All Channels
Popular
930°

What's Gone Wrong with PlayStation Plus?

Push Square: "Whether you're a lifetime subscriber or not, PlayStation Plus changed the game for the PlayStation 3 at the tail-end of the previous generation. The service – alongside late exclusives like The Last of Us and Puppeteer – helped pave the way for the positivity that Sony leveraged for the launch of the PlayStation 4; it offered outstanding value for money, doling out dozens of big budget blockbuster games on a monthly basis.

"But the service that so many held in high regard seems to have taken its foot off the gas of late. Your subscription was still worth over a $1,000 in both 2014 and 2015, but there's now an acceptance – with the influx of smaller digital games – that the Instant Game Collection will disappoint; the days of universal enthusiasm surrounding the service are long gone. And with competing brands beginning to bridge the gap, exactly what's gone wrong with the ground breaking membership model?"

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
Team_Litt3742d ago

PS plus is now a requirement for online play. That's it.

WeAreLegion3742d ago (Edited 3742d ago )

Literally every week.

Rayven3742d ago (Edited 3742d ago )

Discounts were not the reason most people got a PS+. It was always the instant game collection, and then multiplayer.

We really need to start demanding better from Sony. They've gotten way too lax with PS+. We didn't even get a AAA game for the ps4 last holiday.

I said this before and I'll say it again, if you want a better PS+, vote with your wallet, wait a month or two before subscribing, or better yet, don't suobscribe at all. I'm sure having no multiplayer for a month or two won't kill you. In fact, having no multiplayer at all will probably contribute to a healthier body and a healthier outlook in life without prepubescents screaming about raping your mother.

freshslicepizza3742d ago (Edited 3742d ago )

1. sony decidec to make it a paywall to play online, much like xbox live

2. they are relying way too much on indie games as fee giveaways

3. what happened to dedicated servers? this was an area they outshone xbox live last generation. now things have switch sides.

4. beta access are much rarer than they were on the ps3.

sony has become complacent with the huge success of the ps4 and decisions like not allowing ea access shows sony has no pressure to deliver what gamers want.

Okan-Ru3742d ago

you pay $50 a year for PS Plus "Discounts" Then you get discounts on various PC gaming sites like steam, gog, origin, uPlay, Greenmangaming, gamersgate, humble bundle, indiegala, bundlestars, etc.

Paying $50 a year to get a discount? That's silly. just game on PC if you want discounts you don't have to pay no subscription fee for that.

Team89er3742d ago

im on Vita a lot, the extra discount as PsPlus member really helps sometime to get the last 3-4 months released games, i.e like $10 instead of $20...pretty much the same as for the PS3 games..."what about PS4 ?" it just sad...

FamilyGuy3741d ago (Edited 3741d ago )

We're paying to play online, you can't even step one foot into The Division or Destiny without a PS+ or Xbox Live subscription. Sony's selling so much that they're complacent, they don't need to entice us with better games in the instant games collection so they aren't bothering to.

Most of us hoped they'd start adding older AAA (PS4) games after the first year, then after the second year but they still aren't. They probably have no plans to

TFJWM3741d ago

I am sure I am in the minority but I prefer random indie games over old AA or AAA titles. If I had wanted an AA/AAA title this gen by the time it will show up on + or Live I would have bought it already...

April Live is a good showing but I own 3/4 and if I had a One it would have been 4/4

thekhurg3741d ago

@rayven

I've never heard someone screaming at me about raping my mother.

But I have friends, and play games online with them. I guess lonewolfing it 24/7 exposes you to terrible people, but oh well such is life online.

I'll continue getting my subs 12 months at a time, on sale for a reduced cost and doing what I enjoy.

Thanks for the recommendation though! Hope it works out for you.

fr0sty3741d ago

2 of the games I play the most, Don't Starve and Rocket League, were freebies. The Oddworld games were also freebies. There have been some fantastic titles given away. Just because the game didn't have a multi-million dollar budget doesn't mean those games haven't been among my favorite of the generation.

garrettbobbyferguson3741d ago

Discounts for PS Plus have never made sense. Pay 60 dollars a year and you get a 5 dollar discount for something. Wonderful. You are not saving money by paying more money you know.

