Yeah, it's interesting, as games have evolved and become more complex as an art form over time it seems we're seeing more and more of the kind of divergence of opinion that we see in other more mature mediums such as literature or film.

But unfortunately gaming also has a lot of fanaticism and brand loyalty, and that's almost certainly playing a part in the polarization of review scores as well.

I've been seeing mostly 8-9 with only one score going as low as a 6 in the form of a 3/5 score.

I'd hardly say that's divisive. I'd say it's been well received so far.

How so Septic. Out of 62 currently posted to Metacritc 47 of them are positive. Equating to over 75%

Divisive would be more 50/50 don't you think?

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Let me be clear. This is sarcasm