Can agree with that. Though Siege stands apart from other shooters IMO.

Not buying any game promoting diversity. F that.

It's not their job to artificially present 'diversity' in games.

Diversity should be proportionate to reality. If 1/10 Americans are a certain demographic, don't go making the game with 50%

Or if 1% of people fall into a demographic, don't throw in some token character just to give them representation.

Gosh dang I'd watch the news if I wanted to be exposed to this crap.

I'm not to worried about diversity in video games i mean its on the list but when you can get pulled over and shot while following orders, priorities tend to shift just a tad.

Please dont turn rayman into Raywoman!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why are white males so against diversity? I don't mind playing as a woman in Tomb Raider or Bayonetta. I don't mind playing as a Hispanic in Guacamelee or a black guy in GTA San Andreas, or an native American in Mortal Kombat. Not everything has to be a White male. The people against diversity in video games are just closet racists/sexists.

75% of America is white and all the sudden it's horrible to make a white protagonist. Do you see China and Japan making a bunch of non Asian characters . No because thats not your Market. There's nothing wrong with catering to the majority of the population . All the sudden it's like if you use a white person that's the worst thing in the world. Getting tired of this political crap bs

fucking... kill yourselves already.
I'm from a minority group and i dont give a flying fuck if my race is in games or not.

Because god forbid games are just about making them fun.

Gender of the protagonist doesn't bother me at all

Bottomline from comments here. Diversity is good but its not good if it is FORCED!!. And thats what i feel about most movies nowadays. And thats my opinion. Example? Ghostbusters. I mean why cant they have Mixed gender right? Like 2 men and 2 women in ghostbusters just like the cartoon. But no they really need to put all female cast. 1 or 2 guys in it wouldnt hurt. So i feel it is really forced.

Ubisoft means to say that theyre not done collecting money from certain groups in order to promote more "diversity" which by that he really means restricting diversity to female/minority/gay characters as someone else posted.

Tell me again how the multiplatform strategy was supposed to fix everything. Look at your results and compare them to Nintendo, which keeps thriving with exclusives. Your loyal fans are gone. And let’s not forget the pile of IPs you purchased only to let them rot.

The worst thing is this is down from last years numbers/expectations which was down from the previous years numbers/expectations. You think about how long “down” has been a consistent part of the communication and you realize those subscriptions are what’s holding that boat together. The price cut of gamespass is still a price raise in a string of price raises. They are trying to use players to offset the missing revenue. Now call of duty is out of gamespass, which is literally WHY they bought the company. To draw people to the subscription. They realized they missed a boatload of money and that wasn’t sustainable. Now you pay for it like you would have if they never bought the company… so why buy the company? Mind you those billions still need to be paid back. Yeah it gives you a chance to say we make the biggest FPS… but the internal conversations must be brutal at high level on topics that really matter. Like revenue. Profitability. And ROI for the shopping spree.

Is this like the 10th quarter in a row they're down 33% on hardware how is that even mathematically possible. You would think their mediocrity would Plateau