560°

Assassin's Creed Origins Has Loot Boxes

PSLS: "Assassin’s Creed Origins will join the trend of AAA single-player games with loot boxes. Called a Heka chest, these magical boxes contain “one random weapon or shield” that will appear when the box is opened “automatically on purchase.” In the preview builds, players can only purchase these chests with in-game currency."

Read Full Story >>
playstationlifestyle.net
OldGuyStillGaming3023d ago ShowReplies(5)
Bigpappy3023d ago

Haha! Loot boxes. I'll have to see, when I play, if I care.

Kingthrash3603023d ago (Edited 3023d ago )

Cancer to gaming.
And you laugh.
You are not a gamer.
Just a Internet toxic supporter.

Bigpappy3023d ago

Thanks for the classification. Now I know what I am.

Usperg3022d ago Show
TejasTV3022d ago Show
Jinger3022d ago

I don't get why people get up in arms about loot boxes in single player games. They are 100% optional and don't effect other players in the slightest. If little junior son of a bitch wants to use mommies credit card to get a scimitar before me... who. The. F. Cares

Bruneblomst3022d ago (Edited 3022d ago )

But it do effect other players you know that right? i dont want to explain too you why, but you should look in to it yourself before defending greedy companies selling loot boxes(gambling) in full priced games. Peace:)

zivtheawesome3023d ago

It's a misconception. You can only buy it with in game currency like horizon boxes basically.

P_Bomb3023d ago

Those were preview builds though. I could see them expanding it to real bucks for the retail release. Ubi is no stranger to microtransactions.

That said, I never use most of the weapons in Assassins Creed anyways. Have my mains. Plus baddies drop weapons. No shortage.

edeprez3023d ago

I do wish you could keep dropped weapons this time. In the past you would drop them when you climb or switch weapons. The guy i got it from is dead, I doubt he will object.

zivtheawesome3023d ago

Yea i think i was wrong with my assumption but only realized it after my comment.

3023d ago
Angerfist3022d ago

The Problem is this always ends up with real money. Thats why i oppose it. You should be able to get everything with gameplay - especially in a single player game.

And in Multiplayer People are able to buy basically game deciding killstreaks etc

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3022d ago
Mr Pumblechook3023d ago

If you only can use in-game currency is it wrong to call them loot boxes?

OC_MurphysLaw3022d ago

No....its a box with loot in it. How you acquire it matters little and how you define it , it's still a loot box mechanic. That said if it's not offering up a way to buy it with real money as some are indicating then there should be absolutely no anger and outrage around it

nitus103022d ago

Like it or not the so-called loot boxes are a form of gambling.

If you look at microtransactions you paid with in-game currency or you purchased that currency with real money (eg. Shark Cards, Zen ... etc) but you got the item you wanted. With loot boxes that is no longer true since there is no guarantee that you will get the item(s) you want without purchasing many loot boxes unless you are very lucky.

You will always have people that are immune to any form of gambling incentives through to those who are basically gambling addicts (approx 2.9% of the adult population - see Google). What is insidious with this form of gambling in games is the fact that children are prone to get addicted as well.

A quick search will pull up articles like this http://kidshealth.org/en/te... although there are plenty of others.

BTW. I am well aware that the Assassin's Creed games are rated as "Adult" but you would have to be living under a rock if you honestly think that children don't get to play them as well.

DeviateFish3022d ago

I don't recall Horizon Zero Dawn getting any flak for their "loot boxes".

3023d ago Replies(3)
Show all comments (144)
140°

I've Been Replaying Assassin's Creed Origins, And It's Reminded Me What Shadows Is Sorely Lacking

It took going back to a much older game to realise just how empty Assassin's Creed Shadows feels.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
HellspawnPR1981235d ago

"I've never thought feudal Japan would be a good Assassin's Creed setting. Give me 1960s southern England with mods and rockers."

Aaaaaaand that's where I stopped reading.

Terry_B235d ago

Never read anything on that website.

chicken_in_the_corn235d ago

I agree with the first part of their statement. Japan is so overused and it wasn't particularly interesting in Shadows. Now that it's been done, they can do something better.

isarai233d ago

Tf? Almost had an aneurysm at the thought of that concept, like what?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 233d ago
Armaggedon235d ago

And shadows reminds me of something origins is lacking. Virtually every game is lacking something. It is because it is lacking, that it has what it isnt. Funny dichotomy that…

anast235d ago

Origins is a beautiful game made by talented people that got turned into a brutal level-gate fest by the CEOs.

PRIMORDUS234d ago

There are only a few Assassin's Creed games I played. Original, The Ezio Collection, and what I think is probably the best in the series Assassin's Creed Odyssey with the DLC. I'm done with the series, it's the same shit.

isarai233d ago (Edited 233d ago )

Same, enjoyed 1, looooved the ezio trilogy, and 4 was peak, everything after that just sucked. Unity was a great direction but the bugs and how long it took to fix killed it, best parkour system in the series tho

50°

Everything You Wanted To Know of Assassin's Creed Origins, Including Ubisoft Studying NASA Documents

Ubisoft shared a developer Q&A about Assassin's Creed Origins, clearing up pretty much any doubt you could possibly have regarding the game.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
glennhkboy449d ago

AC Origins is the last great Ubisoft game. Period. This game show how great the Ubisoft story writing once was. Also the meticulous research Ubisoft did in the field of Egyptology. Ubisoft was so pride of their research that it made a separate Touring mode just to showcase all of their study.

150°

10 Video Game Sequels That Saved Their Franchise

Video game sequels like Assassin's Creed Origins, Doom (2016), and Fire Emblem Awakening were just what these franchises needed to be revitalized.

Immagaiden986d ago

Lmao what’s Halo Infinite doing on this list?

Who would ever say Halo Infinite saved the Halo franchise

SullysCigar986d ago

Thought the same - very bizarre!

RE7 though... my God, what a shift over RE6! That franchise was definitely going in the wrong direction, so RE7 was a welcome return to form.

ModsDoBetter986d ago

Resi 6 was and still is the worst entry in the series.
7 was a great turnaround, despite people’s concerned about the switch to FP perspective.

DMC5 definitely helped the franchise after the whole DmC debacle. Whilst it was a decent action game, it was a far cry from the series and the characters we knew.

AC Origins is my favourite in the entire AC series. Despite the switch to a more RPG style of gameplay - the setting, soundtrack, length, etc were all amazing. sadly followed up by the ridiculously long and “more of the same” Odsyssey.

I don’t feel it’s fair to say the franchise slipped with Doom 3, Doom 3 was incredibly atmospheric and took the game in a different direction but there’s no denying Doom (2016) was sensational.

Halo 4 & 5 were disappointing but Halo Infinite definitely didn’t save the franchise? What?

TheEnigma313986d ago (Edited 986d ago )

I'm going to have to go with SMB 3. I was around when SMB 2 first came out and people hated it. 3 is still arguably the best mario game created.

HellspawnPR1981986d ago

"Halo Infinite"? Worse Halo ever. Whoever made this list just lost all credibility.

Hofstaderman986d ago

In future lists of a similar nature I have a suspicion Final Fantasy XVI will feature.