All Channels
Popular
210°

FIFA 18 will make or break the Nintendo Switch

Could the biggest game around make Nintendo’s new console a must-have?

wonderfulmonkeyman3324d ago

LOL, just...really?
Who seriously thinks that THIS is going to be the deal make-or-breaker for Switch?XD

Nu3324d ago

lol I hate Fifa but will definitely be getting a Switch possibly this year.

modelgod3324d ago

Why? Just buy a switch and Zelda, beat it, then sell the switch. Why the hell would you want a switch other than that?

EddieNX 3324d ago

Maybe because there's tons of high quality exclousives coming out and a ton that haven't been announced yet?? Xenoblade 2, Mario oddysey p, shin !egami tensei, Splatoon 2? Gtfo

3324d ago Replies(7)
ruefrak3324d ago

I agree partially. FIFA will make Switch, but not FIFA 18. It's if Switch gets FIFA 19 that we'll know whether or not Switch has a future. And not a "legacy" version but an honest to god new version of FIFA.

modelgod3324d ago

I know right. I couldn't bring myself to read this article. Fifa fans are not the target market for the Switch. I can't see avid Fifa players saying " let me ditch my P'S or X1 and get a Switch." Unbelievable! !

ChronoJoe3324d ago

I think the issue is that it will determine if third party support from these types of major franchises is worthwhile. Regardless of what you think of Fifa it's an absolutely huge franchise, especially in Europe, and will serve to demonstrate if its audience are interested in playing it on the go.

If it's a huge success, then expect to see more of EAs franchises on the Switch, and perhaps more from other publishers who choose to follow them. However, if it fails, then that's going to set the bar for EA, and other publishers expectations for what they can get from their franchises with a similar audience. Call of Duty, Fifa, Titanfall, Destiny, etc. these games all have a similar demographic and if Fifa underperforms on the Switch, then that will affect the likelyhood that any of these (or franchises alike) will make it over.

For me it's not a big deal, but if the Switch could capture that relatively mainstream audience (males aged 12-30) then the platform itself would see an incredible boost to its success.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3324d ago
shockwave4life3324d ago

The switch is everybody's secondary console. Everyone owns a PS4 or an Xbox One. THEN they MAYBEE buy a switch. So who in they're right mind would buy FIFA or any third party game on the weaker console with weak as hell online support?!???? Why wouldn't u just buy it on the PS4 or Xbox one??? And don't give me this bullshit "well u can play it on a airplane" how many plane rides in a yr do ppl take?? 1 maybe 2 a yr! Not worth it Nintendo is only good for they're 1st party games but the problem is they don't make em quick enough to keep they're players busy threw the yr

3324d ago Replies(4)
Istolla3324d ago (Edited 3324d ago )

Switch is my primary PC & PS4 are my secondary.

3324d ago
Kabaneri3324d ago

Haha FIFA is for the casuals of casuals (generally), nobody bought a Switch for 3rd party sports games.

Kizwiz63323d ago

People buy consoles for games. The more games the merrier. The Switch has the potential to play Fifa, one of the biggest casual third-party games on the planet, anywhere at anytime. That's potentially a huge appeal for players.

rocketpanda3324d ago

No it won't. A FIFA doesn't make or break any console. It's a yearly drip drip minuscule update every year.

3324d ago
Kizwiz63323d ago (Edited 3323d ago )

It's one of the biggest multi-platform franchises and the only game EA is pumping for the Switch... if it fails then why would EA continue with games on the platform? other third-party studios may follow suit to cancel support = less third-party games for Switch. This is bigger than just the IP.

Show all comments (48)
90°

Who Wore It Better: FIFA vs Pro Evo Covers, 2001 to 2020

Like all great photographs, the covers of the FIFA and Pro Evolution Soccer video games capture a moment in time. But which ones have been best?

Read Full Story >>
gamespew.com
120°

Why I Have a Problem with Microtransactions and You Should Too

BY PHANTOM: Why should someone who has worked hard and grinded day in, day out to build up enough resources to gain quick repairs, be in the same game world as people who have purchased the kits with real-world money instantaneously?

Read Full Story >>
growngaming.com
Hardiman2585d ago

One of the most well thought out and factual article I've read on micro transactions. I've hated the practice because to me it's just wrong unless it's a F2P title.

What gets me is the ones who say "if you don't like it don't buy it" well I don't but enough do, more than enough and it's really conditioning a generation to just accept it as "this is normal."

That's why I rally to those companies that still deliver solid FULL games. Games that are not only incredible to experience but are of some of the best quality. On the flip side that's why Im so anti certain companies. They want to deliver games that seem so sterile and cut content to sell to customers in the game stores.

I lump the GAAS, loot boxes and micotransactions into the same pile because they all exist together in one form or another.

The devs who came from the mobile game model really played s hand in getting the attention of the suits.

TekoIie2585d ago (Edited 2585d ago )

"I lump the GAAS, loot boxes and micotransactions into the same pile because they all exist together in one form or another."

