All Channels
Popular
500°

Will Project Scorpio Bring Gamers Back to Xbox?

Project Scorpio is being hailed as the savior of the Xbox Brand by many people. My question is, will it bring back the gamers who left Microsoft and Xbox?

Read Full Story >>
p4gamers.com
affrogamer3281d ago

lol these ppl don't realize that even if it's the same price as the Pro it would still sell less cuz gamers buy consoles for GAMES. So the only way the scorpio can compete with the Pro is if Microsoft is willing to invest in diverse first party games that are going to deliver!

andrewsquall3281d ago

A 200 price point would help too maybe. :)

Eonjay3281d ago

It's that plus Project Scorpio is an attempt to recycle Xbox One sales since the market dried up on them. They aren't targeting other gamers. They are targeting their own limited base. To an extent the same can be said about the Pro with the exception of the fact that the PS4 sales are still skyrocketing.

thekhurg3281d ago

Games sell hardware, not the hardware itself. Microsoft has little for exclusives. Scorpio isn't necessary.

UnHoly_One3281d ago

Three years ago everyone said PS4 was selling so much better because it was more powerful, and therefore was the best place to play multiplatform games.

Now, that doesn't matter anymore, when the "best place to play" is going to be on the other side of the fence.

Is the Scorpio going to "bring people back" to Xbox? Some, I think. I don't think it is going to be a 20 million console swing in the other direction or anything like that, but I would be willing to bet most of the hardcore Xbox owners are going to upgrade, and it'll bring in some new owners as well.

All of those used Xbox Ones will have to go somewhere, too. There are people like me that will just move the old one to a different TV, but there are also plenty that will trade in their old XB1's. Somebody will pick those up cheap.

Goldby3281d ago

@Unholy

its different times now though, which alot of people using your defense don't seem to understand.

3 years ago when E3 was on there were no games for ps4 or Xbox 1. and upon their releases the library of games for both consoles were made up of 80% multiplatforms, so when both consoles are at the starting line, yes the power does matter.
Console launches are like 100m sprints, normally the first one to have more console sales will begin to increase that lead with every extra Meter/month
Would you want to have a quick start or a slow acceleration?

now 3 years into the race, the tactics used to win the sprint cannot be the same tactics to win the marathon.
The games that Sony is providing are equivelent to months and months of training for a marathon, preparation for what the runner needs to do for them self to win.
Ms on the other hand just gave their runner a 5-hour energy drink in the form of scorpio. quick burst of momentum that ultimately will cause a sugar crash.

81BX3281d ago (Edited 3281d ago )

How many new ips do you think MS needs to show? Also what is the time window you think they should be released? If the Scorpio is easy to dev for and stronger, then MS will have the better multiplats and I agree some new blood is needed and always welcomed. I just want to get a pulse on what would bring those who turned away from MS (and rightfully so), back to game on the Xbox platform.

Bruh3281d ago

Except its a premium device meant to renew consumer interest within the existing Xbox One user base. Not to mention exclusives don't really matter to the casual consumer, 90% of console game sales on both units are your FIFAS, COD and BFs. All of which now can be played at the best setting on Microsoft' unit. Its a selling point in itself, but it won't pass the PS4's success ever

Yohshida3281d ago (Edited 3281d ago )

According to your comment, X1 would have sold better than PS4 from 2013 on. But hey, games didn't matter until this year. Power was all one needed.

Killzone Shadow Fall
KNACK

or

Forza Motorsport 5
ZOO Tycoon
RYSE: Son of Rome
Dead Rising 3
Zumba
Fighter Within
Killer Instinct
Crimson Dragon

Bbbbbbuuuuut GAMEZ

now go on and report me and downvote because you guys know im right, thanks.

Nitrowolf23281d ago (Edited 3281d ago )

@UnHoly_One

You're also forgetting that there was someone all that power at $100 cheaper, which is why it really mattered. Even removing the connect to bring the price to the same you're still getting a lot more for your buck.

Typically it's the opposite where if it's more powerful it's more expensive.

So yes I will say power did matter only because one was more expensive and weaker when it should have been the opposite

Phill-Spencer3281d ago (Edited 3281d ago )

Videogame

But you also have to add the fact that playstation/ sony have a track record of delivering quantities of quality game for each console and has yet to disappoint in the games department. Buying a ps guarantees you get boatloads of high profile exclusives once the floodgates are open. And on the hardware side they have yet to deliver a major Fail like the infamous rrod.

