All Channels
Popular
310°

Four Takeaways from Phil Spencer’s Recent Interview

Xbox division president Phil Spencer made some eyebrow-raising remarks recently. He gave his insights about the current status of the video game industry and he might not be that far off. Here are four takeaways from his comments

Read Full Story >>
hardknockgamers.com
freshslicepizza3333d ago

"Spencer indicated that there are Microsoft IPs in the pipeline without mentioning specifics. The Xbox boss also said on Twitter that there will be single-player Xbox console exclusive games to look forward to in the near future."

I guess people only read what they want to read.

3333d ago Replies(10)
Razzer3331d ago (Edited 3331d ago )

"there will be single-player Xbox console exclusive games to look forward to in the near future."

Like Phantom Dust?

XanderZane3330d ago

Well Voodoo Vince and Phanton Dust are both SP games, but I think there will be new IP SP games coming in the near future.

Godmars2903331d ago (Edited 3331d ago )

And then there are those who are given examples and evidence and don't accept it.

Cause, Kinect is going to make a comeback. Just you wait and see...

"If anything, REAL gamers are more and more interest in the Scorpio"

Meh. "Real Gamers" wouldn't be gushing all over a graphics bump much less call themselves "Real Gamers".

FFS...

DARK_WOLF3331d ago

Woah woah woah, woah...

So if yout excited for a new generation of consoles with better graphics then your NOT a real gamer?

OK!

Godmars2903331d ago

Only this isn't a new console gen. This is Sony making up for hardware shortcomings in the PS4, where MS is putting out a system *NOT* built around Kinect and a few years post the PS4. With the added, continuing, issue of MS more focused on creating a friendly PC-port platform than something for their own IPs.

_-EDMIX-_3331d ago

I love how anybody even thinks it's relevant to have a slight bump and resolution with the takeaway of having less games overall 😂😂😂

For why?

Yohshida3331d ago

To be honest "Single Player Xbox console Exlusive" could be Cuphead or Ori 2. Don't expect some huge AAA

2cents3331d ago

Really doesn't surprise.

This is the problem when children try to understand what adults are taking about.

rainslacker3331d ago

Don't be so hard on moldy. Children don't know when they're not being smart. They think everything they say is clever and relevant, even when they're off topic and meant to only incite.

_-EDMIX-_3331d ago

If it's a console exclusive it's probably not that significant you have to consider the next Halo was coming to PC as well...

bluefox7553331d ago

Without confirmation bias, one is able to read between the lines a bit. Of course he didn't say "NO MORE SINGLE PLAYER GAMES!", but you do get the message that it's certainly less of a priority for them, despite all of the feedback to the contrary. If you like what Microsoft is doing, that's fine, but at least be honest about it.

rainslacker3331d ago (Edited 3331d ago )

And others ignore the actual tangible evidence that exists and ignore that Spencer has said many things which he hasn't lived up to.

Like, where is that game that is on par with UC4 he wished MS had when talking about getting ROTTR exclusive for a year?

Like when he said that Scalebound was coming along great, only to cancel it a month later.

Like when Spencer said that AR was where it was at, only to backtrack later to say that Halolens was not ready for the mass consumer market.

Like when Spencer discredited VR as inconsequential, only to hype it up later when they partnered with Occulus, suddenly acting like big supporters of something they said had a long way to go, or no future at all.

But given all this, yeah, some people only read what they want to read. You being one of those people.

XanderZane3330d ago

He got the Scorpio hardware specs right and then some. ROTTR was actually an excellent game praised by many. http://www.metacritic.com/g...

He may not get everything right, but neither does the competition head executives. No one is perfect in this industry. All 3 game companies have made many mistakes in the past and present.

Many of the people on hear read everything Xbox as a negative, even when there are positive news being presented. You being one of them.

rainslacker3330d ago

I'll actually give MS and Phil credit where it's due. But your comment didn't actually refute that some people ignore evidence that he doesn't live up to everything he says he wants to achieve, and often says things just to try and look good against the competition.

All the things I've said are things Phil has said, and either hasn't delivered on, or has changed his tune about when they had an answer to what they once criticized.

I like Phil well enough, but he isn't perfect, and maybe people should take the good things he does and praise them, but actually call him out for what he doesn't deliver on. When he cancelled SB, he said a month prior it was coming along fine. No Xbox fan boy called him out for that lie. When he said he wanted a franchise on par with UC4, and then goes on to say that SP games don't have the impact they used to, no one called him out on it. Maybe Xbox fans should start looking out for their own interest and call out the companies which can't seem to get their sh*t together, instead of worrying about which Sony fan boys are being unfair against MS.

