
The console and, more importantly, developers don't seem ready.

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.
Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.
To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

TG writes: If you’ve ever wanted that chaotic, large-scale modern warfare feeling from Battlefield but in full VR immersion, Forefront delivers it better than anything else currently available on Quest.
I wouldn't say rushed but it does seem like some aspects weren't thought through properly.
They rushed the release in order to end the Wii u's tenure early. Games like Mario, Splatoon 2, and Xenoblade should've been launch titles. As it stands now it's Zelda and a couple old Ubisoft ports.
How long has NS been in development? Did account for Wii U not meeting expectations during Switch's creation, resulting in it coming out sooner than expected?
It's clear that they're sticking to the March launch month just so they can look good in front of the investors and stockholders after Wii U had a disappointing 2016 holiday season.
I think the concept of the Switch is what they actually wanted out of the Wii U, which was rushed out rather than the upcoming one. Their development resources were diverted into making Wii U games while the R&D team carried on with making the Switch into what it now is. But it now doesn't have enough games at launch because Nintendo first-party were focused on Wii U development rather than Switch. That's my theory, anyway.
it seems its more or less of a wii u mid console re-release with light updates