Xbox/MS on the other side is more miss than hit, 360 last years were game drylands, the first years rrod hell and Og xbox discontinued after just 4 years. So i guess people just being (rightfully) more reserved towards xbox is a major factor. I, for example, played wait and see how x1 turns out and i'm glad i didn't buy it at release because i would have regret it.

Phill-Spencer3281d ago (Edited 3281d ago )

Edit @videogame:

Xbox /ms heavily lacks of any consistency, so people could just hold on buying the device until they see what they get or don't bother at all where sony could get a legacy bonus(atleast for me it is like that) where gamers blindly have trust in brand until the day sony would make something stupid to lose that trust. This has yet to happen!
In consideration of xbox past one could think at release before making the investment:

How long will the device be supported? Ms pulled the plug on a former console because sales weren't enough. Could this happen again?

Will it have major technical faults? The console before had a huge failure rate!

Will it be supported with enough games? Ms almost stopped development of games years before the end of the gen and mainly focused on 2 or 3 genres.

Don't you think it's possible that ms negative legacy outweighted the fact of having a few more games at release?

bluefox7553281d ago

My issue with Xbox this gen has always been related to games, never hardware.

DarXyde3281d ago (Edited 3281d ago )

I think Microsoft has more realistic expectations than their fans at this point. Scorpio WILL reinvigorate sales. It will likely even beat PS4 in North America during the holiday season. But what about after? Additionally, we really don't know much about what games are coming for either system in the fall that are exclusive. My guess is Sony is aiming for Spring and Microsoft will play their hand for the holiday.

Then there's the wild card: Nintendo Switch. If the interest stays strong going into the holidays, Scorpio is going up against a huge Mario game on a publicly lauded Nintendo platform (much like Mario Galaxy on Wii).

Lastly, as Microsoft mentioned, it's meant to be a premium console. It's not really meant to replace everyone's Xbox One, only those with a very vested interest in powerful hardware while attracting some newcomers. I don't think they expect it to outsell the original.

There is one thing about it though that can really ignite the fire they need: the fact that you need it to support mixed reality. Not too many people made the jump yet on Pro, but it also doesn't do anything PS4 can't besides boost performance. Scorpio's boosted performance means it can handle Oculus and HoloLens. In that regard, it makes total sense to upgrade, more than Pro. But will people actually buy it? Realistically, not unless they really kill it with mixed reality. I think that will determine how popular it becomes.

fenome3281d ago

@X1BX

As others have stated, it's more about their track record than anything, they always end up with huge libraries of great games.

For one, they have good relationships with outside studios, and for another their internal teams are top notch. They incubate smaller teams and their studios work together to improve tech and give out pointers on how they do things.

It's way bigger than lists or numbers, all their internal teams grow together and I think that's the biggest thing to it.

The Xbox division just doesn't have enough of their own first party teams under their wings to compete with Sony in the long run. Instead of investing huge amounts of money on a new upgrade they should have just started trying to buy studios and growing teams.

I mean at this point they're pretty much just floating on third party support in-between their sparse heavy hitters which consist of the same kind of games over and over.

At the end of the day nothing else matters, the Scorpio will be strong, but without quality first party to really make it shine then what's the difference?

Either way though, Xbox will be fine, they still sell great numbers, so the "war" doesn't actually matter. In a side by side comparison between them and Sony they're getting stomped though. The only thing that can change that is M$, they need to spend that money on studios and stop being so heavy handed with development team.

Hopefully they have a badass show at E3 for you guys (and I really mean that) this console arms race is what pushes the tech further and creates better prices and quality for us consumers in the long run. I'm sure a bunch of people are stoked on the Scorpio so it'll be a great show regardless, but they need to show some badass first party games to really push it. A shiny new box is cool but the software is make or break.

Crackdown 3 should hopefully be the epic showcase for Scorpio at E3, I had a blast playing crackdown at my friend's house back in the day.

TLDR:

It is what it is.

Fans on all sides are in for a treat at E3 though. Can't believe it's only a week away, this is gonna be badass!!!

ABizzel13280d ago

@UnHoly_One

"Three years ago everyone said PS4 was selling so much better because it was more powerful"

PS4 was selling better because of multiple reasons:

1. Not only was it more powerful, it was also $100 cheaper.
2. Even after removing Kinect XBO was still the same price as the PS4, and still weaker.
3. XBO had a horrible console reveal, and awful PR & marketing before launch and until the 2014 price cut.
4. PS is simply the more popular brand on a global scale (EU / JP / RoW)
5. The XB brand didn't take off in NA as much as the industry thought it would considering it won NA last-gen.