XanderZane3330d ago

Of course. Look at all the disagrees you got for telling the truth.

@DealerGaming
Gamers should listen to you BS instead right? lol!!
Anything positive about XBox/Scorpio you have something negative to say.
SP was never dead on XBox. All these BS articles claiming untruth nonsense.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3330d ago
3333d ago Replies(4)
XiNatsuDragnel3333d ago (Edited 3333d ago )

The biggest takeaway that he won't let first party SP games to be developed but instead let third parties do it.

UCForce3333d ago

It's kind like Phil Spencer care about co op and multiplayer only. That's not good enough.

LexHazard793333d ago

I dont get the fuss really..we pay to play online. There better be great multiplayer games available. Thats what the Xbox is all about Xbox Live! I get my single player experiences more on Playstation and Im fine with that. But when it comes to mp..I prefer to game on Live.

tyasia03331d ago

Lex...

Most games use p2p match making and the games that don't are hosted on private servers owned by the company that owns the game.

So for P2P matchmaking the console with the larger player base will provide the better experience simply because the odds of being matched with people closer to you is greater. And for obvious reason privately hosted games offer the exact same experience.

The fact that somehow Live is better for gaming is a misconception.

Patriot4Life3331d ago

Natsu...your obsession with MS is insane.

Do you even play your PS? You are in MS related article.

ApocalypseShadow3333d ago (Edited 3333d ago )

Let's go ahead and fix this so that gamers can understand this fully. To help, just add this at the end "for Microsoft."

*Single-player games are not as lucrative as they once were(for Microsoft)

Halo and Gears aren't pushing consoles out the door for the company. So embarrassed, Microsoft can no longer post console sales. Even Nintendo, a proud company, posted Wii U numbers. Microsoft, not so proud, show cowardice. And single player games have failed for Microsoft like Tomb Raider exclusivity, Recore,Quantum Break, etc.

*Games as a service is the current market trend(for Microsoft)

Microsoft continues to look for revenue streams. Which is fine for a business to do. But it's because they lack a plethora of in house games that cater to players worldwide. Like Japanese games because Microsoft doesn't believe they will create huge returns in profit for them. And a fan base that believes games that aren't AAA or English based are niche.

*Multiplayer games rule the roost(for Microsoft)

More games that are online for Xbox live, the more Microsoft makes in revenue. It's why Crackdown 3,Sea of Thieves, State of Decay 2, Forza, even the remaster (?? Lol!) Phantom Rush is online. Even with micro transactions. Why Halo had better multiplayer and weak single player with couch co-op stripped out. Why Gears has weak single player story but good multiplayer. Makes Microsoft money to get you online. Paying for it anyway.... Oh.. And even canceled games like Scalebound and Fable Legends were multiplayer focused.

*Xbox One will have upcoming single-player focused games(for Microsoft)

Doesn't say in house. Only IPs that are coming in the pipeline (for Microsoft). And that could be Indies. That could be third parties which are multiplatform. Since single player games haven't helped Microsoft and Xbox one. And with their focus on multiplayer, what trust can you give them in that single player games like Zelda or Horizon are coming from them? They don't take risks like that.

Remember... For Microsoft...

Chris123332d ago

For someone who posts negative Xbox posts every single, always taking the most negative and extreme viewpoint, MS really have you triggered right now.

When someone gives a dose of honesty you may not agree with it, but to pretend this isn't true regarding the market in general you're wrong.

ApocalypseShadow3331d ago

I don't waste my time in every Xbox article because Microsoft is not that important. Seems the Xbox fan base is not that important to Microsoft because they continue to lead you on and you let them. That's why you aren't willing to read the wall of text or ignore truth.

Microsoft would rather be the service behind it all than provide you new games because providing that means they have to spend money when they'd rather just make money from services. They want to be like valve and steam or Netflix. Sell services and make money.

It's why they are buying up the software behind the games because they want to be the main provider of the tools. Why they bought Havok. Why they bought Simplygon. Why they want developers using Windows 10 or DX12. They want to fleece gamer's wallets and developers.

You can ignore it. But the truth is in your face. Phil himself even said that they would rather look into being like Netflix. Enablers like you somehow think Microsoft, with more money than Nintendo and Sony combined, should be providing less games. How that is okay with you is hilarious. More money, less games. And you're okay. And you continue to believe the lies about things like 3X the power with the cloud. Then what's the point of Scorpio if the cloud can do that? They manipulate you and you follow like the good soldier. They knew games like Scalebound were being canceled. But said nothing because that would hurt holiday sales. Misleading you into thinking the game was still coming out.