IceKoldKilla3741d ago (Edited 3741d ago )

@Rayven. 100% agree. I haven't been subscribed since August 2015. Before then I had been a subscriber almost since launch. There was a month or 2 here and there where I wasn't though. I use my friend's PS+. I recommend people do that. It isn't illegal. Have them share their account. In exchange maybe buy a digital game you both want and you share with him/her. I do that. We've shared Fallout 4, Need for Speed, The Walking Dead Season 1 + 2, Dying Light, Destiny: The Taken King all bought either on mine or his account. Good friend. Don't share with anybody though. Only trustworthy friends or close family. That's how I vote. Once they make PS+ better again, I'll pay and secure those IGC games onto my account forever (as long as I have PS+ of course).

Btw, I'm also broke as fuck. No one at home has a job. Living in Spain sucks. Moving soon so I'll get income again and buy more games. Good time to be a gamer!

DARKKENT3741d ago

Same ol same ol with sony

We have all seen it before... Whenever they are the leader they get complacent and cocky and feel they don't need to try

You hope they would have learnt by those mistakes

TyBREAKR3741d ago

PlayStation plus became an entitlement for gamers. It is no longer a fun extra.

freshslicepizza3741d ago

@garrettbobbyferguson
"Discounts for PS Plus have never made sense. Pay 60 dollars a year and you get a 5 dollar discount for something. Wonderful. You are not saving money by paying more money you know."

it's a great deal if you have a ps4/ps3/vita. it's not so great if you just have one of them like i do (ps3). it's more than discounts too. it used to be better i think. access to early beta's, they had a online subscription called qore that was actually pretty good, the games were better they offered for free. and the ps3 had more dedicated server games, why is that when the ps4 doesn't?

but sony were smart and taking a page out of xbox live they now require it on the ps4 to play online. they already built a favorable membership before so it's much easier for sony to use online play as leverage now. micrsooft did the opposite. they were questioned from day one and it wasn't until plus got popular that microsoft decided to make some changes. apps like netflix now no longer require it and they also offer free games now. the better thing about xbox live in the past is you got to keep your games even if you stopped becoming a member, i think that has now changed though.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 3741d ago
Aloy-Boyfriend3742d ago (Edited 3742d ago )

Sony doesn't care or isn't trying to compete with Gold. Too bad because they were the ones who spoiled everyone with this idea, but whatevet.

I pay solely for online because there's no choice and discounts, and that is what I get. Free games is a bonus. Until a game I'm interested is availabe, I'll download it. Don't interest me? No download. Simple!

Too busy with the spring lineup to give a f. For MS is fine because Xbox got nothing compared to PS4. Good for them offering AAAs

slate913742d ago (Edited 3742d ago )

Nice usual sting towards MS in your post. Wonder if youll get marked down for mentioning MS in a Sony article?

Like the other day when MS announced their april gold game line up and everyone was marked for mentioning sony?

http://beta.n4g.com/news/18...

:)

Rayven3742d ago

You being okay with PS+ because you don't play the instant games collection shows the sad state of our world today.

It's like saying that you're okay with Trump being the next president because you don't care about politics. Or like giving a gun to a child. You don't give a f*ck, so screw everyone else.

Aloy-Boyfriend3742d ago (Edited 3742d ago )

@slate
I shouldn't get marked down for unintentionally hurting your feelings. I didn't say anything wrong

@Rayven
You analogy is out os place. I never care for politics and pretty much feel the same with anyone winning or losing. I only pay for Online. That's just me! Everyone else i don't know and yeah I don't care. Most people i see bitching about this just want the $$$ value not have fun with any game they give for free. If I want an specific game, I get it cheap at Gamestop. End of Story

Rayven3742d ago (Edited 3742d ago )

@Kurapika

Your reply pretty much proved my analogy was perfect. You don't give a sh*t about sonething, so you won't do anything to stop it, even if it's bad.

Admit it, and be proud of your beautiful personality.

Aloy-Boyfriend3742d ago (Edited 3742d ago )

Yep. You are talking to the wrong person when it comes to politics. Your analogy doesn't go along with gaming. I don't have to pay to vote like I have ray for online on PS4

I don't care much about these offerings because like I said, I have pretty much every game i want to play right now and I'm focused on the spring lineup. Anyone has the right to complain, but I'm not complaining. Again, that's just me. I'm not speaking for eveyone.

