All Channels
Popular
170°

When Did Butts Become So Offensive?

Poli Games hosts Dan and Joe, talk about Playstation 4's newest update, discuss the possibility of a PlayStation 4k, they debate the divisive topic of Overwatch's "butt pose" controversy, and a congressman's in deep water after allegations of spending campaign money, on Steam Games.

Read Full Story >>
thepolinetwork.com
Poli_Games3693d ago

I know this is a delicate subject but, what do you guys think of the Overwatch "butt pose" fiasco? Do you think the replacement pose is any better? Do you think it should be put back into the game? Let me know down below, but remember be nice to each other! :D

ZaWarudo3693d ago

I really prefer the new pose.

nveenio3693d ago

I think a sexy character is going to look sexualized no matter what. And I don't think there's anything wrong with that. It IS the point of sexy characters, after all. If a team wants to get rid of sexualized poses, they really need to take the sexy out of the character. But then that character might lose its appeal since there are no personalities to speak of.

Poli_Games3692d ago

i actually like both poses equally! I think both are fine, i actually thought the first pose was bad ass! Overall, i love Tracer's look i think she's the coolest looking one, i love her weapons!

Yui_Suzumiya3693d ago

New pose is better. Even hotter :D

HammadTheBeast3693d ago

I feel like Blizzard really got it this time. They acknowledged the complaints of the original person that it wasn't "playful" enough, which I personally think isn't a valid complaint, but then they basically played everyone else by releasing the updated one which includes the "butt pose" in a pinup angle which is pretty funny.

johndoe112113693d ago

When sjw's took over twitter.

Relientk773693d ago

I don't know but people seem really butthurt about butts as of late, Overwatch and Street Fighter V.

Hopefully we're at the rear end of this soon.

Poli_Games3693d ago

Someone give this man the internet! I declare that @Relientk77 has won the internet! It all belongs to him and him alone! ROFL<3 amazing pun work my man!

Ozmoses3693d ago (Edited 3693d ago )

It's because everyone is so sensitive now.

Any and everything nowadays seems to be offensive..

At this rate we won't be allowed to speak in 20 years... The world is getting scarier and scarier each passing day.

It's only going to get worse.

Just a simple character blown out of proportion likes most of the other issues in the world.

Qrphe3693d ago

They're just vocal minorities, that's what the Internet does, it's a megaphone for opinions if you're listening. Then again don't listen and ignore them and you'll remain sane.

Hercules1893693d ago

Just like the 1 in 5 claims, sometimes people do lie just to send a message. Glad I didn't go to a big university to be six figures in debt and in jail for false accusations that are so popular now days. In a couple years women will wonder why men don't look or talk to them or surprise them anymore. A guy was charged for touching his gfs hips while making out in the hallway, that's what this generation has become.

annoyedgamer3693d ago

Men go to foreign third world countries for wives these days. I saw an interview where women from first world countries were complaining about it.

003693d ago

Nonsense like this has always been going on in human history and the pendulum always swings back and forth. these over sensitive babies are starting to annoy the average person who has no time for this nonsense.

and they are starting to lose there power by trying to shut don't everything they don't like, and the batshit crazy is starting to collapse on itself.

madjedi3691d ago

I don't think it has ever been quite like this, because they are alienating themselves on every possible side of the spectrum.

They are throwing everyone under the bus at some point or another to champion for the newest most oppressed group in society.

therevolution3693d ago

How dare she have an ass? The developer should replace with a gay space dragon, or an Islamic tomato unsure of it's place in this crazy world. I'm so triggered I could use a single sex only bathroom right now. This PC shit is too utterly out of control

madjedi3691d ago

They are not sensitive, some people are going out of their way to find something offense in anything and everything.

So they can get on social media and virtue signal to each other about how outraged they are about the lack of inclusion or diversity or terrible slight group a or b suffered.

I give it 5-15 years depending on what part of the world you are in, unless we see some major changes in a fairly short time frame.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3691d ago
Dan_scruggs3693d ago

One person dared to have personal opinion and the internet did what it always does. Overreacts.

vanity293693d ago

The opinion felt more like a troll attempt to me. Some of the things that person talked about was kinda strange. Felt like an angenda type of thing, you know?

Dan_scruggs3693d ago

Probably. Deep down everyone has an agenda. Even now after all the fuss. Nothing really changed.

