@Godmars290: ".Also have to wonder that is the gaming media failed to properly describe the game, when it was a Sony AAA production, how is that not the devs failing to describe and promote the game to the gaming media?"

they did let everyone know what the game was but , like usual, the morons that bought the game didn't listen, or can't F-ing read.

and they had the "gaming media" play the game a month before launch so so yeah.

the game is good for what "they" were trying to accomplish. and they did a great job doing it.

show me somewhere that the devs said the game s like Uncharted and isn't story driven

" the morons that bought the game didn't listen"

You wrote that. You honestly wrote that.

The main issue is that there was a disconnect in what devs wanted to do with the game, and what gamers wanted out of the game.

And the gamers wanted a *GAME*. What they got was a story. A poorly written and paced one, one highly cliche, that came in a pretty package not pretty enough to forgive it's faults.

@Godmars290: "The main issue is that there was a disconnect in what devs wanted to do with the game, and what gamers wanted out of the game.

And the gamers wanted a *GAME*. What they got was a story. A poorly written and paced one, one highly cliche, that came in a pretty package not pretty enough to forgive it's faults."

all that and I'm still waiting for you to post a link that shows them saying the game would be like Uncharted.

I've posted links showing what they were saying 2 years before launch saying

" we definitely wanted it to be more of a storytelling medium for us in this game."
yet here you are once again saying that they were selling the game as a Uncharted style game when they never once made the comparison. they said it was an action cover shooter https://www.youtube.com/wat... which it is. it was established one year before launch that the game would have quick time events http://www.playstationlifes... and that the game would be story driven

Digital Foundry

"We discovered that The Order: 1886 is a linear, story-based third-person action adventure with shooting mechanics and moment-to-moment gameplay that's "really not what you might expect". Beyond that, no detail. The Order is real, but it remains a mystery."

"A recurring theme is this concept of The Order being "filmic". It's a somewhat abstract term that I at first took to mean cinematic, so, sort of like Uncharted, but Weerasuriya says it's to do with the way Ready at Dawn is shooting the game.

Yes, shooting the game.

"I know it's a word that's been thrown around quite a bit," Weerasuriya admits. "We concentrate on the important part of what makes something feel like a movie. It's not about making a game that just has a string of things that happen, like a movie. But, how can we inject some of the things you've seen in films?"

Published 29/08/2013

it's all right here and it's almost a year before its release http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

" the morons that bought the game didn't listen"

"You wrote that. You honestly wrote that. "

yes i did. what else do you call people that buy a game thinking it's something t's not?
as shown above the info was everywhere for almost 2 years = morons

it's like a youtube video that features a certain band and it gets down votes because those people don't like that band.

"yes i did. what else do you call people that buy a game thinking it's something t's not?"

What few people who bought a game that would have crashed and burned harder than it did?

The devs tried to do their own thing, different from the norm, and it didn't work or sell. You can quote from articles from dev interviews all you want, but all you're doing is ignoring the complaints that came along with them. Complaints from potential buyers of the game pretty much warning the devs that their product and production wasn't viable.

Some of the people who bought the game as likely read the articles, dismissed complaints right along with the devs only to be disappointed with the final product. How does that say that the final product failed to live up to the dev's projections? That they were the ones who were wrong.

Regardless, what makes you think a sequel, one too similar to the original and doesn't fix it's mistakes, isn't something more like Uncharted, is going to be bought by "morons"?

Godmars290: "What few people who bought a game that would have crashed and burned harder than it did?

The devs tried to do their own thing, different from the norm, and it didn't work or sell."

the game sold almost 2 million units.
so i stopped reading after your uninformed first few comments.

i bring facts and you give opinions.

I still get chills watching the Silent Night trailer for The Order 1886...!

@Samsonon:
Meh. If your "facts" were relevant the Order would be regarded as an unappreciated classic or beginning of franchise rather than largely forgotten, ego driven, misstep.

Speaking of which: what's the dev team up to? That more than 2 million in sales - at a time when 4 million was supposedly needed to break even because HD production was that much of a mess - should tell you something.

@mercyblades;
yep...

@Godmars290: you talk a lot yet you never back anything up with facts. Links please that show production costs???
didn't think so..... as usual u don't prove anything.

any new IP that can sell 2 million units is a success but the only difference between that game and others is it was "MISUNDERSTOOD" by morons, like you, that seem to have a problem with understanding what it is that you're reading. i posted multiple articles that the devs did not lie or mislead people into thinking the game was going to be like Uncharted. no! i showed you articles where they say the game is geared more towards story telling.

"It's not about making a game that just has a string of things that happen, like a movie. But, how can we inject some of the things you've seen in films?"

which is what you would call proof of facts.

Why should I have to bring facts regarding a game largely forgotten? Much less one you consider some or most of the 2 million who bought it "morons" for for not understanding it's ads? Really, the only point you're trying to get across is that the devs had a vision few who bought the game understood. That means nothing.

"oh! and that means almost 7 out of 10 people liked the game."

And?

You've only been going on about a near 7/10 as if it were a 9/10 and the devs didn't miss the mark trying to sell to "morons". Until the series gets a sequel, one more like a Telltale than Uncharted that manages to take off besides, you're hardly conducting this pointless internet argument from a solid foundation. Are only using your own opinion no matter how many "facts" you think you bring to the table.