All Channels
Popular
640°

Xbox Two vs PS5: predicting the future

Tech Radar: After E3 2018, we know for a fact that Microsoft is working on the Xbox Two – and Sony can’t be that far off with the PS5.

Beyond the fact that the next-generation consoles will exist, however, we don’t really know anything else beyond that. We know of a few games that have been teased for the next generation, sure, but in terms of what these consoles can actually do, it's anyone's guess.

Read Full Story >>
techradar.com
chrisx2858d ago (Edited 2858d ago )

I predict that as always since the Ps1, Sony will continue to dominate and set graphical and gaming(story, gameplay etc) standards with the PS5.

2858d ago Replies(2)
2858d ago Replies(1)
Skull5212857d ago

Microsoft will have the more powerful system, not really a prediction since it has been stated but it is at least something we know.

RauLeCreuset2857d ago

You do realize other parties have a say in that? They wouldn't have needed to release the X if their statements were credible. The first $500 machine they sold at launch would be more powerful than PS4 and future proof thanks to the power of the cloud.

Skull5212857d ago

Can safely predict the Xbox has the best controller. Wouldn’t surprise me if we get multiple SKUs like X360 had so people can buy what they want. They learned with Kinect that people want options, maybe even a drive-less console for those of us who don’t want to deal with discs anymore, and I would think the PS5 may finally support UHD blu-rays but maybe not since the PlayStation community has almost unanimously said they could not care less about that feature.

RauLeCreuset2857d ago

What does any of those debatable points have to do with knowing the next Xbox will be most powerful, because MS said so? That wasn't a response. It was a desperate attempt to deflect by spitballing talking points.

RosweeSon2857d ago

They already have it now not that’s it’s doing them any favours this far into the Gen

morganfell2857d ago (Edited 2857d ago )

Why doesn't MS do something with the power they have now? The beast?You sound like some child, "Just you wait till my daddy..."

It doesn't matter because the future isn't about the PS5 vs the X2. It is Sony's games and atmosphere vs Microsoft's continual sleight of hand. The one hardware feature you can be sure of from the PS5 is 100% backwards compatibility out of the box. At the end of the day it is about games.

Go ahead and keep chasing the power equation as Ghosts of Tsushima, God of War, TLOU II, and so many other Dony titles keep defying your little teraflop fetish.

Aenea2857d ago

Only if they release a year later than Sony does which looking at the One X/Pro thing might be a possibility.

Otherwise they never ever going to be able to make sure they have the more powerful console...

S2Killinit2857d ago

@Skull521
You didnt answer. Who said that?

Omnislashver362857d ago (Edited 2857d ago )

Either way, even if PS4 is 20-35% weaker. Do you really think MS will produce better looking games? They don't have the studios to even max out the X, much less the X2.

As far as multiplats go they generally are near in quality and cater towards the system with the greater install base which will no doubt be PS5.

And we're going to be looking at power that puts them in a similar class anyway. Even if Sony is 9 TFLOPS and MS is 12: techniques liker Checkerboarding are still going to leave the question of visual fidelity up to developers which Sony has but MS doesn't.

Sorry, but even in a worst-case scenario like I've listed above Sony will come out the clear winner on most fronts. MS will likely take an entire Gen to begin to catch up(which they'll fail at).

MS is just too far behind. Don't get me wrong, I'm looking at buying an X2 after PS5. Mostly for HALO, Gears, and Emby- maybe Forza of they do something city based like NFS or maybe in Japan. But PS5 is going to dominate. It's not even a competition.

Godmars2902857d ago

They'll try to have to most powerful system at launch. Otherwise, unless they happen to be selling well, they'll beef up their "slim" model.

Though really, as streaming is made more and more of a thing, how much will base power of a system mean?Especially if a console or PC title can be made to look as good as on a tablet?

StormSnooper2857d ago (Edited 2857d ago )

I think PlayStation will have the benefit and arriving right after the Xbox, since they are in no rush to change the generation. So, more likely the PlayStation will be slightly more powerful. But regardless I think we’ve seen enough to know that PlayStation games will be better looking regardless of who has the stronger console.

