You know you lying. Switch is great though. Should be a good game even so.

Bioshock on an iPhone was impressive, its lack of dedicated sticks and buttons was what kept me from paying it any attention beyond the technical side of things. No one was expecting this to run at 1080p, no one expected 60fps, you have to look at what the device is and isn't.

If snap map, Dooms MP and 60fps are key components to Doom for you then move on. Just keep in mind this is full ID Tech 6 not a cut down version of it running on the switch. Regardless of ANYTHING that's impressive, regardless of N64 emulators or iPhone ports. Don't tell people what they should and shouldn't find acceptable, you'll sound like less of a brat.

Here's the problem though weeblord, and it's one that has been completely swept under the rug lately. This is supposed to be a HOME CONSOLE as well, and it's priced as such. Nintendo has even stated that it is primarily a home console first lol! Had nintendo made the switch their next portable while developing a true dedicated home console that could actually handle these 3rd party games on par with even the base ps4, all would be peachy.

As it stands it is a CRAP home console. There is a large percentage of folks in the gaming community like myself who have zero need, interest, want or even ability to play games on the go. Its why I haven't owned a handheld since the DS.

So yippy I can play downgraded Doom in its 540p 30fps glory on the shitter...while all games in docked mode are gimped versions of what they should be. Now I WILL buy a switch for Mario/Metroid/Zelda, but fack buying the 3rd party big hitters on it.

@Weeb-buddy I don't really care how interesting Bioshock is on a cell phone it looks like complete crap compared to the PC PlayStation 3 and 360 version. At the end of the day I believe that wow factor wears off pretty quickly simply because people play games for fun and the lack of quality is not to the standard that is going to make sense to most Gamers so the notion of being able to play on the go it's going to wear off rather quickly no different than gaming laptops that might be interesting to be able to whip out a laptop anywhere and start playing a game but it's not going to be more interesting than the software itself.

What gaming laptops most people find that not being able to change remove an upgrade the hardware definitely takes the excitement out of the mobility so in my opinion being mobile doesn't essentially determine the entire purpose of the existence of someone buying something like this ie being portable being more important than gaming itself

The game must come first and if the game is going to be suffering, I had these absolutely abysmal resolutions and almost unplayable frame rates for today's standards along with missing features I actually believe that interesting idea of playing on the go is going to be quickly diminished especially since this is not the first time in gaming such a thing has happened.

Playing something like Doom or Skyrim on the go is not really that much different than the PSP being able to play Resident Evil 2 or Metal Gear Solid or Final Fantasy 9 etc

The interesting Factor starts to wear while rather quickly simply because it is still a game system made to play games, not meeting the standards of today will definitely affect the games because what you were trying to argue is that someone playing on the go is more important than all of the quality and features there are actually even playing the game for which begs the question why do they care about playing something on the go if it also means having possibly the worst experience feasible for the game?

I mean name-calling is not really going to solve your problem regarding this.

I would say this is an interesting as Grand Theft Auto playing on the iPhone.

Playing Grand Theft Auto San Andreas portable e is not somehow going to supplement Grand Theft Auto V.

Sooo it might be interesting in terms of a novelty, but I find a hard time believing that being portable is more interesting than every feature in a game in terms of performance, quality and features.

If that was the case PS Vita should have been out selling every single system imaginable that's like trying to say being able to play Uncharted on a portable is more important than every feature known inside of Uncharted on consoles 😂😂😂
28514;

@GBS- exactly. It is Nintendo themselves so that kept trying to Market this as a Home console so I don't know why suddenly we want to ignore the standards of quality for Home console and use it being a portable as this cop out. Like you I intend to still purchase a Nintendo switch but only for specific titles that are actually made for this system I see no value in me buying games that will be the worst versions if I already own a gaming PC and a PlayStation 4.

It does nothing to me as a consumer to be playing a game with missing features and the worst performance. If I want to play something on the go with performance issues and restrictions I might as well just use Remote Play on the PlayStation Vita.

Because I'm pretty sure I did not see this same audience going nuts and ranting and raving about remote play on how revolutionary was to play Uncharted 4 on the toilet....

Trust me folks as with the PSP in the PS Vita that wears off pretty damn quickly.

I mean that's like saying somebody could get Skyrim up and running on a toaster like somebody has actually done before that doesn't make me want to run out to buy a damn toaster to play Skyrim you guys are more interested in the novelty of doing this then you actually even are the overall quality or even features of the game itself.

To me that does not sound like a realistic or healthy market.

Ask the PSP.