These are just several of the reasons PS4 was outselling XBO.

Power matters to a degree, but it's not the end all, as you know. However, it does matter when your console is not only more powerful, but also $100 cheaper, and more popular to being with.

LastCenturyRob3280d ago

What does "cuz" mean? Are you talking to your cousin?

EatCrow3280d ago

Lol other people don't realize it doesn't need to. Why should it. It's not like games on Xbox don't sell.

Now if the facts were that all multiplats sold poorly on the Xbox then I'd agree that Xbox would need some help. But the facts show Xbox games, multiplats or not, sell.

Do they sell some magically arbitrary number? No. But it doesn't need to.
And therefore, no. The Scorpio won't bring gamers back. Those that want an Xbox already have it. The rest will sell via limited editions and bundles.

XStation4pio_Pro3280d ago (Edited 3280d ago )

Yeah games. And the majority of games aren't exclusives and ms has plenty of multiplatform/3rd party support so that means a majority of released games will run better on Scorpio. I'm happy with my pro but I'm definitely buying Scorpio even if it ends up being the go to for multiplatform. Why pick a side. I could give an F about what emblem is on the console. I just want the best console experiences. Period. If that means I can have games in true 4K hdr to take advantage of my tv investments then in going to. Exactly why I got the pro - except the pro usually runs stuff at 1600p.

+ Show (15) more repliesLast reply 3280d ago
3281d ago
3281d ago Replies(1)
MegamanXXX3281d ago (Edited 3281d ago )

That was a fast no are you sure. I'll get one if its 300

SkippyPaccino3281d ago

I'm not sure.... If they come out at 399$ (a real possibility if Microsoft is really serious about winning) and Sony keeps the pro at the same price or just lowers it to 349$, then you'll only have a 50$ difference between consoles. People might be more willing to bite and buy a Scorpio over a pro. Only time will tell, but at 499$ or more it will be a tough pill to swallow.

1Victor3281d ago

It will bring new gamers but it won't be as big as the fanboys think (game over Sony ),as always there's people that buy the newest and top of the line so just saying no is just a wishful thinking and unrealistic

4U2NV3281d ago

I own an xbox and have all 3 so far but with xbox one ive never felt so distant from a console, the thing barely gets turned on ive not even been updating it recently as there is no point turning the thing on.
Xbox needs games to bring gamers back to them. Scorpio wont do a thing for me im afraid i have no reason at all to purchase one.

Tbh id prefer if they cut there losses and release Scorpio as a new console gen with bc capabilities and a plethora of decent exclusive games.
They're gonna mess up big time if not but i believe this is ms plan anyway they have no choice to really.

JasonKCK3281d ago (Edited 3281d ago )

Odd considering the power difference brought gamers to the PS4. Suddenly of course those gamers don't care about that anymore... right? According to Sony fans here that's why many bought a PS4 at the beginning of the gen, because it sure as hell wasn't games.

letsa_go3281d ago

I have invested too much into digital games on ps4 to do a mid-gen jump to xbox one, especially considering I have all the recent xbox one exclusives on my pc. I just wish I had access to my digital copy of sunset overdrive still.

4U2NV3280d ago

Erm actually yes i did. b4 the console was even out i had my money down in pre order ready for release. Reason why....

The game's. Sonys exclusive catalogue from previous generations was enough to convince me.

SirBradders3280d ago

Don't forgot the price bro, the PlayStation was cheaper and more powerful to begin with.

No need to find excuses we all remember.

ssmilloy363280d ago

liar. xbox 24 hour drm xbox camera had to be plugged in. the list goes on. power had nothing to do with it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3280d ago
XanderZane3280d ago

I never left. lol!! Always play my games on XBox and Playstation since these brands were created. Own every single PS and XB console. Microsoft just needs to bring the games. If they brought the exclusives games like they did with the OG XBox , they would be fine. They rely to much on other developers to make their games. They really need more in-house studios to make both PC and console exclusive games. Halo Wars 2 alone isn't going to cut it. Microsoft Studios has some decent franchises, but they need to unlock them and make games.

Studio-YaMi3280d ago

That's the short answer for it, lol.

