340°

Elder Scrolls Online Runs at 4K@30FPS on XB1X with Additional Graphics Fidelity over PS4 Pro

Zenimax Online confirmed that Elder Scrolls Online will run at 4K@30 on XB1X just like on PS4 Pro, but with additional graphics effects.

They also confirmed that HDR support will be brought from console to PC eventually.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
KaiPow3137d ago

Higher resolution for an MMO is always good. Console UI just takes up so much bloody screen space lol

Gazondaily3137d ago

Nice!

"4K@30FPS while also getting those additional graphics effects that PS4 Pro only enables when running at 1080P resolution."

Impressive

Babadook73137d ago

So same res and frame rate as Pro but with slight bump to assets. This is what I've been saying for a while.

freshslicepizza3136d ago

@Babadook
"So same res and frame rate as Pro but with slight bump to assets. This is what I've been saying for a while."

You mean the gap from the PS4 to the PS4 Pro is the same gap from the PS4 Pro to the Xbox One X? Yes, I also agree.

Babadook73136d ago

Then you don't know how to read. Pro runs it 4k 30 fps. Like one x. But one x has a very minor bump to settings. This is what the differences are. Oh well.

badz1493136d ago

"...will run at 4K@30 on XB1X just like on PS4 Pro..."

xbox fanboys be like...WTF Bethesda? if the Pro can do 4K, there's no way the X can't do more! I expect 4K60fps at the very least or 8K30fps. Sony is clearly paying for parity bla bla bla

Obscure_Observer3136d ago (Edited 3136d ago )

@moldybread

"You mean the gap from the PS4 to the PS4 Pro is the same gap from the PS4 Pro to the Xbox One X? Yes, I also agree."

I´m not agree.

Gears 4 is native 4K/30fps on X vs Uncharted 4 1440p/30fps on Pro.

Now, show me a game which runs at native 1080p on PS4 while 720p on Xbox One, then, i´ll agree. ;)

Aenea3135d ago

@obscure

X1: 1.3Tflops
PS4: 1.8Tflops

X1: game runs 1080p@30fps, to get that to 2160p@30fps, need 4 times the GPU power, 4 x 1.3 = 5.2Tflops, 6Tflops is more than enough

PS4: game runs 1080p@30fps, to get that to 2160p@30fps, need 4 times the GPU power, 4 x 1.8 = 7.2 Tflops, 4.2 is not enough

Do you get it now??? The X1 can NOT run UC4 at 1080p@30fps, The One X would not be able to run UC4 at 2160p@30fps either...

Basic math, simple logic, but you keep going on and on about it...

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3135d ago
jay23137d ago

loving the 4k 60fps guys well done ms.

TheUndertaker853137d ago (Edited 3137d ago )

"The team is still making tweaks at this point, but he replied that it’s most likely going to run at 4K@30FPS while also getting those additional graphics effects that PS4 Pro only enables when running at 1080P resolution."

Pretty much states they chose to add effects on top of the 4K/30 PS4 Pro offers while Pro can only sustain those same effects at 1080p and not 4K.

That should also be somewhat telling as to how taxing their effects are. It'd make you wonder if Xbox One X could run it at 4K/60 without those effects.

Shadowlee3136d ago (Edited 3136d ago )

Probably could run it but for an mmo I prefer 4k/30 with increase graphics over 4k/60 standard graphics. Only first person shooters, racers and fighters would i choose the 4k/60 option

Eonjay3137d ago

I don't understand this comment. It's not based on reality so....

threefootwang3137d ago (Edited 3137d ago )

Nice try but that was never advertised. I've already mentioned this in a past post, but 4K/60 FPS was never advertised by Xbox or Phil Spencer. The goal was always 4K native, and that has been achieved.

Don't believe me? Research all past information regarding Project Scorpio.

GUTZnPAPERCUTZ3137d ago

Where are you getting this crap? No one ever stated every game will be 4k-60fps, get your defensive bs outta here

Vasto3136d ago (Edited 3136d ago )

.

It would be an unfair advantage.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3136d ago
jokerisalive3137d ago

Nice to see a dev actually implementing more for the stronger hardware. Bungie.....take notice.

Kribwalker3137d ago

Yep someone is gonna take advantage of the OneX and not the paycheck #4theParity

Aenea3135d ago

Still believe in that parity BS, oh Krib *shakes head*

Allsystemgamer3136d ago

Yea cuz this is on the same graphic level as destiny.

Smh you people are too much.

3136d ago
Anzil3136d ago

@gapecanpie Destiny has great to awesome graphics for an FPS imo.

deadfrag3137d ago

4K BS!Why not make the games all at 1080p60fps using all the power of this mid-gen console upgrades and just skip 4K until next generation.Its already obvious that this mid-gen upgrades cant do true 4K without compromises.