Keep being like this
https://goodybagsblog.files...

_-EDMIX-_3331d ago

Except he's not wrong...

The games Microsoft has cancelled show that there is this focus to multiplayer titles.

Regardless of how you look at it Microsoft has had a very very weak generation, this might be one of their worst they've had in recent memory.

rainslacker3331d ago

So....care to counter any of his points?

I'm not that fond of MS either, and could easily do so. I won't, because I mostly agree with him, but I can actually argue against his points without trying to call his console preference into question. Sadly, it'd probably be more intelligent and actually a practical view that you wouldn't see from most Xbox fans around here, because they rarely try to counter actual arguments, and when they do, it's typically with nothing but hyperbole. Maybe 1 in 4 can actually make coherent and relevant arguments.

Chris123331d ago

@apocalypse - you see, once again you make huge assumptions. I'm an 'enabler' now? I believe in the power of the cloud? I'm a manipulator and follow like a good soldier?

You really are a piece of work and the very worst type of gamer.

FYI I own a PS4 Pro and and Xbox One S. Which do I play more, the One S. I don't have an allegiance to either company but I use the Xbox more because my mates play more there, I much prefer the controller and I actually like the exclusives better.

Yes, I loved HZD but I really don't care for the stream of Japanese Sony exclusives, I'm in the UK and have a very western taste in games. Being cocky about the number of exclusives Sony is releasing early 2017 doesn't count for much if you don't like the genres.

I would finish by saying nowhere did Phil say he or MS prefer a Netflix type of system, that's the twisted words of someone trying to downplay MS again and as for a good soldier, who is a multi system owner and who is posting negative MS walls of texts regularly. The irony of you calling me a manipulated good soldier is what really is hilarious here, so carry on the good work for your company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3331d ago
Patriot4Life3331d ago

I think when people see your wall a text on an XBox article they just skip your comment like me.

We all know that your hate for MS is strong and no matter what they do, you will find something to moan about.

_-EDMIX-_3331d ago

Except you fail to realize even someone who doesn't like the company is going to have grievances that are actually more important to those who own an Xbox

Now I don't own an Xbox but I own a gaming PC and I could tell you that Microsoft has yet to even publish a game that has been on PC that is even made me slightly interested to purchase, this goes to show you I was probably correct it to never even purchase an Xbox One.

Even before you talk about the platform if you just stop and focus on what the publisher has been doing in regards to the games that they've been releasing or even cancelling it goes to show they're not really favoring their fan base.

I think especially if you went out of your way to buy an Xbox One you should be questioning what's going on with this publisher right now.

Microsoft already has less teams than Sony and Nintendo solta close down teams cancel Fable 4, cancel scalebound in a bunch of other games I think a community has to seriously really question what's going on.

I'm not saying you have to bash the company but at the end of the day you have to at least start questioning What's Happening Here.

What I've noticed is that there's a lot of people or blindly trying to pretend nothing is wrong with Microsoft right now yet if the company came out today and said they've made mistakes in their restructuring the company in purchasing more teams , I don't think you would be sitting here obliging and saying "don't do it" that you have enough, that just seems unrealistic.

So to those who keep trying to ignore it you seriously can't keep pretending it's not a problem yet also jumping for joy when you even hear the slight glimmer of hope that this company is changing their ways it's either something is wrong and it's bad or nothing is wrong and it's unnecessary...

If gamers are able to look at Ubisoft Activision Electronic Arts and a bunch of other publishers and be able to give their opinion on their performance is there a reason why Gamers seem to be completely hesitant about doing this for Microsoft? I think it has everything to do with trying to desperately justify the purchase of a plastic box I own a gaming PC not for Microsoft sake I did not purchase or build my gaming PC to just play Microsoft games. .

So you have to consider I'm rating Microsoft based on no bias of feeling like I have to defend them, I never purchased any one of their platforms so it means nothing to me I'm simply rating them based on the publisher.

To me Microsoft is no different than any other third-party publisher...

Tussin1873331d ago

I can guarantee that if Scorpio sells well then MS will give us numbers. Even though people won't admit it, this is like a new gen for MS. Everything inside from architecture to memory is all new. We can argue about the CPU(the die-hards say it custom and way better than the Jaguar) but MS will be treating this like a new generation console launch.

They are behind right now and a lot rides on this system. Yes, we can say this is s midgen system like Sony but it much more than that for MS. That's my take on things. E3 needs to hurry up.