I would disagree slightly there. GaaS model does not require loot boxes or MT's to work and a few good examples off the top of my head would be Total War: Warhammer 2 and Total War: Rome 2. TW:R2 was at launch considered to be one of the worst TW games of all time but because of mod support, updates and we'll timed free and paid content releases it has a strong community and is now a highly recommended game.

TW:W2 is the opposite at launch and is maybe the best TW game of all time and treats it's previous instalment as an expansion in a way (basically if you own the previous game it merges the maps to a degree). Like Rome 2 it's recieved great mod support, lots of updates along with free and paid content.

GaaS by itself isn't bad and in some ways I dislike lumping it altogether with MT's and
Loot boxes. I agree that many of the games that make use of the service have something questionable mixed into the model but the obvious answer there is stop supporting those games. You can in some ways see RE2 and DMC5 making use of the model too.

Hardiman2585d ago (Edited 2585d ago )

Doesn't require them and I get what you are saying but but I'd argue it's fertile ground for them. That's what loot boxes/micro transactions are about. Extending profits. Monthly subs are the same thing. Cheaper games to create but games that maximize profits. It doesn't take much imagination to see where this leads and why some companies push for subscriptions!

The same massive corps that all too often push micro transactions want the industry to be subscriptions based. Let's just say they come from the same mindset.

You are correct in that GAAS isn't bad in and of itself but again I don't see games like GOW, Spider-Man, HZD, Red Dead 2, Uncharted, Sekiro, TLOU, Zelda and any of the other high quality SP games existing if it's just GAAS. No I see games like Fallout 76, Anthem, State of Decay, Sea of Theives, Fortnite etc.

TekoIie2585d ago (Edited 2585d ago )

"You are correct in that GAAS isn't bad in and of itself but again I don't see games like GOW, Spider-Man, HZD, Red Dead 2, Uncharted, Sekiro, TLOU, Zelda and any of the other high quality SP games existing if it's just GAAS. No I see games like Fallout 76, Anthem, State of Decay, Sea of Theives, Fortnite etc."

Your list is actually very interesting because some of those SP games can actually be seen as using the GaaS model or at the very least portions of it in the eyes of some. To my knowledge Spider-Man, TLoU, Uncharted 3+4 and Zelda all had a season pass which can very easily be considered as something that comes under GaaS in that it creates an additional revenue stream beyond the inital purchase.

A lot of the DLC for games like Uncharted 3 and The Last of Us can very easily be categorized as Micro-transactions. Cosmetics definitely come under the MT umbrella so why are these games exempt from the criticism but not others? And are these games exempt from the term but not the others you listed? Also why would you rather not see games like Dota 2, Splatoon 2, Halo 3, Diablo 3, Apex Legends etc.? Point being there are many top tier games that are using the GaaS model and many top tier SP games doing the exact same.

UltraNova2585d ago (Edited 2585d ago )

This logic can be applied to the recent upheaval about an easy mode in Sekiro. Guy A, spends X amount of time grinding it out until he/she finally overcomes the difficulty and "gits gud". Guy, spends 1/3 of the time beating the game without breaking a sweat because of an easy mode( analogy: paid progression in online games). Both brag about beating the game. You get the rest...

BlackIceJoe2584d ago

Microtransactions are the worst thing that has happened to video games this generation and because of them now games are being designed with them in mind.

2584d ago
CrimsonWing692584d ago

Here’s the thing, until people stop buying them they will always exist. It’s a market and a multi-billion dollar one at that.

If people didn’t buy them then publishers wouldn’t waste their time on them.

UltraNova2584d ago

If they didn't add them people wouldn't buy them and get addicted to them. There is always two sides on a coin.

CrimsonWing692584d ago

But my point is that people feed it. People need to learn some self-control. It'd be like if people start getting pissed at publishers because people are addicted to video games or getting mad at card makers because people waste their money on collecting cards.

rpvenom2584d ago

@Crimonswing69

This is the same concept of a casino.. do you think that casino's benefit people in general? No.. majority of people go there to lose money.. if they didn't exist.. or people didn't have access to it.. then we'd be better off.. but the reality is some can control or afford to lose the money.. while most cant.. and most cant even control that addiction or desire to gamble.. it's because of greed that people are willing to ruin other's lives to make a profit.. dont get me wrong.. i go to the casino's sometime just to hang out with my friends and maybe spend $100.. but i have some self control.. most people dont.

off topic but i see both casino's and microtransactions as a way of corporations to take advantage of consumers stupidity

Lord_Sloth2584d ago

So long as they're just cosmetic or can be obtained for free in game idc.

Show all comments (14)
70°

EA Sports Fifa 18 Joins EA Access Vault

Last year's Football/Soccer simulation, Fifa 18 has now joined the EA Access vault as a title that's free for those that subscribe to the EA service on Xbox One consoles.

Read Full Story >>
gamerheadquarters.com