Rayven3742d ago (Edited 3742d ago )

@Kurapika

Again, you just proved my point. And I'm not sure you understand that an analogy is merely a representation of something to communicate an idea in a simpler way. Like saying that 3/4 of something is like 3 slices from a 4-slice pizza.

So what I said about Trump and politics is a mere "analogy" about you not giving a sh*t about something bad even though it affects everyone including yourself.

And you do pay when you vote. You'll probably pay with your life when Trump orders all able-bodied Americans to fight against China or something.

Good on you that you're happy with your purchases. But there are people like me that want to get value for my money. I'm not satisfied with PS+ and I'm not happy that people are so complacent that they don't give a shit when they're paying $50 for something that's worth less. It makes it harder for Sony to actually give a sh*t and be better.

Aloy-Boyfriend3742d ago (Edited 3742d ago )

Nah. I don't have to complain about everything that doesn't affect me*. I don't see how this affects anyone like if anyone would pay $50 a year to play free games only. I get my value with online having fun with friends and a very much improved PSN compared to last gen, and discounts for new games day one like DS3. Again, that's just me.

Good if Sony offers a game I skipped. I'm not expecting anything. They could pretty much offer games I already have too. Should I complain they gave a game I already have?

Again, that's just fkin me. I pay 4x more for Verizon and they don't give me anything. Instead, they rip me off because I'm hispanic. And if I want to watch my native channels, I also have to pay for the hundred american channels I don't watch. And you are talking me about politics?

Muzikguy3741d ago

I stopped paying a few times because I don't play online like I used to. I'm also not buying any "always online" games from Ubisoft or EA. If I was playing online though, and as it stands I do have a sub for Plus right now, I wouldn't have (and don't) have a problem paying $50. People are way to stingy these days. How come being able to play online and have fun for an entire year isn't worth $50? Yeah, it was free before. Big deal, it isn't now. We just have to accept that. I don't want all these free games they're giving away because I'm not even playing them. Having more in that sense isn't adding value to anything. People who think that it's too much money, you should be ashamed in yourself for not finding value in your $50 and online play for an entire year IMO.

Vasto3741d ago (Edited 3741d ago )

PS4 got nothing compared to Xbox.

Cant wait to get my 4 AAA Gold titles next month and also waiting on the spring line up starting with Killer Insinct Season 3 in a couple days.

Muzikguy3741d ago

@Vasto

Ever stop and think that maybe the only reason why that is is because MS is "losing"?

It's the leeches that want something for nothing that's ruining this industry IMO

Aloy-Boyfriend3741d ago (Edited 3741d ago )

Aww the desilucion is strong with you, Vasto. Thr fact that you have to depend on free old games proves xbox got a sparse lineup.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3741d ago
Corpser3742d ago

Should have seen this coming, when it's an optional service Sony needs to pay for good games, now most people subscribe because you need it to play online, Sony doesn't need to spend the $$$ anymore

Muzikguy3741d ago

I saw it coming and many others did too. What people have to realize is money talks. Sony needs it and they're giving us online play, the ability to stream, sharePlay, and many other things for that $50/yr. I seriously don't understand why people make it such a big issue. It's not like MS and their Office365 model. In that sense I don't want what Microsoft is giving me nor would I pay for it. They make enough as it is than to need to nickel and dime everyone. I don't consider paying to play online as nickel and diming

ShowanW3741d ago

Mzikguy that makes no sense at all.

Sony gets pass because of financial troubles.

Microsoft shoukdnt do it because currently thriving?

They are both legit mega corporations trying to seel you a product

What you described hypocrisy

Muzikguy3741d ago

Showan

It makes perfect sense you're just generalizing What I'm saying and not understanding it. Nowhere did I say Sony should get a pass. I was only using office as an example. I don't believe we should have to pay a subscription for office over buying a full product one time and being done with it. Maybe it was a bad example to use. Office is a product and should be treated as such. Online is a service and that's different. What MS is trying to do is make Office into a service so people will subscribe. There are enough subscriptions to contend with these days IMO.

My point is that servers cost money and that's what I mean when I say "Sony needs it". MS charge for online too, and although I thought it was stupid during the PS3 days, I can see why they'd do it. That's why I have no problem paying Sony to play online. No hypocrisy in my statement

sanosukegtr1233741d ago

When I owned a ps3 i didnt use plus much but since i switch to ps4 i use it and its mostly for online gaming.

Godmars2903741d ago

"We really need to start demanding better from Sony."

