Yeah its been seen running. Online is very possible, even though the online is fairly basic. I was in for a ps4 copy anyway, i play games on my couch.

It was that funny for you was it? Bill Burr makes me laugh, people in fast cars crashing when they act like idiots are amusing, can't say I tickled a funny bone with this one.

Different strokes and all that. Simple things makes others laugh their ass off I suppose.

You know what's not right around the corner? AAA Switch games.

Not for me, winter's right around the corner.

Even on the Aus psn store they have winter sales in the middle of my summer. It irks me!

First it's "Nintendo doesn't have enough third party", and now it's "Nintendo should not get third party."
For God's sake, I wish people would make up their minds.

Actually according to the many footage and opinions of the ppl whove played the game including vets, not really a "true" remaster, a disappointment. Its pretty much just the resolution and framerate increase. But hey thats nice for ppl who havent played the game yet.

It's 1080P on both just 30FPS on Switch. So Switch is in full HD.

You got proof to back up that fun fact or is this just another time of a fanboy making something up to suit their agenda.

Also, which company are you blaming for this? Dark Souls Remastered was revealed on a Nintendo Direct and Dark Souls 3 was revealed at a Microsoft E3 conference. So which company that has had the most recent close relationship with Fromsoftware are you blaming - Nintendo or Microsoft?

Lmao, now you're implying maybe Sony or Microsoft are to blame for this?

I'm a big Switch fan, but your overdefensiveness, apologism and excuses for it are absolutely ridiculous. Are Nintendo paying you or something?

That link is for a post from 2002 from a game designer that has nothing to do with Dark Souls. Please try a little harder next time.

It's 1080P on Switch. Also 1080P on PS4. Nice try .

I think you should blame their poor online infrastructure as well.

Triggered.

You're the one who is having trouble accepting things here. The game got delayed, so what? Instead of taking it for what it is you're trying to blame Sony without any proof to back up that claim. I think you need to take a nap and take a break from your fanboyish hyperbolic claims.

Asking for proof isn't being defensive... Link info to prove Sony caused this delay and i'd be happy to admit i'm wrong.

This is amusing because Nintendo is the least consumer and fan friendly of the 3 console manufactures. Remember Operation Rainfall? Nintendo went out of their way to make sure fans knew it wasn't their actions that made them decide to localize Xenoblade Chronicles - because nothing worse than fans having a positive effect on a corporate decision. Mother 3? Nintendo made fun of all the western players asking for it to be localized. The NES classic disproved the notion of fanboys that Nintendo would never deliberately limit stock to generate hype since the Nintendo was perfectly ok with just selling 2.3 million NES classics even though most fans never even got one. Remember when Nintendo tried to shutdown the Smash Bros Evo tournament even after fans raised $94,000 for charity to have it included?

But yeah, to fanboys Sony is the big evil.

No, a delay for Switch is because of Sony, and the conspiracy.

No, you got it right. Or you've got the wrong mindset right, rather.
It's really pathetic that the moment a third party does something different on a Nintendo system, suddenly it's completely Nintendo's fault.
Caught some idiot a few days ago trying to blame the pricing of third party Eshop games on Nintendo, too, when everyone knows Nintendo doesn't decide that for them.