Poli_Games3693d ago

Everyone has a bias, the best thing to do is acknowledge them for the audience. For me when it comes to GG v Feminist Frequency, i am somewhere in the middle. i don't think the pose is sexist, my brother does, we butt (no pun intended) heads and debate. With that being said, if people have such a problem with Overwatch, why do i hear nothing about Warcraft? I love Warcraft, its my favorite video game series, but they wear some risky stuff ya know? But, if Sylvanas windrunner started wearing pants, i wouldn't be able to recognize her! xD Vol'jin, Windrunner 2016!

Show all comments (45)
50°

Nintendo Switch 2 Drops Must-Play Free FPS You Can Enjoy From Today

In 2023, developed by Blizzard Entertainment, Overwatch 2 was released, which was basically a big, glorified update of the original game that launched in 2016. Now, it’s simply reverted to being called just Overwatch, which is probably for the best.

The second iteration of Overwatch was released on the original Nintendo Switch, and while it’s still an enjoyable game with cross-play/progression functions, it’s still lacking in terms of performance and visuals, compared to its PC, PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X/S counterparts. Well, it was.

As of today, the second iteration of Overwatch is natively available on the Nintendo Switch 2, just in time for Season 2: Summit.

The Nintendo Switch 2 version of Overwatch will have increased resolution both in handheld and docked modes, enhanced textures and lighting, up to 60 frames-per second, improved audio and more.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbible.com
repsahj35d ago

Blizzard is readying a patch to address the issue that the game is still running in Switch 1 build and just 30 fps.

Neonridr35d ago

you'd think they'd test it before pushing it live, lol.

that being said, clearly it's not running as intended.

repsahj35d ago

They know it for sure. Maybe they didn't finish optimizing the game by the targeted release date. That's why they released the Switch 1 30fps version first. XD

40°

Nexon agrees to publish Overwatch in Korea

Nexon has entered a publishing agreement with Blizzard for Overwatch in Korea, with the companies working to deliver services 'tailored' for the region.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
130°

PlayStation’s Revenue From Its PC Games Reached $300 Million in 2023

PlayStation PC revenue reached $300 million in 2023, but despite this success, it appears Sony may be pulling back from PC releases.

47d ago
lodossrage47d ago

It's not a success unless we know the profit. It's the same reason I get on Xbox when they mention revenue.

If Sony is considering keeping their single player games exclusive to the PS systems despite the 300 million PC revenue, that means they didn't profit from the venture.

Eonjay47d ago

You are correct. Making 300 million doesn't mean anything if you have 299 million in operating costs. Clearly they are making some profit if they want to keep their multiplayer games on PC but what of their single player games?

DivineHand12547d ago

How could they possibly not make a profit with $300M in revenue?

Nixxis only has about 90 employees. Let's go high and say each person on the payroll makes $200k per year; payroll would only be $18M. I believe the development time to port a game from PlayStation to PC is only about a year, so unless Sony is giving out Bentleys and 5 bedroom houses to each employee with payroll, they should be making a sizable profit.

lodossrage47d ago

See, the problem with what you said is we don't know what their operating costs were. So everything you're saying there is just speculation. What we do know is reported revenue and the rumored reporting that Sony is taking first party single player games out of the PC release cycle.

Not saying you're wrong, but we need to work with what we're given.

TOTSUKO47d ago

Here’s another angle of the argument. What if they saw a concerning decline in console sales and/or game sales on PS during this window of PC releases? It may be a crazy success on pc we don’t know but eating your own market share scare PlayStation for sure especially when they are trying to sell every new gen.

lodossrage47d ago

Ok, THIS makes sense. I don't know how I didn't think about that. And we know they'll want those PS6 sales to be off the charts. It's harder to do that if their in-house made blockbusters are shared with PC.

darthv7247d ago

Given the recent price increase for their hardware... Sony should really rethink things. Having an additional revenue stream, even if the games come to PC a year after, is still money coming in. Those who wanted a 5 likely already got one, but that doesn't mean Sony should turn their backs on those who may still want to play their software on a PC.

Eonjay47d ago

Honestly, I think they are worried about PC piracy.... Getting their games on PC for free is... well its not hard at all. They have to know that and I am sure that goes into their calculus.

Michiel198947d ago

thats bogus. Early 2000's a lot of things got pirated sure, but most piracy that currently exists is because the companies themselves sell an inferior product than when you pirate it, denuvo, bad quality on movies/shows etc. It's not much anymore and other companies have been releasing their games on pc since the beginning of time and are doing fine and given the quality of sony's 1st party games they should have no issue making profit at all. Adding shit like having to log in to psn in order to play single players games because they wanna harvest your data, yes that's when I say people are in their right to pirate and sony can go suck a fatty.

