
Earlier this month, buried in some exciting new details about the Switch’s upcoming online service, Nintendo revealed that it was killing the Virtual Console as a concept. “There are currently no plans to bring classic games together under the Virtual Console banner as has been done on other Nintendo systems,” a company rep explained. This careful wording led to many upset fans.
Since the original Wii, the Virtual Console has been a Nintendo staple, a place where you could buy everything from Super Metroid to obscure TurboGrafx games. What does its absence mean for retro games on the Switch? If a few recent releases are any indication, Nintendo’s tablet will be just fine in that regard.

Nintendo's mid-noughties revolution feels so distant now, even if its impact hasn't really dimmed. The touch sensation of the DS led in its own way to the iOS revolution, the motion controls of the Wii helped reestablish video games in the living room and push them towards the mainstream, and the reverberations of both are felt to this day. There's another facet of its revolution that sadly never had the same impact, and now is set to finally fizzle away.
yet another part of gaming where the past was better than what we get in the present/future.

Streaming services have become really popular in the last decade. Are subscription and streaming services right for Videogames?
Nintendo Switch Online has replaced the Virtual Console but is the service up to the standard of previous Nintendo offerings? Furthermore, do subscription services like Xbox’s Game Pass and NSO really suit video games? This article explores these issues and looks back at the Virtual Console.
VC is better imo. I got games like Super Metroid for like 30 cents. If NSO allowed you to play online with anybody then I would give it the edge.

While that's valid, though, that old social media meme 'why not both?' springs to mind. Why not have subscription options and a Virtual Console eShop? With NSO being multi-faceted in its offering, it seems unlikely that everyone would drop that subscription in a heartbeat in order to buy Super Mario Bros. for $5.
Because a yearly flow of money is better than people buying specifically what they want. If online was also not behind a paywall you'd be surprised just how many people would drop the sub. When you're only given one option there's not much of a choice.
Just another reason why modding your Switch can fix almost all of the flaws Nintendo purposefully created on their platform. Save file back ups being another reason. Nintendo is the only company that forces you to pay money in order to back up your save files, and it doesn't even work for all games. Talk about anti-consumer B.S.!
Because it was only successful on the Wii. Both the Wii U and 3DS VC offerings were no where as successful. It was time to move on from that service. More and more 3rd parties devs started supplying older games in other ways on the Switch so there's no need. Look at all the Capcom collections for instance. Even Konami got in on it. Same with Neo Geo or Atari collections. I could go on and on.
I must respectfully disagree with this article. I would love some sort of Virtual Console to come to the Switch. I'd be all over it.
I’ve been having a blast with Virtual Console on my Wii U as well as its Wii VC lineup
PlayStation Classics also takes up my time on PS3 & PS4.
The best thing about each service is that it allows me to play individual titles I otherwise would’ve overlooked.
I am ok with the Netflix style of service included with the Online subscription as long as they continually update and add more stuff to it.
lol no, It absolutely does. The fact that it still doesn't is mind boggling to me, but I guess Nintendo needs to keep selling their Mini consoles...
Not having VC is lame. Period. There’s no way to fanboy spin this to be fine. It’s a disappointment.