8.8. 3.5. 93%. When reading a review of a game, what does this number represent? It could mean one thing if you are visiting one site, and another on a different site. SuperiorVersion is looking to remove that mystery, and has implemented a simple, effective way to say just where a game stands, focusing on the details and overall quality of the game, rather then a made-up number.
Darryl Linington from Notebookheck writes: "Keebmon is a crowdfunded foldable workstation concept that combines a Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 PC, a 13-inch ultrawide touchscreen, and a low-profile mechanical keyboard in a single aluminum device."
bbno$ has temporarily shut down his website after receiving a legal notice from Blizzard Entertainment related to Diablo-themed content.
When Google unveiled Genie 3, an AI that generates explorable 3D worlds from simple text prompts, investors responded by dumping video game stocks en masse—wiping out billions in market value in mere hours. But in their rush to flee, Wall Street confused "playable environments" with actual video games, ignoring the technology's hard limits while threatening the human creativity that makes games worth playing. As the industry faces a future of automated mediocrity driven by shareholder demands, the panic reveals a deeper truth: investors aren't betting on better games, just cheaper ones.
same level of fear that gen ai will replace art ... it is a tool that will help to prototipize open world games, but to completelly substitute game engines ... we are still a long way from it
Humans have been developing things to simplify jobs since the beginning.
AI is going to remove the human factor from the job, but it can never replace all jobs that need a human factor.
I wish I could see the end of the story. What is the end, end goal, final piece, etc.
Is it a world run by machines, do humans live in a free world, does a dictator finally have an robot army, do humans finally free of working forever, does ChatGPT create an army to defeat Gemini., so many possibilities …
If the concept of great, good, average is given then lots of games will be great and consumer will still be confused.
The problem is BIASED sites. Either they are biased towards a console like xbox or towards the game like Gtaiv.
Gtaiv getting one 100 isn't shocking, but getting 100 from each site is what is shocking. How can no one see the obvious flaws.
We never used to have this problem during last-gen because reviewers were fair and consumers agreed with the score more or less.
The review is broken. Everything is gauged on a scale of 1 to 10, 1 to 5 or A to F. It's stupid. And when I say everything, I mean everything.
DS and PSP games are graded on the same scale. PSN and xbox live games, same scale. Ps2 games are being gauged against PS3 and xbox 360 games. Wii "hahahahaah" of all things are being gauged by xbox 360 and ps3 standards.
It's absurd.
How can a 100mb XBL game be a 9 out of 10 and viewed and reviewed the same as MGS4 or Halo 3?
It can't be. It's absurd and they need to sanction reviews off, not by numbers but by system and object.
seems like a good scale. no more of this 7.5 is bad crap. one more thing i like about superiorversion.
"If the concept of great, good, average is given then lots of games will be great and consumer will still be confused. "
how will they be confused? is someone going to see a game labeled "good" and think its not worth playing?