Write a letter to Rockstar I guess. They're the ones who didn't want to spend money making a port.

Valkyria Chronicles sold very poorly on PS3 and there was still a PC version and now we're getting a PS4 version. That game has sold FAR less and is a much more niche game from a developer that doesn't have as much money to blow as Rockstar and YET we are still getting the best version of Valkyria Chronicles for $30...so again. You're just doing damage control.

Seriously, what are you talking about? Where are you getting this?

Valkyria Chronicles sold well over a million copies on PS3 alone, which is better than any version of Bully every sold in it's lifetime. As of 3/5, Valkyria Chronicles has also sold 210k on Steam.

And I am baffled how this is in any way damage control. Who's damage am I controlling? And how am I controlling damage by agreeing with you that the PC version of Bully was the best?

That's over the course of several years and again, look at the developers of Valkyria Chronicles and look at Rockstar....Rockstar clearly has more money...Why do you think the second game jumped to PSP? To cut down on production and development costs because they didn't sell well enough. And then why do you think the third was never localized? Because the franchise as a whole didn't sell well enough outside of Japan for them to justify it.

Bottom line is Rockstar could easily port over the pc or Xbox 360 version(whatever is the better version) and charge $15 for it without bleeding dry of money. It's very easy to do a simple port of an already existing version. If you ever read the interview with whoever it was at Sony, this software emulation of ps2 games to ps4 is actually a complicated process and isn't as easy to do as people would think so.....bottom line. Ps4 got the worst version of Bully and is charging too much for it.

I also just looked up bully sales to confirm your statements...as of March 2008, the ps2 version alone sold 1.5 million.....Damage Control, bud. Damage control.

I seriously do not understand what your point is. Rockstar already spent money on a port, and it did not sell well by Rockstar standards. Why would they throw money away and port it again? Rockstar chose instead to release an emulated version instead of a full port. The PC version is better than the PS2 version. This is not in dispute. Rockstar didn't want to spend money on a port.

So again, I have to ask:
How is this damage control?
Who am I damage controlling for?
What does Rockstar's business decisions have to do with Sega?
What is your point?