Thing about that, as customers, the only statement that can be made is to not buy the product, not subscribe to PS+, and *hope* that the company in question makes changes which then appeal to consumers. And that's even when a segment of said customers announce suggestion.

However as things are, with PS+ a required indirect product that provides access to full products - games - you would likely have to buying games that require online. And that is something which might cause Sony to close their doors.

The key problem here is that the gaming community think themselves and their hobby as a community where companies like Sony only see a consumer base. One which can be manipulated because it sees itself as a community.

GamingIVfun3741d ago

Them giving indie games on PS4 is a way to help support the indie developers and keep the Indie community thriving, Sony is paying the indie developers each time they give a indie game with PS+. I really think that is most of the reason for sticking with indie games.

I don't really buy that many indie games so I rarely get a game I already have. Sometimes I get an Indie game that I really enjoy.

Almost all of the AAA games from Xbox Live I have already
bought, and some of them to me weren't good games to start with like Thief. I already have Sunset over drive and I have the other The Wolf Among Us on PS4, got it for $10.00 a ways back. They are great if you haven't played them though.

Lets face it, the reason Xbox Live gives bigger supposed AAA games (to me AAA is a really good game) is because they are the under dog wright now and they are competing.

Also PS+ is cheaper ($49.99) than Xbox Live ($59.99), you can get each service cheaper sometimes.

For me the free games are great but not he real reason for getting the service. the real reason is to play games online, the free games and the game discounts (new game discounts nearly every week for both services) are Icing on the cake.

Muzikguy3741d ago (Edited 3741d ago )

That's exactly what people seem to be forgetting. We pay to play online and the free games are just a bonus. Sony could cancel PS+, come out with some brand new service that allows online play, and then charge for that without giving out any free games. They might even cancel streaming and sharePlay too. The new service would be strictly for playing online and cost $50.

Sometimes I think that's what people would like to see happen, because they're never satisfied. Of course they'd still complain because they aren't getting anything for free. Be happy with what you got. It's no wonder this is called the "entitlement generation"

Pogmathoin3741d ago (Edited 3741d ago )

PsN plus was just bait... Gamers bit.... Now Sony does not feel the need to care, enough of you believe everything Sony does is gold.... Classic symptoms..... Crappy offerings.... PSNow, charging to play the games you already bought..... Whats next?

Muzikguy, seriously, you know if that was MS, it would be pure evil and greed....
It's Sony, so all is good....

dragon823741d ago

You bought every game PSNow offers?

Muzikguy3741d ago

MS does charge for online, I don't see what you're getting at. Yeah I thought it was stupid at first, but I got over it. Sony charges to play online too, big deal. Nobody is forcing anyone to pay for PSNow. If you already have the games, don't subscribe. That would be kind of a stupid thing to do

Pogmathoin3741d ago

My point is, MS does something, gets slaughtered... Sony does similar, free pass, no big deal...

Muzikguy3740d ago

It's the price you pay for going against the grain, for being different. If we always worried about what people would think if we did something, we wouldn't get anywhere. Like I said, I thought it was stupid that MS started charging to play online, but I got over it. Now Sony does it too, and I was already over it

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3740d ago
PhucSeeker3741d ago (Edited 3741d ago )

Nah, Ps4's success is what really made the line up drop that much in qualiy. If the Ps4's sale number was behind xbone's then the line up would had seen some big-budgets games by now.

magiciandude3741d ago

Online multiplayer paywall
Limited cloud storage
Quality of giveaways went downhill from the PS3 era
PS+'s original purpose was to be a value added service for loyal Sony fans, now it's Sony's way of cashing in, and their online multiplayer network still needs a lot of improvement
Discounts still trail behind Steam

Pogmathoin is the winner here. "Bait" couldn't have been a better word for describing PSN+.

Muzikguy3741d ago

"Original purpose was" welcome to business. Things change.

Muzikguy3741d ago

"Original purpose was".... Welcome to business. Things change. That stuff happens all the time. Just like MS giving away more AAA games with their GWG. If you really thought that the "original purpose" was going to carry over then you were mistaken. I knew it wouldn't last

kaizokuspy3741d ago

Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't they heavily invest in psvr and are doing right by us with all that sub money? I'd rather have that then AAA games bc I actually buy the AAA games I'm interested in.

