All Channels
Popular
70°

'Not much' fan feedback used in Fallout 3 development

Speaking in an interview with VideoGamer.com, Bethesda Softworks vice president Pete Hines revealed that the developer instead prefers to rely on internal feedback.

Hines told VideoGamer.com that "you have to take feedback from the people who are actually playing the game".

When asked how much the series' protective fan base figured in the development of the game, he replied: "Not much. When you're designing a game, you have this group of people on the inside who are working on it every day and who know everything about the decisions that are being made. You don't just take a chunk of that, throw it out to the community and say, "We don't know how this question works, so let's ask the fans". You're working and changing every day - it's a constant, fluid process. It's not like we say, "Okay, everything is done now, let's see what they say then go back and change it."

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
Captain Tuttle6488d ago

The hardcore Fallout fan is a special breed (NMA). They only have 1 vision of what this game should be and that's 2D isometric with turn-based combat, with huge dialogue trees and multiple paths for finishing ie. Fallout 1&2.

That being said, I'm afraid they were accurate when they predicted "Oblivion with guns", especially when it comes to NPC interaction. Oblivion was so stiff and lifeless in that department and it seems like Fallout 3 will be the same. It's a shame.
Still a day 1 purchase though.

Skemo6488d ago

I'm a apart of that hardcore group. Unfortunately from their perspective making a more accessible (and "safe") title (aka Oblivion with Guns), is more important than preserving the roots of the franchise. IMO, they should have came up with their own IP rather than sully the great legacy of Fallout 1 and 2.

StephanieBBB6488d ago (Edited 6488d ago )

"IMO, they should have came up with their own IP rather than sully the great legacy of Fallout 1 and 2. "

Still you can say that because you haven't played it yet. If you play it and still think they've done a crappy job with it then more power to ya!

cemelc6488d ago (Edited 6488d ago )

You can pretty much say how the game is going to be played by the thousand gameplay videos already on the web, the only video remaining is one seeing a guy push buttons and i don't thing anyone want to see that.

On the next note, yeah it looks a lot like oblivion with guns, and the only thing the company is doing is ovehyping that you can go from first person to third person perspective(oblivion anyone??). Its not like the game is going to be bad because oblivion was great, but fallout a total ripoff of oblivion is not good a thing either, and reviers should take this into account for their correponding reviews.

f7897906488d ago

That reason just bumped this game down to my bargain bin wait list.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 6488d ago
PS360WII6488d ago

Probably because it would of been sent back to the drawing board if they listened to fans. . .

butterfinger6488d ago

I will still be picking up Fallout 3 for the 360 on day 1. I'm just hoping the game has a bit more polish and is a lot less like Oblivion in certain areas than it seems to be.

EvilCackle6488d ago (Edited 6488d ago )

No game can live up to the idealized image some fans have of Fallout 1 and 2. I loved those games but they weren't perfect and Fallout 3 won't be, either. It'll just be imperfect in different areas. People who gripe that it's going to be Oblivion with guns should realize that having a new installment of a game feel too much like a former Game of the Year isn't that horrible of a problem. At least it's still an open-ended RPG. Look at how badly some other franchises have been mangled in sequels - X-Com, for example, went from being a strategy series to an awful shooter.

LeonSKennedy4Life6488d ago

Being part of that group...I can say I'm totally excited about this!

2D restricted the storytelling aspects of the game. Why would you do that again???

It's like turn-based RPG's...why continue to do those when we have the technology for real-time...which is much more exciting AND you can still use tactics??? (I'm gonna get a couple of disagrees on that one...)

Show all comments (13)
60°

Fallout 3 Remaster Is Allegedly Planned For Release At Some Point In The Future

A remaster of Bethesda Game Studios' 2008 action role-playing game, Fallout 3, is planned for release at some point in the future.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
LucasRuinedChildhood152d ago

Would be nice if they had New Vegas ready as well, especially because of the show.

Hopefully this doesn't have the same performance issues as Oblivion Remastered.

cloganart150d ago

I haven't seen anything on these performance issues? What's been going on?

walken7150d ago

Probably the Unreal Engine issues, I skipped it for that reason.

Snookies12151d ago (Edited 151d ago )

Throw in all the DLC as well, like Oblivion and I'll definitely bite. I recall having one trophy left to unlock on the PS3 version with 100+ hours in my save. When my save file got corrupted, lol. Very sad day.

To be fair though, Bethesda was trash at Playstation ports anyway.

Michiel1989151d ago

all devs sucked at porting to ps3 for the first like 3 years because no one had experience with the cell architecture. Even 1st party took a long while to get proficient with it, the difference between uncharted 1 and 3 is massive for example.

Extermin8or3_151d ago

Oh oh oh I can do this too. GTA 7 will be made at some point in the future. Fallout 5 will enter development in the future too

jznrpg151d ago

Everyone there should know most gamers want New Vegas and Morrowind more than anything.

Christopher151d ago

Which is why we won't get them. Gotta keep floating "support this one and it might happen".

BlaqMagiq1151d ago

Can't wait. Won't have to go back to my PS3 to play this when it comes out.

Show all comments (14)
80°

Fallout 3 remastered on the Nintendo Switch 2 is what we deserve, not the worst Fallout game

Fallout Day's disappointing news that Fallout 4 is coming to Switch 2 is a shame, as this 17-year-old entry is more deserving of a new port.

Read Full Story >>
pockettactics.com
jambola223d ago

Why exactly do you think you deserve it??

Phoenix76223d ago

Fallout 4 isn't the worst game in the franchise. It's either Fallout 76 or Fallout BOS that's the worst.

gigoran8223d ago

PC and all other modern consoles never got a remaster of 3, but obviously the switch 2 was the tipping point to make it a reality... ahuh

1nsomniac222d ago

Meh, I thought 3 was garbage. I'm not a great fan of the franchise to be fair. They're like B-Movie films, really shallow and janky. 4 was definitely one of the better ones though.

UltimateOwnage222d ago

So the article makes a snippy entitled statement and acts like that is going to encourage a publisher to give them what they want. Okay.

Show all comments (6)
110°

Fallout 3 designer expects remaster to revise gunplay to make it closer to Fallout 4

Fallout 3 game designer Bruce Nesmith explains that the upcoming remaster should revise the game's gunplay to be more modern.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
neutralgamer1992410d ago

Give us FO3 with all the dlc remastered like ESO. Load times faster, quality of life improvements, gun play improvements

I believe it shouldn't just be graphical they should make improvements where they can to make the game better. A simple face lift isn't what's needed

ZeekQuattro410d ago

Still my favorite one. I remember getting a digital copy of FO3 when I got FO4(XBO). It was nice to finally play a stable version of the game. Then when I got a Series S it was an even better expierence. Quick resume and FPS boost made it feel like a whole new game. Updated gunplay would be very welcome though. One of the few things FO4 did better.