Why would you buy a console that has no exclusives? this is such a brain-damaging issue to me,I mean if it's POWER you want, go buy yourself a freaking gaming PC with a full lifetime library of games on steam/or other applications,if it's games you're after and you're satisfied with the 4 or 5 franchises that Microsoft has(that's ALSO ON PC) then kudos to you, have fun...if not,then why is Project Scorpio considered the new Massiah of gaming when the freaking thing is missing on what is important to "GAMERS" which are "GAMES"?

Instead of asking Microsoft for more power, you need to ask them for more exclusives, what a joke.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3280d ago
Neonridr3281d ago

Depends on what it can do vs the competition. The Pro can already do a lot, so it would have to be able to offer a sizeable difference (not just graphics alone) to warrant gamers picking it up. That being said, it's definitely got my interest and I look forward to the full reveal.

Death3281d ago

It took Microsoft 5 years to hit 50 million units sold. They averaged 10 million a year for 8 years to end up at 84 million sold. After 3 years on the market, Xbox One seems to be between 25-30 million units which is pretty close to 360 sales figures. I'm not sure they have lost many customers, Sony is simply selling very well and most likely recovering lost customer to the Wii last gen.

Eonjay3281d ago

Not to the Wii. But rather to the 360. Truth is without an overpriced PlayStation on the market, there is no chance for Microsoft to mimic last gen. Wasn't it already reported that the Xbox One has already fallen behind the 360?

Death3281d ago

It's likely Xbox One is behind 360, but it's not confirmed. If it's down 10% and WiiU sales are down by 100 million, chances are Sony is regaining lost customers to Nintendo. If it was from Microsoft it would be hard to gain 30 million customers from Microsoft's lost 2-5 million. Sony's lost 75 million PS2 customers migrated to Xbox 360 and Wii. As long as sales continue they will make up a lot of lost ground. The market also grew last gen which was much needed.

Ashlen3281d ago (Edited 3281d ago )

That's not entirely accurate. According to sales tracking firms (excluding VGChartz) Xbox One is between 27 and 28 million after three and a half years. Considering the launch rush sales have slowed to 6 - 7 million average. And the truth is that for the past year the sales have really trailed off beyond that because either people are waiting on Scorpio or they have just saturated the interested market.

Microsoft's failing this gen was the inability to capture sales outside of the North America (mainly the US). Many stores in Europe don't even sell Xbox One and Asia isn't even worth mentioning because they are getting outsold so bad.

3281d ago
WickedLester3281d ago

The difference this gen is North America and UK. Sony trailed MS in both of those regions the entirety of last gen. This gen they lead in those regions. I said it at the very beginning of this generation, all Sony has to do is keep it close in North America and the UK and they will dominate the global market because in Europe, Japan, and pretty much every other region in the world PlayStation dominates

EatCrow3280d ago

Coming out at 600 probably had something to do with that.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3280d ago
DaDrunkenJester3281d ago

Honestly at this point I doubt it. The Power struggle and resolution gate was really only a thing because there was a lul in between some major releases so fanboys really only had 3rd party differences to fight about. Now that Sony had turned on the exclusive train and doesn't seem to be stopping, I don't think better resolution on 3rd party games are really going to cut it. MS needs to come out with some new surprises, some big new IP's.

I mean they do have Crackdown 3, State of Decay 2(one of my personal most anticipated games), Sea of Thieves, Below and Cuphead as some major releases coming up, but we have known about these for a while now. So if SCORPIO is going to win anyone back they need to show off some new games and WHY it will be better to play on Scorpio.

2pacalypsenow3281d ago

Pretty sure majority of gamers, did not choose PlayStation because of the minor graphics advantage over Xbox 1. Sure most of the hardcore gamers will but a Scorpio, but they are the minority, a PS4 at $250 or a Pro at $350( if they lower the price) will still dominate sales. Because of Games.

EatCrow3280d ago

Those diverse games are bought by the minority that for some odd reason people tend to scoff at.

EatCrow3280d ago

Interesting that you bring up the minority. But unless my math is wrong... The majority of non third party games barely sell to even 10% of the Playstation user base if it's 60million.

The minority on both consoles are the ones that buy the exclusives and bother comparing these consoles.

