Maybe the PC version but the console version was sweet & ran sweet.

Incorrect. Sony still owns Spiderman. Marvel and Sony came into a deal that would benefit both companies mutually. But, Sony pictures did not release Spiderman. Marvel isn't getting any money from any Spiderman movie and Sony isn't getting paid to have Spiderman in the Avenger movies.

God that may be the densest post I've ever read.

You do realize that the X-Men were created by Stan Lee as an allegory about the civil rights movement of the 60s right?

Either way, you are somehow claiming that the people who actually created those characters in the first place are somehow unfit to take their film rights back, even though they've been putting out their books for decades? What about the Fox run of the films? You also realize that Brian Singer based a huge portion of the films around a metaphor for homosexuals coming out (The Iceman scene)? There are some insufferable SJW types, but how do you consider yourself any different from those folks? You are essentially 2 sides of the same coin. There is a happy medium of just being tolerant & accepting of all people, and only calling out pandering practices when they actually exist.

Your post takes the entire cake, literally the most hilarious comment I've seen on N4G in quite some time. I do agree with one thing though a Zack Snyder Spider-Man film would be the worst thing to ever happen to the character...kinda like BvS was to those two.

OT: the X-Men won't see another decent game for as long as their rights are held back by companies unwilling to take chances. Making a quality X-Men game will be difficult & it stands as more of a "High Risk/Low Reward" property, so I don't see a quality game centered on the X-Men anytime soon. I'd assume solo characters would be a safer bet & even then it's unlikely.

It ain’t great.