OMGitzThatGuy3136d ago

60fps requires double the cpu usage AND double gpu usage while while 4k needs 4x gpu usage. If it hits 30fps on base consoles and the upgrades are slight overclocks what makes you think that games are capable of doubling so easy.

deadfrag3136d ago

You know what Asynchronous compute is?Well with the way that Cpu tasks can be render or achieve using the Gpu.This mid-gen consoles can use Asynchronous compute and if developers were smart they would use this rendering technique more often,and yes developers could achieve 1080p60fps with the PS4 pro and Xbox one X much more often if they used Asynchronous compute with there games not to mention they will still be able to achieve a very high graphic quality with Asynchronous compute.

3136d ago
conanlifts3136d ago

That's the next gen war "Worlds first true 4k60fps console" followed by "worlds most powerful 4k/61fps console"

Shadowlee3136d ago

60fps wont be that big a deal for an mmo imho. I dont see how it would make a difference in game

FITgamer3137d ago

Is this game still strong online? I put like hour or two into it when it first launched and haven't touch since. Been thinking about jumping back into it.

Kribwalker3137d ago

Me too. I think I'll hop back on when the OneX drops

Nightmar3Demom3137d ago

It has improved since it was released

Sam Fisher3137d ago

I don't know about xb but on the ps4 its got a strong community, so my guess is that yea most likely for xb aswell

Show all comments (41)
40°

ESO's director says doing the same-old yearly patch cycle wasn't 'going to cut it'

"Nothing is off the table right now."

40°

An Update to Our Shared Commitment to Safer Gaming

Discover how Sony Interactive Entertainment, Nintendo, and Microsoft continue to collaborate to improve player safety across our platforms.

Read Full Story >>
sonyinteractive.com
110°

There's an Underrepresented Majority That Wants Entertainment Without Agendas, Says Ex Tripwire CEO

Ex-Tripwire CEO John Gibson shares his 'Entertainment First' vision to capture the agenda-free magic of classics like Star Wars, Zelda, and Metroid.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
Goodguy012d ago

Yes. Just make a good game instead of worrying it should make some kind of stupid social/political differences in the world... we've got enough of that in the real world. Games are places we can escape to and just have fun.

z2g2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

How about you make a game that’s important to you and the people who are interested in that buy it and the ones that don’t like it don’t have to buy it. Just because something bugs some people doesn’t mean there aren’t other people who it doesn’t bug. Someone’s hangups shouldn’t be other people’s problems.

Don’t want a game that features a political or cultural statement or an underrepresented group of people? Don’t buy it.

Not all of us just want vapid, mindless fantasy all the time. Sometimes we want something that represents us or means something. There’s nothing wrong with that. Look how many movies in the world have covered so many types of stories, people or historical controversies to huge successes. Games are no different.

Eonjay2d ago

The plot to remove representation or ideas and content that you dont approve of is an agenda within itself. Its also censorship. People need are trapped in this main- character syndrome where they believe that the world and all of its happens are fashioned for them alone.

crazyCoconuts2d ago

"Don't buy it"
Exactly what people do.
And then big companies are reminded why if you want to make money you may not want to do things like villainize half your market. If you want to preach one side of an argument you're gonna lose people. At least do the Deus Ex/GTA thing and show the warts on both sides so everyone has something to agree with

senorfartcushion2d ago

We’re still waiting on that Splinter Cell remake…

raWfodog2d ago

On the flip side of that, good games can have characters of different ethnic and social backgrounds without thinking that some agendas are trying to be pushed. I've played many, many great games throughout my life with many different characters (male, female, white, people of color, even some animal characters) and loved them all simply for the story and entertainment they provided me while I escaped into those worlds.

senorfartcushion2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

That’s not possible.

Being a child doesn’t remove the political points of OLD GAMES, we were just kids. In fact, older media was decidedly more political than some of the cowardly, childish efforts we have today.

This is precisely why we are still to get that Splinter Cell remake. We can’t have a fun Splinter Cell game with AAA graphics because a few virgins don’t want “politics in their games.”

neutralgamer19922d ago

Keep gaming free of nonsense. Agenda pushing in social media age has gotten worst

senorfartcushion1d 5h ago

Name a game and I’ll tell you what the agenda was

Notellin1d 19h ago

"While our first game is faith-based"

Yeah you guys want to get rid of all the politics and play a nice Southern Baptist game. We get it.

Christopher1d 18h ago

He should follow his own words, then.

*** That changed around two years ago, when he started consulting for Bible X, the studio behind the Christian-based game project Gate Zero. Last month, Gibson, through his recently established publisher Templar Media, acquired the developer.***

Not sure there's anything more political in history than religion.

S2Killinit1d 15h ago

But his statement is also an agenda. Hope people are intelligent enough to know that.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 1d 5h ago
z2g2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I fail to see how representing actual underrepresented or making them feel included is an “agenda”. This is an extremely self centered selfish viewpoint. Those actual underrepresented people just want to be recognized as valid. The privileged majority who are always represented take that for granted and can’t deal with the fact that “other” types of people or views exist. Inclusion or awareness isn’t an agenda. It’s representing reality and making those “other” people or stories be seen and align with actual reality.

