1020°

Rockstar Games Teasing Something Red: Is a Red Dead Redemption Sequel Coming?

Rockstar Games just updated its official site with a completely red splash screen, that you can see above. It appears to be something quite relevant, as the studio’s social media channels are also echoing the change.

Genuine-User3379d ago (Edited 3379d ago )

Hyped! I'm excited to see the new Red Dead!

bouzebbal3379d ago (Edited 3379d ago )

i think it is red dead remaster
i never get my hopes too high

b163o13379d ago

How can RDR get a sequel when it is a..... you know what never mind. Hype switch engaged!!!!

freshslicepizza3379d ago

on pc please whatever it is, remastered and or a new game

morganfell3379d ago (Edited 3379d ago )

Rockstar San Diego is working on Red Dead 3. The other studios will contribute but they (RSD) have been in development for 2 years. This could be about a RDR remaster, but that doesn't alter the fact the 3rd game in the series is being built at RSD.

Concertoine3379d ago

@abzdiine

RDR remaster is unlikely... the game is very complex code and that is the reason it never had a PC port and why it is glitchy as far as Rockstar games go. It's also why the multiplayer is broken to this day. Members of the dev team often said it was a miracle it ever came out.

In other words - get hyped for Red Dead 3!

mikeslemonade3379d ago (Edited 3379d ago )

Nope. We want GTA6 not another boring Red Dead.

Red Dead only had good graphics at the time. Gameplay was dry as heck.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3379d ago
-Foxtrot3379d ago ShowReplies(5)
ServerBOT3379d ago ShowReplies(2)
MasterCornholio3379d ago (Edited 3379d ago )

Agent is black.

http://www.rockstargames.co...

:P

@Dragon

Depends on your interpretation of soon.

LOL

notachance3379d ago

It's been 3 years since GTA V, I'd say it's about damn time!

XanderZane3379d ago

They had already hinted last year that the game was in the works. Maybe they finally have a teaser to show. Can't wait.

Crazyglues3379d ago

So where is it already.. ???

Perjoss3379d ago

Careful guys, Red Dead isn't the only 'red' game that R* makes:
https://www.blogcdn.com/www...

senorfartcushion3379d ago

So when people blame hye for a game bwing disappointing.....I'll be right to blame people like you?

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 3378d ago
Walker3379d ago

Everything's just changed red too. Website has that exact image, Twitter banner image has change to that image and its Twitter avatar has changed to a black background with its logo in red.

itshappening.gif

InMyOpinion3378d ago

Or...it's another f*cking remaster. :(

nowitzki20043378d ago

At least it would be a game worthy of a remaster.

InMyOpinion3377d ago

Sure but it would be a big letdown for me.

ocelot073379d ago

I want Red Dead 3. Not a sequel to Red Dead Redemption.

Hroach6163379d ago

Red dead 3 would be a sequel to red dead redemption. Redemption was red dead 2 essentially

ocelot073379d ago

As solidossnakos said I mean a new story new characters ect. I keep seeing people saying they want Red Dead Redemption 2. To me that would make no sense.

3379d ago Replies(6)
-Foxtrot3379d ago

If it's RD3 then please god don't let them focus on the online and multiplayer DLC

5p4c3d3379d ago

yea right, after GTAOnline, this is their bread and butter now. I actually liked red dead's online more then GTA's though. Id say its safe to assume it will be back in red dead in a big way for better or worse.

SgtPepper18063379d ago

I adored Red Dead online. It's probably the best online experience I ever had, sans maybe Halo 3. But GTA online was ruined by shark cards. I'm terrified they'll do it to Red Dead too.

Oschino19073379d ago

Please site one time sharks cards ever directly affected you in a negative way while playing online?

Nitrowolf23379d ago (Edited 3379d ago )

You know it will be..

I mean gta sp dlc isn't being done because of it.

They've seen the success of it and are gonna keep going with it.

That's ashame to as red dead redemption had one of the best multiplayer

-Foxtrot3379d ago

I don't see why they don't get a smaller studio to work on a separate online part for whatever main game the bigger studios are doing. Then they can release it either on the same day or a month or so down the line. An optional download.

Then the bigger studio can work on single player DLC or the next IP. They have enough money to do this.