The minority will buy the Scorpio. Obviously. Just like the minority bought the ps4pro

KickSpinFilter3280d ago (Edited 3280d ago )

"Stop making it seem like only exclusives sell"
I don't think anyone is saying that but they do point you in one console direction or another.
Player A,B,C,D,E,F may have only interest in one exclusive, but if the diversity is there, others will pick up on some other exclusive games to go along with the 3rd party AAA's they usually buy.
Kinda Like this:
Player A,B,C,D,E,F
Exclusive 3,4,1,3,2,6
3rd Party AAA Z,Z,Z,Z,Z,Z
So ya while 3rd party sells "better" Exclusives show you a direction

Show all comments (125)
60°

Final Fantasy X 25th Anniversary Website Launches With New Nomura Artwork and Merchandise

Square Enix launches Final Fantasy X 25th anniversary site, revealing new Nomura art, books, music releases, and merchandise.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
-Foxtrot32d ago

Look I know VIII has its issues and all that but how on earth can the do big anniversary events with new artwork and merchandise for VII, IX and X yet VIII got sweet f*** all.

They could have given it something during its 25th anniversary yet all it got was a single Happy Anniversary post on their social media.

solideagle31d ago

they should know that we are OG fans of VIII as it sold truckload as well. not as much as VII or X. I personally didn't like IX but X and VI are my personal fav.

Shadow Hearts 2 covenant is another game I love. I hope one day someone can make remake, I would be delighted

Relientk7731d ago

Final Fantasy VIII is great and you are always the first to defend it in the comments

40°

Star Wars: Bounty Hunter Let Jango Fett Loose

LucasArts gave Jango Fett his own game in 2002, and it pulled Star Wars into a much dirtier, rougher, and more interesting corner of the galaxy.

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
Relientk7736d ago

I remember playing this back in the day on PS2. What a sick game!

270°

We Are Xbox

Dear team,

Xbox has always been different.

We started with a simple idea. Games should bring people together through shared experiences. That led to the first Xbox in 2001, Xbox Live in 2002, and new ways to connect, from friends lists and achievements to parties and play across devices. Today, Xbox reaches over 500 million players around the world, with some of the most important franchises in entertainment.

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
37d ago Replies(15)
Outside_ofthe_Box37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

If they go back to exclusive games it at least shows that they are finally getting it. They would be turning down immediate money for something that will potentially workout in the long term.

Only issue is they've already opened Pandora's box. A lot of their base has moved to PC or jumped to PS. So will be a long road to get back on track.

We have been saying this from day one exclusives are a must if you are going to be selling hardware look at Nintendo and Sony before Jim Ryan. That's the proven formula. You had some that were deluded and blinded by loyalty accepting that multiplat was the future and that MS was merely getting ahead of where the industry was headed, but at least they can finally see the light and agree with what everyone has been saying for a decade+

pwnmaster300037d ago

True, blame it on the rabid fanboys. MS can do no wrong and spinner this multiplatform move. While the actual fans moved on.

I feel like with the new Xbox coming they are hoping to bring back those old fans and then if it goes well. Bring back exclusives.

If the new console is performing like series x and one. Naw they staying multiplatform.

darthv7236d ago

Actual fans dont move on... they can add to their hobby while waiting for the next new release. If you believe what you typed then I guess PS fans moved on too.... you know, since its been a Sahara for 1st party games this gen.

S2Killinit36d ago

The fans didn’t tell them to go multilat. MS was forced to after the 82 billion they spent to destroy gaming. Then, while xbox fans cheered, MS realized they can’t justify the price tag by selling through xbox only, so they went multiplat and in the process began to downplay console gaming.

37d ago Replies(4)
CrashMania37d ago

I think it's too late, xbox sales were diving even before ABK, they got even worse since then even long before the full multiplatform push. I'd be surprised if they even went back to timed exclusivity at this point, Helix is basically a PC and is going to be expensive, they already struggle to sell cheaper xbox consoles, it will be low volume and they'll have a very small 'console' base to sell to, which has already been conditioned to just play via gamepass anyway.

S2Killinit36d ago

They will do what they always do, they will promise the world at the beginning of next GEN and then failed to deliver all generation long. But there will always be some gamers who will buy into their promises.

ocelot0736d ago

Absolutely agree, Do people genuinely believe Microsoft are now going to go. Hang on how's about we go back to 2020. Then GP was stagnating, Games sold where awful because of GP. Outsold by Playstation by a landslide.

