Sony hasn't had that many new launch IPs for PS platforms. They're usually sequels. Knack is a pretty decent game. Not the best game from Sony by a long shot, but a decent little title to kill some time for the dry spell after console launches.

I'd say jumping flash or Resogun would probably be my favorites though. Driveclub would have been my choice if it hadn't been delayed and launched with the console.

So easy to call out "some people" without ever having to back up anything, isn't it?

On the day the reviews for Days Gone hit and the 71 metacritic score was all the rage on n4g, YOU were the guy who said we needed to just acknowledge that Days Gone was a "bad game", without even playing a second of it. And now you are trying to boost up Crackdown 3 and Sea of Thieves? You are "calling out" "some people" for doing the exact thing you have done.

The hypocrite here is you. No bullshit "some people". You.

And this nonsense you are pushing that Knack was universally praised is just a bullshit lie and you know it. The game was trashed.

"By the way, based on you I had just realized that any “above average score” games can be considered as “one of the best” launch game now, especially if it is released exclusively on one particular console."

lol....you wouldn't be here trolling if this were not a game "released exclusively on one particular console".

The lesson you need to learn is that anyone can have an opinion that is at odds with review scores. Reference: The Last of Us 2. Why are you not stalking every single person who has something bad to say about that game and reminding them of its 94 metacritic score? Fanboys are so selective.

"I rest my case on that."

Of course, you ignored completely my take on Days Gone where I thought the metacritic score was accurate, didn't you?

"I didn't think so. The overall metacritic rating was 71. Not great, not bad. Just good. That is about right, imo."

And what I further said about Crackdown 3.

"Crackdown 3 wasn't horrible, wasn't good either."

This is where your "case" is bullshit. My opinions were formed from actually playing the games. I'm sure your polarized brain is going to read those statements as one being "praised to hell" and the other as "worst games ever". Whereas you flatly said Days Gone was "just bad" without even playing it at all. What point do you think you are making? You are just highlighting your own hypocrisy.

"So anyone who have different opinion from you is a troll? What a wide outlook you have."

If this were some multiplat, you wouldn't be have bothered to reply. That's why you are a troll. Hell, you don't even have an opinion. Your opinion is what metacritic says your opinion is. It is absurd really.

"Yes I did not play it, but did I defend a low-scored game and praise it to hell and back like in this case?"

If you had played it and liked it then that would have been your right. In that article you linked, I'm defending Rage 2. I played it. I liked it. Perfectly fine for me to have whatever opinion I want, just like the author is doing here. That's his right.

"Isn’t it you who called this game “ about average in quality“? Why is it suddenly became trash now?"

You can't read for shit. I said a 54 metacritic score means "the game is considered to be about average in quality in reviewer consensus". And I said it "was trashed". I didn't say it is "trash". I said I didn't like it. These are basic words and sentences that you are struggling with. But if you want to pretend that the reception for Knack on n4g was "praised to hell" then you are simply lying to yourself.

No idea why you think your article submissions somehow are a defense to your comment hypocrisy. You hide behind article submissions like you hide behind metacritic. As if they are some shield for what YOU say.