XanderZane3330d ago (Edited 3330d ago )

@Apocalypse Shadow
Microsoft is not important to you? Obviously that's a lie if you can take time to write almost 20 paragraph posts to spew your hate and negativity for the subject.

Keep being like this.... https://68.media.tumblr.com...

freshslicepizza3330d ago (Edited 3330d ago )

@Apocalypse Shadow
"I don't waste my time in every Xbox article because Microsoft is not that important. Seems the Xbox fan base is not that important to Microsoft because they continue to lead you on and you let them. That's why you aren't willing to read the wall of text or ignore truth."

There is a ton of reference to either Microsoft or the Xbox in a lot of your comments, don't try and persuade otherwise now. Much more than Nintendo, I wonder why?

"Microsoft would rather be the service behind it all than provide you new games because providing that means they have to spend money when they'd rather just make money from services. They want to be like valve and steam or Netflix. Sell services and make money."

They release more games than Valve, terrible comparison. They may not release as many as Sony but they still release a fair amount each year, whether they interest you is a different story.

"It's why they are buying up the software behind the games because they want to be the main provider of the tools. Why they bought Havok. Why they bought Simplygon. Why they want developers using Windows 10 or DX12. They want to fleece gamer's wallets and developers."

They want to fleece gamers wallets, how so anymore than Sony? One company is offering over 350 Xbox 360 games on backwards compatability, who isn't offering that? Sony also offers Playstation Now, isn't that also fleecing gamers wallets?

"You can ignore it. But the truth is in your face. Phil himself even said that they would rather look into being like Netflix."

Way to take what he said out of context. Playstation Now is no different, oh wait actually it is, they charge double. My wallet is full of fleece now.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3330d ago
iDadio3331d ago

Feel that if the SP game was AAA he would be shouting about it, using no definition surely hints that the offerings in the 'near future' will be Phantom dust and Ori.

For the good of gaming and MS I hope they have some bombs to drop at E3, I'm shopping around for 4K TVs so the Scorpio would be on the cards if they prove it will be worth it. I'm a PC gamer at heart but sometimes you just wanna sit on your ass in the couch.

Show all comments (64)
60°

Take-Two CEO Once Again Side Steps Grand Theft Auto 6 Price Point

Strauss Zelnick says price of GTA 6 is being carefully considered and that Rockstar is focused on "making the most spectacular piece of entertainment on Earth."

Kuma51d ago

If GTA 6 abandons everything that made GTA 5 great, it will crash and burn right out of the gate. GTA 5 was funny and not at all PC. My worry is that they will cave to the PC crowd and ruin the vibes.

Eonjay51d ago

They got freaking BBLs twerking on the top of trucks for the gram, the freaking Flordia joker, and dude running down the stree in their undies and you are worried about it being 'too PC'? The internet has runied gamers. It doesn't matter how non-PC they make the game, you will all listen to the grifters telling you not to believe your lying eyes lol.

gigoran851d ago

"Rockstar Games’ co-founder and former VP of Development Jamie King said he envisions GTA 6 as a game that’s “maybe not quite as edgy or quite as funny” as its satirical predecessors."

oh yeah, totally internet grifters spreading rumors...

blacktiger51d ago

That's part of the plan, they destroyed you but they need to destroy the shareholders? Only 1 shre holder is the true elite that don't care

1nsomniac51d ago (Edited 51d ago )

Meh.., if it’s above £55 I ain’t buying it.

Rockstar are genuinely not half the company they used to be. I was a die hard GTA fan I’ve purchased every game and expansion and spin off day 1.

My opinion of GTA6 is that I can take it or leave it. Not bothered. They burnt too many bridges.

DaReapa51d ago (Edited 51d ago )

So they're actually leaving the door open for an L.A. Noire sequel? Nice!

VaNdAl51d ago (Edited 51d ago )

He should just come out and say it already it's getting stupid it's going to be a 100 bucks $200 for the special edition🤡🤡; 29315;🤣♿

Storm2351d ago

I won't be getting this game until I can get it for $70. SHoot, I could wait for it to be even lower. I don't need the game that badly as my backlog is still huge and I am enjoying playing other things.

Show all comments (13)
40°

Talking Aliens: The Video Games With Author Mike Diver

Skewed and Reviewed have posted an interview with Author Mike Diver about his pending book on Aliens video games.

70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay52d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn253d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers53d ago (Edited 53d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn252d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown53d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos53d ago (Edited 53d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay52d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay52d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac52d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger53d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300053d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde53d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood53d ago (Edited 53d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde52d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)