It should also be noted that DX12 doesn't really help the Xbox one hardware. Better for PC hardware.

Do you expect anything else from Gamingbolt?

It must be noted that the PS4 versions of games outperform and outshine their respective XBO counterparts every single time.
But yeah, this is you-know-who-bolts article so you can expect flame wars.

WW1 =/= Modern shooter at all

Works for me

@Rimeskeem Right, is that why BF hardline is BF4 with cops & robbers or Battlefront is just a star wars version of BF?

Nobody's going wild over this news.

@Lennoxb63

He is talking about COD; BO1

@Xavier

Pot meet kettle.

For someone who likes to deride other people for their console, you kinda show how transparent you are. You speak like a child who wants nothing more than for the grownups to listen at the big boy table, only to realize everyone can see through your saaaad saaaad facade. Get some fresh air mate, maybe speak to someone who doesn't just echo the exact same bullshit at you like a gang of seals.

Seriously, the article isn't even about BC how desperate are you to downplay a great, improving and free service? Gods I bet you're insufferable in person, I bet you sneer at kids playing phone games like a pretentious...I'm assuming metal head teen asshole. Grow up and go rebuy Vice City.

I see DX12 really pushed Quantum Break to the limits res wise...........

You are also selectively forgeting that UC4 runs at 1080p comfortably in SP mode.......

No DX12 doesn't require engines to be built from the beginning with it in mind, they can be changed to accommodate DX12 if they're coming from a DX11 base or any other alternative API like OpenGL to Vulkan.
The major points of DX12 are to allow for CPU workloads to be spread across all cores and for communication to the GPU to not be bottle workloads by having to use a single CPU core to "talk" to the GPU.
Essentially a rework from single core chatter, to all cores talking freely, as needed is what DX12 requires and that can definitely be done with an older engine designed for DX11.

Battlefront used the most up to date version of Frostbite 3, Battlefield 1 will have iterated on that somewhat, but it won't be some massive step forward. BF1 uses Frostbite 3, so there won't be huge changes to what it can do in BF1.

kstuffs...wrong.

Frostbite 3 very much WAS built from the ground up for 8 core scalability, and integration of API's like DX12...The PC version of BF4 had mantle a few months after release...Mantle tech was integrated into DX12, its just no longer an open source project.

DX12 has not, and will not, do anything relevant for the Xbox One. It blows me away that some of you keep acting like a magic little api suite (that is what, 'more' to the metal than what was in there from the beginning? Listen to yourselves...) will compensate for the fact that the XBO has a low end laptop gpu. I agree the Xbox one, and to some degree the PS4, are both pants at running Frostbite 3...but that is because its a resource hungry engine that can do some incredible things on powerful hardware...not that the Xbox One is just waiting for the right API to run it...

Not to mention...the PS4 is running a derivative of Vulkan, which is extremely similar to DX12...and AMD has been working with both for cross development tools for the consoles...Neither console is going to have an advantage over the other in relation to what API they're running...the Xbox One got DX12 solely to connect with windows 10's desktop xbox app, and future cross play features as the official win 10 games library grows.

So...back to where it all begin...the PS4 remains the better console because it still has, and always had, the better gpu...the PS4 will NEVER struggle more so than the Xbox One, on any title...period.