BiggerBoss2857d ago

@skull

I predict that the Ps5 will have better hardware (just like PS4 vs Xbone) AND it will DEFINITELY have better games (just like PS4 vs Xbone).

You know this is true, Skull, just be honest with yourself.

DJ_Professor_K2857d ago

The moronic predictions start 😑

Realms2857d ago

LOL. If MS waits a year yes they will have a more powerful console but Sony will have the market share and it will be the same as this generation casual gamers don't care. Extra pixels don't mean jack if you don't have the software to show of what your console can do.

xfiles20992856d ago

PS5 will be more Powerful Due to the VR Aspect

1Victor2856d ago

Skull51 Is that you moldybrain your comment read like a person with chronic verbal diarrhea with a high fanboy fever

Muzikguy2856d ago (Edited 2856d ago )

That's impossible to know. Even if it was stated, statements aren't fact. Especially those by companies about a future that's ever changing. Where did you get this about UHD blu-rays and people not wanting them? I would say that that feature is a guarantee next gen. 4K will be more mainstream next gen and so will the games. Should be awesome. I need a few new tvs!

Obscure_Observer2856d ago

@Aenea

"Only if they release a year later than Sony does which looking at the One X/Pro thing might be a possibility.

Otherwise they never ever going to be able to make sure they have the more powerful console..."

Not necessarily. I remember the fanboys who predicted the X would fail because of its price point while they were all praise for Sony and their 400 dolar price tag for PS4 Pro and PS4.

To summarize, even if both PS5 and X2 are released in the same year, if Sony sticks with their 400 dollar price tag and MS with their 500 price tag, you can bet all you want that the X2 will be the more powerful console.

Obscure_Observer2856d ago

@S2Killinit

"Stated by whom?"

By Phil Spencer. According to his statements, Microsoft is focusing on powerful console again with the X2, which means that Xbox fans already known that a new 500 dolar console is to be expected.

Sony is very tight-lipped about the PS5 so i don´t know if they´re going to focus on power as well. But if their focus is price point, i don´t think that a 400 dollar PS5 will be more powerful than an (or more if multiples SKUs is to be expect) 500 dollar Xbox One X2.

Rude-ro2856d ago

I would trust the company that actually makes games.

As far as delivering, you judge anything by its past in order to predict its future...

Obscure_Observer2856d ago

@StormSnooper

"I think PlayStation will have the benefit and arriving right after the Xbox, since they are in no rush to change the generation."

And where did you get the idea that Microsoft is in a rush to release the new Xbox? Because they´re officially talking about it before Sony? Microsoft just acquired/created 6 new first party studios. To let those studios work on their new games is the best course of action. They don´t needed to rush the X. They certainly don´t need to rush with the X2.

Z5012856d ago

Stated by who? Link/source?

S2Killinit2856d ago (Edited 2856d ago )

So he is basically saying Spencer can tell what Playstation will be doing in the future. He must be high up in the cult of Spencer. Smh.

+ Show (21) more repliesLast reply 2856d ago
2857d ago
MuddyWaters2857d ago

I predict that if Microsoft had a more powerful console and had more exclusives at launch that most people here would still find 101 reasons why they will say Sony is better.

Does not anyone want stronger competition?

BiggerBoss2857d ago

Ps4 was stronger than xbone, and One X was only stronger because it released an entire YEAR later.

So what leads you to believe this nonsense?

StormSnooper2857d ago

Even if Microsoft has/had all that, it still can’t maintain it for the entire generation. Or should I say won’t because their business model is to enter strong and then hand over the reins to 3rd party games and rely on 3rd party contractual exclusives. (This is why they weren’t prepared for falling behind this generation because after they did, they hadn’t culminated enough 1st party studios to do anything about it.)

First party is just not their thing. I reckon they will slowly dismantle studios again if they have a fighting chance once next generation starts, and go back to their 7sual way of doing business.

MuddyWaters2857d ago

BiggerBoss
"Ps4 was stronger than xbone, and One X was only stronger because it released an entire YEAR later.
So what leads you to believe this nonsense?"