There are literally thousands and thousands of games to choose from, and if you are annoyed that some have cultural or topical relevance, that’s your problem and you don’t have to buy them. Meanwhile other people who want that actually have games that speak to them. So sick of this “my way or the highway” attitude.

And there are plenty of games out there, if that privileged majority have an issue or don’t want a game based on cultural relevance. Pick up a Switch. Most games are g-rated, noncontroversial cartoons with stories fit for tweens. No reality to get mad at.

2d ago Replies(2)
KyRo2d ago

It's always me me me me me with you lot. There's a difference between representation and forcing it for the sake of forcing something to a very very loud but very small minority.

Christopher2d ago

You really are only proving their point with this sort of response to the idea of people feeling included in some games versus the plethora of games without it.

Outside_ofthe_Box2d ago

We need to define what "forcing" is because I've seen people say things like Aloy being female in Horizon is pushing an agenda or catering to a "very very loud but very small minority" before.

dveio2d ago

@z2g

I personally think you've nailed it here.

For decades, wether in film or music, there had been ONE primary target group.

And if you're looking further, even in economy, laws, courts or any other area there had been only one target group.

While others, let's be real, were surpressed.

It's "funny" though - why do we all think personalities like David Bowie, Mick Jagger, Freddy Mercury, etc., have had such a huuuge impact on cultures and society? Because they were 1:1 depicts of the Demon Slayer or the Duke?

No, because they were different. Because we all are different.

The only people time and time again that are complaining, whining and moaning about everything (while highly likely even been a fan of Queen or something) are prejudiced people.

Are people that "But it's never been any different, and I want it to stay that way!".

There's nothing highly hidden here. It's always been the same. After decades, even centuries of rules written by and for the "one primary target group", they are now the loudest that complain & moan.

Inverno2d ago

Y'all could also, ya know, just not buy games you feel have an agenda? This constant bitching coming from all these whiney men every time they see a game that isn't catering to them specifically is tiring. They latch themselves onto these games and throw endless amounts of harassment as if there aren't another thousand games releasing before/around/after. I'm usually outspoken when it comes to forced diversity in games, but the issue here is you're all bigoted as hell and need to learn to be a little less offended. Y'all become the snowflakes you mocked so much lol.

MrDead2d ago

This guy is one of the biggest most delicate snowflakes out there, I'm sure he'll be crying on Tucker Carlson or Fox "News" again soon.

Michiel19891d 19h ago

@christopher cater to and include are two very different things. Played most of the games you mentioned and had no issue with any of em because they just include it. I have no issue with inclusion of that, but if in the next god of war, Kratos would all of a sudden hyperfocus on being a strong independent man or a hypermasculine one, I would give them shit for it as well. It has nothing to do with the inclusion of x or y group, but about the integrity of the game.

@inverno stop putting words in my mouth . It's actually the opposite of what you say, I said there can be no conversation because as soon as you criticize them, a whole angry mob comes at you and tries to cancel you. Thankfully it's become less and less over time and people actually realize now they can voice their opinion without having the fear of losing their job.
You really can't see that a lot of companies are now backpeddalling about the woke bs? They finally realize making your product worse to cater to a group who doesn't buy your product anyway is terrible.

Michiel19892d ago ShowReplies(4)
PitbullMonster1d 13h ago

Who was crying about kingdom come deliverance, Stellar Blade and the first descendant? White Hetero men Or leftards?

Inverno1d 2h ago

Leftards but those games still went on to release and become financially and critically successful. This dood, who was a CEO, went on social media to voice an opinion that at the time was controversial. Just cause you have freedom of speech and expression doesn't mean you hafto always voice your opinions publicly. He had to step down because it was more about the company than just him. Now he's back talking bout "unrepresented majority", as if there aren't different audiences to cater to. Since people from both sides can't seem to escape getting fired for voicing opinions then I guess everyone's got to equally face the consequences of their inability to shut up.

MrBaskerville2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Star wars, anti agenda? Lol. I don't think Lucas would agree.

Inverno2d ago

One of the most politically charged movies in existence. They can pretend it's all about space wizards with swords but the space nazis are still in the movies and they're still the bad guys. It's ironic as hell.

JEECE2d ago

More evidence that if the agenda feels legitimate within the story's world, people don't even notice that it is an agenda and they don't complain.

Elit3Nick1d 23h ago

This one gave me a chuckle, too.

JEECE2d ago

As ever, this is a misguided expression of the speaker's issue. While of course there are some games (pure puzzle games, etc) that have no agenda, any game with a narrative is conveying some type of message. What people who say they don't like "woke" or "politics in games" actually mean is that they don't like hamfisted, poorly written narratives/characters that are thin veneers for modern political messages that feel out of place in the game's universe. It's why all these people complain about the Veilguard and not Baldur's Gate 3. They both have "woke" characters but in BG3 they feel like they belong in the universe, while in the Veilguard they just feel like generic fantasy skins for modern American 20-somethings.

Show all comments (61)