They have sold 5m of Forza I believe on PS5. Spite it being a old game. I think Starfield is going to sell well in the end. Halo is deffinetly going to sell well as is Fable and Forza Horizon 6.

I think at best (for Xbox fans). Single player titles like Clockwork will have a timed exclusivity. Multiplayer centric games like Forza, E Day will release day and date on all platforms.

Or all games will release on all platforms day and date. But maybe Xbox and Windows Store copies will have exclusive bonuses. Or may even get timed exclusive dlc like Fallout and Elder Scrolls and COD use to do.

I think they will treat Xbox players like the premium customers or at least act the way. But will serve just the Playstation and Switch 2 customers as well.

Neonridr37d ago

I don't see them removing PC from the equation. Considering MS has a heavy enough investment in the PC market, it would be foolish to abandon them. I could see them taking away games from PlayStation or ensuring they are timed exclusives at the very least. Say what you will but if Call of Duty ends up becoming a timed exclusive to Xbox machines, that would hurt PlayStation, don't pretend like those games don't sell millions.

Outside_ofthe_Box36d ago

They would lose out on a lot of CoD sales tho. Doesn't PS make up most of the sales?

Neonridr36d ago

@Outside - possibly, but it might push people to want Xbox hardware so they can play with their buddies day one.

Who knows.

S2Killinit36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

it would but remember doing that can splinter the COD fan base and in the process damage the call of duty brand which is probably the only franchise in that $82 billion purchase that in anyway gets even close to delivering what Microsoft thought they bought. If Microsoft fudges around too much with the COD franchise, you might even see a competitor franchise show up on the scene and that would be a catastrophe after the huge debt that Microsoft put itself into with the ABK purchase.

But Its almost guaranteed that Microsoft will want to do something drastic at the beginning of the next generation as they always do. We will see.

Pyrofire9537d ago

Their lifeline of solely the Xbox consoles is dry. Good-Great games on a 1st party scale can't be made at a loss so willingly - sent to the Xbox to only sell limited copies.
They invested billions scooping up studios and need to start making returns.
Sucks that nearly every company is publicly traded and have to be so shareholder biased but that's how it is.
Their words are strong but it'll take time to see what their actions accomplish. Lowering the cost of Game Pass and taking CoD off of it was a good clear start.

darthv7236d ago

More like, allot of their base just played game pass. So now they need to encourage them to start buying again.

S2Killinit36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

A lot of their base left for greener (bluer?) pastures.

--Onilink--36d ago

What exactly is the long term goal with exclusives though?

Because for the most part, the hardware side of things has never been the most profitable, even sometimes being subsidized for a period before breaking even. And that’s before the hardware component nightmare we currently live in.

The whole point of exclusives was to get more people to buy your console in order to have a bigger install base, which meant even bigger software sales.

But if their ports to PS5 are selling (for the most part it seems) quite well, then other than negating the cut Sony takes there, unless you are REALLY increasing your software sales on your own console, it probably doesn’t make that much of a difference?

Honestly I don’t even understand Sony’s decision to scale back on it for PC unless they weren’t even recouping the port expenses. They released ports when the hardware sales never really dropped, and now that all consoles will undoubtedly take a noticeable drop in sales due to the ridiculous prices, that’s when they decide they don’t want to sell to a larger install base to more easily recoup dev costs… it’s just weird

Outside_ofthe_Box36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

I agree. I mean once they went multiplat, in theory there should be no going back especially when you have games that have sold really well on other platforms.

Microsoft are the ones that announced that they are reevaluating. So I'm just guessing on what their end goal is. Right now Xbox as a hardware is not a must buy for anyone but fans of the brand because their games can be played elsewhere. Going exclusive would solve this, but you lose out on a ton of money instantly which has always been what the company does not want to do so not really sure what their "reevaluating exclusives" means unless they are pulling a Phil Spencer and are just saying what people want to hear and will continue to do what they are currently doing.

darthv7236d ago

Their ports to PS5 are selling because Sony's output has been so dry... the fans are thirsty, and MS is the oasis.

