All Channels
Popular
340°

Should Sony Make a Vita 2?

Alex S. from Link-Cable writes: "A few months ago I wrote a piece that asked if the Vita was getting its second wind, and since then my thoughts have changed slightly on the system’s longer term prospects. The biggest thing prompting this change of perspective is of course the brand new Nintendo Switch and the success that system’s seen by marrying console and handheld gaming, something that the Vita attempted back in 2012, with less than stellar results. But now, with Nintendo seemingly finding the magic formula to getting console-level gaming working on the go, should Sony revisit the concept? Is the time right for a PlayStation Vita 2?"

Read Full Story >>
link-cable.com
3308d ago Replies(3)
Omnislashver363308d ago (Edited 3308d ago )

Yes, but closer to PS5's launch. As long as it has L2/R2 and a 720p or 1080p 5.2 inch screen, gets support and has backwards compatibility, I'll buy it.

syphon323308d ago

they do that.. and they gonna own the industry.....

3307d ago
DragoonsScaleLegends3307d ago

They need to call it something competently different too.

3307d ago
Araragifeels 3308d ago

No, they need to make PSP2 and it should be based on the PlayStation Switch like portable patent. They should make it backwards compatibility with PSVITA both Retail and digital. No exclusive memory card rather 3rd party unless the exclusive it sold at a affordable and friendly consumer Price. Upgrade Remote play, allowing to play PS4 games on the go without being online. Allowed PS1/PS2 games to be downloadable and play. 1080HD and 30 frames or 60 frames depending on the game. Get Western third party like Rockstar (GTA exclusive), Bethesda(Elder Scroll), EA, 2K, Ubisoft to makes games for it and keep Japanese third party supporting strongly. A better marketing team, a better person in charge of the handheld division and keep supporting with PlayStation first party.

JonTheGod3308d ago

Explain to me how you envisage the Vita 2 being different to the PSP2? (Ignoring the fact that the Vita IS the PSP2!!)

Gman323308d ago

Yup i agree the psvita was psp2

IanTH3307d ago (Edited 3307d ago )

While the Vita was certainly the PSP2, if they do go for another portable it might not be a bad idea to go with a naming convention like PSP2. PSP probably still has a larger mindshare than Vita does (and likely more positive on the whole), so it might have better traction; not to mention we know companies tend to ditch brand names that haven't performed up to their expectations. Unless they really can make something akin to a portable PS4 and they can capitalize on the PS4's momentum and mindshare by calling it the PS4P or something.

Not sure they'd even go for another handheld, but I think it could be interesting for them to try for a PlayStation Tablet like device and leverage their mobile device division to make a compelling gaming tablet w/easy to remove controller unit (perhaps akin to Switch) that would act as both their gaming portable and a nice Android tablet giving value outside of gaming. Keeping users a tap away from the PS Store even while they browse the web. It could leverage their mobile design prowess while both potentially bolstering their flagging mobile division numbers and offering a compelling product for multiple segments. A great value and, for those buying for non-gaming purposes, a gaming trojan horse.

No easy feat, but I assume if they try again it'll be something in that vein.

syphon323308d ago

psp2/psvita argument aside.. i'll give you an up vote for feeling

Araragifeels 3307d ago

I said no to Vita 2 is because Vita was a flop and the name PSVITA is not establish name so I don't want it to be name PSVITA 2 rather go to establish name which is the PSP brand so naming a spiritual successor PSP2 may help yeh system. The feels.

3308d ago Replies(4)
Death3308d ago

I'd settle for Sony actually supporting the original Vita instead of letting it become an indie platform. You don't need more power unless you are going to make games that use it.

Jalapeno3307d ago

If Sony cuts the price of the memory cards, there's hope for the Vita.

Razzer3307d ago

They would be better off redesigning it with microsd if they were going to do anything.

The 10th Rider3307d ago

This is actually an excellent point. Making a new handheld with more power would only mean that more development teams and resources have to be dedicated to it in order to support it.

Concertoine3307d ago

The vita was an impressive piece of tech back in 2012, and few games ever utilized that power.

ILostMyMind3307d ago

Although i agree that Sony must have SUPPORTED Vita, it already has six years in the market. At that time Nintendo released several models of 3DS and its replacement, the Switch. Vita needs to die for a more current device to replace it. PSP3 needs to be compatible with the PS4 and DS4.

rainslacker3307d ago

reinstating support will likely not be as successful as a well built, newly marketed system. People already have their views on the Vita, and that can be hard to change.

Death3307d ago

If Sony released a Bloodborne or Horizon quality game or two game on Vita people would quickly forget the past 6 years.

rainslacker3306d ago

Agree to disagree I guess.

I just don't think after all this time of the Vita being ignored by Sony Europe and Sony America that they'd really gain that much ground by bringing it back for a second wind. Even if they churned out 3-4 good 1st party games a year, got better 3rd party support that wasn't in the niche markets, and got a few good games like say what Metal Gear did for the PSP, that they'd receive the benefit of the doubt.

OTOH, it is hard sometimes to say how the market would react, but I'm pretty sure I know how the forums would react.

