Not just experience, talent and skill, but also resources given. Some studios has more of that than others. Oh, it also better if they don't have a marketing deal that will seek to squash differences.

Talent is far more important IMO. That's why you see games like UC4 and HZD on PS4, and nothing really comparable from Xbox, even with their new console. MS really need to get ahold of some 1st party talent that will set them apart.

That's where you are wrong. GB have always had a bigger bias towards Xbox. Look at silly artciles like this for reference. https://gamingbolt.com/xbox...

Look at the damage control even from earlier in the gen. Whenever there was even a CARETAKER at a gaming development studio that made a comment on Xbone's awkward eSRAM architecture, GB were on the scene to downplay its inconvenience to developers and their "next gen" game engines.

Then every single time there was a mention of Xbone getting back some of its already under powered potential with the removal of Kinect from the development kit, they were on the scene saying that Xbone was now on par with the same power as PS4 lol and people lapped it up. The exact same thing goes for DX12 and da cloud.

https://gamingbolt.com/crye...
Look at the 3rd comment from somebody in that article.
"No he just told you they are so close in power hopefully they unlock the 10% power from kinect then they have dx12 coming good chance it will beat the ps4"
This person actually believed that Xbone was around the same power as PS4, 6 months AFTER they were out and there were MANY others like him that never understood what it meant that kinect was already leeching at some of Xbone's power for it to be only returned to the system after launch. And he even convinced himself that the "unlock of 10% power from Kinect" and DX12 would push it further than PS4 too. Too funny.

Gamingbolt were always Gamingbolt.