The CPU can bottleneck the GPU though, like running a 1080TI with a core i3

@2pac: definitely there are instances it can be a bottleneck but there are usually solutions or ways around it. But don’t get me wrong, the faster the cpu the better for sure. Offers so many ways to optimize and improve the overall game. For example allowing smaller file sizes by maximizing compression, more particle effects and more realistic particle effects, all audio, advanced lighting and effects, better collision detection and more advanced physics in general. CPU is just as if not more important than the gpu just not in regards to resolution.

Umm what are you talking about???🤔🤔

Pot, meet kettle.

If you have a PC and a Pro, you're not missing out on anything the Xbox has to offer.

OT: It's like the dev said, it alll depends on the framerate. The most demanding games will still only have true justice on PC (at least for Native 4K + 60fps). Very few 4K/60fps games on the X and I don't expect that to change much. But it will certainly have quite a bit of Native 4K titles @ 30fps. I expect next gen consoles to better serve that purpose.

I don't think there is a single demanding AAA game on PS4 Pro that does native 4k. There are a significant number of them on Xbox One X though. I can't think of any in 60fps though. Maybe CoD: WWII?

F4 is hardly graphically demanding... talk about DF's Quantum Break analysis... it runs only at 1440p on 1x... now THAT was a graphically demanding game... not only its far, far below 4K mark, but it has its own share of glitches not present in the base version... so yeah... its far from a 4K machine AND devoid of any world-class exclusives AND came out an year after the Pro AND is 100$ more expensive... i.e. the ultimate money-grab! hehehe ;)

Heads up :D
http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

@Bhai: it might not be the prettiest but it is definitely demanding. Even on PC it has perf issues.