This is about next generation, so yes it is nonsense to already pick a winner.

xX-oldboy-Xx2857d ago (Edited 2857d ago )

Muddy - PS3 and PS4 were the most powerful consoles respectively, and they both outsold their main competition.

All this is conjecture at the moment, PS owners are enjoying their current and will continue to enjoy their upcoming exclusives.

MS supporters should really be taking a hard look at their purchase. Remember that 1 billion dollars in game development? Look what that got you lot. Bugger all.

Hold them accountable and you might actually get some decent support from them for the x. Truly feel for x owners only getting support from 3rd parties and a sequels.

dekke2857d ago

no exclusives on Xbox

Obscure_Observer2856d ago

@BiggerBoss

"Ps4 was stronger than xbone, and One X was only stronger because it released an entire YEAR later. "

Not just that. The X has a 500 dollar price point to justify its specs while the Pro was released with the same price as the base PS4 which hensing why the PS4 is weaker than the X.

The only way to PS5 match the new X on power and specs, will be if Sony decides to follow Microsoft´s steps and charge us a 500 dollars (or more) consol

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2856d ago
DJ_Professor_K2857d ago

Until sega comes and kicks them in the face an takes over once again lol I can dream can’t I lol

bumbleforce2856d ago

Microsoft will have a weaker and more powerful system than the ps5. I predict 3 consoles. Regular with will be less powerful or just as powerful as ps5 and and more powerful version. I also expect them to have more users but not just though xbox. Streaming service to phone etc. Sony ps5 will still not have cross play and good exclusives but so will microsoft

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2856d ago
PhoenixUp2858d ago

Xbox One is called that because Microsoft wants it to be your All in one entertainment device

Why do people tentatively call its successor Xbox Two? Microsoft even avoided calling Xbox 360 the Xbox 2 for a reason.

Goldby2858d ago

Well they will have to sort something out, as the constant name differences between sequels to consoles will become confusing specially if all games going forward are xbox one supported.

Do they continue the one and rebrand it as thr one stop console ecosystem shop instead of all in one or do they use the two or something else to differentiate itself as thr successor to one.

Hence why Sony has stuck yo numbers you walk into a store and see a ps3 and ps4, you know without any previous knowledge which one is the new one. Some may say the 360 sounds newer than one if they have jo prior knowledge

UltraNova2856d ago

Xbox XL? Xbox Super? Xbox Ultra?? Xbox X: Beast Edition? I could go on. My personal fav must be Xbox Future, as in everything promised will come in the future. /S

Obscure_Observer2856d ago

@Nova

Well, at very least you´re talking about a "future" for Xbox! That´s huge, if we consider that about a year ago or so, fanboys predicted Xbox would be dead and gone under Phil Spencer´s leadership. ;)

UltraNova2856d ago

Obscure,

Even then that's still [xbox dying] a future possibility ;-)

Obscure_Observer2856d ago

@Nova

"Even then that's still [xbox dying] a future possibility ;-)"

Yes, it´s true for every company in this industry. Nothing is set in stone. ;)

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2856d ago
zivtheawesome2857d ago

it's just a name for now, it's obviously not gonna be called Xbox 2, i guess saying either Next Xbox or Xbox one successor will be good.

yomfweeee2857d ago

Because MS is stupid with naming their systems.

OB1Biker2857d ago

So would you call it the Xbox one too?
Its just a name people give for convenience. Its not easy to predict what name they'll go for.

yellowgerbil2857d ago

The next system will not be branded Xbox it will have a name similar to Google home something like the Microsoft hub

ILostMyMind2857d ago

It would be funny if MS called it XBox One again.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2856d ago
hench072858d ago

Anyone can win, who knows MS might buy Sony and save us another console war.