Loadedklip3741d ago

I can't believe you have 19 disagrees. That is the main reason why its now not an "option" but a requirement thus there is no reason to put triple A games on it anymore.

Microsoft help get people use to paying for online multiplayer.
Sony put the nail in the coffin and it is now 100% standard.

Nintendo doesn't count ... no third party support.

mark_parch3741d ago

playstation has a lot of things going for it but i feel with them having such a huge lead in sales they aren't trying hard enough. i mean xbox has really good games with gold, preview program, backwards compatibility and ea access

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 3740d ago
3742d ago Replies(3)
Gwiz3742d ago

Sony no longer needs a competitive edge.It's not so much online needing a PS+ subscription but rather people buying PS4's.

Look at Microsoft and them offering Sunset Overdrive with Games for Gold.They need that competitive edge.

81BX3742d ago

Sony no longer needs the competitive edge??? That should worry u. I feel like xbl is the better online service over all. I was actually surprised that after all the flack ms got on the 360 needing xbl to play online, so many were willing to accept it when sony went the same route. I thought it was going to be one of those things where gamers stood up and voted with their wallets like the xb1 announcent and force a change. But no luck on that front.

travestyj3741d ago

If you voted with your wallet that people wouldn't have bought either console, PS4 was still the much better offering.

XBL has gone way downhill and has been having issues multliple times a week, at least Sony people when the service is interrupted.

Sony is being much more competitive than MS when it comes to video games and that is why the PS4 h as hundred of more games and dozens more announced, both AAA and indie.

Gwiz3741d ago

I'm not saying i agree,it's a corporate perspective.

Davi1233742d ago

Exctaly, Sony not will compete with M$ on that.
First, it was Sony who start with that ideia;
Second, Plus still have more value for those that have 3,4 and Vita;
Third, start competition with M$ only will show that they are worried. Like it happen last gen, M$ only start with games with gold because they get worried about the success of Plus.

FlexLuger3741d ago

"Second, Plus still have more value for those that have 3,4 and Vita"

Gee...Sucks for the majority of people that dont own a vita. And the people that sold their PS3s so they could buy PS4s....pretty much all of them, then.

"Exctaly, Sony not will compete with M$ on that."

Yeah. The "$" sign says it all on your post, even though thats not what you meant. Sony cant afford to foot the bill for free AAA games , every other month. My sub ran out out last november. No regrets here. Especially seeing as I dont have a VITA or a PS3...Bit of a waste of a subscription, when I can play My free X360 games on my X1.

"M$ only start with games with gold because they get worried about the success of Plus."

Huh? XBL has more gold subscribers than PSN+ does for sony. Those XBL subscribers also spend more money. You must have missed the memo.

travestyj3741d ago

@Flex

"Gee...Sucks for the majority of people that dont own a vita. And the people that sold their PS3s so they could buy PS4s....pretty much all of them, then"

And yet people would complain if they stopped supporting those platforms with PS+ games, the fact is that it is a good thing they are still giving those users games instead of ignoring them, especially since the service started on those platforms.

"Huh? XBL has more gold subscribers than PSN+ does for sony. Those XBL subscribers also spend more money. You must have missed the memo."

Not sure how you misunderstood what he said, GWG was created to compete with PS+. Not sure why you mentioned XBL members spending more money especially when you have zero basis for that claim.

Davi1233741d ago

@FlexLuger

"Huh? XBL has more gold subscribers than PSN+ does for sony. Those XBL subscribers also spend more money. You must have missed the memo."

Is you Phill Spencer?!?
Look don't try to troll me! Because, after the Games with Gold, the apps start to be for free too. Like in PS network, soooo???? Something is happen for sure!
If you start to see Sony trow alots AAA games to Plus for the PS4, don't tell me that you wouldn't think that something are changing?

Pogmathoin3741d ago

Davi, $ony are all about the $ too.... $ony did what it had to do to get gamers back, especially after $ony did not feel the need to tell its loyal gamers that there credit card information was becoming public knowledge..... Now that gamers are flocking to $ony in record numbers, why would $ony feel the need to offer its gamers any incentive?