Long as they stick to one character in the single player I'm good.

Phill-Spencer3379d ago (Edited 3379d ago )

@foxtrott
I think it they could have used a second Team for singleplayer dlc for gta BUT(i like big buts^^) i'm sure they they want to avoid pulling players away from gta online, which is a unimaginable Huge money maker for Rockstar. So i'm afraid they repeat they same strategy for red dead multiplayer.

Skankinruby3379d ago

Very unlikely unfortunately, after the huge success of GTA online

Red_Renegade3379d ago

red dead was a lot of fun online?

rynodigital3379d ago

You mean you're not gonna pay real money for some RD Snake Oil cards?

Phunkydiabetic13379d ago

Why? Red Dead had amazing online. And the Undead Nightmare DLC was fantastic. They do both things right in nearly all their games, why would you want them to not to it this time? Go back to 1993 and play SNES or something.

-Foxtrot3379d ago

Urgh before you get on your high horse and throw shade you'll see I didn't call the quality of the online

They spent all their time on the multiplayer in GTAV with shitty MTs that the single player had no post launch content

Phunkydiabetic13378d ago

You gotta be shitting me. Have you ever PLAYED GTA Online or do you just like whining about multiplayer games? They have steadily released awesome updates for years. All for free. There is nothing "shitty" about what they've done. And don't even start about the shark cards. They do nothing to affect the online.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3378d ago
Show all comments (165)
60°

Rockstar launches official marketplace for mods

Rockstar has launched an official marketplace for "every server and every player" to buy mods: Cfx Marketplace.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
Christopher2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I wonder how much of this isn't just taken work of others who have modded for free.

Edit: Also, great way for R* to take popular ideas and build them into GTAVI based on demand.

fr0sty6h ago

What I see happening here is, R* is going to ban mods in GTA6 UNLESS you buy them from the marketplace and R* then gets a cut of that sale.

ActualWhiteMan9h ago

Ah, perfect timing with them taking down the Bully online fan mod. Greedy a$$ company.

Christopher6h ago

It's okay as long as they get a cut of the money.

fr0sty6h ago

Expect R* to force it on you.

Snookies1233m ago

Yep, right there with you. I'll happily donate to a mod creator if it looks really cool, or if I enjoy it. But expecting payment up front? Nope, not touching it.

IanTH5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

I'm not entirely sure how to read this, as it doesn't seem exactly like an exact parallel to Bethesda's paid mods shenanigans.

Rather than single player stuff, this appears to be aimed solely on Cfx Servers. From what I've gleaned, apparently Rockstar bought the Cfx mod team several years ago, coming a few years after weird contentions led them to ban a few of their members. Ultimately, the question is if they plan to keep this contained to only online/servers.

I have to guess to a degree yes. It'd be pretty hard to "force" paid mods for single player when modding files locally on your own machine, but much easier for servers they'll control. So perhaps this is their soft launch ahead of GTA6 online and they'll clamp down more tightly on non-official servers going forward? Ever since they've become a 1 or 2 property studio, I haven't really cared much for Rockstar stuff, so I'm not entirely up on everything surrounding this. Sounds like it has the potential to be problematic further down the line, but right now fairly easy to ignore...I think lol.

50°

Kotick claims lawsuit objecting to MS-Activision deal was "tied to Embracer's desire to boost sales"

Former CEO describes lawsuit filed by Swedish pension fund as a "collateral attack" on Activision Blizzard.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
OpenGL1d 3h ago

Yeah, the Microsoft deal has DEFINITELY worked out for everyone.

galgor23h ago

Can this mother fucker just get lost already

PRIMORDUS22h ago

He belongs in here ⚰️, hopefully sooner than later.

MrDead7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

Kotick Made $155 million from MS in the buyout, the little b*tch needs to stop whining. Thanks to this Microslop deal and massive industry consolidation thousands upon thousands of devs and other workers lost their livelihoods. This greedy piggie pervert needs shut up and f-off.

40°

An Update to Our Shared Commitment to Safer Gaming

Discover how Sony Interactive Entertainment, Nintendo, and Microsoft continue to collaborate to improve player safety across our platforms.

Read Full Story >>
sonyinteractive.com