All Channels
Popular
600°

Microsoft explains why ReCore costs $40 USD

Recently, the marketing manager of Xbox, Aaron Greenberg, appeared in TXR Podcast on July 14, where he talked about the price of ReCore, which will be $40 instead of $60 USD, price set for AAA titles.

Read Full Story >>
gametransfers.com
SaveFerris3578d ago

Pricing it at $40 just because it is a new ip? I don't recall The Order or Quantum Break at that price upon release. If MS considers it to be AAA, why the lower price?

Gaming_Cousin3578d ago (Edited 3578d ago )

Complaining because a game is $20 cheaper? And then you add The Order into this when it has nothing to do with Microsoft... I am lost for words

3576d ago
Nitrowolf23576d ago (Edited 3576d ago )

He's not complaining about the price, he's complaining about their reason behind it.

Sayings because it's a new IP doesn't fly with him because quantum break was a new iPhone also. There was clearly more to selling it at a reduced price then simply being a new IP

Though you can read between the lines by what they mean honestly, I mean they specifically say a game like "that" and then so it has no fanbase yet. That makes sense, whereas with QB people knew what they were buying because it was basically a third person shooter,l.

As for the order, idk why he brought that up that's a Sony game

freshslicepizza3576d ago

quantum break has remedy behind it, i don't think this game is as big as that game. so let's be honest here, the budget for recore is probably much less than other new ip's like quantum break. scalebound will likely be $60 and microsoft will try and backpeddle there.

it really comes down the scale and budget of the game. something like the witness was questioned about its procing but to me that was fair. regardless, the market will speak for otself. it is why call of duty will continue to get away with half baked campaign modes because they dont have to put a huge budget in that part of the game. other games like titanfall failed commercially because people didn't think it offered enough content. so guess what? titanfall 2 will offer a campaign mode, right? then you look at evolve, it is now free to play. the market will contstantly correct itself in pricing.

dcbronco3576d ago

All of those other new IPs didn't have huge sales numbers. Sony fans will buy a new IP because its Sony. Microsoft fans act as if they need Sony fans permission to like something. If Sony fanboys hate it Microsoft fans often shun it. The main problem being no matter what Microsoft does Sony fanboys will never give them credit.

KwietStorm_BLM3576d ago

So you don't understand the context then, yes?

ULTp0ltergeist3576d ago

Or that The Order isnt' worth it's price?

Cy3576d ago

He brought it up because it was a new IP and a lot of people shit all over it as not being worth $60, and rightfully so. The Order was a DLC campaign looking for a game.

Big_Game_Hunters3576d ago

The order sucks ass it should be 15$

Artemidorus3576d ago

He/she isn't a gamer in my eyes

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3576d ago
DarXyde3576d ago

Part of me thinks this is a passive apology for Mighty No. 9.

I don't buy that it's because it's a new IP. Cheaper is cheaper though.

coolbeans3576d ago

But it's not really Comcept's decision to make, in the end.

DarXyde3576d ago

coolbeans,

Correct, but it's entirely possible that Microsoft is assisting Inafune in undoing some of the damage MN9 did to his clout in the industry. In other words, Microsoft is doing them a solid. It's about getting good faith with consumers as Microsoft said, but I don't buy the whole "it's because it's a new IP" explanation.

s45gr323576d ago

Not really, these $60.00 games gave gamers a really barebones gaming experience:

The Order 1886
Star Wars Battlefront
Evolve
Destiny
Street Fighter 5

These $60.00 games have microtransactions:

Metal Gear Solid V
Dead Space 3
Gran Turismo 5

These $20.00 games or $40.00 games have way more content and replayability value:

Dust an Elysian tale

Divinity Original Sin (launched PC version) with map editor

Trackmania franchise
The Witness
Pillars of eternity
Stellaris with mod support
Distance

The AAA industry has failed, indie games is where all the innovation, creativity, and willingness to challenge the status quo is at.

dcbronco3576d ago

Because it's a Microsoft IP. Ten dollars of every game is usually a royalty fee that goes directly to the console manufacturer. So that makes the price of a game really $50. Add that it's a new IP that they apparently like or really dislike, more likely really like, and you use price to get it into as many hands as possible. Think of the way NFL 2K was sold for $20. Had it not been for exclusivity, madden wouldn't be on top anymore because people tried 2K.

TheColbertinator3576d ago

I went nuts for the $20 price point on 2K05. Only football game I bought since then.

Goldfinger03576d ago (Edited 3576d ago )

@SaveFerris
"If MS considers it to be AAA, why the lower price?"