Goldby2858d ago

The delusion some people have is redonkulous

babadivad2857d ago

Their's a close to 0% chance of that happening, but they definitely could if they wanted.

dcbronco2857d ago

Actually, Sony and Microsoft are publicly traded companies. Any serious offer would have to be considered. Sony may not be able to buy Microsoft. They just don't have the money and I doubt any bank or investor would give it to them. It would cost several hundred billion. Microsoft, on the other hand, has more than enough cash on hand to make an offer Sony couldn't refuse. Remember we saw this a few years ago with Yahoo. Microsoft offered more than the company was worth, the CEO resisted, a few months later he was fired after Microsoft walked away. Sony has a market cap of around 63 billion, Microsoft can easily pay that. Microsoft has a current market cap of over 777 billion. Sony could never get that. Probably only Apple could buy out Microsoft. Microsoft currently has 132 billion in cash. Apple has about 300 billion in cash. Sony has 26 billion in cash but while Microsoft and Apple rarely carry any, Sony has over 10 billion in debt. So Microsoft could easily buy Sony.

Goldby2856d ago

@Dcbronco

you seem to forget a few major points.

Ms gaming division would never be approved a purchase of a single division of a company for over 70 billion.

and while on the topic of divisions, Ms gaming division is no where near valued at 777 Billion.

stop looking at sony as a game division while lookingh at Ms as a whole. put them on equal grounds ya, your comments might start makign sense

dcbronco2856d ago

My numbers are based on both companies as a whole. And while Microsoft has many profitable divisions, Sony doesn't. Gaming is a big part of this keeping Sony going, not at all the case with Microsoft. Gaming is maybe number four within Microsoft with cloud or office easily beating Sony corporation in profitability. Gaming wouldn't be the ones making a decision to buy sony, it would be Microsoft as a company. And it would be the board approving it. They could sell off parts they don't want to keep. But Microsoft would never buy Sony. They know people are stupid. Many Japanese people would turn against sony if an American company bought it. PlayStation fans would too because people have become so stupid that they regularly defy logic and common sense to stay in their lane. Though the person with the most voting stock can control a company and anybody with the money can buy the stock 18 people on this site still say it's not possible. Some don't understand how it works, but some are so stupid that even given what they know they will click their heels and pretend it's not true. And actually believe they're right. We're in a whole new era of stupid and it may destroy us all.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2856d ago
Goldby2858d ago

Right around the time they announce halo and forza becomes multiplatform for all consoles.

ILostMyMind2857d ago

This would be the best thing MS could do. XB has no exclusivity anymore and they want CP with PS. Sony could not avoid CP in a game of the MS itself in PS. And their talk of "games on all platforms" would no longer be a lie.

RauLeCreuset2857d ago

MS didn't even buy a major developer, but now they're going to buy Sony after four gens of no one having had that bright idea?

Razzer2857d ago

lol.....you can't buy something that isn't for sale. Just ask Vivendi.

Razzer2856d ago

Again.....ask Vivendi how that turned out.

Goldby2856d ago

@343 the last company to ever be bought by MS wild be sony, the gaming industry would probably back sony over a hostile takeover by ms

DialgaMarine2856d ago

@343 Hostile takeovers involve buying enough shares to become the majority shareholder. It’s extremely unlikely that Sony will ever have even to enough shares on sale for MS to even try.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2856d ago
Aenea2857d ago

Yeah, even I can suddenly become a billionaire and buy the Xbox division of MS and turn it into a software only company and thus ending this silly console war crap in a diff way!

We both can dream....

babadivad2857d ago

You don't[and never will] have the capital to buy Microsoft. Microsoft DOES have the capital to buy Sony. But like I said before, there's basically a 0% chance they will do that.

Aenea2857d ago

@baba

I said the Xbox division not MS as a whole. Besides the person I replied to was fantasising and said anyone can win, meaning anything can happen, I can become so freakishly rich that I might be able to buy MS AND Sony for all you know :)

Also, Sony's net worth is estimated at $40.5 billion, I don't see MS dropping that to just buy out a console competitor...

2857d ago
FinalFantasyFanatic2856d ago

No, we must be forever locked in an eternal console war.

DialgaMarine2856d ago (Edited 2856d ago )

lol Just because a company is significantly wealthier than another, that doesn’t mean they can simply walk up and say “Here’s X ammount of dollars, I own you now”. A company can only be bought out if it either wants to be outright purchased, or it puts enough shares on sale for another company to buy them and become the majority shareholder. Even with their gaming presence in the West, Sony is still natively a Japanese company, and the likelihood of a Japanese company selling itself to an American one are about the same as the sun turning into a black hole tomorrow.

