All Channels
Popular
300°

First gaming benchmarks for Intel's new Intel Core i9-7900X CPU surface

Intel’s new CPUs will be released in a few days and the first gaming benchmarks for its new Intel Core i9-7900X CPU have surfaced.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
tyasia03276d ago

So a $1000 Intel chip with 10 cores barely outperforms 8 core Ryzen at $450. Not to mention ThreadRipper will be out with 16 Cores and has a rumored price of $849 to again regain the performance crown.

ninsigma3275d ago

It's way too expensive. You would not need that at all for a gaming rig. An i5 would suffice!

KwietStorm_BLM3275d ago

*An i5 would suffice for [some] games.

attilayavuzer3275d ago

@KwietStorm

Oh stop, a used $50 OC 2500k will still run almost anything without issue.

tyasia03275d ago

Well... I wouldn't recommend an i5 to a friend. Almost all modern games can use 6 to 8 threads. Currently I would recommend an AMD 1600 or a 1700. I personally consider them to be the best value, the 1600 is cheaper than the top end i5 and it has 6 cores and 12 threads and the same cache as the 8 core R7, it's the best value at the moment.

IanTH3275d ago (Edited 3275d ago )

An i5 is mostly fine in...I'd say most games, if looking at all past games and even some current. But more new games are using more cores and can really take advantage of all the CPU grunt you can throw at it (The Division or Watch Dogs 2, for example).

My old rig I just replaced had an OCed 2500k in it and it was holding performance back - if only slightly - in several games even on that system's GTX 970 (would have severely hobbled my new 1080 in some cases). Any CPU bound game will bottleneck your GPU output, so if you can afford to spend a little more on a 4 core/8 thread or better, it can certainly be worth it.

Though if you put together a value build with a mid tier GPU, then an i5 is certainly the best choice for both price:performance & that it mostly won't hold those level GPUs back in any meaningful way.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3274d ago
ProjectVulcan3275d ago (Edited 3275d ago )

It's not really a gaming chip.

You could easily turn that around and say so a $450 Ryzen 1800X doesn't outperform a $300 i7 7700k!

Which it doesn't BTW, in games it mostly loses to said cheaper Intel chip.

But in productivity Ryzen wins because of all the cores.

Same goes for 7900X here but even more so. It DESTROYS a Ryzen 1800X in productivity which is why it costs $1000....

What's more unlike AMD's Ryzen architecture which has severely limited overclocking ability (around 4Ghz), the 7900X samples tested have been able to do an astounding 4.7Ghz.

10 Intel cores at 4.7Ghz will be a match for 12 Ryzen ones at 4Ghz. At that rate by the time Intel launch 12 cores AMD will need 16 just to edge it out.

sadsatan3275d ago

better waiting for the 10-core threadripper imo

darksky3275d ago

Would anyone buy a $1000 cpu for games? This is far too expensive compared to the very competitive Ryzens for business usage too.

maybelovehate3275d ago

Exactly. But I would buy it for producing music.

maybelovehate3275d ago

Would rather see the VST and Render benchmarks. Games are not really a good example for CPU benchmarks.

Show all comments (14)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio37d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing37d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9237d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit37d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing37d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9237d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
60°

Steam Controller (2026) review

Second time's the charm.

cl198338d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Seams like a nice controller

Reaper22_37d ago

Two analog sticks acrossvftom each other is a no go.When will everyone learn.

30°
9.0

Forefront VR Review - Battlefield Comes to VR — and it Actually Works | Terminal Gamer

TG writes: If you’ve ever wanted that chaotic, large-scale modern warfare feeling from Battlefield but in full VR immersion, Forefront delivers it better than anything else currently available on Quest.

Read Full Story >>
terminalgamer.com