Today we found six new screenshots of Bethesda's Rogue Warrior. The game will be released somewhere this year on PC, Xbox 360 and PLAYSTATION 3, and it seems like the developer has some work to do on the graphics before releasing this game.
You might not remember Rogue, but this 1980 game is responsible for one of the most popular genres today: the roguelike.
Atari has filed a U.S. trademark for Rogue as speculation builds surrounding a possible IP takeover by the revitalised publisher.
Atari - I remember when they were a real video game company...
those days are long past along with Colecovision and Intellivision...
ahhhh the 70's/80's - these kids just don't understand 😂
Snafu on Intellivision and Time Pilot on Coleco Vision and Pitfall+Jungle Hunt on Atari2600 we’re the games I spent the most time with on those consoles. I had many other games but those were my favorites.
“Atari” is like the guy that wears band shirts for inclusive fashion only, and has no idea who any of the bands are or what they perform. The new tenant does nothing Atari.
Atari was cool as a kid but nothing Atari has done since then has been very good. Maybe they turn it around someday and release something worthwhile software wise but I wouldn’t bank on it.
Like any console, not every release was going to be a hit, and the PS3 certainly had its fair share of stinkers.
turning point had a really great story / concept... it just was very generic in its game play.
Haze is a bad game but Turning Point: Fall Of Liberty makes it seem like a captivating work of art. haha. Fuck that game
Shellshock 2: Blood Trails isn't on this list but it might be the worst game I've ever played. I got it as a present from my mam and when I saw the box, my life flashed before my eyes thinking of the Metacritic score: https://www.metacritic.com/...
I also received Turning Point: Fall Of Liberty as a present from another family member. Bless their hearts for trying but ... oh Lord. My uncle gave my Prince Of Persia: Sands Of Time and MGS2 though. 😎
Was it really that bad? I recall trying the demo and not liking it, but that's just me not liking FPS games.
People I know who played it and like FPS games mostly came to the conclusion that it has a lot of room for improvement, but it's not nearly as bad as it's made out to be.
Don't know, my opinion on these games should be taken with a grain of salt.
Oof! yeah, Ride was a huge fumble they tried to market twice.
Haven Fall of the King was dog-shi7-tastic and should be a runner up to some of those.
I'd even nominate Legend of Kay. Heh Haze... there is no excuse for that one (just pretend Haze did not happen).
looks like to be a hit...
Looks like crap to me!
The dev's have to get around the PS3's hardware to improve the graphics. It's PS3's limited capabilities that has this title looking like sh*t they're trying to do the photo real aproch that so many 360 titles have but the PS3's hardware is limited to cartoon-ish art styles, Racers don't count. I hope some of you Sony fans understand why some of use 360 fans do not like games developed with PS3 in mind. http://media.xbox360.ign.co... vs http://media.ps3.ign.com/me... .
...that Bethesda is using UE3 in this game.
1.) Other than the cancelled 'Frame City Killer', no developer has made such an ugly game with that engine.
2.) Everything about the game looks EXACTLY like Oblivion. Since Oblivion could be played entirely in FP mode, that engine would have been perfectly suited for a FPS.
I think Bethesda is just spreading themselves too thin, and half-assing things in the process. Porting Oblivion to PS3/PSP, making the Star Trek games, Rogue Warrior, continuing to develop content for Oblivion.....something's got to give, because they simply aren't that big.
Dice's Bad Company looks to be the better pick.