All Channels
Popular
130°

I hate the word 'Gamer'

"Gamer is a tired and discriminatory word. Let's ditch it."

Read Full Story >>
gamertime.co.uk
OB1Biker3471d ago (Edited 3471d ago )

Totally disagree.
I think that piece may have been true still 5 years ago but not anymore.
'why keep in service a word with such heavy male bias that people feel the need to specify when ‘gamers’ are female with phrases like ‘gamer girl’.'
Is not true, Like most arguments in this piece.
I think the word has never been the problem anyway since its somehow neutral. It was more the people thinking they are sort of 'elite' and that word would carry that meaning. 'gamer' is fine now. I think the problems are more around the word 'casual' nowadays. Now that is a 'discriminatory word.'

ninjazfistz3471d ago

Why classify yourself though as a "gamer"? I don't buy it. For instance Mike is a mid to casual level gamer and he likes to consider himself gamer. Others might just want to be called Mike or a guy.

OB1Biker3470d ago

Im not sure we understand it the same way. A gamer is just a word from the dictionary to say someone play games on a regular basis. Nothing more. My 7.5 year old daughter is a gamer like me. Theres no proud or any special connotation to it. Its just easier to say than 'plays videogames regularly' and is just used when I have to tell we play videogames for some reason.

ninjazfistz3470d ago

@OB1Biker

So if I watch movies regularly what are you going to call me? If I read books? If I wrestle alligators occasionally. Their convenience is not our convenience. If a word is in the dictionary it doesn't mean it has to be applied especially to describe a person that maybe doesn't play on a regular basis. It is a bad assumption and a bad setup. Even if they play heavily they don't have to be viewed or categorized a certain way.

Then people will turn around and say people play games too much. Its bad culture for the videogaming industry to refer to anybody participating in a game activity as a gamer. Casual gamer is their way out of it but even then it shouldn't be applied in the first place. Whose business is it how much a person games or if they enjoy gaming? It is their own business. Don't fall for that

Army_of_Darkness3470d ago

I've been a gamer since grade 3. I don't care, it doesn't bother me in any way ... There are Way more important things to be concerned about these days bro.

madjedi3471d ago

Didn't you people get the memo 2 years ago, when the whole gamers are dead narrative caused outright revolt of average gamers against gaming journalism.

Rebel_Scum3471d ago

I've no idea what the article says in argument but I've always thought it was pretty lame to say you're a gamer.

ninjazfistz3470d ago

I think when gaming was first getting established to let people know the industry needs to be taken seriously it was okay to title or count its numbers as gamer ranks.

Nowadays it totally useless to use outside of Esport. Some people want to show their passion or be counted as a videogame player thats fine. But this placeholder name should chill and people need to accept there isn't a good use for it when referring to others.

Dragonopolis3471d ago

Been gaming since late 70's early 80's starting on atari console and apple computer....... I can tell you for a fact that the word "player" already had a sexist and derogatory meaning and that meaning still is used today ....

Player is an older derogatory word but still more recognized than "gamer" as derogatory term...... Player still has a positive meaning as well for instance when sitting in a sports bar the word "Player" less like to cause a scene.

Just be careful where, when, and who you say .... " I'm a Player "
as opposed to " I'm a Gamer "...... you just might not get the human response you were hoping for....

ninjazfistz3470d ago

Player by itself could cause problems. Perhaps its best not to apply a label to yourself in the first place. It causes less of a scene. Could be at the bar and say I was playing this game not scream out Im a player

ninjazfistz3471d ago

Game player yup. Cuz once you leave the game console are you then a gamer the rest of the day? I dunno. I don't personally think so. If you went to a movie afterwards or went camping do people call you camper all day long?

Show all comments (30)
60°

Take-Two CEO Once Again Side Steps Grand Theft Auto 6 Price Point

Strauss Zelnick says price of GTA 6 is being carefully considered and that Rockstar is focused on "making the most spectacular piece of entertainment on Earth."

Kuma14d ago

If GTA 6 abandons everything that made GTA 5 great, it will crash and burn right out of the gate. GTA 5 was funny and not at all PC. My worry is that they will cave to the PC crowd and ruin the vibes.

Eonjay14d ago

They got freaking BBLs twerking on the top of trucks for the gram, the freaking Flordia joker, and dude running down the stree in their undies and you are worried about it being 'too PC'? The internet has runied gamers. It doesn't matter how non-PC they make the game, you will all listen to the grifters telling you not to believe your lying eyes lol.

gigoran814d ago

"Rockstar Games’ co-founder and former VP of Development Jamie King said he envisions GTA 6 as a game that’s “maybe not quite as edgy or quite as funny” as its satirical predecessors."

oh yeah, totally internet grifters spreading rumors...

blacktiger14d ago

That's part of the plan, they destroyed you but they need to destroy the shareholders? Only 1 shre holder is the true elite that don't care

1nsomniac14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

Meh.., if it’s above £55 I ain’t buying it.

Rockstar are genuinely not half the company they used to be. I was a die hard GTA fan I’ve purchased every game and expansion and spin off day 1.

My opinion of GTA6 is that I can take it or leave it. Not bothered. They burnt too many bridges.

DaReapa14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

So they're actually leaving the door open for an L.A. Noire sequel? Nice!

VaNdAl14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

He should just come out and say it already it's getting stupid it's going to be a 100 bucks $200 for the special edition🤡🤡; 29315;🤣♿

Storm2314d ago

I won't be getting this game until I can get it for $70. SHoot, I could wait for it to be even lower. I don't need the game that badly as my backlog is still huge and I am enjoying playing other things.

Show all comments (13)
40°

Talking Aliens: The Video Games With Author Mike Diver

Skewed and Reviewed have posted an interview with Author Mike Diver about his pending book on Aliens video games.

70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay16d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn216d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn216d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown16d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay16d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay16d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac15d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger16d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300016d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde16d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde16d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)