We know exactly why they wouldn't want it, because they can't get people into their ecosystem and profit more off of them if they buy it for pc. Nothing more nothing less as with any other company it's only about money.

neutralgamer199247d ago

We buy more games than console gamers BTW. We have over 132 million users on steam so out of that if 2% pirate how can we all be labeled as pirates?

Real reason is sony probably didn't see the big benefits and that's on them because games come out a year later and costs full price

Profchaos47d ago (Edited 47d ago )

I disagree I think it's strategically in their best interest to remove PC as a pathway to access you need to encourage people to buy the console to play the games otherwise they won't

As soon as Xbox started putting games day one on PC sales of their consoles dropped off a cliff and piracy of their games went sky high

@michiel not true piracy exists because people want to play a game but don't want to pay for it. Piracy may have started really in the 80s but it's still going strong today if you look at any torrent and it's seed count you'll see just how strong the scene is

Michiel198947d ago

i specifically said "most piracy that currently exists", not all piracy that has ever existed.

I'm not believing that gamepass story, it's so counterintuitive. They didn't remove the option to be able to purchase a game and for short term they gave people a cheaper way to play it and THEN suddenly they started mass pirating them? yeah I'm not buying that.

Just took a look at GoW Ragnarok and the seed counts are either single or double digits, with 3 out of like 30 having triple digits, 2 of those being basically double digits cause they're so close and the other one a bit above 200. So strong........

Hereandthere47d ago

Pc sucks and xbox is dead because they stupidly put games on pc and game pass. You like this dumb idea because you want sony down to xbox pathetic level.

Extermin8or3_47d ago

Error the price hike effects hardware as well. By all accounts ps6 is designed to be able to be made as cheap as possible. Which should mean it's cheaper than ps5 pro at the very least. Pc parts are effected by increased hardware costs too so they have an obvious market position as the more affordable alternative and once people are in their ecosystem they are unlikely to abandon libraries and switch

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 47d ago
Jammit47d ago

And people think they’re going to give that up 🤣🤣

And it’ll be way more than 300m by now

Profchaos47d ago

If they make billions in sales on the actual console sure this isn't gross profit either

47d ago
Redemption-6447d ago

The value to the brand is significantly more important. Plus is this before or after steam takes their cut?

47d ago
Redemption-6447d ago

@Jammit

Majority of the sales is more than like from live service games, so it makes sense why they're pulling away their single player games. Which is honestly a good idea for those games and the brand. Also, if the 300M is revenue, steam taking a 30% cut means Sony is only getting around 210M. Now take aways how much they spent to bring those games to PC and you're looking at less than 200M. With majority of the money coming from live service games.

47d ago
1Victor47d ago

So easy to spot I wonder HOW YOU GUYS keep falling for his first almost sensible comment then keep getting more and more deranged 🤦🏿 😩.

47d ago
mkis00747d ago

Death Stranding is owned by Kojima (he purchased the rights back from sony.) Hence the eventual xbox port of the original. Not exactly a good example. Lets see if/when Yotei comes to pc, as that should have been announced already if going by their last first party developed titles ps5 release to pc announce timeline. It's looking more and more like the rumors are correct and Helix has has Sony rethinking pc releases. And why wouldn't they when it would guarantee a competing "console" has access to all their games without their say so.

I'd argue that 300 mill revenue without even considering what part is profit, is not nearly enough money to risk giving xbox access to PlayStation games.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 47d ago
Reaper22_47d ago (Edited 47d ago )

Thats not a lot but still successful,when you consider some games costs over 100 million. But I still think Helix has something to do with them pulling back too.

Jammit47d ago

They’re definitely panicked by helix

Helix also marks the end of their party PS exclusives - Sony can’t afford to keep 3rd party games off PC

Chevalier47d ago

🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣

Panicked by Helix? You probably also believed Xbox Games would never come to Playstation or Nintendo.

47d ago
Tanktopmaster9247d ago (Edited 47d ago )

“They’re definitely panicked by helix” - 🤡🤡 I know you are a dumb little troll hurt by the demise of Xbox and the continued success of Playstation, but that is still a hell of a clown statement to make after Xbox series got whipped by Nex Playground in December… in 2026 Xbox doesn’t even show up as a skid mark next to PlayStation😬

Also, tech wise PlayStation is ahead of Xbox with PSSR. I can’t see Xbox coming up with anything that matches it. Ps6 is already WAY ahead of Helix

Show all comments (53)