Davi1233741d ago

@Pogmathoin

Really? I never think about it! /s
It's obvious why Sony start the PS plus last gen. And if you look to this comment section, you will read a lots "I stop buying the Plus". If is true. That a lots of gamers are given up of Plus, Sony will do something about, but if it is not true? Got it?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3741d ago
rainslacker3741d ago

I'm not sure Sony considered PS+ a competative edge last gen. They used it to have a steady revenue stream from a subscription service...much like they are using it this time around, but increasing the base by making it required for MP. Last gen, since Sony committed to free online early on, they had to offer something of substantial value to entice people to enroll. Now, the reasons to offer the kinds of games they did last gen are diminished, and possibly even non-existent.

Personally, I'd drop the service except i have Vita, PS3, and PS4, which for the course of the year actually provides enough content of varying degrees to make it worthwhile, and I've had it pay itself back in PS+ discounts several fold, so I don't really hate the service. But I don't feel the "free games" selection is anywhere close to the standards they started last gen for the service, and that most definitely influenced people's expectations....including my own.

lelo2play3741d ago (Edited 3741d ago )

Well, somebody gets it...

Microsoft, Sony, Nintendo, Steam, etc, aren't saints. They only "give out" things for "free" when they absolutely have to. Only blind fanboys believe otherwise.

Sony hasn't "given" PS4 AAA games with PS+ because they don't have to. They don't have competition. I hope Nintendo's new console changes that...

3741d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3741d ago
Puty3742d ago (Edited 3742d ago )

It would be nice to bring back yearly games(like it was with Uncharted on ps3 for example) in PS+.
Nothing too big but it would be great to introduce people to The Last of Us Remastered for example, or Uncharted Collection.

They could announce:
2016: Knack(that game sucked balls, but whatever xD)
2017: TLOU or Uncharted Collection
2018: Infamous SS or KZ: ShadowFall
Or sth like that.
And we would know that only AAA games we would get would be a yearly ones, older titles, that's it.

Rayven3742d ago (Edited 3742d ago )

I'm fine with this actually, except for Knack. If they're giving us 1 AAA game per year, it should atleast be of decent quality. I already have DriveClub but that's a good option. Maybe The Order 1886, or some of the older multiplat titles like Ass Creed Black Flag and Rogue, or maybe Tomb Raider.

Still, I think if Sony wants to, giving out 2 AAAs per year would be preferable, and I'm sure it'll be worth it if they manage to make their consumers happy enough to be loyal and buy their next console from Sony once more.

Bass_fisherman3742d ago

wow that´s really crappy for whole generation of ps plus next year i demand AAA titles

rainslacker3741d ago

Whenever this subject comes up, I'm always asking myself why Sony hasn't offered some of the older games already. They have plenty of games which many people never played which would make good candidates. Things like the order for instance since a lot of people skipped it due to the early hate.

I could see them offering a single title from the UC collection, but that would come across as trying to sell the other two but still better than some of the stuff they put out.

I do think quite a few of the indie games they do offer on PS+ are very good games, and I don't like seeing so many people saying that the game selection sucks, because it doesn't do some of these games justice. One of the best parts of PS+ is that you can try games that you wouldn't have looked at before due to not knowing about it, or having preconceived notions on what it is. That's a trend that really should stop IMO.

Free_Fro3742d ago

I haven't had a reason to get PLUS since I got my PS4.

I certainly will when Uncharted 4 eventually drops. I love the multiplayer.

-

SpaceRanger3741d ago

I'm reading and re-reading your comment...and I just don't get how you love the multiplayer if you didn't even have plus to try it out?

I'll just wait for your eventual comment that goes something like: "blah blah blah....YouTube....blah blah blah...friends house....blah blah blah...I had it only for the month during the beta....". Feel free to fill in the blanks for us here on N4G.

Free_Fro3741d ago (Edited 3741d ago )

*sigh*

The open beta was free for everyone.

PLUS wasn't required to play it.

You didn't have to write that much gibberish just to ask me how I played it ^_^ detective.

-
xoxo

SpaceRanger3741d ago

I forgot about the 'open' beta since I played it for like an hour compared to the full beta early on. That's why your comment didn't click at all to me. My bad.

Luckily the best PS4 gaming features aren't behind a paywall, but you're missing out on it though man. As a Weeknd fan, especially after seeing this picture, I know that you'd get the best out of it like he probably does on his preferred console.

http://www.looklive.com/app...

Show all comments (191)
150°

PS Plus vs. Xbox Games With Gold: Which Free Games Are Better? (February 2019)

Author writes "Both Sony PS Plus and Microsoft Xbox Games with Gold include some excellent free games as part of their service this month. But who wins February?"