Wow! are you complaining that the game is lower than the usual $60 AAA price tag?
smh

Maybe because MS has money to blow, that they can price a AAA lower than normal? just to give it the best chance to be successful. It's not out of the norm, how do you think 2K Sports managed to have a successful franchise in NBA 2K? Simply because they priced it at $19.99 while NBA Live was priced at $59.99. Now look, NBA 2K is the premier basketball game while NBA Live is toast. Same thing happened with NFL 2K (which no longer exist) while Madden was priced at $59.99. EA was so terrified, they acquired the NFL License so that 2K could no longer make a football game lol. If that didn't occur, Madden wouldn't be the only NFL football game to play 10 years later.

2cents3576d ago

Everything's gotta be a conspiracy.

To me recore looked ok, nothing special but I could be proven wrong. Im not gonna complain about it being cheaper on release, id rather that than pay full price for a sub-par game with sliced off content behind micro-transactions.

I paid full price for Evolve = pissed
I paid full price for Destiny = pissed
Etc...

S2Killinit3576d ago

Its not AAA, didnt you see the gameplay? It was clear in the physics of the character's jumping that it was a more layed back platformer game than a AAA per se.

DaleCooper3576d ago

And how well did the order and quantum break sell at $60? :/

bf0007779663576d ago

I don't see why this game should cost more than 30$, another inafune garbage.

DivoJones3576d ago

If you'd like, I'll pick up the game for you and charge you $60 for it.

rainslacker3576d ago

Not complaining about the costs, but the more likely scenario is that this game is on a production level about equivalent to R&C was for PS4. Not low end indie quality, not quite AAA. what we used to call mid-tier back in the old days....which later got supplanted with the terms "niche" or indie(or indie crap depending on the person).

The comparisons are undoubtedly going to be made, and the last thing MS wants is to look like they're are not conscious of certain aspects of consumer spending habits.

Plus the fact that the $40 price point really helped to sell it quicker, which means MS can have a successful IP to tout going forward.

Personally, I'm all for the cheaper mid-tier games to make a comeback to the more mainstream sectors of gaming, instead of barely getting any attention on an indie digital market or small out of the way marketing exposure. Some of my favorite games were the mid-tiers of their respective generations.

OC_MurphysLaw3576d ago

@saveferris yes they priced QB at $60 and... it sold just OK compared to what they wanted. Introducing a game like this at $40 is a good way to introduce a title that isn't getting the buzz other established IP are getting.

spicelicka3576d ago (Edited 3576d ago )

It's perfectly priced. Lower price doesn't mean it's not AAA. It's priced based on the content and value, and probably budget as well. The Order was a very short game and got absolutely slammed for having little content. In fact it was a good game, but the high price really affected it's rating negatively, it should've been $40. We should be supporting this practice, not questioning it.

Artemidorus3576d ago

Are you just trolling or being genuinely stupid?

Bruh3576d ago

And both of those games aren't worth $60, you can platinum the Order in under 8 hours and QB is mediocre and repetitive beyond measure. If quality is to judge the price, neither of those games make a good point. I didn't see anyone complain about R&C's $40 price tag, why the sudden bitching now?

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 3576d ago
3576d ago
robtion3576d ago

Hope not. Hopefully it's similar to Ratchet and Clank on ps4. Great AAA game, reasonable $40 price.

Nodoze3576d ago

Something is rotten in Denmark here. Greenberg is the lowest form of bridge troll. If they were confident in the title they would be selling it for 99 bucks. Proceed with caution!

gamertk4213576d ago Show
s45gr323576d ago

No, $60.00 does not equal quality. Street Fighter V, Star Wars battlefront and even Overwatch are using DLC as a crutch to get more content in the game. In contrast Divinity Original Sin launched PC version for $40.00 came with a map editor, single player campaign and online co-op. Proving that $60.00 does not equal quality.

Scatpants3576d ago

It's not because it looks super crappy? That's what I figured it was.

MasterCornholio3576d ago (Edited 3576d ago )

Ratchett and Clank is priced at 40$ and the game is awesome.

So no, the price doesn't mean that it's crappy.

@Candy

"Yet when MS does it there has to be a conspiracy lol"

Buddy I've seen people argue that Ratchett and Clank would be a bad game due to its price tag.

Open your eyes.

@In

If I'm not mistaken Recore only has a single player campaign just like Ratchett and Clank. With that said Ratchett and Clank did very well at its price point so I'm guessing that Microsoft believes they can achieve the same with Recore.

@Shu

"Microsoft should release this particular game on Steam like Ori."

That would be great but their main objective is to push the windows store.

@Candy

" I rarely visit Sony news sections."

Ah OK. I frequent Sony news section so I can tell you there were some people who criticized the low price.

candystop3576d ago (Edited 3576d ago )

Yet when MS does it there has to be a conspiracy lol. They won't stop at anything to downplay anything X1 related.

Edit cornilio

"Buddy I've seen people argue that Ratchett and Clank would be a bad game due to its price tag. "

Maybe so but I don't remember it simply because I rarely visit Sony news sections.

