All Channels
Popular
310°

Why are Gamers So Angry?

Susana Valdes writes: "This isn’t the case amongst the loud minority. A (now ex) friend of mine hated the Assassin’s Creed series. He couldn’t stand the game, for whatever reason, and always personally attacked me whenever I brought up my excitement for an upcoming game or already released game."

Read Full Story >>
newnormative.com
theXtReMe13058d ago

I think its more spoiled than anything else. They dont take any game for what it is, always wanting more from everything and comparing new titles to games that had budgets 10x the size. Then, there are the console wars fanatics. People who defend their brand to the death. Acting as if their lives depended on that piece of plastic. Like Microsoft, Sony or Nintendo is paying them to advocate on their behalf. Im not even sure, most of the time, that any of them even play games... because they always seem to be waiting in the shadows of every forum, waiting to pounce on anyone who doesnt share their beliefs.

Play games, not systems. Console, PC, phone or tablet... we are all using them to play, mostly, the same games. Which we should be enjoying together, not bickering over which has an extra pixel or two.

OB1Biker3058d ago (Edited 3058d ago )

No, no, no. There's nobody :defending their brand to the death'. I know you mean well but that sort of expression is exactly what hate is about. There's nothing wrong with loving gaming, loving a gaming experience on any platform. What is wrong is trying to belittle people because they love something and using silly expression like 'defending' (I'm not even going onto the 'to death' silliness).
The mystery to me is how can people waste so much time on expressing their hate for hardware (no using piece of plastic expression, that's the sort of silly expression coming from spite and easily spiraling into despise, hate confrontation or even often used in a hypocritical way)
How people can waste so much time expressing hate on games is even a bigger mystery. I also dare say on publishers and developers is another one.
Love stronger than hate is the point.

theXtReMe13058d ago (Edited 3058d ago )

There is a difference between loving a system and going out of your way to make others who game on another system feel bad or lesser for not owning it. Which was my point. My whole post was about gamers getting along for the greater good of the hobby. Not fighting about the plastic they are playing those games on.

Maybe it just came off the wrong way in the post. LoL. Anyways, I agree with you. Im hippy all the way., Ive been a gamer since Pong and just want the world to get along.

Brian76554923058d ago (Edited 3058d ago )

They are talking about riduculing others for enjoying something they don't. It's teasing to a whole new level which is abuse. This I think boils down to immaturity, lack of empathy and education.

Saying you suck in competitive online is different than saying of course you would like Asssassins Creed because you're an idiot.

People should be free to purchase what they want, whether it be EA games, Ubisoft or Microsoft related items free of hassle (who all seem to be highly targeted within the forums). The pc community is alo very toxic, try talking about games like Dragonball Fighter Z without all the aggressive posters around. Or games that have Denuvo. There is so much anger out there not just to the publisher but also towards others. The internet has become a dumping ground for the obsessed and the depressed.

OB1Biker3058d ago

I agree with both thanks for clearing things up theX :)

fiveby93056d ago

@Brian People are free to purchase what they want. One has to be very thin-skinned, immature, and/or easily manipulated to allow anonymous forum postings, social media, or an Ex significant other to berate them into not purchasing something they want to play. Who the heck cares if someone doesn't like your gaming choices. Play what makes you happy. Granted I think trolling or bullying someone over a prospective purchase is equally immature. One has to be stronger than that and follow your own interests, not someone else's.

OB1Biker3056d ago (Edited 3056d ago )

@fiveby
'trolling or bullying someone over a prospective purchase is equally immature'
And that's the point. You want to be able to talk about games you enjoy (not just prospective buy) in the relevant posts in a friendly atmosphere.
Its the other way round.it s the haters who think they have influence not gamers enjoying their game. The toxic comments are wrong even if they don't influence mature gamers that's not an excuse.

HyperMouse3056d ago

No, no, no. There's nobody :defending their brand to the death'......you must not see the influx of toxic waste from fanboys on any MS or PS article, or hell PC referring to people as peasants, to death may be an exaggeration but the comment has substance.

3056d ago
OB1Biker3056d ago (Edited 3056d ago )

@hyperM
Often people simply saying they disagree or even pointing out a detail are called out as 'defending' something. Its ridiculous. Posting your thoughts in a comment is not defending anything. I think you are referring to some fanboy warriors trying to promote their brand by any means which is different than saying you disagree and explain in a reasonable way

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3056d ago
IGiveHugs2NakedWomen3057d ago (Edited 3057d ago )

I believe it's the whiny minority. PC Elitists and Console Warriors scream and yell when things don't go their way. However, the console warriors are the absolute worst. They don't seem to understand that these corporations are not their friends. The only thing that these gaming companies want from you is YOUR MONEY and those that constantly damage control for and defend weak leadership truly need to understand that the word 'corporation' has nothing to do with the word friendship.

