All Channels
Popular
250°

The Elder Scrolls VI is next rather than Oblivion HD or Morrowind HD

There was no Elder Scrolls VI announcement at QuakeCon, but the show hasn’t passed by without some news on the highly anticipated sequel.

Read Full Story >>
finder.com.au
SlappingOysters3590d ago

Good, I've got no interest in playing old games in HD over getting a new game. Games are just fine in the style they were originally made in.

ifrit_caress3590d ago

Oblivion for the PS3 had a game breaking bug, and a few other bugs. It would be nice if they made an HD remaster and fixed that bug. I'd certainly play it for another 200 hours.

_-EDMIX-_3589d ago

Lol what I'm not really understanding is who here even believes that the entire team that would have been making the 6th Elder Scrolls game was even working on a damn remaster? Do people not understand it takes like 10 dudes to make a remaster? Lol

Ummmm ok.

SlappingOysters3589d ago

Well obviously that is not how Pete Hines sees it

babadivad3589d ago

I wish more people felt like you do. If they did, we wouldn't be seeing so many damned remasters.

-Foxtrot3590d ago

Still....Oblivion should have been done for the 10th Anniversary, however I'll take a 15th Anniversary if they start now

Sexius Maximus3590d ago

Morrowind was the far better game, but fewer people played it since it was a PC and Xbox exclusive. So I can see why Oblivion is a wanted remaster...but my vote would be Morrowind.

Movefasta19933590d ago (Edited 3590d ago )

Why is morrowind better than oblivion?I haven't played it becauseI only had a ps2 when it released.I am waiting for the sky wind mod to release.

Sexius Maximus3590d ago

Movefasta1993 - At the time, the world was far more impactful than the world of Oblivion. Personally, I enjoyed the lore and land of Morrowind better than I did Cyrodiil. Everything since Morrowind since felt like a simplified version of Morrowind...prettier, and with better combat, but still simplified. The setting of Morrowind is still enough to make me want to play the game. There are fast travel locations, rather than instant fast travel, which also forced you to explore. Knowing you couldn't just instantly fast travel to safety made the game more intense...you risked more exploring, which added to the excitement. (I'm not right or wrong on any of this...this is all personal preference.) I think it'd be great to have others explore this amazing land, so I'd love a Morrowind remaster.

Forum_Pirate3589d ago

No, you are right. If if someone says Oblivion and Skyrim aren't simplified compared to Morrowind, they're just wrong. If someone says that limited fast travel/no compass markers doesn't force you to get to know the world better, they're wrong. If someone says that doesn't add an element of risk because (while it is avoidable) you can get stuck miles from nowhere in hostile territory while low on supplies, they're wrong. Just like if someone says that the simplification (especially with faction relations/magic) doesn't greatly hamper the ability to roleplay by dramatically limiting the choices you make and playstyles you can have, they're wrong.

It's not preference, it's objective fact. What *isn't* fact is that such simplification is bad. I say it ruined the whole series (and many others besides) and that there are so many "streamlined" AAA rpgs that it wouldn't hurt the fans of those if we got a few RPGs that took roleplaying and creating/defining your own playstyle seriously.

babadivad3589d ago (Edited 3589d ago )

@Movefasta1993

Morrowind was considered better because it was MUCH more open than the games that came after it. They literally put no limits on what you could do, what magic you could create, anything. It was like a GTA game with magic. it was a true sandbox game.

I made a spell that let me jump across the entire map. I had to tone it down a little because sometimes it would kill me. You could make levitation spells to escape from guards and basically fly away.

In Morrowin, you could even kill characters pivotal to the games plot [you'd get a message that killing them wouldn't let you beat the game] but you could do it anyway if you wanted.

The spells you could create in Oblivion was VASTLY cut down from what it was in Morrowind. I think Oblivion was the happy median between the total freedom of Morrowind and the completely locked down Skyrim.

I hope the next Elder Scrolls is a move back towards Morrowind/Oblivion and not further toward the dumbed down experience we got with Skyrim

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3589d ago
_-EDMIX-_3589d ago

Because business that's why.

Duke193589d ago

Aren't these games already modded to HD hell on pc anyway? I loved both of them, but time to move on please

Pongwater3589d ago

That's good news. The Skyrim remaster instead of a new game is disappointing enough.

Show all comments (17)
60°

Take-Two CEO Once Again Side Steps Grand Theft Auto 6 Price Point

Strauss Zelnick says price of GTA 6 is being carefully considered and that Rockstar is focused on "making the most spectacular piece of entertainment on Earth."

Kuma39d ago

If GTA 6 abandons everything that made GTA 5 great, it will crash and burn right out of the gate. GTA 5 was funny and not at all PC. My worry is that they will cave to the PC crowd and ruin the vibes.

Eonjay38d ago

They got freaking BBLs twerking on the top of trucks for the gram, the freaking Flordia joker, and dude running down the stree in their undies and you are worried about it being 'too PC'? The internet has runied gamers. It doesn't matter how non-PC they make the game, you will all listen to the grifters telling you not to believe your lying eyes lol.

gigoran838d ago

"Rockstar Games’ co-founder and former VP of Development Jamie King said he envisions GTA 6 as a game that’s “maybe not quite as edgy or quite as funny” as its satirical predecessors."

oh yeah, totally internet grifters spreading rumors...

blacktiger38d ago

That's part of the plan, they destroyed you but they need to destroy the shareholders? Only 1 shre holder is the true elite that don't care

1nsomniac39d ago (Edited 39d ago )

Meh.., if it’s above £55 I ain’t buying it.

Rockstar are genuinely not half the company they used to be. I was a die hard GTA fan I’ve purchased every game and expansion and spin off day 1.

My opinion of GTA6 is that I can take it or leave it. Not bothered. They burnt too many bridges.

DaReapa38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

So they're actually leaving the door open for an L.A. Noire sequel? Nice!

VaNdAl38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

He should just come out and say it already it's getting stupid it's going to be a 100 bucks $200 for the special edition🤡🤡; 29315;🤣♿

Storm2338d ago

I won't be getting this game until I can get it for $70. SHoot, I could wait for it to be even lower. I don't need the game that badly as my backlog is still huge and I am enjoying playing other things.

Show all comments (13)
40°

Talking Aliens: The Video Games With Author Mike Diver

Skewed and Reviewed have posted an interview with Author Mike Diver about his pending book on Aliens video games.

70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay40d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn240d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn240d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown40d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay40d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay40d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac39d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger40d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300040d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde40d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde40d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)