SIdepocket36d ago

Unfortunately, the studios they buy wither under their leadership.

mcstorm36d ago

Microsoft still has a name with Xbox the issue is the casual games are not looking at the console because its not the same console their friends have. Look at that poll on how many users upgraded from xbox 365 to one and then the X. Part of Microsoft's downfall was thinking that the Wii was the market they had to be in when really it was the core market. If you get the core gamers you then get the market to. As I posted a few minuets ago on another post Microsoft putting exclusives on PS this gen could bold well if they hit next gen with all our games are staying exclusive from this new gen. They will then get gamers wanting Halo, Forza Gears but this is also where Microsoft fell over with the xbox one and X in terms of they did not have may quality 1st party games affter they fell into the Gears, Forza and Halo cycle. If they can get some old IPs back to bring back the old core gamers as well as fresh ips to bring in new gamers things could improve next gen. But as I said in my last post its all if buts and maybes at the moment. No one knows if the next home consoles will be to expensive that people move to pc as we are now seeing or look at the stem deck as a cheepier alternitive.

DarXyde36d ago

"Only issue is they've already opened Pandora's box."

That's very optimistic. It's not the only issue, far from it. There is a serious rupture between Microsoft generally and the public caused by their weird Game Pass price fluctuations, taking down physical game space in stores, and being the first to go nuts on hardware price hikes that they themselves played a big part in.

They're also charging beyond a premium for Helix which is just vile at a time when the economy is in shambles.

The company itself is really not doing itself any favors with the approach they're taking Windows. Even France is looking to ditch Windows in favor of Linux.

But the most offensive thing is this AI push. They're doubling, tripling, and quadrupling down on the very technology they're using to replace a considerable proportion of their workforce... And the slap in the face is how they bake copilot into everything when nobody likes it—they couldn't even make Bing stick, so why on earth are they trying so hard? You know it's bad when people would rather use ChatGPT than Copilot which is killing their OS. But aside from their snatching up of farmland to build data centers (and reduce the agriculture capacity of whichever country allows them to build them), they made an AI-generated gamer gurl that loves AI the head of Xbox.

Even if we grant them the full benefit of the doubt, it hardly matters what Xbox wants to do if Nadella says no, and that includes exclusive games. Microsoft's relationship with Xbox is the opposite of Sony's relationship with PlayStation—Microsoft pulls the reins of Xbox, but Sony damn near went under for the PS3.

Tanktopmaster9236d ago (Edited 36d ago )

“If they go back to exclusive games it at least shows that they are finally getting it.”

Great strategy, especially after Forza selling 5 million on PlayStation and sea of thieves selling at least another million (2 million) for example. In March 2026, Xbox consoles sales ratio vs PS was 10:1.

In addition to that, with Gamepass, which unequivocally cuts out chunks of sales (Cannibalizing revenue from 1st month sales especially).

I’m sure going exclusive again after releasing everything on Ps5 is going to work out great for business.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 36d ago
maximusprime_37d ago

Despite all of that, it's clear that Microsoft's Xbox division is broken beyond repair.

37d ago
BeHunted37d ago

PlayStation is currently draining money on flop after flop. It's Sony that needs to re-evaluate their strategy

37d ago
CrashMania37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Wonder how much money was lost on perfect dark, hellbalde 2, 300 million lost revenue
by putting cod on gamepass. The recent Jason schrier news that Xbox has cancelled dozens of projects, spent 70 billion just to see Xbox sales further collapse and gamepass see little growth.

The fact is this has been PlayStation's most profitable generation and they are making loads of money and selling plenty of consoles and games. While MS won't give you any sales figures or profit numbers for Xbox, says it all really.

S2Killinit36d ago

Sony PlayStation has deservedly dominated xbox. Facts

Tanktopmaster9236d ago (Edited 36d ago )

Ok tween.

Xbox series SX got outsold 10:1 last month. lol.

36d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 36d ago
shadowT37d ago

"Our presence on PC isn’t strong enough."

Fishy Fingers37d ago

It isnt. But I dont think they mean in 'games', rather, footprint.

They own the OS but as far as gaming is concerned, Steam dominate. I imagine the VAST majority of people who use the Xbox app/launcher are PC gamepass subs. No ones buying their 3rd party PC games through Xbox PC.

badz14936d ago

and many gamers prefer SteamOS for gaming over Windows too. If only Valve would be more uncompromising to the anti-cheat makers that locked out non-windows players, more pc gamers would have moved onto SteamOS by now and not looking back to Windows. overall, Win11 is a terrible, bloated, unoptimized OS which is not what many people want

ocelot0736d ago

Agreed and I think that's where they are going to focus on more. I think cheaper games on Windows/Xbox store (MS IP) compared to Steam and Epic and maybe even compared to PSN store as well.

Show all comments (107)