Considering Sony is still seeing record profit margins and market cap growth, I doubt they’ll be selling out to anyone anytime soon. These MS shills are just to have to accept that PS is in a far better position to dominate next gen.

Muzikguy2856d ago

Sony would never sell and definitely not to MS.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 2856d ago
2857d ago Replies(4)
xRacer74x2857d ago

Xbox will be the most powerfull system of the two for next gen. They learned their lesson from the OG Xbox and Microsoft has plenty of money they can spend compared to the much smaller Sony company,

RauLeCreuset2857d ago

Then why didn't they make the launch model more powerful and cheaper than PS4 while also keeping the Kinect? There are other, external, factors that go into being most powerful, beyond a mere desire to be. That's not even getting into the question of if claiming that crown will be worth the investment.

xRacer74x2857d ago

Spencer has already said they made a mistake going for the whole home package not just a gaming machine.

RauLeCreuset2857d ago

Why was it a mistake? They have plenty of money, right? Why not do it all? A whole home package still more powerful than the PS4, but cheaper, supported by endless exclusives?

King_Lothric2857d ago

Is having the most powerful system right now helping them? Even the Switch is selling more than the Xbox.

I think Sony and Nintendo does not consider the Xbox a competitor anymore.

xRacer74x2857d ago

Never said it would be best seller just said it would be more powerful. Do not let you being a fanboy hater cloud what I posted. Id like to see a percentage of switch sales whose owner consider it their main console and not their secondary console.

2856d ago
Razzer2856d ago (Edited 2856d ago )

@cigi

45-50 mil installments? Of what? You aren’t trying to say that is how X1s have been sold, right? Cuz that would indeed be stupid.

And MS combined Xbox with Windows 10, not PC. Steam still rules PC. You have a talent for overstating shit in MS favor obviously

LordJamar2856d ago

Saying there not a competitor is extremely stupid ignorant

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2856d ago
OB1Biker2857d ago

Probably at some point. The question is which iteration.

xRacer74x2857d ago

Microsoft learned their lesson with how they goofed on the XBOX one at launch.

OB1Biker2857d ago (Edited 2857d ago )

'Microsoft learned their lesson '
No doubt. That doesn't mean PS5 will be underpowered though.
Similar hardware if they release in the same year is a safe bet

Aenea2857d ago

Nonsense, when both release at the same time they can never ever guarantee to have the more powerful system. If they could the X1 would've blown the PS4 out of the water from the start...

zypher2857d ago

The OG Xbox was more powerful than the PS2, yet it was dominated. The XBox One was less powerful than the PS4 and got dominated. The Xbox One X is more powerful than the Pro, yet hasn't done anything to turn the tide.

Nothing would please Sony more than if MS botched more crucial aspects of the next system (such as price, or launch time frame), because they were obsessed with being the most powerful.

343_Guilty_Spark2856d ago

Considering Sony already had tremendous mindshare from dominating a weak Sega and a floundering Nintendo I’d say Microsoft’s first console attempt was pretty damn good. They had a lot of quality games and really innovated on hardware, and online multiplayer

2857d ago Replies(2)
+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 2856d ago
Show all comments (147)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay6d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn27d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn26d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown7d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay6d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay6d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac6d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger7d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster30007d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde7d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde6d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
40°

Microsoft lifts the lid on Project Helix at GDC Festival of Gaming

The Xbox maker will begin sending alpha versions of Project Helix to developers starting in 2027.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
240°

Xbox Confirms 'Project Helix', Its Next-Gen Console That Will Also Play PC Games

New Microsoft Gaming CEO Asha Sharma, who took over as the head of the Xbox business last week as longtime Xbox boss Phil Spencer retired, has confirmed the codename for Xbox's next-generation console – Project Helix – and also confirmed long-swirling rumors that the device will play Xbox and PC games.

60d ago
dveio60d ago

Hm.