InTheZoneAC3576d ago

they did it to reflect the original R&C price seeing how this was a reboot.

shuvam093576d ago (Edited 3576d ago )

I believe Ratchet was priced at $40 so that people would have money left for Uncharted 4, which released after Ratchet...
I can't think of any other reason..
That being said, ReCore looking like a budget title might be a reason...
Personally, I don't care how a game looks as long as it plays well...
ReCore needs to be given chance until it is released...

PS: Microsoft should release this particular game on Steam like Ori...
Seems like a perfect match...

rainslacker3576d ago

I think given that a good portion of the R&C budget was paid through the budget of the movie, and the game could use the content that was produced there, that R&C itself was probably a fairly inexpensive title to make compared to doing it all from scratch. This means Sony could sell it at $40, and still make the same as if it had been a full production and selling it at $60.

Granted, Sony does have several games that release at the $40 price point, or has had varied pricing in the past for new releases, but not typically of a game that is of the quality of R&C was, which had exceedingly high production values.

I believe since Recore is going to be most likely compared to R&C on the PS4, MS doesn't want to get into this back and forth that R&C is a better deal because the content is equal or less, and we all know it's coming given the nature of console exclusives and the absolute law that similar titles must be compared in every way shape and form.

Recore probably had a low budget, and I wouldn't doubt that $40 was the price consideration going in regardless.

The excuse that it's a new IP is completely idiotic, because that has absolutely nothing to do with the cost to produce or distribute the game, nor it's potential to sell at a set price. Plenty of new IP's routinely sell well at $60, but from what I've seen of Recore, and despite it being one of the few games I'm actually looking forward to play, it seems like it's a lower budget game that probably warrants the $40 price tag. If something like Klank were released outside the launch window at $60, people would not be looking at it. It's not that it's a new IP, it's that the production quality, and content doesn't reflect the $60 price tag.

Scatpants3576d ago

No I said it's $40 because it LOOKS crappy not all $40 games are crappy.
With Ratchet and Clank I assumed it was $40 because it was a remake of an old game.

Seriously, does it look like a $60 game to you? Be honest. It may very well be good but it just has B level game written all over it.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3576d ago
spicelicka3576d ago

Seriously you dumbasses are what's wrong with the industry. Your attitude basically encourages companies to overcharge so they can rip off gamers. Half the games released aren't worth $60. Overwatch looks like turd and is $60.

s45gr323576d ago

Thank you, I bought Doom for $35.00 😀. No way I am paying $60.00. I payed $27.00 for MGS V during the Steam summer sale. Due to MGS V has microtransactions and because of that is not worth $60.00. These gamers obsessing over price are retarded. They sure as hell did not mind the lack of content in overwatch (3 game modes and 8 maps for $60.00 online only lol)

Show all comments (104)
60°

Take-Two CEO Once Again Side Steps Grand Theft Auto 6 Price Point

Strauss Zelnick says price of GTA 6 is being carefully considered and that Rockstar is focused on "making the most spectacular piece of entertainment on Earth."

Kuma2d ago

If GTA 6 abandons everything that made GTA 5 great, it will crash and burn right out of the gate. GTA 5 was funny and not at all PC. My worry is that they will cave to the PC crowd and ruin the vibes.

Eonjay2d ago

They got freaking BBLs twerking on the top of trucks for the gram, the freaking Flordia joker, and dude running down the stree in their undies and you are worried about it being 'too PC'? The internet has runied gamers. It doesn't matter how non-PC they make the game, you will all listen to the grifters telling you not to believe your lying eyes lol.

gigoran82d ago

"Rockstar Games’ co-founder and former VP of Development Jamie King said he envisions GTA 6 as a game that’s “maybe not quite as edgy or quite as funny” as its satirical predecessors."

oh yeah, totally internet grifters spreading rumors...

blacktiger2d ago

That's part of the plan, they destroyed you but they need to destroy the shareholders? Only 1 shre holder is the true elite that don't care

1nsomniac2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Meh.., if it’s above £55 I ain’t buying it.

Rockstar are genuinely not half the company they used to be. I was a die hard GTA fan I’ve purchased every game and expansion and spin off day 1.

My opinion of GTA6 is that I can take it or leave it. Not bothered. They burnt too many bridges.

DaReapa2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

So they're actually leaving the door open for an L.A. Noire sequel? Nice!

VaNdAl2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

He should just come out and say it already it's getting stupid it's going to be a 100 bucks $200 for the special edition🤡🤡; 29315;🤣♿

Storm232d ago

I won't be getting this game until I can get it for $70. SHoot, I could wait for it to be even lower. I don't need the game that badly as my backlog is still huge and I am enjoying playing other things.

Show all comments (13)
40°

Talking Aliens: The Video Games With Author Mike Diver

Skewed and Reviewed have posted an interview with Author Mike Diver about his pending book on Aliens video games.

70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay4d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn24d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn23d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown4d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay4d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay4d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac3d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger4d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster30004d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde4d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde3d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)