the route 2K NBA took

Clearly many don't think the game is worth $60. Who knows maybe the remaster can give it hope. But it would be funny if they get a sequel and people refuse to buy it at full price. Highly doubt those who think the game isn't worth 60, will be lining up for 70.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 460d ago
S2Killinit462d ago

Days Gone deserved so much better than 71. I’ve noticed that some PlayStation games get attacked and it feels generated. Like money is behind the hate campaign.

-Foxtrot462d ago

Days Gone was that one game which wasn't really attacked by gamers but by journalists.

As soon as it was revealed they really didn't like it for some reason, it was made out to be because it came across as a generic looking open world game or another generic "zombie" game but at the time we had plenty of open world games and a fair few "zombie/infected" games that these journalists didn't bad an eyelid towards.

When the game released broken before the Day One patch it just gave these journalists a massive excuse to slaughter the game in their reviews.

On one hand, a game shouldn't have released in that broken state or at least they shouldn't have given journalists a copy without the Day One patch HOWEVER these are the same journalists who usually gloss over that kind of stuff with so many other games, take Star Wars Outlaws for example, the game was a buggy, broken mess at launch with plenty of issues, bad AI, some clear performance issues and a lot of quality of life improvements needed but it still did a lot better than Days Gone at launch.

Personally I think they knew they could get away with it more because Sony Bend weren’t that high up and respectable, they knew calling their game out as much as they did wouldn't hit them with any major consequences unlike if they hypothetically were like this towards NaughtyDog, Sony Santa Monica or Insomniac.

RaidenBlack463d ago

Yea and there was/is a PC version of 1886 too in 2016 ... but now maybe collecting dust in some dev's hardrive.

Relientk77463d ago

That's lame. It's not perfect, definitely a flawed game, but deserves a sequel. You already have the first game as a starting point just need to improve upon it. This could have been a much better sequel like the jump from Assassin's Creed to Assassin's Creed 2. The IP has potential.

S2Killinit462d ago

But Assassins Creed sold a lot.

Show all comments (57)