All Channels
Popular
90°

Why Red Dead 2's Delay is a Great Thing

Bad news for people who were already placing pre-orders for Red Dead Redemption 2. Don’t roll your eyes or scoff. There were already people doing such things. Anyways, it isn’t going to happen this year. Despite Rockstar Games offering a 2017 release window for the game, it has been bumped. Now, it’s heading to the PlayStation 4 and Xbox One in 2018 instead. Even worse, the Take Two Interactive quarterly earnings report pegs it in the next fiscal year, meaning we won’t see it until after April 1, 2018.

Read Full Story >>
dispatches.cheatcc.com
CP_Company3317d ago (Edited 3317d ago )

there is either RDR2 or RD3.
delays are never good,the core game is out there and you did not change any major issues,that showed many previous titles,the same as,if the game is ready,delay does not help.
there are other reasons why they delayed the game and non of them are because of optimization or buggyness of the game.

attilayavuzer3317d ago

Interesting. Article says its mostly negative despite the headline...

Wuket3317d ago

The delay isn't good. It sucks. The reasons for the delay are good (better game).

XbladeTeddy3316d ago

"Red Dead 2's Delay is a Great Thing"

Said no-one, ever, at all, in any way.

Aenea3316d ago

It's not a great thing, it's a shame! It's not bad or anything, but it surely is not great!

30°

Red Dead Redemption 2 Turns Into Elden Ring in New Mod, Featuring Uncle as Final Boss

Red Dead Redemption 2 mod turns the game into Elden Ring, adding spells, boss fights, and Uncle as the final boss.

110°

GTA5 Has Sold Over 220 Million Copies, Red Dead Redemption 2 Has Sold Over 79 Million Units

Take-Two announced its financial results for Q2 of fiscal year 2026, and shared an update on the sales of GTA5 and Red Dead Redemption 2.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
TheDreamCorridor228d ago

You think Rockstar views Red Dead 2 as a failure because it didn't sell 150m copies?

jznrpg228d ago

3 billion or so in revenue not including online stuff I’m sure they don’t

SethNW228d ago

I am pretty sure they don't. It was profitable and made them a lot of money. Not GTA5 money but far from failure. Maybe it is lower priority franchise, due to being smaller, but that is about the lowest they would put it as. Only thing they do consider failure is RDR2 Online, unlike GTA5 Online, that RDR2 Online flopped. Hence why it got less support. And when it come to profits, sales for both combined don't come close to GTA Online microtansactions. Hence why everything very quickly got canceled and GTA Online was top priority, so no GTA6 for a long time, no DLC for GTA5, despite there being 5 DLCs planned, at least I think it was 5, give or take one. But as I see it, they needed to rejuvenate interest and all, hence why GTA6 eventually is getting made. But what they are really looking forward to is refresh of Online.

ZeekQuattro228d ago

Only in terms of the online aspect of the game. They didn't support it as much as they did GTA V Online. I remember people being pissed about that.

jznrpg228d ago

I own a few GTAs but never played them. I love Red Dead though

Yui_Suzumiya222d ago (Edited 222d ago )

Boring and overrated. Red Dead Redemption is pretty good though. The Hundred Line: Last Defense Academy is my personal GOAT. We need more stuff like that from TooKyo.

victorMaje228d ago

I must be one of the few who are fine with the GTA6 delay. People treat that game like it’s the 2nd coming lol.

FIELDMARSHALL_P227d ago

My daughter asked me how I felt about I shrugged and said I don't care gives me time to finish up games I already have. It's all good let them make the best game they can.

RedDevils228d ago

Wish they make another Manhunt or Bully.

gold_drake228d ago

damn, thats a ridiculous number

Show all comments (11)
160°

Dan Houser: RDR2 was "behind schedule" and "over budget so much I didn’t want to think about it"

Dan Houser opens up about Red Dead Redemption 2’s rocky development, calling it behind schedule, massively over budget, and full of pressure to prove doubters wrong.

Read Full Story >>
thegamepost.com
Storm23233d ago (Edited 233d ago )

The world they built is pretty amazing. Unfortunately, the game was mostly boring to me. I definitely had fun in some parts, but it didn't do it for me as a whole like the first one did. I loved RDR so much.

The budgets and time it takes to make games these days is out of control. Such a big risk. If a game isn't a huge hit, it is often it for a studio. Scary. I really miss the PS2 and PS3 days where studeios could make 4 games in a generation and take risks in making something new. And so many were using their own engines. Those were the days.

neutralgamer1992232d ago

Agreed. I love RDR but couldn't get into RDR2. The animations take forever and game slows you down on purpose. It won't let you have fun because R* want us to play the game they want to. I know millions love RDR2 and I even bought and own it. But just wasn't for me.

It's like comparing GTA4 to saints row 2. One game was about fun while the other was about realism and that's coming from someone who beat GTA4 many times. I much rather a game be fun to play than chase realism

YodaCracker232d ago

GTA IV’s realism is what made it so much more fun for me. I loved experimenting with the physics.

Storm23231d ago

I bought RDR2 also. Put 100+ hours into it and beat it our of respect for Rockstar and all the people saying it was the greatest game ever. RDR blew my mind but might also have been the best time in gaming for me personally. l loved that PS3 gen so much.

I am excited to see what GTA6 is like.

233d ago Replies(1)