we all have are opinions

Bruh... Dragon's Dogma is the only good game out of those, and it came out in 2013 for consoles xD. The rest are some mediocre low budget indy games created by nerdy teenagers in Unity xD. I'm talking AA and AAA here. Here is what is the true pwoer of bi budget games. Where are such games on PC? Only multiplatbones that they get from consoles. "PONY island"? Really? That's all PC got? Nice mustard race of bronies :D. Nice try.

Homeworld is actually a big series-your replies in general hardly screams "I am an IT engineer"

>big game
>made in unity

Choose one bro.
How big was the budget of this game so that you call it "big"?

"you just dont want to see it"
"plenty"

xD Typical PC pleb crying and changing of the real facts. W3 works very good on PS4 now, not sure about Fallout 4 (which looks like crap compated to for ex. GTA V which works perfectly). Oh well two games that were poorly optimized, let's look at the list of terribly working PC games just from 2015:
http://suckmyjoystick.blogs...

GTA 5 having drops as low as 23 fps on GTX 980 xD and other problems like bugs that were nowhere to be seen on even PS3 adn X360.

Project Cars working like sheyt (and looking like that) on AMD cards, while Driveclub eats this game and works perfectly.

Witcher 3 played on a computer of the price of PS4 at the lowest settings and onl 14 fps xD.

Arkham Knight - not even gonna comment this one.

Black Ops 3 - i7, 980ti i 16GB RAM - and drops to 0 fps like crazy, while looking like it's PS4 counterpart.

Fallout 4 - STUTTERRING STUTTERING STUTTERING

AC: Syndicate - poor performance on a game that is a AC Unity downgrade brother on a 980ti. Nice job there.

And other games that have or had biiig problems that are MKX, DOA, F1 2015, and that's just the year 2015. But you pc mustard pleb will cry me a river how much terrible console games work xD.

Edit: You can down vote this comment all you want :D. This will prove to me how many butthurt pc pleb people read my comment and got butt hurt :D.

Lol Driveclub didnt work "perfectly" it had launch issues. At least they managed to fix Witcher.. after how long? I was able to play at 60 frames day one without any patches, same with Fallout.
Uhm AC Syndicate user rating is Positive on steam vs Unity's negative. So I dont see how that is a downgrade from Unity? And im not sure why you are comparing Witcher 3's performance to rig that is built at a same price as consoles. Get real, PC gamers that are into AAA games are not going to build rigs at console prices, then you might as well go for consoles, that is if you can bear the higher prices of games and having to play online :p

The only title I agree with is Mortal Kombat, but that is purely on the developer not PC as a platform. As a seller you just dont turn your back and pull support from your users that's a straight up dick move.

"Lol Driveclub didnt work "perfectly" it had launch issues."
Proofs, links or GTFO. If by launch issues you mean it didn't have a ton of current version features, because it's one of the best supported after-release games, then yes. No wonder. If you mean fps problems then GTFO. Online problems for maybe 2 weeks (which is common nowadays, also on PC so STFU). Other than that it was a great game since day 1 and now it's close to perfection.

"Uhm AC Syndicate user rating is Positive on steam vs Unity's negative. So I dont see how that is a downgrade from Unity?"
Oh so now STEAM RATING is the determinant if a game is a downgrade or not? xD If you see this and tell me there was no downgrade from Unity to Syndicate, you must see your doctor:

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

And if you tell me "this is a console downgrade" then let me burst out laughing at you and inform you, that Unity had terrible drops on PC, due to terrible optimisation of the CPU oriented assets. Mostly due to big amounts of people in towns, and every one of them worked with it's own AI process. On PC you needed a 8 core or at least 4 core, 8 threaded CPU, which by looking at steam charts only a few percent of people have (8 cores are only 0,12% of PC players on steam xD, talk about master race, 4 cores are not common too, mostly 2 cores).

"Get real, PC gamers that are into AAA games are not going to build rigs at console prices"
Yeah? That's why PC gaming is only pretty much alive in the indie and low budget games?
http://suckmyjoystick.blogs...

Or maybe that's indicated but the fact that only 36% of PC players play at 1080p or above? :D (34% on 1080p) Yep, those high end pcs are so common in PC gaming. That's what is pissing me off - whenever arguments go around, pc pleb always try to justify their platform and generalise, as if EVERY PC was a beast with 16 cores, 32GB of RAM and TITAN Z in 4x SLI. Most of you sit on cheap ass writing machines, which even game developers say it is the truth:

"Most PC players do not realize that lots of PC players has below specs and power the XB1 and PS4 has. PC is a niche market. Would it be awesome to max out this crazy tech in PC's? Yes. But are developers gonna do it? NO. Consoles drive the industry forward more than most people think. Why do you think just now developers are revealing new graphics engines? It is because of the new consoles."
~Lead Engine Programmer Krzysztof Narkowicz of Flying Wild Hog

"The only title I agree with is Mortal Kombat"
LOL total damage control in the meaning of "damn, he is right, but his argument is too real, I better say that I agree with 1% of his stattement to make myself not look like a total fanboy and I will cover it with a funny little argument, maybe he won't notice how short sighted I am trying to be".

Beautiful quote you got there, found on google in 5 seconds, that has no sense whatsoever in this conversation xD.

Nice try though.

It may be easier than before, but still not that much easier for the average. Go and ask anybody on the street what RAM is or what a driver is in a PC. 9 times out of 10 you're going to get confused looks.

You upgrading your GPU from last gen has no relevance, because lots of people don't even know that they CAN upgrade their GPU. Let alone know what G-P-U stands for.

When I said "power," I meant the upgradeability of PC as well. That's one reason why its superior in power.

Saying that you can upgrade your GPU for the same price as a console isn't a great argument.

Like I said before. The average consumer doesn't even know you can upgrade a GPU in a PC. They'd end up buying a whole new PC. Hell, a lot of them don't even know GPUs exist.

Lennox,

The price of the GPU vs. console is a great argument, there's no argument against it. You're halfway correct, The average PC "owner" does not know about a GPU, and they have an off the shelf PC that doesn't have a GPU, or know what one is. Most likely, their MOBO isn't even capable of accepting a GPU for most consumer friendly PC's. But this isn't what we are talking about. We are talking about purpose built gaming PC's and that type of gamer.

The average PC "gamer", which is what we are talking about, absolutely knows what their GPU is and how to upgrade it without buying a new PC.

So, case in point, $400 GPU upgrade blows away $400 console.

"No one is talking about the average consumer. We are talking about PC gamers and gaming PC's."

Well, the article isn't talking about PC gamers either really. As the article states, "Here is why we believe PC gaming is superior to console gaming." Its talking about how the PC platform is the best platform. And that's true to a certain extent.

I was saying that if the average consumer can't get into it, it will never be as popular as console. Both in price and convenience PC is at a disadvantage.

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Its like the final episode of the Sapranos. You gonna go to make a comment and when you click add th-

Timezone thing maybe.... RIP