Read Full Story >>
twinfinite.net
gangsta_red2696d ago

"Too bad PS4 owners won’t be able to play it as a backward compatible game, huh?"

Which is a shame, because this would have been an awesome month for PSplus.

Unfortunately for myself, I have already packed up my PS3 (and 360) to clear some shelf space when I got my X. Hopefully for next gen (and if the patent rumors are true) Sony will offer a lot more titles on PS+ that range from all their previous consoles.

2pacalypsenow2696d ago

It still is, you get Hitman and MGS4

gangsta_red2696d ago (Edited 2696d ago )

Yeah, but you don't get MGS4 playable on the PS4. That would have been cool to have the PS3 PS+ free games playable on PS4.

2pacalypsenow2696d ago

That doesn't change the fact that it's a great month for PlayStation+ members.

gangsta_red2696d ago

That does change the fact completely. Especially for those that don't own a PS3.

uptownsoul2696d ago (Edited 2696d ago )

@gangsta_red

Both are offering 4 games playable on current gen consoles (2 AAA & 2 indie games)…

For PS4 the 2 AAA games are: For Honor & Hitman 1; while the 2 indie games are: Gunhouse & Rogue Aces

For Xbox One the 2 AAA games are: Assassin's Creed: Rogue & Star Wars: Jedi Academy; while the 2 Indies games are: Bloodstained: Curse of the Moon & Super Bomberman R...

The only difference is that the 2 AAA games for Xbox One are old gen games…while the 2 AAA games for PS4 is current gen

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2696d ago
uptownsoul2696d ago

@gangsta_red

PS4's offering could be better with back compat…But its still better than Xbox One's offerings

Here's how: Both are offering 4 games playable on current gen consoles (2 AAA & 2 indie games)…

For PS4 the 2 AAA games are: For Honor & Hitman 1; while the 2 indie games are: Gunhouse & Rogue Aces

For Xbox One the 2 AAA games are: Assassin's Creed: Rogue & Star Wars: Jedi Academy; while the 2 Indies games are: Bloodstained: Curse of the Moon & Super Bomberman R...

The only difference is that the 2 AAA games for Xbox One are old gen games…while the 2 AAA games for PS4 is current gen

gangsta_red2696d ago

Yeah, not really comparing the offerings from both Xbox and PlayStation though.

But GWG already offered For Honor a while ago and Hitman is on Game Pass for anyone who subscribes to enjoy.

Orionsangel2695d ago

Seems Sony is aware of this and the PS5 may have backwards compatibility.

OffRoadKing2695d ago

So its not an awesome month for anyone because you packed up your PS3? smh Still a better month for Plus then GWG regardless.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2695d ago
Imortus_san2695d ago (Edited 2695d ago )

Gold on Xbox One >>>>>>>&g t;>>>>>> Plus on PS4, easy win.

120°

PlayStation Plus vs. Games With Gold – Which Is Better? August 2018 Edition

"August is here and now that both Microsoft and Sony have announced their free games lineup for the month via Games With Gold and PlayStation Plus it’s time to look at which is offering the better value for gamers."

Read Full Story >>
thisgengaming.com
sinspirit2882d ago

If you look at each services free games. You will see that GWG also has re-released a couple titles multiple times, and that Plus tends to beat it to the punch with more relevant titles that make their way to Live a month or more after.

TGGJustin2882d ago

Do you mean that GWG has offered the same game free more than once b/c no I'm pretty sure they haven't. Also both services tend to have a lot of carryover. trackmania Turbo and Trials Fusion were on GWG long before they came to PS+.

segamaniaco2882d ago

Obvious PLUS WON, they will give 9 games vs 4 on gold.

230°

Add a year to your PlayStation Plus membership for just $47

If you need to top off your PlayStation Plus membership with an extra year, $45 is the best excuse.

Read Full Story >>
knowtechie.com
DreadGara2889d ago

Should I wait for the 40$ PlayStation Plus deal?
My subscription just ended.... not in rush to renew it atm.

KnowTechie2889d ago

Those days of $40 are long gone.

DreadGara2889d ago

Yeah I saw that in the article, Last time I paid 40 bucks for my subscription and it was last year....
I dunno but I find 40$ is too much for a year subscription still.