Selling to customers the benefits of Xbox Helix compared to a PC and Steam Machine will be the biggest task for Xbox' marketing, I suppose.

60d ago Replies(2)
60d ago Replies(5)
1Victor59d ago

I said when Xbox destroyed their future with with all their arrogance at the start of XBone”if they keep loosing money they only have 2 more generations before they exit the console market like sega.
This is their final chance to validate the existence of a console to the INVESTORS if this console fail as we all know without exclusives from the activision acquisition or their old exclusives for more than a year it’s game over for Xbox consoles.
Everyone know games will wait for a timed exclusive to go to their console of choice, Microsoft signed the Xbox console death certificate the moment they started PORTING ALL THEIR GAMES to other consoles.
Now my hope is that Valve gives Sony a run for their money and we get a good generation where they take risks and bring new experiences to the market.

59d ago
S2Killinit59d ago (Edited 59d ago )

They will make xbox “consoles”, but they actively downplay consoles because their business strategy is walled garden services

This is basically a PC w xbox logo

fr0sty59d ago (Edited 59d ago )

Xbox has put itself in a tough position... With current RAM prices, the system is going to cost a fortune (it's APU alone is $500-600, before you even get to the RAM, SSD, power supply, etc). So, we're looking at a 4 digit price tag, and it has the Gabecube to compete against now directly in that console space. It has no exclusive games at all. PS6 is coming in close in performance but expected to cost hundreds less, and PS6 Pro will likely again take the "most powerful crown" once it drops, but it will actually have exclusive games.

Not an easy sell to the general public, and not even an easy sell to the PC enthusiasts as it isn't powerful enough to justify paying that much for when you could just build a far more powerful PC for not much more $. If I'm dropping north of $1k on a game system, I'm going to want to go all out, not have mid-range performance. It'll be interesting how they plan on marketing this thing, and who they expect to buy it.

Reaper22_59d ago

Looks like you dont know what you're talking about.

1Victor59d ago

What changed?
Hey obscured 🤖🤖
I’ll explain it like to a IQ 9
Nothing has changed they kept loosing money and to please their INVESTORS Microsoft purchased activision and other developers spending more money they could make in WAAAAAY too long for the company CEO that love monetizing everything so they started porting to EVERYTHING they could (even fire stick🤣🤣).
Do you know why it’s called the big 3?
In the lat 70’s to early 80’ there was multiple companies with their own consoles each the market collapsed and only 2 survived, enter PlayStation, exit sega, exit google, Microsoft is destabilized and desperately start to port all their games EVERYWHERE, enter valve.

Now
W h a t do Y O U think w i l l h a p p e n t o
t h e 3rd leg of that triangle when one is warbling and a replacement is on the way.

GhostScholar59d ago

Loosing money ? Got it. You’re obviously educated….

1Victor59d ago

@ghost: “ Loosing money ? Got it. You’re obviously educated…”
Sure I’m not a scholar but it’s obvious that they aren’t going to be publishing their big franchises day one games on their competitors because of brotherly love for the gaming industry.
Unless and I know this is something a lot of Xbox hardcore fans like obscure can’t comprehend that a big corporation like Microsoft is loosing money gen after gen,
Money doesn’t come for free from big corporations Xbox gen 1 lost money on consoles sold. Xbox 360 lost money on repairs of the RROD Xbox One didn’t make the money they wanted, Xbox series hasn’t sold as well as expected and have a MASIVE LOAN from all the studios and a publisher purchase..
I’ll be waiting for your reply proving they are not loosing money. Oh I see you pulling that game pass card, put it back FCC filing by Microsoft said they didn’t make money from game pass.
NOW PROVE ME WRONG

mudakoshaka59d ago (Edited 59d ago )

They had to put them on other platforms. All the gaming companies they bought cost a LOT of money. Xbox is not sufficient to bring in new revenue, so the only choice is expanding your market share by releasing on other platforms that are clearly leading the market. It was not something they wanted but something they needed to do to recoup some of all the expenses.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 59d ago
peppeaccardo59d ago

I might be saying the obvious but any piece of hardware for as powerful as it could be, without an healthy portfolio of fun to play and engaging games is worth less tehn zero. So as long as the new XBOX will be marketed as the most powerful console on the planet and NOT as the ONLY place where true long lastying XBOX fans can impersonate their beloved characters/heroes this thing is going to fail big. I would love to think that Playstaiton is moving away from the PC ports also to keep its identity, the truth is that a console value is higher if that console is the only mean to access certain IPs. XBOX with gamepass and PC ports has depersonalized his player and fan base.
Just my two cents ... but I am sure there is some thurth in here.
Peace on !

