All Channels
Popular
280°

Is Overwatch Getting A Pass?

In the week of its release, Overwatch has received a lot of praise by mainstream media. But there's a vocal group of gamers wondering if the game is getting a pass. As a multiplayer-only game with micro-transactions, is Blizzard's FPS getting a free pass by the media?

Read Full Story >>
drmgamecast.com
garrettbobbyferguson3633d ago (Edited 3633d ago )

That's putting it nicely. The game clearly is using Team Fortress 2 and CSGO's loot crate system. People have spent much too much money on just opening up crates already. It's funny how everything Blizzard does seems to get a free pass though.

"Why do you care"

I don't care. But you seem to not comprehend what I'm saying. Blizzard should not be getting a free pass for even offering people the ability to spend hundreds of dollars on cosmetics.

TFJWM3633d ago

If people want to spend their money to buy skins or other non game improving stuff why do you care. The game plays the same for everyone regardless if you have just bought it or spent $500 on it....

_-EDMIX-_3633d ago

buddy, "why do you care"?

Seriously?

Someone wants to spend their money on junk, they have free will to do that.

How is this an issue to you? So you are made others are spending their money how the want to? How does that effect you though? The are just skins....you'll live

UnHoly_One3633d ago

I don't get the anger at Blizzard over having microtransactions in the game. It is all 100% cosmetic stuff that doesn't affect the gameplay in any way at all.

They are selling a product, and some people want to buy it. Where is the problem?

I don't like McDonald's hamburgers, but if I go there to get some chicken nuggets I'm not going to be pissed at them for selling something I don't want.

I just don't get it.

I don't have any desire to buy any loot boxes, but I could care less if they want to sell them. Good for them, I hope they make a bunch of money.

3635d ago Replies(3)
MR_BLACKMAGIK3635d ago

It's funny how people like to say this is "for the clicks". I've been playing Overwatch this entire week and my time played is at 30 hours (according to the stats page). So I wrote a review for it and also wrote about a topic I find interesting, which is how a lot of people think the media is giving the game a pass.

So unless you expect me to write about random happenings that aren't at all relevant, everything would be considered "for the clicks". I write about what interest me at the time. I also don't consider myself a gaming journalist. I'm a gamer who happens to write his opinions and reviews on a website. Fell free to contact me directly on twitter @mrblackmagik if you want to discuss this further.

3635d ago
PixelGateUk3634d ago

if the transactions effected gameplay then the game would of had a much more negative push back.

Kane223633d ago

SF5 got hated like hell for not having hardly enough content at launch..yet overwatch is being praised to high hell and people saying just wait there will be more...on top of that. the console version is being charged $20 more...

Vegamyster3633d ago

SF5 launched with short Story Modes (Proper one doesn't come til June, the game came out in February), online (Ranked/Casual) & that's it, It was missing many basic features that the previous games had which is why people were upset.

generic-user-name3633d ago

And where is OW's story mode?

_-EDMIX-_3633d ago

"SF5 launched with short Story Modes"

Well.....thats nice. Overwatch isn't that soooooooo, I"m not sure what to tell you. The price for the game is fine as it was never going to be a SP game, thus not really sure what the point you are making is.....

That is like saying "Witcher 3 is an RPG with lots of hours, Overwatch is not" lol

Then....maybe you don't want to play the MP only genre. How is that the game developers fault? Their job was to create a MP only title.....that is all that should be expected.

You've known of this for months, you've played the beta and the team has been extremely transparent about what it actually is.

Witcher 3 is missing a MP mode with you're logic.

GTSport is missing having a story mode and being fighting game lol

When did games need to be ALL IN ONES? I don't recall that ever being the norm.

We had Quake, we had Doom, we had CS, we had TF series, we had BF when it was actually MP ONLY btw, we had Tribes, we had Planetside etc. I'm sorry bud, but MOST games were never really all in one bundle type deals, most gamers where either or, not both.

Most games that included some MP mode or SP mode...if it wasn't their main specialty, you could tell really, really quickly.

DragonDDark3633d ago

@Edmix
Blizzard teased a campaign mode though

Vegamyster3633d ago

@generic-user-name

Overwatch is a new IP, Blizzard made it as a MP shooter. Street Fighter is not, the new game lacked features that the previous games had. It would be like Call of Duty launching without a story mode & only had TDM/Domination modes in multiplayer, you don't expect less from a new game in a *established* franchise. That's why people were upset & is sold well under there expectations, it was basically rushed out for EVO.

@_-EDMIX-_

I don't know what you're going on about, i never said or implied "When did games need to be ALL IN ONES? I don't recall that ever being the norm." Look at my comment to @generic-user-name

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3633d ago
_-EDMIX-_3633d ago

Don't disagree with you on that one.

Folks didn't like SFV having limited content and having server issues at launch, I feel....maybe they should feel the same way about Overwatch.

I"m not sure though, I got SFV at launch and I didn't get Overwatch, so I don't really know what to say about this as I didn't play it to really know how bad it might have been (in terms server issues).

But I've read what is released with Overwatch and I actually personally think its fine for what it is. I played TF2 at launch with way, way less for over 300 hours.

antz11043633d ago (Edited 3633d ago )

Well maybe that SF V averaged a 7.4 while Overwatch is holding steady at 9.1 has something to do with it. It's a ton of fun.

Show all comments (54)
50°

Nintendo Switch 2 Drops Must-Play Free FPS You Can Enjoy From Today

In 2023, developed by Blizzard Entertainment, Overwatch 2 was released, which was basically a big, glorified update of the original game that launched in 2016. Now, it’s simply reverted to being called just Overwatch, which is probably for the best.

The second iteration of Overwatch was released on the original Nintendo Switch, and while it’s still an enjoyable game with cross-play/progression functions, it’s still lacking in terms of performance and visuals, compared to its PC, PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X/S counterparts. Well, it was.

As of today, the second iteration of Overwatch is natively available on the Nintendo Switch 2, just in time for Season 2: Summit.

The Nintendo Switch 2 version of Overwatch will have increased resolution both in handheld and docked modes, enhanced textures and lighting, up to 60 frames-per second, improved audio and more.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbible.com
repsahj28d ago

Blizzard is readying a patch to address the issue that the game is still running in Switch 1 build and just 30 fps.

Neonridr27d ago

you'd think they'd test it before pushing it live, lol.

that being said, clearly it's not running as intended.

repsahj27d ago

They know it for sure. Maybe they didn't finish optimizing the game by the targeted release date. That's why they released the Switch 1 30fps version first. XD

40°

Nexon agrees to publish Overwatch in Korea

Nexon has entered a publishing agreement with Blizzard for Overwatch in Korea, with the companies working to deliver services 'tailored' for the region.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
40°

Blizzard announces four showcases over the next two weeks for WoW, Overwatch, Hearthstone & Diablo

The four-part Blizzard Showcase will reveal “what comes next” for each series…

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com