I'd be estatic myself, because I do love my Vita, and I'd be a bit hesitant to support a new handheld from them given how all but Sony Japan dropped any meaningful support.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3306d ago
Show all comments (83)
70°

Looking Back At the Most Underrated Handheld Systems

Why didn't the PS Vita get more love again?

Read Full Story >>
thegamebutler.com
darthv721214d ago

Not sure if the Nomad and Express should be on this list. Meaning that while they were portable, they didn't have their own games and instead relied on the same games the console hardware used. Neo Geo pocket, Lynx, Vita... those are dedicated handhelds with their own software library.

If criteria is simply to just allow for handheld gaming then the supaboy should be on there as well.

cthulhucultist1214d ago

While that is true, Nomad was an amazing handheld which I greatly enjoyed, and holds a special place in my heart.

I would definitely include it in this list.

I remember connecting it to my tv and playing Vector Man and Comix Zone and I was astounded by the fact that this was a handheld device

TheEnigma3131214d ago

The Nomad should have never been made, that big cartridge on the back. Sega was throwing out money. I thought the Lynx was solid. I never knew about the Turbo express though

130°

New PS Vita Browser Exploit Makes Installing Custom Firmware Easier Than Ever

DS: Hacking a PS Vita has never been so easy.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
anubusgold1249d ago

Why is this news if sony doesnt want it get out of the way and let modders make games for it. There are people still making games for sega dreamcast and genesis if you abandon something dont be a ahole when someone else tries to support it. Thats like some deadbeat dad coming back after 20 years and yelling at the man that raised him thats my son leave him alone lol.

Eidolon1248d ago (Edited 1248d ago )

I've avoided CFW because I am afraid of being banned and also was unsure how trophies would work with syncing, and then Sony constantly patches these.

luckytrouble1248d ago

I installed CFW ages ago, spoofed the firmware number, blocked official updates, and even made purchases from PSN after. Sony really doesn't care what you do with hardware they no longer support.

Eidolon1248d ago (Edited 1248d ago )

Can you sync trophies and all that?

Eidolon1248d ago

Come to think of, idk if I care about emulation or homebrew anymore on it. I just want to play vita games.

Sirk7x1248d ago

Can confirm, Sony doesn't give a crap lol. As long as you're not hacking trophies, you can legitimately download games and play them online, no problem. I've had mine hacked for years.

Eidolon1248d ago

They won't see you have trophies on a digital only game you have not purchased, and ban you?

300°

Sony Quietly Removed the Ability to Transfer Games from PS3 to Vita - PlayStation LifeStyle

Sony removed the ability to transfer games from PS3 to Vita, which unfortunately locks Vita players out of a lot of PS1 classics.

Read Full Story >>
playstationlifestyle.net
ZeekQuattro1474d ago

Sony really hates the Vita. Years later and they're still finding ways to snub owners of the device.

1474d ago
Tacoboto1474d ago (Edited 1474d ago )

Sony really hates the players, demonstrated by an onslaught of anti-consumer moves - from PS+ Cloud Save restrictions, enforced DualSense on-console (despite input flexibility on Remote Play), no DLC Support for PS3 PS+ titles, upgrade fees on not just cross-gen titles but also now on their new PS+ service, to things like this.

Only Nintendo out-snubs Sony on treatment of their players.

King_Noctis1474d ago

This I have to agree. Nintendo is the worst when it comes to consumer-friendly moves, and now Sony is coming so close.

Auron1474d ago (Edited 1474d ago )

Well atleast nintendo dont dictate/cherry pick what deserves censorship on 3rd party titles.

1474d ago
Goozex1474d ago

Ya ms has anti consumer moves like drm

persona4chie1473d ago

I fully agree that Nintendo cares less about its fans and stuff, but can we look at each company for what they’re doing not others? Yeah I’m irritated at Nintendo for more or less ignoring drift, limited releases like Mario 3D all stars etc, but guess what when I’m mad at Sony for something I’m not going to keep bringing it up, it’s not going to change the fact that I still can’t transfer my ps1 games.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1473d ago
Wrex3691474d ago

Yeah unfortunately they gave it a decent start then just kind of relegated it to the bin. Really great handheld though and in its day was my favorite. Gravity Rush, Persona 4 golden, uncharted, tearaway, freedom unite monster hunter(psn downloaded psp version), and DRAGONS CROWN.. just to name a few.. such a good handheld I'd wish they'd try again man.

shinoff21831474d ago

Only indie devs helped keep it alive sony got some games made for it. Just most aaa devs didnt bother. That was the vitas downfall

darthv721474d ago

It seems like this was included in the most recent PS3 and Vita fw updates. So as long as i dont upgrade my systems... it should still work.

porkChop1474d ago

What, why? I don't understand the point of this.

Inverno1474d ago

People, jailbreak you Vita.

IanTH1474d ago

Yeah, I'm not sure why Sony did this. It's one more thing to push people towards CFW, and then that's basically priming people to pirate. Why would they take away a feature? Why do companies continue to punish the loyal, paying customers? It boggles the mind.

flyinb111473d ago

This definitely pushed me to do it.

GoodGuy091474d ago

Just mod your vita and ps3 lol.

one2thr1474d ago

This, Pokémon Inclement Emerald on PSVita🤯

Show all comments (36)