Reaper22_59d ago

Xbox has a huge library of great games. This new console will be able to play them all. Thats what gamers care about the most.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 59d ago
60d ago Replies(1)
Deathdeliverer60d ago

The question will be if you have a PC, why buy a Xbox that plays PC and Xbox games… Unless they plan to have you buy a Xbox PC instead of a dedicated PC. Thats got to be the plan. Take some of the PC players and turn them into console PC players. They couldn’t give you full access to the PC/console like you can with a dedicated PC because you would think the piracy for the “dedicated” Xbox games would be crazy. Yeah, they are really going to have to explain who this is for. If you can install whatever you want then you would have Steam access. This directly copies the Steam box idea so I’m sure Steam isn’t happy about it. I guess time will tell.

60d ago
Rainbowcookie59d ago (Edited 59d ago )

Maybe it will be heavily subsidized so software sales will make up the loss to get it into peoples hands early and the system allows for a steam like environment. I think Sony knows since rumor has it that they will do less Pc ports.

derek59d ago

I dont think that's in the cards not with the 80 plus billion spent on gaming this gen. Microsoft aint subsidizing hardware anymore look how they've priced the series consoles and offered no deals this past holidays. Sony pulling away from pc ports is because there is no good rational for continuing to do so.

ABizzel159d ago (Edited 59d ago )

They don’t sell enough of the current Xbox consoles to heavily subsidize those platforms and in fact they increased in price, so I don’t see a future where this gets any. I think we’re looking at a $999 platform, which I mean is great for a GPU rumored to be on par with a full PC running a RTX 5070Ti/5080 equivalent depending on clocks, since those GPUs alone around $1000+.

I assume they’re going to do a two tiered system again, because a lowered cost version could be the significantly better option for PC gamers specifically the esports crowd who doesn’t upgrade all the time and don’t care about the highest specs. If they can do something around a RX 9060 with 16GB+ of VRAM for $499 then that would be the true winner because it gives those PC gamers a REAL substantial upgrade at a very reasonable price. It’ll also put a huge amount of pressure on the Steam Box.

isarai_lee59d ago

What i was wondering too, like best case scenario it's a PC with a bunch of restrictions on it, and when ALL their games on on PC, what is even the incentive here? 🤔

ABizzel159d ago (Edited 59d ago )

It builds a niche for them, and I’ve been saying they should have done this since the XBO. However, it’s still going to be a battle. Hardcore PC gamers are not leaving PC unless this is an ultimate steal in price:performance.

The rumored spec depending on clock speeds should place this around RTX 5070TI / 5080 performance which sounds insane, but the rumored launch in late 2027 and the RTX 5070Ti/5080 will be almost 3 years old by then.

But those GPUs are retailing around $1000, so what is this PC-Console hybrid going to cost.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 59d ago
MrNinosan60d ago

Basically a PC with an Xbox logo slapped on, just like the so called Xbox handheld.
My guess is it won't play my Xbox games I have on disc 🤔

60d ago
babadivad59d ago

Nah, the handheld IS a PC. It can stream Xbox games or play the PC version of those games with "play anywhere".

This sounds like it will play Xbox games natively, which is amazing if true.

I want to see more. I already have a powerful PC so I need to be sold on this before just diving in. Tech whore that I am. Seems very interesting so far, regardless.

DazaMc59d ago

Perhaps it will download a compatible version if you have the disc in.

Reaper22_59d ago

You just described all consoles. At the end of the day they're all PCs.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 59d ago
Show all comments (122)