Kek comparing persona 5 to this garbage...

You should be thankful because of the +nintendo bonus on those scores..

@lovable - yeah, at least I own both a PS4 and a Switch.. so I can actually make valid comparisons. I love how so many people are down on the Switch but haven't touched one. It really shows through when people try to make these educated statements with zero knowledge to back it up. Try playing the game. Maybe then you will understand why it deserved the scores it got. I am merely saying that just because a game doesn't look like Horizon or Uncharted, doesn't mean that it's ugly or garbage. Gravity Rush is a beautiful game and is far from photorealistic.

Even the art style is inconsistent. There are characters in the game in 3d models where the rest have that cell shaded look. But I am not referring to the art style, I am referring to the actual graphics. They aren't crisp and it doesn't run well. Which is a shame because the game deserves better. You can tell it is being held back.

Not realy the 1t teraflops is FP16... like the PRO is 8.4 on FP16, but the normal use is FP32, where it is 0.5.

That specs were thinking that the switch run like the Shield console, but its not the same.

It's actually somewhere close to 0.400 Docked and 0.160 Undocked. Look, the Tegra X1 when in stock form (1000 MHz) offers 0.512 teraflops, but the Switch runs on underclock (768 MHz Docked and 307.2 MHz Undocked) so it ends up delivering less.

Now where does the 1.0 teraflops come from? This value refers to when the Tegra X1 is performing calculations using half-precision floating-point format, however this format is not common in graphics applications such as games or engines because it is simply not reliable.

So in practice, this value is more for marketing purposes on the part of Nvidia than anything else. In addition AMD Jaguar is also able to perform tasks using this format, so even if it was usable we would have to double the "teraflops" of the other consoles, so comparatively the Switch's performance would remains the same.

Wrong, buddy. Switch is 0.4 teraflop. 3 times less than the original xbox one. Otherwise Doom wouldn't have to run at half the resolution and half the framerate on it versus the xbox one.. That's 4 times less pixels per second, and at lower settings!

who cares about digital foundry... Let's compare a 1080 gtx to a ps4. People care way too much about graphics and not enough about the game itself, hence why the quality of games has dropped with lootboxes and all the crap following your so called amazing looking games.

I don't care what resolution it is on portable mode. It still looks great and runs well. It is still Xenoblade on the go. Why should I care about what DF says when in reality the game looks good regardless of the specs?

I play games, not resolutions.

Theeze I'm still getting the game. But just stop. The games graphics were praised before to see it flawed is something. Also no, I said nothing about graphics. Res isn't graphics, it's clarity. If it's going sub Hd that's bad for me. It bothered me seeing some games at sub native res. Atleast on tv's they usually don't get too noticeable unless you use a big tv. But it's obvious on Vita and was on Mario odyssey when it happened for me. I don't want to be surprised by the games technical issues. Frame rate issues are notable and so is clarity.

If you think the Switch version models look unique, I have dozens of anime titles to sell to you.