PLAYWATCH763056d ago (Edited 3056d ago )

I understand your point but you seem to be missing the point that some corporations have people who work for them who are more passionate about their work and thus produce products of different level of qualities.

All developers are corporations and want your money but some are more worthy of getting your support than others.

Chaos_Order3057d ago

"They dont take any game for what it is, always wanting more from everything and comparing new titles to games that had budgets 10x the size."
If the games are launched at the same price then it should be fair to compare them. Doesn't matter what the budget is. In fact if the low budget directly resulted in a worse experience then by all means, it should be noted as a negative aspect.

Ricegum3057d ago

Oh the irony of Septic popping up in an article like this.

Gazondaily3057d ago

Lol you're saying I'm the cause of your anger Unreal?

Felsager3057d ago

Pretty much is just that, the lag.

It breaks gaming smoothness and continuity. Lag is a central issue in current gaming.

3057d ago
Big_Game_Hunters3057d ago

No? Journalists mad because their english degree didn't teach them how to play games. Corporations mad because we don't want to eat the shit from their assholes. Must be that gamers are spoiled and angry.

thisismyaccount3057d ago

... sexual frustration (frigid)

Show all comments (67)
140°

I've Been Replaying Assassin's Creed Origins, And It's Reminded Me What Shadows Is Sorely Lacking

It took going back to a much older game to realise just how empty Assassin's Creed Shadows feels.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
HellspawnPR1981378d ago

"I've never thought feudal Japan would be a good Assassin's Creed setting. Give me 1960s southern England with mods and rockers."

Aaaaaaand that's where I stopped reading.

Terry_B378d ago

Never read anything on that website.

chicken_in_the_corn377d ago

I agree with the first part of their statement. Japan is so overused and it wasn't particularly interesting in Shadows. Now that it's been done, they can do something better.

isarai376d ago

Tf? Almost had an aneurysm at the thought of that concept, like what?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 376d ago
Armaggedon377d ago

And shadows reminds me of something origins is lacking. Virtually every game is lacking something. It is because it is lacking, that it has what it isnt. Funny dichotomy that…

anast377d ago

Origins is a beautiful game made by talented people that got turned into a brutal level-gate fest by the CEOs.

PRIMORDUS377d ago

There are only a few Assassin's Creed games I played. Original, The Ezio Collection, and what I think is probably the best in the series Assassin's Creed Odyssey with the DLC. I'm done with the series, it's the same shit.

isarai376d ago (Edited 376d ago )

Same, enjoyed 1, looooved the ezio trilogy, and 4 was peak, everything after that just sucked. Unity was a great direction but the bugs and how long it took to fix killed it, best parkour system in the series tho

50°

Everything You Wanted To Know of Assassin's Creed Origins, Including Ubisoft Studying NASA Documents

Ubisoft shared a developer Q&A about Assassin's Creed Origins, clearing up pretty much any doubt you could possibly have regarding the game.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
glennhkboy592d ago

AC Origins is the last great Ubisoft game. Period. This game show how great the Ubisoft story writing once was. Also the meticulous research Ubisoft did in the field of Egyptology. Ubisoft was so pride of their research that it made a separate Touring mode just to showcase all of their study.

150°

10 Video Game Sequels That Saved Their Franchise

Video game sequels like Assassin's Creed Origins, Doom (2016), and Fire Emblem Awakening were just what these franchises needed to be revitalized.

Immagaiden1129d ago

Lmao what’s Halo Infinite doing on this list?

Who would ever say Halo Infinite saved the Halo franchise

SullysCigar1129d ago

Thought the same - very bizarre!

RE7 though... my God, what a shift over RE6! That franchise was definitely going in the wrong direction, so RE7 was a welcome return to form.

ModsDoBetter1129d ago

Resi 6 was and still is the worst entry in the series.
7 was a great turnaround, despite people’s concerned about the switch to FP perspective.

DMC5 definitely helped the franchise after the whole DmC debacle. Whilst it was a decent action game, it was a far cry from the series and the characters we knew.

AC Origins is my favourite in the entire AC series. Despite the switch to a more RPG style of gameplay - the setting, soundtrack, length, etc were all amazing. sadly followed up by the ridiculously long and “more of the same” Odsyssey.

I don’t feel it’s fair to say the franchise slipped with Doom 3, Doom 3 was incredibly atmospheric and took the game in a different direction but there’s no denying Doom (2016) was sensational.

Halo 4 & 5 were disappointing but Halo Infinite definitely didn’t save the franchise? What?

TheEnigma3131129d ago (Edited 1129d ago )

I'm going to have to go with SMB 3. I was around when SMB 2 first came out and people hated it. 3 is still arguably the best mario game created.

HellspawnPR19811128d ago

"Halo Infinite"? Worse Halo ever. Whoever made this list just lost all credibility.

Hofstaderman1128d ago

In future lists of a similar nature I have a suspicion Final Fantasy XVI will feature.