All Channels
Popular
120°

Will Red Dead Redemption 2 Get A Standalone Expansion?

RDR 2 writes "Way back in 2010, the gaming industry looked a lot different than it does today. Microtransactions had barely even reared their ugly heads and bigger paid DLC packs were the in-thing at the time."

kraenk123449d ago (Edited 3449d ago )

There really a website already called RDR2.com?!
Bit early to speculate on that, isn't it?!

mushroomwig3449d ago

Funny enough the website was created in 2014

kraenk123449d ago

Lol...didn't even see that.

Blu3_Berry3449d ago

The game is not even out yet and we are already speculating if it will get a standalone expansion? Lets wait for the game to release first then we can talk about dlc.

A2X_3449d ago

RDR2 is a long way out but let me tell you: No, it won't.

With Gta V Online's success at generating money, it's very likely that they'll do the same with RDR2. They will create a big online componant and release overpriced DLC items on a regular basis to make you buy shark cards or whatever they'll call it - just like they're doing with GTAV now. Shame really.

3449d ago
CorndogBurglar3449d ago

Undead Nightmare remains as one of my favorite DLC's of all time. I certainly wouldn't be opposed to another one. Even if its zombies again. It was so good last time I would be totally fine with them doing it a second time.

Show all comments (9)
30°

Red Dead Redemption 2 Turns Into Elden Ring in New Mod, Featuring Uncle as Final Boss

Red Dead Redemption 2 mod turns the game into Elden Ring, adding spells, boss fights, and Uncle as the final boss.

110°

GTA5 Has Sold Over 220 Million Copies, Red Dead Redemption 2 Has Sold Over 79 Million Units

Take-Two announced its financial results for Q2 of fiscal year 2026, and shared an update on the sales of GTA5 and Red Dead Redemption 2.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
TheDreamCorridor201d ago

You think Rockstar views Red Dead 2 as a failure because it didn't sell 150m copies?

jznrpg201d ago

3 billion or so in revenue not including online stuff I’m sure they don’t

SethNW201d ago

I am pretty sure they don't. It was profitable and made them a lot of money. Not GTA5 money but far from failure. Maybe it is lower priority franchise, due to being smaller, but that is about the lowest they would put it as. Only thing they do consider failure is RDR2 Online, unlike GTA5 Online, that RDR2 Online flopped. Hence why it got less support. And when it come to profits, sales for both combined don't come close to GTA Online microtansactions. Hence why everything very quickly got canceled and GTA Online was top priority, so no GTA6 for a long time, no DLC for GTA5, despite there being 5 DLCs planned, at least I think it was 5, give or take one. But as I see it, they needed to rejuvenate interest and all, hence why GTA6 eventually is getting made. But what they are really looking forward to is refresh of Online.

ZeekQuattro201d ago

Only in terms of the online aspect of the game. They didn't support it as much as they did GTA V Online. I remember people being pissed about that.

jznrpg201d ago

I own a few GTAs but never played them. I love Red Dead though

Yui_Suzumiya195d ago (Edited 195d ago )

Boring and overrated. Red Dead Redemption is pretty good though. The Hundred Line: Last Defense Academy is my personal GOAT. We need more stuff like that from TooKyo.

victorMaje201d ago

I must be one of the few who are fine with the GTA6 delay. People treat that game like it’s the 2nd coming lol.

FIELDMARSHALL_P201d ago

My daughter asked me how I felt about I shrugged and said I don't care gives me time to finish up games I already have. It's all good let them make the best game they can.

RedDevils201d ago

Wish they make another Manhunt or Bully.

gold_drake201d ago

damn, thats a ridiculous number

Show all comments (11)
160°

Dan Houser: RDR2 was "behind schedule" and "over budget so much I didn’t want to think about it"

Dan Houser opens up about Red Dead Redemption 2’s rocky development, calling it behind schedule, massively over budget, and full of pressure to prove doubters wrong.

Read Full Story >>
thegamepost.com
Storm23206d ago (Edited 206d ago )

The world they built is pretty amazing. Unfortunately, the game was mostly boring to me. I definitely had fun in some parts, but it didn't do it for me as a whole like the first one did. I loved RDR so much.

The budgets and time it takes to make games these days is out of control. Such a big risk. If a game isn't a huge hit, it is often it for a studio. Scary. I really miss the PS2 and PS3 days where studeios could make 4 games in a generation and take risks in making something new. And so many were using their own engines. Those were the days.

neutralgamer1992205d ago

Agreed. I love RDR but couldn't get into RDR2. The animations take forever and game slows you down on purpose. It won't let you have fun because R* want us to play the game they want to. I know millions love RDR2 and I even bought and own it. But just wasn't for me.

It's like comparing GTA4 to saints row 2. One game was about fun while the other was about realism and that's coming from someone who beat GTA4 many times. I much rather a game be fun to play than chase realism

YodaCracker205d ago

GTA IV’s realism is what made it so much more fun for me. I loved experimenting with the physics.

Storm23204d ago

I bought RDR2 also. Put 100+ hours into it and beat it our of respect for Rockstar and all the people saying it was the greatest game ever. RDR blew my mind but might also have been the best time in gaming for me personally. l loved that PS3 gen so much.

I am excited to see what GTA6 is like.

206d ago Replies(1)